T. Wisniewski

Human growth hormone treatment: Synthesis of literature on product delivery systems and administration practices

PURPOSE To synthesize current literature on recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) use and to identify areas of research that have received little to no attention in light of administration practice and patient perception/behavior. DESIGN AND METHODS Relevant articles for a systematic review were identified through PubMed. RESULTS A total of 43 articles were identified: 9 (15.9%) studies on product administration practices and 34 (84.1%) on patient behavior patterns. Patients primarily preferred simple, convenient, and easy-to-use delivery devices. However, literature addressing the effect of convenient product administration practices on treatment outcomes using real-world patient/caregiver data is lacking. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Better understanding of real-world product administration practices will help nurses identify areas of improvement in patient education and training.

Patient/caregiver perceived benefits and barriers to elective orthopedic surgery (EOS) in patients with congenital hemophilia with inhibitors

Abstract Objective: Congenital hemophilia patients with inhibitors are at greater risk for developing arthropathy and orthopedic complications compared to those without inhibitors. Elective orthopedic surgeries (EOS) may be an option for these patients and may provide long-term cost savings due to reduced bleed frequency. However, patient motivations and goals for undergoing or delaying such surgeries are not well understood. A US-based patient/caregiver survey was designed to describe inhibitor patient experiences and outcomes following EOS and to develop a comprehensive understanding of patient preferences for EOS, which are lacking in the literature. Methods: The paper–pencil questionnaire was mailed to 261 US inhibitor patients/caregivers and included history and timing of EOS, quality-of-life (QoL) and potential benefits of and barriers to receiving EOS. Univariate/bivariate descriptive analyses were performed to characterize those with/without a history of EOS. Results: For 103 subjects who responded, the mean age was 20.9 years. Approximately 25% (n = 26) of respondents underwent EOS, most commonly on the knee (21, 81%); 73.1% of surgery recipients reported the surgery improved or greatly improved their QoL based on single-item response. The highest ranked perceived benefits were less pain, fewer bleeds, and improved mobility. However, the leading concerns reported were lack of improved mobility (62.2%), fear of uncontrolled bleeding (61.3%), and surgical complications, such as blood clot (60.0%). Limitations: The study consisted of a small sample size, primarily due to the difficulty in trying to reach inhibitor patients or their caregivers, thereby restricting inferential and stratification analysis. Conclusions: QoL improved for most inhibitor patients who reported having EOS. For those considering surgery, there is optimism about the potential benefits, but realistic concerns associated with bleed control and post-op complications.

Primary care physicians’ utilization of type 2 diabetes screening guidelines and referrals to behavioral interventions: A survey-linked retrospective study

Objective To assess primary care physicians’ (PCPs) knowledge of type 2 diabetes screening guidelines (American Diabetes Association (ADA) and 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)), the alignment between their self-reported adherence and actual practice, and how often PCPs recommended diabetes prevention and self-management education programs (DPP/DSME). Research design and methods An online survey of PCPs to understand knowledge and adherence toward use of USPSTF/ADA guidelines and recommendation of DPP/DSME. Patient data from electronic medical records (EMRs) for each PCP were used to identify rates of screening in eligible patients as per guidelines and the two sources were compared to assess concordance. Results Of 305 surveyed physicians, 38% reported use of both guidelines (33% use ADA only, 25% USPSTF only). Approximately one-third of physicians who reported use of USPSTF/ADA guidelines had non-concordant EMR data. Similarly, while most PCPs reported they are ‘very likely’ to screen patients with risk factors listed in guidelines, for each criterion at least one-fourth (24%) of PCPs survey responses were non-concordant with EMRs. PCPs reported they provide referral to DPP and DSME on average to 45% and 67% of their newly diagnosed patients with pre-diabetes and diabetes, respectively. Conclusion Findings show disconnect between PCPs’ perceptions of adherence to screening guidelines and actual practice, and highlight limited referrals to DPP/DSME programs. More research is needed to understand barriers to guideline consistent screening and uptake of DPP/DSME, particularly in light of recent policy changes such as the linking USPSTF criteria to reimbursement and expected Medicare DPP reimbursement in 2018.

Product wastage from modern human growth hormone administration devices: a laboratory and computer simulation analysis

Background Treatment of growth hormone disorders typically involves daily injections of human growth hormone (GH) over many years, incurring substantial costs. We assessed the extent of undesired GH loss due to leakage in the course of pen preparation prior to injection, and differences between the prescribed dose, based on patient weight, and the actual delivered dose based on pen dosing increments in five GH administration devices. Methods Norditropin® prefilled FlexPro®, NordiFlex®, NordiLet®, and durable NordiPen®/SimpleXx® 5 mg pens (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) and durable Omnitrope® Pen-5 devices (Sandoz, Holzkirchen, Germany) were tested (n = 40 for each device type). Product wastage was measured in accordance with validated protocols in an ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 11608-1 and Good Manufacturing Practice compliant laboratory. The average mass of wasted GH from each device type was measured in simulations of dripping with the needle attached prior to injection and while setting a dose. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was confirmed by Student’s t-test, and a model was constructed to estimate mean annual GH wastage per patient in cohorts of pediatric patients with GH disorders. Results Mean GH mass wasted with the needle on prior to injection was 0.0 μg with Norditropin pens, relative to 98 μg with Omnitrope Pen-5. During dose dialing, 0.0–2.3 μg of GH was lost with Norditropin pens versus 0.8 μg with Omnitrope Pen-5. All Norditropin and Omnitrope device comparisons were statistically significant. Modeling GH wastage in a US cohort showed 5.5 mg of annual GH wastage per patient with FlexPro versus 43.6 mg with Omnitrope, corresponding to 7–8 additional pens per patient annually. Conclusion Overall, Norditropin pens resulted in significantly less wastage than the Omnitrope Pen-5. The study suggests that GH devices of the same nominal volume exhibit differences that may affect the frequency of GH prescription refills required to remain adherent to therapy.