Lisa Seitz

Parent preference in Switzerland for easy-to-use attributes of growth hormone injection devices quantified by willingness to pay

Sustained treatment adherence, usually over long periods of time, is critical to the success of growth hormone (GH) therapy. However, adherence rates are often poor which may result in suboptimal clinical outcomes. The type of device used by patients to administer their GH can influence adherence. Offering patients a choice of device maximizes the chance of adherence to treatment. Multiple factors will influence a patient’s choice of device, depending on individual priorities. This study evaluated the most preferred features of GH injection devices by parents using a web-based questionnaire and as assessed by their willingness to pay for specific device features. The results show that parents are willing to pay for device features facilitating ease of use.

An analysis of product wastage arising from dosing increment granularity in four modern growth hormone administration devices

Objective: Human growth hormone (hGH) delivery systems differ in the size of the dose increments that can be set by the patient, affecting proximity to the target (i.e., prescribed) dose which can be attained. We investigated differences in dosing increment granularity in NordiFlex®, FlexPro®, NordiPen® (all multiple dose devices) and MiniQuick® (single dose) delivery systems. Methods: A simulation model was developed to project hGH dosing in pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency, small for gestational age or Turner syndrome, calculating the nearest dose above the target dose administrable by each device in typical EU and US cohorts and projecting the excess dose (hGH wastage) over 1 year of typical use. Results: The device with the smallest dosing increment (FlexPro 5 mg; 0.025 mg dosing increment) was projected to administer doses < 1% above the target across all indications. MiniQuick (0.2 mg dosing increment) was projected to deliver between 5 and 6% above the target dose. None of the sensitivity analyses changed the conclusion that larger dosing increments result in more hGH wastage. Conclusions: In addition to increasing dosing accuracy, finer dosing increments may result in reductions in unnecessary hGH usage, which may in turn result in reductions in the cost of hGH treatment borne by the health-care payer.

Product wastage from modern human growth hormone administration devices: a laboratory and computer simulation analysis

Background Treatment of growth hormone disorders typically involves daily injections of human growth hormone (GH) over many years, incurring substantial costs. We assessed the extent of undesired GH loss due to leakage in the course of pen preparation prior to injection, and differences between the prescribed dose, based on patient weight, and the actual delivered dose based on pen dosing increments in five GH administration devices. Methods Norditropin® prefilled FlexPro®, NordiFlex®, NordiLet®, and durable NordiPen®/SimpleXx® 5 mg pens (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) and durable Omnitrope® Pen-5 devices (Sandoz, Holzkirchen, Germany) were tested (n = 40 for each device type). Product wastage was measured in accordance with validated protocols in an ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 11608-1 and Good Manufacturing Practice compliant laboratory. The average mass of wasted GH from each device type was measured in simulations of dripping with the needle attached prior to injection and while setting a dose. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was confirmed by Student’s t-test, and a model was constructed to estimate mean annual GH wastage per patient in cohorts of pediatric patients with GH disorders. Results Mean GH mass wasted with the needle on prior to injection was 0.0 μg with Norditropin pens, relative to 98 μg with Omnitrope Pen-5. During dose dialing, 0.0–2.3 μg of GH was lost with Norditropin pens versus 0.8 μg with Omnitrope Pen-5. All Norditropin and Omnitrope device comparisons were statistically significant. Modeling GH wastage in a US cohort showed 5.5 mg of annual GH wastage per patient with FlexPro versus 43.6 mg with Omnitrope, corresponding to 7–8 additional pens per patient annually. Conclusion Overall, Norditropin pens resulted in significantly less wastage than the Omnitrope Pen-5. The study suggests that GH devices of the same nominal volume exhibit differences that may affect the frequency of GH prescription refills required to remain adherent to therapy.