Ling Shan

Diagnostic value of a novel fully automated immunochemistry assay for detection of ALK rearrangement in primary lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND To evaluate the diagnostic value of a novel fully automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay for detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion in a large number of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We tested 196 lung ADCs for ALK rearrangement by two IHC assays (Ventana pre-diluted ALK D5F3 antibody with the Optiview DAB IHC detection kit and Optiview Amplification kit, D5F3 by Cell Signaling Technology (CST) with Ultraview DAB detection kit by Ventana), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). CST ALK IHC was scored using the scoring scheme of 0, no staining; 1+, faint; 2+, moderate; and 3+, strong cytoplasmic reactivity in ≥ 10% of tumor cells. As for Ventana IHC, a binary scoring system (positive or negative for ALK status) was adopted for evaluating the staining results. RESULTS Among 196 cases tested, 63 (32%), 65 (33%), 70 (36%), and 69 (35%) cases were ALK positive by FISH, Ventana IHC, CST IHC, and RT-PCR, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Ventana IHC were 100% and 98%, respectively. Two Ventana IHC-positive cases, which were also CST IHC score of 3+, showed FISH negative, but their ALK rearrangement was confirmed by RT-PCR and direct sequencing. The sensitivity and specificity of CST IHC with staining intensity score of 1+ or more were 100% and 95%, respectively. Five (25%, of 20) patients with CST IHC score of 1+ were both FISH and RT-PCR negative. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR for detection of ALK fusion were 98% and 95%, respectively. The total accordance rate between ALK RT-PCR and Ventana IHC was 97%. CONCLUSIONS The novel fully automated IHC assay is a reliable screening tool in routine pathologic laboratories for identification of patients with ALK rearrangement for targeted therapy in lung ADC.

HER2 expression and relevant clinicopathological features in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a Chinese population

BackgroundWith varied immunohistochemistry scoring criteria and patient cohorts, HER2-positivity rates in gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have been reported with a wide range. Recently standardized scoring criteria for GC and GEJ cancer has been established and recommended. In this study, the frequency of HER2 expression and the relationship between HER2 expression and clinicopathological features were examined in a large cohort of Chinese GC and GEJ cancer patients.MethodsA total of 1463 patients, including 929 primary GCs and 534 primary GEJ adenocarcinomas, was retrospectively analyzed for HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was used in 308 GCs and GEJ adenocarcinoma cases to assess HER2 gene amplification.ResultsHER2 overexpression (3+) was detected in 9.8% of carcinomas and more frequently observed in GEJ cancer cases, in the intestinal type, and in the well or moderately differentiated type (P=0.003, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively). HER2 equivocal (2+) was detected in 14.4% of cases. As for the 308 cases analyzed by FISH, 39 (of 40, 97.5%) IHC 3+ cases, 11 (of 38, 28.9%) IHC 2+ cases, and 3 (of 230, 1.3%) IHC 1+/0 cases showed HER2 gene amplification. A high concordance rate (98.5%) between IHC and FISH was demonstrated.ConclusionsApproximately 10% of Chinese patients with primary GC and GEJ adenocarcinoma were HER2-positive on IHC. HER2 overexpression was associated with GEJ site, intestinal cancer subtype, and well or moderately differentiated carcinomas.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1935951199941072.

Detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison of IHC, FISH and real-time RT-PCR.

Aims To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays for detection of ROS1 fusion in a large number of ROS1-positive lung adenocatcinoma (ADC) patients. Methods Using IHC analysis, sixty lung ADCs including 16 cases with ROS1 protein expression and 44 cases without ROS1 expression were selected for this study. The ROS1 fusion status was examined by FISH and qRT-PCR assay. Results Among 60 cases, 16 (26.7%), 13 (21.7%) and 20 (33.3%) cases were ROS1 positive revealed by IHC, FISH and qRT-PCR, respectively. Using FISH as a standard method for ROS1 fusion detection, the sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 100% and 93.6%, respectively. Three IHC-positive cases, which showed FISH negative, were demonstrated with ROS1 fusion by qRT-PCR analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of qRT-PCR for detection for ROS1 fusion were 100% and 85.1%, respectively. The total concordance rate between IHC and qRT-PCR were 93.3%. Conclusion IHC is a reliable and rapid screening tool in routine pathologic laboratories for the identification of suitable candidates for ROS1-targeted therapy. Some ROS1 IHC-positive but FISH-negative cases did harbor the translocation events and may benefit from crizotinib.

Colorectal carcinomas with KRAS

BackgroundKRAS mutation occurs in 35%-40% of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the pathological and molecular features of specific KRAS mutated colorectal carcinomas. KRAS and BRAFV600E mutation tests were performed in 762 primary tumors from a consecutive cohort study of Chinese CRC patients.MethodsDNA mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Assessment of KRAS and BRAF V600E mutational status was performed using a multiplex allele-specific PCR-based assay.ResultsMutations of KRAS (34.8%) and BRAFV600E (3.1%) were nearly mutually exclusive. Both KRAS- and BRAF- mutated tumors were more likely to be located at proximal colon than wild-type (WT) carcinomas. KRAS-mutated carcinomas were more frequently observed in female patients (47.5% vs 37.1%, p = 0.005) and mucinous differentiation (34.7% vs 24.8%, p = 0.004), but have no difference between lymph node (LN) metastases and among pTNM stages. Whereas, BRAF-mutated carcinomas more frequently demonstrated histologic features such as proximal location (60.9% vs 20.9%, p = 0.001), low-grade histology (43.5% vs 18.0%, p = 0.005), mucinous differentiation (69.6% vs 25.9%, p = 0.001) and deficient MMR (dMMR) (21.7% vs 7.6%, p = 0.03). In particular, KRAS codon 12 mutated carcinomas had increased lymph node metastasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 1.65; P = 0.02) and were more likely in higher disease stage (III-IV) than that of WT carcinomas (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.64; P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in lymph node metastasis and disease stage between KRAS codon 13 mutated carcinoma and WT carcinoma patients.ConclusionsIn summary, KRAS codon 12 mutation, but not codon 13 mutation, is associated with lymph node metastasis and higher tumor stages.

BIRC6-ALK, a Novel Fusion Gene in ALK Break-Apart FISH-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma, Responds to Crizotinib

e37 Journal of Thoracic Oncology ® • Volume 10, Number 6, June 2015 Crizotinib was approved for the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer patients with ALK fusion as detected by the ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. The assay clearly defined that isolated 5′ ALK signals are considered ALK negative because the 5′ probe is not located in the kinase region. However, here, we describe a case with a negative FISH result that was later identified as ALK+ by VENTANA ALK (D5F3) immunohistochemisty (IHC) and responded well to crizotinib. Targeted next generation sequencing revealed a new ALK partner gene, baculoviral inhibition of apoptosis protein repeat containing six (BIRC6), and the paracentric inversion for generating this fusion gene.

Genome-Wide Screening for Genetic Alterations in Esophageal Cancer by aCGH Identifies 11q13 Amplification Oncogenes Associated with Nodal Metastasis

Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is highly prevalent in China and other Asian countries, as a major cause of cancer-related mortality. ESCC displays complex chromosomal abnormalities, including multiple structural and numerical aberrations. Chromosomal abnormalities, such as recurrent amplifications and homozygous deletions, directly contribute to tumorigenesis through altering the expression of key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Methodology/Principle Findings To understand the role of genetic alterations in ESCC pathogenesis and identify critical amplification/deletion targets, we performed genome-wide 1-Mb array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis for 10 commonly used ESCC cell lines. Recurrent chromosomal gains were frequently detected on 3q26-27, 5p15-14, 8p12, 8p22-24, 11q13, 13q21-31, 18p11 and 20q11-13, with frequent losses also found on 8p23-22, 11q22, 14q32 and 18q11-23. Gain of 11q13.3-13.4 was the most frequent alteration in ESCC. Within this region, CCND1 oncogene was identified with high level of amplification and overexpression in ESCC, while FGF19 and SHANK2 was also remarkably over-expressed. Moreover, a high concordance (91.5%) of gene amplification and protein overexpression of CCND1 was observed in primary ESCC tumors. CCND1 amplification/overexpression was also significantly correlated with the lymph node metastasis of ESCC. Conclusion These findings suggest that genomic gain of 11q13 is the major mechanism contributing to the amplification. Novel oncogenes identified within the 11q13 amplicon including FGF19 and SHANK2 may play important roles in ESCC tumorigenesis.

Combination of conventional immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR to detect ALK rearrangement

BackgroundCompared with FISH and qRT-PCR analyses, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the preferred screening test in most pathology practices for ALK-rearrangement detection. With 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity, the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) IHC assay has been approved in the EU and some Asian countries for ALK-rearrangement detection. However, an automated Ventana IHC platform is not available in most pathology labs. In this study, we evaluated the applicability of conventional IHC with D5F3 antibody in routine pathological practice and proposed detection methods and procedures that ensure that patients with ALK+ are not missed.MethodsFISH and IHC analyses were performed on 297 lung adenocarcinoma cases. VENTANA IHC and qRT-PCR assay were applied to evaluate ALK-fusion status in the discordant cases of FISH and IHC. The association of ALK+ with clinicopathological characteristics was statistically analyzed.ResultsIHC had 100% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity for detecting ALK+. Eight ALK-expressed cases were ALK-, five of which had ALK fusion detected by qRT-PCR analysis. Three of these five cases showed ALK expression using VENTANA IHC assay. ALK+ was associated with younger age and lymph node metastasis in this Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patient cohort.ConclusionsThe advantages of low cost and 100% sensitivity allow conventional IHC to serve as a robust diagnostic tool for screening patients with ALK+, especially in pathology labs without a VENTANA IHC platform. For cases in which ALK is weakly expressed, qRT-PCR is necessary as a diagnostic test for ALK-fusion detection.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2269448351088278.

Concurrence of EGFR amplification and sensitizing mutations indicate a better survival benefit from EGFR-TKI therapy in lung adenocarcinoma patients

OBJECTIVES Tumor heterogeneity, which causes different EGFR mutation abundance, is believed to be responsible for varied progression-free survival (PFS) in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment. Frequent EGFR amplification and its common affection in EGFR mutant allele promote the hypothesis that EGFR mutant abundance might be determined by EGFR copy number variation and therefore examination of EGFR amplification status in EGFR mutant patients could predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, 86 lung ADC patients, who harbored EGFR activating mutations and received EGFR-TKI treatment, were examined for EGFR amplification and expression by Dual-color Silver in situ Hybridization (DISH) and immunohistochemistry analysis, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Forty-one of 86 (47.7%) samples with EGFR activating mutations were identified with EGFR amplification. Patients with EGFR gene amplification had a significantly longer PFS than those without (16.3 vs. 9.1 months, p=0.004). The EGFR expression was then examined by immunohistochemistry analysis. Thirty-nine of 86 (45%) tumors had EGFR overexpression, which was significantly correlated with EGFR amplification (p=0.000). However, patients with EGFR overexpression exhibited no difference in PFS (14.1 vs. 13.3 months, p=0.797). In conclusion, EGFR amplification occurs frequently in lung ADC patients harboring EGFR activating mutations, and could serve as an indicator for better response from EGFR-TKI treatment.

Detection of BRAF mutation in Chinese tumor patients using a highly sensitive antibody immunohistochemistry assay

BRAF mutations can be found in various solid tumors. But accurate and reliable screening for BRAF mutation that is compatible for clinical application is not yet available. In this study, we used an automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining coupled with mouse monoclonal anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) primary antibody to screen the BRAF V600E mutation in 779 tumor cases, including 611 colorectal carcinomas (CRC), 127 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) and 41 malignant melanomas. Among the 779 cases, 150 cases were positive for BRAF (V600E) staining, including 38 (of 611, 6%) CRCs, 102 (of 127, 80%) PTCs and 10 (of 41, 24%) malignant melanomas. Sanger sequencing and real-time PCR confirmed the sensitivity and specificity of IHC staining for the V600E mutation are 100% and 99%, respectively. Therefore, our study demonstrates that the fully automated IHC is a reliable tool to determine BRAF mutation status in CRC, PTC and melanoma and can be used for routine clinical screen.

Colorectal carcinomas with KRAS codon 12 mutation are associated with more advanced tumor stages

BackgroundKRAS mutation occurs in 35%-40% of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the pathological and molecular features of specific KRAS mutated colorectal carcinomas. KRAS and BRAFV600E mutation tests were performed in 762 primary tumors from a consecutive cohort study of Chinese CRC patients.MethodsDNA mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Assessment of KRAS and BRAF V600E mutational status was performed using a multiplex allele-specific PCR-based assay.ResultsMutations of KRAS (34.8%) and BRAFV600E (3.1%) were nearly mutually exclusive. Both KRAS- and BRAF- mutated tumors were more likely to be located at proximal colon than wild-type (WT) carcinomas. KRAS-mutated carcinomas were more frequently observed in female patients (47.5% vs 37.1%, p = 0.005) and mucinous differentiation (34.7% vs 24.8%, p = 0.004), but have no difference between lymph node (LN) metastases and among pTNM stages. Whereas, BRAF-mutated carcinomas more frequently demonstrated histologic features such as proximal location (60.9% vs 20.9%, p = 0.001), low-grade histology (43.5% vs 18.0%, p = 0.005), mucinous differentiation (69.6% vs 25.9%, p = 0.001) and deficient MMR (dMMR) (21.7% vs 7.6%, p = 0.03). In particular, KRAS codon 12 mutated carcinomas had increased lymph node metastasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 1.65; P = 0.02) and were more likely in higher disease stage (III-IV) than that of WT carcinomas (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.64; P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in lymph node metastasis and disease stage between KRAS codon 13 mutated carcinoma and WT carcinoma patients.ConclusionsIn summary, KRAS codon 12 mutation, but not codon 13 mutation, is associated with lymph node metastasis and higher tumor stages.