Lisa K. Naeger

Clinical evidence and bioinformatics characterization of potential hepatitis C virus resistance pathways for sofosbuvir

Sofosbuvir (Sovaldi, SOF) is a nucleotide analog prodrug that targets the hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B) polymerase and inhibits viral replication. High sustained virological response rates are achieved when SOF is used in combination with ribavirin with or without pegylated interferon in subjects with chronic HCV infection. Potential mechanisms of HCV resistance to SOF and other nucleos(t)ide analog NS5B polymerase inhibitors are not well understood. SOF was the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved antiviral drug for which genotypic resistance analyses were based almost entirely on next‐generation sequencing (NGS), an emerging technology that lacks a standard data analysis pipeline. The FDA Division of Antiviral Products developed an NGS analysis pipeline and performed independent analyses of NGS data from five SOF clinical trials. Additionally, structural bioinformatics approaches were used to characterize potential resistance‐associated substitutions. Using protocols we developed, independent analyses of the NGS data reproduced results that were comparable to those reported by Gilead Sciences, Inc. Low‐frequency, treatment‐emergent substitutions occurring at conserved NS5B amino acid positions in subjects who experienced virological failure were also noted and further evaluated. The NS5B substitutions, L159F (sometimes in combination with L320F or C316N) and V321A, emerged in 2.2%‐4.4% of subjects who failed SOF treatment across clinical trials. Moreover, baseline polymorphisms at position 316 were potentially associated with reduced response rates in HCV genotype 1b subjects. Analyses of these variants modeled in NS5B crystal structures indicated that all four substitutions could feasibly affect SOF anti‐HCV activity. Conclusion: SOF has a high barrier to resistance; however, low‐frequency NS5B substitutions associated with treatment failure were identified that may contribute to resistance of this important drug for chronic HCV infection. (Hepatology 2015;61:56–65)

Effect of baseline protease genotype and phenotype on HIV response to atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients.

Objectives:To assess the virologic response rates of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir based on baseline genotype and phenotype. Methods:Resistance analyses were performed on a Bristol-Myers Squibb-sponsored study comparing the safety and efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir to lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced subjects at 48 weeks. Analyses evaluated virologic response based on the presence of baseline primary protease inhibitor mutations and baseline susceptibility. Results:Less than 30% of atazanavir/ritonavir-treated patients were responders if substitutions at positions M46, G73, I84 or L90 were present in their HIV at baseline. In comparison, lopinavir/ritonavir response rates were less than 30% when protease substitutions at M46, I54, or I84 were present at baseline. The response rates were similar between atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects with zero to four baseline protease inhibitor mutations, but response rates were reduced if five or more baseline mutations were present: 0% for atazanavir/ritonavir compared with 28% for lopinavir/ritonavir. Baseline phenotype results showed that response rates were similar between atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir if shifts in susceptibility were zero to five, but response rates were lower if shifts were greater than five; 11% for atazanavir/ritonavir compared with 27% for lopinavir/ritonavir. Conclusions:Both type and number of baseline protease inhibitor mutations affected virologic response to atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced subjects. In addition, baseline phenotypic susceptibility could differentiate virologic response rates to the two drugs. These resistance analyses provide information on the likelihood of a virologic response to antiretroviral drugs based on baseline genotypic and phenotypic data, which is valuable to physicians and patients when choosing antiretroviral regimens.

Food and Drug Administration analysis of tipranavir clinical resistance in HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients.

Objective:To assess the resistance profile of tipranavir. Methods:Resistance analyses were performed on Boëhringer Ingelheim-sponsored studies examining the safety and efficacy of tipranavir in highly treatment-experienced individuals at 24 weeks. Virologic response rates based on the presence of baseline primary protease inhibitor mutations and based on baseline tipranavir susceptibility were evaluated, and the development of protease mutations during treatment with tipranavir was analyzed. Results:Virologic response rates in tipranavir-treated individuals were reduced when isolates with substitutions at amino acid positions I13, V32, M36, I47, Q58, D60 V82 or I84 were present at baseline. In addition, virologic response rates to tipranavir decreased when the number of baseline protease inhibitor (PI) mutations was five or more. Individuals who received tipranavir without concomitant enfurvitide and had five or more baseline PI mutations group began to lose antiviral response between weeks 4 and 8. However, individuals taking enfuvirtide with tipranavir were able to achieve greater than 1.5 log10 reductions in viral load from baseline out to 24 weeks even if they had five or more baseline PI mutations. Virologic response rates to tipranavir decreased when the baseline phenotype for tipranavir had a greater than three-fold shift in the 50% effective concentration (EC50) from reference. The most common protease mutations that developed in tipranavir-treated individuals who experienced virologic failure were L10I/V/S, I13V, L33V/I/F, M36V/I/L V82T, V82L, and I84V. The resistance profile in treatment-naive individuals was not characterized. Conclusions:Baseline genotypic and phenotypic data provide valuable information on the likelihood of a virologic response to tipranavir.

Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to ganciclovir/valganciclovir: a comprehensive review of putative resistance pathways.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a pathogen that can be life-threatening in immunocompromised individuals. Valganciclovir and its parent drug ganciclovir are currently the principle drugs used for the treatment or prevention of HCMV disease. The development of HCMV resistance to ganciclovir/valganciclovir has been documented in treated patients and is associated with the emergence of amino acid substitutions in the viral proteins pUL97, pUL54 or both. Generally, single amino acid substitutions associated with clinical resistance that alone do not confer decreased ganciclovir susceptibility in cell culture have been disregarded as causative or clinically significant. This review focuses on the analysis and mechanisms of antiviral drug resistance to HCMV. We also conducted a review of publicly available clinical and nonclinical data to construct a comprehensive list of pUL97 and pUL54 amino acid substitutions that are associated with a poor clinical response to the first line therapies ganciclovir and valganciclovir, or associated with reduced HCMV ganciclovir susceptibility in cell culture. Over 40 putative ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance-associated substitutions were identified in this analysis. These include the commonly reported substitutions M460I/V and C592G in pUL97. There were additional substitutions that are not widely considered as ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance-associated substitutions, including V466M in pUL97 and E315D in pUL54. Some of these ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance-associated substitutions may confer cross-resistance to other HCMV therapies, such as cidofovir and foscarnet. Based on this review, we propose that there are more potential HCMV ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance pathways than generally appreciated. The resulting comprehensive list of putative ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance-associated substitutions provides a foundation for future investigations to characterize the role of specific substitutions or combinations of substitutions, which will enhance our understanding of HCMV mechanisms of ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance and also provide insight regarding the potential for cross-resistance to other HCMV therapies.

Hepatitis C Virus RNA Levels During Interferon-Free Combination Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in Registrational Trials

Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1267–84. 5. Abulhasan YB, Al-Jehani H, Valiquette MA, et al. Lumbar drainage for the treatment of severe bacterial meningitis. Neurocrit Care 2013; 19:199–205. 6. van de Beek D, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M, Reitsma JB, Vermeulen M. Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1849–59. 7. Glimaker M, Johansson B, Halldorsdottir H, et al. Neuro-intensive treatment targeting intracranial hypertension improves outcome in severe bacterial meningitis: an intervention-control study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e91976. 8. Gopal AK, Whitehouse JD, Simel DL, Corey GR. Cranial computed tomography before lumbar puncture: a prospective clinical evaluation. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2681–5. 9. Hasbun R, Abrahams J, Jekel J, Quagliarello VJ. Computed tomography of the head before lumbar puncture in adults with suspected meningitis. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1727–33. 10. Joffe AR. Lumbar puncture and brain herniation in acute bacterial meningitis: a review. J Intensive Care Med 2007; 22:194–207. 11. Majed B, Zephir H, Pichonnier-Cassagne V, et al. Lumbar punctures: use and diagnostic efficiency in emergency medical departments. Int J Emerg Med 2009; 2:227–35. 12. Chia D, Yavari Y, Kirsanov E, Aronin SI, Sadigh M. Adherence to standard of care in the diagnosis and treatment of suspected bacterial meningitis. Am J Med Qual 2014; doi:10.1177/1062860614545778. 13. Brouwer MC, Coutinho JM, van de Beek D. Clinical characteristics and outcome of brain abscess: systematic review and metaanalysis. Neurology 2014; 82:806–13. 14. Tattevin P, Bruneel F, Clair B, et al. Bacterial brain abscesses: a retrospective study of 94 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (1980 to 1999). Am J Med 2003; 115:143–6. 15. Koster-Rasmussen R, Korshin A, Meyer CN. Antibiotic treatment delay and outcome in acute bacterial meningitis. J Infect 2008; 57:449–54. 16. Proulx N, Fréchette D, Toye B, Chan J, Kravcik S. Delays in the administration of antibiotics are associated with mortality from adult acute bacterial meningitis. QJM 2005; 98:291–8.

Running a tightrope: regulatory challenges in the development of antiretrovirals.

Since the approval of Retrovir, (zidovudine, AZT) in 1987 by the Food and Drug Administration, a number of regulatory initiatives were codified into regulation which contributed to the rapid development of new treatments for HIV-1 infection. These initiatives are a testament to the efforts of AIDS activists and regulators to improve access to drugs for serious and life-threatening diseases. Currently, 28 antiretroviral drugs and combinations of antiretrovirals are available to treat HIV-1 infection. The broadening armamentarium of approved antiretroviral drugs provides new options and more choices for physicians and HIV patients. Importantly, the introduction of these newly approved HIV drugs has shown that the majority of HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients can achieve maximal virologic suppression (less than 50 copies/mL HIV-1 RNA). This article describes the past and current regulatory challenges in the development of new HIV treatments and provides an overview of the drug regulations that were required for the approval of HIV drugs. This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, Vol 85, issue 1, 2010.

