Lisa Booth

Assessment of a reporting radiographer-led discharge system for minor injuries: a prospective audit over 2 years

Background and purpose In the UK, there is a continuing effort within the National Health Service to reduce patient waiting times in emergency departments (EDs). This audit aimed to evaluate whether a reporting radiographer-led discharge system could reduce waiting times from x-ray to discharge with no detrimental effect on patient outcomes. Methods A prospective audit over 2 years was conducted. Patients were considered for discharge by a reporting radiographer-led service if they were >5 years old, attended the hospital ED between 9:00 and 17:00, Monday to Friday, had an injury below the elbow in the upper limb or below the knee in the lower limb that required an x-ray, and were able to be discharged home without further medical intervention. Outcomes of interest were overall waiting times, accuracy of diagnosis and re-attendance at the ED within 28 days. Results Between July 2006 and June 2008, 497 patients met the inclusion criteria and were discharged home by the radiographer-led service, and 2632 were discharged home using standard practices. Overall waiting times were >20 min quicker for the radiographer-led service at 100.9 min. The false negative rate was reduced from 2.09% to 0.2%, and re-attendance at the ED within 28 days for the same injury was reduced from 3.27% to only 0.4% for radiographer-led discharge. Conclusions The service reduced waiting times and re-attendance rates while improving the accuracy of diagnosis. The efficacy of such services should be further studied in relation to more complex patient groups.

Dementia and clinical interaction in frontline radiography: Mapping the practical experiences of junior clinicians in the UK:

This paper reports findings from a study of the practical experiences of junior diagnostic radiographers in the UK when managing patients with dementia. Extended semi-structured interviews with six participants (mean experience in diagnostic radiography = 3.5 years) were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings highlight that participants’ recurrently cited lack of confidence around their knowledge of dementia, and regular treatment of the condition as a ‘generic’ thing in practice, had sometimes damaged clinical interaction, particularly when the participant was feeling institutional time pressures. Education for new professionals was seen as lacking in both quantity and context-relevance, with implications for professional confidence and ethical practice. Carers and family members were viewed by participants as potentially positive and negative forces within an examination context, and technological advances in radiography were taken to be clinically advantageous but also actively detrimental to the effective interpersonal care of their patients.