Line Hjortø
Aarhus University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Line Hjortø.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2015
Line Hjortø; Jehan Frans Ettema; Morten Kargo; A.C. Sørensen
Until now, genomic information has mainly been used to improve the accuracy of genomic breeding values for breeding animals at a population level. However, we hypothesize that the use of information from genotyped females also opens up the possibility of reducing genetic lag in a dairy herd, especially if genomic tests are used in combination with sexed semen or a high management level for reproductive performance, because both factors provide the opportunity for generating a reproductive surplus in the herd. In this study, sexed semen is used in combination with beef semen to produce high-value crossbred beef calves. Thus, on average there is no surplus of and selection among replacement heifers whether to go into the herd or to be sold. In this situation, the selection opportunities arise when deciding which cows to inseminate with sexed semen, conventional semen, or beef semen. We tested the hypothesis by combining the results of 2 stochastic simulation programs, SimHerd and ADAM. SimHerd estimates the economic effect of different strategies for use of sexed semen and beef semen at 3 levels of reproductive performance in a dairy herd. Besides simulating the operational return, SimHerd also simulates the parity distribution of the dams of heifer calves. The ADAM program estimates genetic merit per year in a herd under different strategies for use of sexed semen and genomic tests. The annual net return per slot was calculated as the sum of operational return and value of genetic lag minus costs of genomic tests divided by the total number of slots. Our results showed that the use of genomic tests for decision making decreases genetic lag by as much as 0.14 genetic standard deviation units of the breeding goal and that genetic lag decreases even more (up to 0.30 genetic standard deviation units) when genomic tests are used in combination with strategies for increasing and using a reproductive surplus. Thus, our hypothesis was supported. We also observed that genomic tests are used most efficiently to decrease genetic lag when the genomic information is used more than once in the lifetime of an animal and when as many selection decisions as possible are based on genomic information. However, all breakeven prices were lower than or equal to €50, which is the current price of low-density chip genotyping in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, so in the vast majority of cases, it is not profitable to genotype routinely for management purposes under the present price assumptions.
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-animal Science | 2016
Margot Slagboom; Morten Kargo; David Edwards; A.C. Sørensen; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Line Hjortø
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to characterize preferences of farmers for breeding goal traits with Danish Red (DR) or Danish Jersey (DJ) cows. A breed-specific survey was established to characterize farmers’ preferences for improvements in 10 traits, by means of pairwise rankings using the online software 1000Minds. These pairwise rankings were based on equal economic worth of trait improvements. The DR survey was filled in by 87 farmers and the DJ survey by 76 farmers. Both DR and DJ farmers gave the highest preference to improvements in mastitis, and the lowest to calving difficulty. By means of a cluster analysis, three distinct clusters of farmers were identified per breed. Comparisons of herd characteristics between clusters suggest that farmers choose to improve traits that are problematic in their herds. This study shows that heterogeneity exists in farmers’ preferences for trait improvements and that herd characteristics influence these preferences in DR and DJ.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2017
Jehan Frans Ettema; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Line Hjortø; Morten Kargo; Søren Dinesen Østergaard; A.C. Sørensen
Journal of Dairy Science | 2016
Margot Slagboom; Morten Kargo; David Edwards; A.C. Sørensen; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Line Hjortø
Livestock Science | 2016
Søren Dinesen Østergaard; Jehan Frans Ettema; Line Hjortø; J. Pedersen; J. Lassen; Morten Kargo
Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production | 2014
Søren Dinesen Østergaard; Jehan Frans Ettema; Line Hjortø; J. Pedersen; Morten K. Sørensen
Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production | 2018
Morten Kargo; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Anna Wallenbeck; Line Hjortø; Margot Slagboom
Journal of Dairy Science | 2018
Margot Slagboom; A. Wallenbeck; Line Hjortø; A.C. Sørensen; L. Rydhmer; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Morten Kargo
Archive | 2016
Morten Kargo; Line Hjortø; Margot Slagboom; Jørn Rind Thomasen; A.J. Buitenhuis; Lisa Hein; J. Pedersen; Arne Munk
Archive | 2016
Margot Slagboom; Morten Kargo; David Edwards; Anders Christian Sørensen; Jørn Rind Thomasen; Line Hjortø