Effect of dolutegravir functional monotherapy on HIV-1 virological response in integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistant patients.

BACKGROUND VIKING-4 assessed the safety and efficacy of dolutegravir in heavily antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients who had documented integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance-associated substitutions in their HIV. VIKING-4 had a placebo-controlled 7-day dolutegravir functional monotherapy phase followed by dolutegravir plus an optimized background regimen for 48 weeks. METHODS Independent resistance analyses evaluated week 48 virological responses in the VIKING-4 trial based on the presence of baseline INSTI resistance-associated substitutions and baseline dolutegravir phenotypic susceptibility. Response rates at week 48 based on baseline dolutegravir resistance subgroups were compared for the 7-day dolutegravir functional monotherapy arm and placebo-control arm. Additionally, genotypic and phenotypic resistance at day 8 and time of failure was analysed for the virological failures from both arms. RESULTS Week 48 response rates for VIKING-4 were 23% (3/13) in the 7-day dolutegravir functional monotherapy arm compared with 60% (9/15) in the 7-day placebo arm. Response rates were consistently lower in the dolutegravir functional monotherapy arm across baseline INSTI genotypic and phenotypic subgroups. There was a higher proportion of virological failures in the 7-day dolutegravir functional monotherapy arm (n=6/13; 46%) compared with the 7-day placebo arm (n=3/15; 20%). Additionally, five virological failures in the dolutegravir arm had virus expressing emergent INSTI resistance-associated substitutions compared with two in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of response rates and resistance emergence in VIKING-4 suggests careful consideration should be given to the duration of functional monotherapy in future studies of highly treatment-experienced patients to reduce the risk of resistance and virological failure.

Antiviral Information Management System (AIMS): A Prototype for Operational Innovation in Drug Development

This article presents a prototype for an operational innovation in knowledge management (KM). These operational innovations are geared toward managing knowledge efficiently and accessing all available information by embracing advances in bioinformatics and allied fields. The specific components of the proposed KM system are (1) a database to archive hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment data in a structured format and retrieve information in a query‐capable manner and (2) an automated analysis tool to inform trial design elements for HCV drug development. The proposed framework is intended to benefit drug development by increasing efficiency of dose selection and improving the consistency of advice from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is also hoped that the framework will encourage collaboration among FDA, industry, and academic scientists to guide the HCV drug development process using model‐based quantitative analysis techniques.

Impact of hepatitis C virus polymorphisms on direct‐acting antiviral treatment efficacy: Regulatory analyses and perspectives

Several highly effective, interferon‐free, direct‐acting antiviral (DAA)‐based regimens are available for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite impressive efficacy overall, a small proportion of patients in registrational trials experienced treatment failure, which in some cases was associated with the detection of HCV resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) at baseline. In this article, we describe methods and key findings from independent regulatory analyses investigating the impact of baseline nonstructural (NS) 3 Q80K and NS5A RASs on the efficacy of current United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved regimens for patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT3 infection. These analyses focused on clinical trials that included patients who were previously naïve to the DAA class(es) in their investigational regimen and characterized the impact of baseline RASs that were enriched in the viral population as natural or transmitted polymorphisms (i.e., not drug‐selected RASs). We used a consistent approach to optimize comparability of results across different DAA regimens and patient populations, including the use of a 15% sensitivity cutoff for next‐generation sequencing results and standardized lists of NS5A RASs. These analyses confirmed that detection of NS3 Q80K or NS5A baseline RASs was associated with reduced treatment efficacy for multiple DAA regimens, but their impact was often minimized with the use of an intensified treatment regimen, such as a longer treatment duration and/or addition of ribavirin. We discuss the drug resistance‐related considerations that contributed to pretreatment resistance testing and treatment recommendations in drug labeling for FDA‐approved DAA regimens. Conclusion: Independent regulatory analyses confirmed that baseline HCV RASs can reduce the efficacy of certain DAA‐based regimens in selected patient groups. However, highly effective treatment options are available for patients with or without baseline RASs. (Hepatology 2018;67:2430‐2448).

Benefit-risk assessment for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir based on patient population and hepatitis C virus genotype: U. S. Food and Drug Administration's evaluation

On July 18, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) (Vosevi) fixed‐dose combination (FDC), an interferon‐free, complete regimen for adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (Child‐Pugh A) who have: