Lindsey Rolfe

Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in ovarian carcinomas with homologous recombination deficiency. Along with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) might also represent homologous recombination deficiency. In ARIEL2, we assessed the ability of tumour genomic LOH, quantified with a next-generation sequencing assay, to predict response to rucaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor. METHODS ARIEL2 is an international, multicentre, two-part, phase 2, open-label study done at 49 hospitals and cancer centres in Australia, Canada, France, Spain, the UK, and the USA. In ARIEL2 Part 1, patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma were classified into one of three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups on the basis of tumour mutational analysis: BRCA mutant (deleterious germline or somatic), BRCA wild-type and LOH high (LOH high group), or BRCA wild-type and LOH low (LOH low group). We prespecified a cutoff of 14% or more genomic LOH for LOH high. Patients began treatment with oral rucaparib at 600 mg twice per day for continuous 28 day cycles until disease progression or any other reason for discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All patients treated with at least one dose of rucaparib were included in the safety analyses and all treated patients who were classified were included in the primary endpoint analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01891344. Enrolment into ARIEL2 Part 1 is complete, although an extension (Part 2) is ongoing. FINDINGS 256 patients were screened and 206 were enrolled between Oct 30, 2013, and Dec 19, 2014. At the data cutoff date (Jan 18, 2016), 204 patients had received rucaparib, with 28 patients remaining in the study. 192 patients could be classified into one of the three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups: BRCA mutant (n=40), LOH high (n=82), or LOH low (n=70). Tumours from 12 patients were established as BRCA wild-type, but could not be classified for LOH, because of insufficient neoplastic nuclei in the sample. The median duration of treatment for the 204 patients was 5·7 months (IQR 2·8-10·1). 24 patients in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 56 patients in the LOH high subgroup, and 59 patients in the LOH low subgroup had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival after rucaparib treatment was 12·8 months (95% CI 9·0-14·7) in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 5·7 months (5·3-7·6) in the LOH high subgroup, and 5·2 months (3·6-5·5) in the LOH low subgroup. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the BRCA mutant (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·16-0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high (0·62, 0·42-0·90, p=0·011) subgroups compared with the LOH low subgroup. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (45 [22%] patients), and elevations in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (25 [12%]). Common serious adverse events included small intestinal obstruction (10 [5%] of 204 patients), malignant neoplasm progression (10 [5%]), and anaemia (nine [4%]). Three patients died during the study (two because of disease progression and one because of sepsis and disease progression). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION In patients with BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type and LOH high platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinomas treated with rucaparib, progression-free survival was longer than in patients with BRCA wild-type LOH low carcinomas. Our results suggest that assessment of tumour LOH can be used to identify patients with BRCA wild-type platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers who might benefit from rucaparib. These results extend the potential usefulness of PARP inhibitors in the treatment setting beyond BRCA mutant tumours. FUNDING Clovis Oncology, US Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program, Stand Up To Cancer-Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance-National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant, and V Foundation Translational Award.

A Phase I-II Study of the Oral PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Patients with Germline BRCA1/2-Mutated Ovarian Carcinoma or Other Solid Tumors

Purpose: Rucaparib is a potent, oral, small-molecule PARP inhibitor. This phase I–II study was the first to evaluate single-agent oral rucaparib at multiple doses. Experimental Design: Part 1 (phase I) sought to determine the MTD, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of oral rucaparib administered in 21-day continuous cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Part 2A (phase II) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) associated with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation who received two to four prior regimens and had a progression-free interval of 6 months or more following their most recent platinum therapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1. Results: In part 1, 56 patients received oral rucaparib (40 to 500 mg once daily and 240 to 840 mg twice daily). No MTD was identified per protocol-defined criteria; 600 mg twice daily was selected as the RP2D based on manageable toxicity and clinical activity. Pharmacokinetics were approximately dose-proportional across all dose levels. In part 2A, 42 patients with germline BRCA1/2–mutated HGOC received rucaparib 600 mg twice daily. Investigator-assessed ORR was 59.5%. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades) were asthenia/fatigue (85.7%; 36/42), nausea (83.3%; 35/42), anemia (71.4%; 30/42), alanine transaminase and/or aspartate transaminase elevations (57.1%; 24/42), and vomiting (54.8%; 23/42). Among 98 patients, 5 (5.1%) discontinued because of an adverse event (excluding disease progression). Conclusions: Rucaparib was tolerable and had activity in patients with platinum-sensitive germline BRCA1/2–mutated HGOC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4095–106. ©2017 AACR.

Antitumor activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with high-grade ovarian carcinoma and a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: Integrated analysis of data from Study 10 and ARIEL2

OBJECTIVE An integrated analysis was undertaken to characterize the antitumor activity and safety profile of the oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib in patients with relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC). METHODS Eligible patients from Study 10 (NCT01482715) and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344) who received a starting dose of oral rucaparib 600mg twice daily (BID) with or without food were included in these analyses. The integrated efficacy population included patients with HGOC and a deleterious germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation who received at least two prior chemotherapies and were sensitive, resistant, or refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The integrated safety population included patients with HGOC who received at least one dose of rucaparib 600mg BID, irrespective of BRCA1/2 mutation status and prior treatments. RESULTS In the efficacy population (n=106), ORR was 53.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.8-63.5); 8.5% and 45.3% of patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively. Median DOR was 9.2months (95% CI, 6.6-11.6). In the safety population (n=377), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nausea, asthenia/fatigue, vomiting, and anemia/hemoglobin decreased. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AE was anemia/hemoglobin decreased. Treatment-emergent AEs led to treatment interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 58.6%, 45.9%, and 9.8% of patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Rucaparib has antitumor activity in advanced BRCA1/2-mutated HGOC and a manageable safety profile.

Abstract B136: Plasma EGFR mutation detection using a combined exosomal RNA and circulating tumor DNA approach in patients with acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs

Background: After initial responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), NSCLC patients (pts) harboring EGFR activating mutations inevitably progress, with the “gatekeeper” EGFR T790M resistance mutation accounting for approximately 60% of cases of acquired resistance (AR) to TKIs. EGFR activating and T790M resistance mutations can be found in plasma on both circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) and on RNA contained within exosomes. While ctDNA is thought to be primarily released by dying cells, exosome RNA is actively released by many living cells (Jahr et al. Cancer Res 2001; Thery et al. Nat Rev Immunol 2009). Some pts, particularly those with either early stage or intra-thoracic disease, do not seem to release mutations on ctDNA into circulation that is detectable by any current method. Here we present data demonstrating the detection of activating and AR EGFR mutations using a combined single-step exosomal RNA (exoRNA) and ctDNA approach to maximize sensitivity and demonstrate the ability to detect mutations using exosomal RNA on pts previously described as negative by ctDNA methods alone. Methods: Matched pretreatment tumor tissue and plasma were collected from 81 NSCLC pts enrolled in TIGER-X, a Ph1/2 study of rociletinib in previously treated mutant EGFR pts with advanced NSCLC. Among the 81 pts (all enrolled before Dec 2014), 56 cases were randomly chosen from the clinical patient population (including 35 cases ≥10 mutant copies/mL and 21 cases Results: For the 56 cases randomly chosen from the clinical patient population, 54 had valid tumor tissue results. The positive percent agreement (PPA) between plasma and tumor was 96% (52/54) for activating mutations and 86% (42/49) for T790M with tumor as the reference method. For most cases analyzed, the combined mutation signal from exoRNA and ctDNA was greater than the signal from ctDNA alone. Furthermore, we detect mutations in the circulation of some pts who were previously called negative by analysis of ctDNA alone, suggesting improved sensitivity from addition of exoRNA to the analysis. In the subset of pts with low or undetectable levels of ctDNA and valid tumor results (N = 45), we detect activating mutations in 38 of 45 cases (PPA 84%) compared to 27 of 45 (PPA 60%) by ctDNA alone, as well as T790M in 22 of 35 evaluable cases (PPA 63%) compared to 19 of 35 in ctDNA alone (PPA 54%). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the ability to detect low copy numbers of activating and AR mutations in plasma of lung cancer pts by combining the mutation signal from exoRNA and ctDNA isolated by EXO52 and using the EXO1000 targeted NGS gene panel. By combining these two analytes, a higher sensitivity of mutation detection may be possible compared to analysis by ctDNA alone. Citation Format: Anne K. Krug, Chris Karlovich, Tina Koestler, Kay Brinkmann, Alexandra Spiel, Jennifer Emenegger, Mikkel Noerholm, Vince O9Neill, Lecia V. Sequist, Jean-Charles Soria, Jonathan W. Goldman, D. Ross Camidge, Heather A. Wakelee, Shirish M. Gadgeel, Elaina Mann, Shannon Matheny, Lindsey Rolfe, Mitch Raponi, Daniel Enderle, Johan Skog. Plasma EGFR mutation detection using a combined exosomal RNA and circulating tumor DNA approach in patients with acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B136.

Abstract 927: Pretreatment and serial plasma assessments of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients treated with rociletinib (CO-1686)

Background: EGFR mutation testing is required to identify patients who may respond to TKI therapy. However, tumor biopsies from NSCLC patients can pose challenges for molecular analyses due to inadequate sample material, the inability to biopsy patients due to poor health status or inaccessible lesions, and tumor heterogeneity. We examined the detection of EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma and the concordance of EGFR mutation status with contemporaneously matched tumor tissue in TIGER-X, a Phase 1/2 clinical study of rociletinib (CO-1686) in previously treated advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations in their tumors. Rociletinib is an oral, potent, small-molecule irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets mutant forms of EGFR, including T790M, L858R and Del(19), while sparing wild-type EGFR. Methods: Pretreatment matched tumor tissue and plasma from 139 Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients enrolled in TIGER-X were evaluated for EGFR status. Tumor tissue was processed as FFPE and tested by allele-specific PCR. Plasma was tested as a two mL aliquot using BEAMing, a quantitative and sensitive detection technology based on digital PCR. Results: Using tissue as the reference, the positive percent agreement between tumor and BEAMing plasma test results was 86% (102/119) for activating mutations and 77% (78/101) for T790M. Four plasma samples of the 23 tumor T790M+/plasma T790M- cases were also tested by three independent plasma testing platforms with claimed analytical sensitivities of Conclusions: The BEAMing plasma test identified EGFR mutations detected in tumor with high sensitivity. In addition, plasma testing identified T790M+ patients that were determined T790M- by the tumor test, which may be in part explained by tumor heterogeneity and/or inadequate biopsy. These findings demonstrate that BEAMing can be a useful tool for the non-invasive assessment of EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Citation Format: Jonathan W. Goldman, Chris Karlovich, Elaina Mann, Lindsey Rolfe, Shannon Matheny, Darrin Despain, Philipp Angenendt, Claudia Stamm, Heather A. Wakelee, Jean-Charles Soria, Benjamin Solomon, D. R. Camidge, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Leora Horn, Shirish Gadgeel, Mitch Raponi, Andrew R. Allen, Lecia V. Sequist. Pretreatment and serial plasma assessments of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients treated with rociletinib (CO-1686). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 927. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-927

Rucaparib Monotherapy in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and a Known Deleterious BRCA Mutation

Purpose Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Approximately 9% of pancreatic cancers harbor a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. Because poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have significant activity in BRCA1/2-mutant ovarian and breast cancers, RUCAPANC investigated the efficacy and safety of rucaparib in BRCA1/2-mutant pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods RUCAPANC enrolled patients with measurable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received one to two prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients received oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. Sixteen of 19 BRCA1/2 mutations were germ-line; three were somatic. Patients had received a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Four patients achieved a response; two partial responses and one complete response (CR) were confirmed (objective response rate, 15.8%; 3 of 19), with an additional CR unconfirmed. The disease control rate (CR, partial response, or stable disease for ≥ 12 weeks) was 31.6% (6 of 19) in all patients and 44.4% (4 of 9) in those who had received one prior chemotherapy regimen. As prespecified in the protocol, enrollment was stopped because of an insufficient response rate among the first 15 patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea (63.2%) and anemia (47.4%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included anemia (31.6%), fatigue (15.8%), and ascites (15.8%). Secondary resistance mutations were detected in circulating free tumor DNA in two patients with a germline BRCA2 mutation. These mutations are predicted to lead to the reversion of a somatic-not germline-mutation. Conclusion Rucaparib provided clinical benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation, and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Additional trials of rucaparib in this population are warranted.

Abstract A31: Assessment of EGFR mutations in matched urine, plasma and tumor tissue in NSCLC patients treated with rociletinib (CO-1686)

Background: The acquisition of suitable tumor tissue is a challenge for a significant fraction of late-stage NSCLC patients who require EGFR testing to inform choice of therapy. An alternative for these patients could be the assessment of EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In this study, we examined the detection of EGFR T790M mutation in ctDNA from urine, assessed urine sample requirements, and compared the results with contemporaneously matched tumor tissue and plasma in TIGER-X (NCT01526928), a Phase 1/2 clinical study of rociletinib in previously treated mutant EGFR patients with advanced NSCLC. Rociletinib is an oral, potent, small-molecule irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets mutant forms of EGFR, including T790M, L858R and Del(19), while sparing wild-type EGFR. Methods: 63 Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients enrolled in either Phase 1 or 2 components of TIGER-X and representing all therapeutic dose groups consented to optional urine collection. Maximum sample volumes were 100 mL for urine and 2 mL for plasma. To maximize assay sensitivity in urine, samples containing the recommended sample volume of ≥90 mL (≥ 90% of maximum in this study) were evaluated; all samples received were processed to assess this recommendation. Urinary and plasma ctDNA were tested for mutations by the same EGFR assays using a sensitive and quantitative short footprint assay method that employs a mutation enrichment step followed by next generation sequencing. Results: Urine volumes ranged from 8-100 mL with a median DNA yield of 313 ng (N = 63). The median DNA yield was 299 ng for urine specimens with volume Conclusions: The analysis of ctDNA from urine identified a similar proportion of T790M+ patients as tissue-based testing with highest PPA amongst patients with urine volumes ≥90 mL. Discordant samples between urine and tissue that were not identified by the tumor test may be explained by tumor heterogeneity and/or inadequate biopsy. EGFR mutation detection from urine increases with urine volume and DNA yields and should be considered as a viable approach, particularly when tumor tissue is not available. Lastly, monitoring urine ctDNA T790M mutations longitudinally with baseline and post-therapy sampling could be clinically useful to determine benefit from therapy. Citation Format: Shirish Gadgeel, Chris Karlovich, Vlada Melnikova, Lecia V. Sequist, D. Ross Camidge, Heather Wakelee, Maurice Perol, Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Karena Kosco, Cecile Rose T. Vibat, Elaina Mann, Shannon Matheny, Lindsey Rolfe, Mitch Raponi, Mark G. Erlander, Karen Reckamp. Assessment of EGFR mutations in matched urine, plasma and tumor tissue in NSCLC patients treated with rociletinib (CO-1686). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A31.

Abstract 4670: A novel companion diagnostic predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian cancer

Background: Genomic studies suggest that ∼50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (OC) have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAmut) are expected to account for 1/3 of HRD in OC, and identification of non-gBRCAmut HRD tumors likely to respond to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) remains a challenge. Using comprehensive next generation sequencing (NGS)-based tumor genomic profiling, we developed a companion diagnostic HRD assay to predict sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib by combining tumor BRCA1/2 status (germline and somatic) and genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH). The HRD assay is being validated in a Phase 2 study (ARIEL2) and will be prospectively applied to the primary analysis of the ongoing Phase 3 study (ARIEL3) of rucaparib. Methods: The HRD assay uses 50-200ng of DNA from tumor FFPE specimens, which undergoes sequencing library construction and hybrid-capture of all coding exons from 100s of cancer-related genes. Libraries are sequenced to high, uniform depth (>500× unique coverage, Illumina® HiSeq) and data are processed by a customized pipeline that accurately detects all classes of genomic alterations, including BRCA1/2 base substitutions, indels, and homozygous deletions. Genomic LOH is assessed by a CGH-like analysis of sequencing coverage and >3,500 genome-wide SNPs and a tumor is classified as HRD with either BRCA1/2 alteration or high genomic LOH (LOH+). Somatic/germline status of discovered BRCA1/2 alterations is assessed by a previously-presented computational approach (“SGZ”, AACR 2014 abstract #1893), and verified against medical records where available. ARIEL2 is an ongoing single-arm (n = 180), open-label study of rucaparib in recurrent, platinum-sensitive OC patients. The primary objective is to evaluate clinical activity of rucaparib among 3 prospectively defined subgroups: tumor BRCAmut, BRCAwt/LOH+ (“BRCAness”) and BRCAwt/LOH-. Response is determined by RECIST and/or GCIG-CA125 criteria. Results: The HRD assay was performed on tumors from 121 patients, of whom 25% were found to be BRCA mutant (17 germline/12 somatic), 42% had the BRCAness signature (BRCAwt/LOH+), and 33% were biomarker negative (BRCAwt/LOH-). Efficacy data available for 61 patients revealed objective response rates (combined RECIST/CA125 criteria) at 70%, 40% and 8%, respectively. Responses were observed for all classes of genomic alterations, and in gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut tumors. Conclusions: Preliminary clinical data indicates that the HRD assay identifies OC patients likely to respond to rucaparib and highlights the potential for innovative companion diagnostics enabled by comprehensive genomic profiling based on NGS. Citation Format: James Sun, Iain McNeish, Robert L. Coleman, Amit Oza, Clare Scott, David M. O9Malley, Kevin K. Lin, Christine Burns, Christine Vietz, Philip J. Stephens, Murtaza Mehdi, Matthew Hawryluk, Heidi Giordano, Mitch Raponi, Lindsey Rolfe, Jeff Isaacson, Vincent A. Miller, Andrew Allen, Elizabeth Swisher, Roman Yelensky. A novel companion diagnostic predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4670. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4670

Abstract B102: A phase 2, open-label study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with pancreatic cancer and a known deleterious BRCA mutation

Background: Despite the recent progress made with front-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), most patients (pts) will either relapse or be refractory to treatment. Others may not even be eligible due to the toxicity profile of the available options or due to clinical deterioration. Once the disease progresses following front-line treatment, there is no accepted standard of care. Treatment options are clearly needed for patients with refractory disease. Approximately 5% of unselected PC pts, 10% of PC patients of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, and up to 19% of familial PC cases, harbor a germline BRCA mutation. Though less well characterized to date, somatic BRCA mutations also appear to play a significant role in PC. Clinical data have shown that pts with BRCA-mutant (BRCAmut) tumors, including those with PC, respond to treatment with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi). Early data suggest that other genomic characteristics may be surrogate biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and define a larger group of responders than just BRCA mutation(s) alone. Rucaparib, an oral PARPi, is being developed for treatment of cancers associated with HRD due to a BRCA mutation or other homologous recombination pathway defect. Rucaparib has a desirable PK profile, is well tolerated, and has demonstrated clinical activity (RECIST and/or CA-125 responses) in patients with BRCAmut pancreatic, ovarian, or breast cancer in an ongoing Phase 1/2 study (NCT01482715). Three studies are currently ongoing in ovarian cancer and a trial in BRCAmut pancreatic cancer is now planned. The clinical activity of PARPi, including rucaparib, in BRCAmut PC, combined with the paucity of active 2nd-line therapies, support evaluation of rucaparib in PC pts with a BRCA mutation. Methods: Study CO-338-023 (NCT02042378) is a single-arm, open-label Phase 2 trial of continuous monotherapy rucaparib in up to 100 pts with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (or related subtype) who are known to harbor a deleterious BRCA mutation (germline or somatic). Pts must have received at least 1, but no more than 2, prior regimens for locally advanced or metastatic disease and have relapsed / progressive disease confirmed by radiologic assessment, or are no longer able to tolerate chemotherapy due to toxicity, and radiologic assessment confirms stable or progressive disease. Other key inclusion criteria include measurable disease, ECOG Performance Status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Pts with endocrine tumors or who received prior PARPi treatment are excluded. Pts will take 600 mg BID rucaparib continuously and be evaluated for safety every 2–4 wks, disease status (CT scans, CA19–9) every 4–8 wks until disease progression, and then for survival every 4 wks. Blood and archival tumor tissue (if available) will be collected from all pts. The primary endpoint is ORR by RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, PFS, OS, and safety. Exploratory analyses include gene sequence and structural rearrangements of tumor DNA and evaluation of circulating tumor DNA. A group sequential interim monitoring plan will be implemented to stop the study early for either superior efficacy or futility. Interim analyses will occur after every 10th patient enrolled has sufficient disease assessment data available. If robust activity is observed in the BRCAmut PC population, the trial may be broadened to include PC pts with HRD due to other than a BRCA mutation. The trial will be open to enrollment at clinical sites in the US and Israel in 2Q 2014. Citation Format: Susan M. Domchek, Robert McWilliams, Andrew Hendifar, Rachna T. Shroff, Lawrence Leichman, Ron Epelbaum, Ravit Geva, George Kim, Steven R. Alberts, Robert A. Wolff, Andrew Allen, Heidi Giordano, Mitch Raponi, Jeff Isaacson, Lindsey Rolfe, Andrew Biankin, Robert H. Vonderheide. A phase 2, open-label study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with pancreatic cancer and a known deleterious BRCA mutation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Innovations in Research and Treatment; May 18-21, 2014; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(13 Suppl):Abstract nr B102.