Liza Ceroni

Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Precut papillotomy is considered a risk factor for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications; however whether the complication risk is due to precut itself or to the prior prolonged attempts is still debated; therefore, early precut implementation has been suggested to reduce the complication rate. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cannulation and complication rates of early precut implementation with persistent attempts by the standard approach. METHODS RCTs that compared cannulation and complication rates of the early precut implementation and of persistent attempts by the standard approach were included. Summary effect sizes were estimated by odds ratio (OR) with a random-effects model and by Peto OR. RESULTS Six RCTs with a total of 966 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Overall cannulation rates were 90 % in both randomization groups (OR 1.20; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54 - 2.69). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 2.5 % of patients randomized to the early precut groups and in 5.3 % of patients from the persistent attempts groups (OR 0.47; 95 %CI 0.24 - 0.91). The overall complication rates, considering pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis, and perforation rates, were 5.0 % in the early precut groups and 6.3 % in the persistent attempts groups (OR 0.78; 95 %CI 0.44 - 1.37). CONCLUSIONS RCTs that investigated the issue of timing of the precut procedure were limited. Current evidence suggests that in experienced hands the early implementation of precut and persistent cannulation attempts have similar overall cannulation rates; early precut implementation reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis risk but not the overall complication rate. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Can a Wire-Guided Cannulation Technique Increase Bile Duct Cannulation Rate and Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES:The most common technique used to achieve primary deep biliary cannulation is the standard contrast-assisted method. To increase the success rate and reduce the risk of complications, a wire-guided cannulation strategy has been proposed. Prospective studies provided conflicting results as to whether the wire-guided cannulation technique increases the cannulation rate and reduces post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis risk compared with the standard method. The objective of this study was to carry out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compares primary biliary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique.METHODS:Literature searches of electronic databases and online clinical trial registers up to March 2009 were conducted to identify RCTs comparing primary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique. A meta-analysis of these clinical trials was performed.RESULTS:Five RCTs were included. Overall, the primary cannulation rates reported with the wire-guided cannulation technique and the standard method were 85.3 and 74.9%, respectively. The pooled analysis of all the selected studies comparing the wire-guided cannulation technique with the standard method yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 2.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–3.31). The pooled analysis comparing the post-ERCP pancreatitis rates for the wire-guided-cannulation groups with those for the standard-method groups yielded an OR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13–0.41).CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis shows that the wire-guided technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the standard contrast-injection method. Further large, well-performed, randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Does Stent Placement for Advanced Colon Cancer Increase the Risk of Perforation During Bevacizumab-Based Therapy?

BACKGROUND & AIMS Data on the safety of bevacizumab-based therapies for patients carrying a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for occlusive colon cancer are lacking. We report 2 cases of colon perforation observed in our case series of patients with SEMS for occlusive colon cancer. METHODS Patients with occlusive symptoms caused by colon cancer received a colonic stent under endoscopic and radiologic guidance. RESULTS Over a 10-month period, 28 patients with occlusive colon cancer were treated with stent placement. The stent was placed as a bridge to surgery in 12 patients who were treated surgically within 4 to 78 days after the endoscopic procedures, without any stent-related complications. Seven patients did not receive any other antitumor treatment as a result of concomitant comorbidities. Nine patients with both primary tumor and metastatic lesions were treated with medical therapy. Over a median follow-up period of 131 days colonic perforation occurred in the 2 patients treated with a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS Further studies are needed to clarify whether SEMS placement increases the risk of perforation caused by bevacizumab-based therapies.

Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction

PurposeSurgical decompression is the traditional treatment for acute colorectal cancer obstruction. In recent years, colorectal stenting has been used to relieve the obstruction. This study used meta-analytic techniques to compare colonic stenting versus surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction.MethodsA comprehensive search of several databases was conducted. The search identified 321 potential abstracts and titles of which eight randomized trials involving 353 patients were retrieved in full text. A meta-analysis of the studies included was carried out to identify the differences in outcomes between the two procedures.ResultsThe pooled analysis showed no significant differences for mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.91) and morbidity (OR 2.05) rates between the two strategies while the permanent stoma creation rate was significantly higher in the surgical group as compared to the stent group (OR 3.12). By comparing surgery and colonic stenting in studies which analyzed the use of stenting as a “bridge to surgery,” the pooled analysis showed that primary anastomosis was more frequent in the stent group as compared to the surgical group (OR 0.42), and the stoma creation was more frequent in the surgical group as compared to the stent group (OR 2.36).ConclusionOur study suggested that, in patients with acute colorectal cancer obstruction, stent placement improved several outcomes, such as primary anastomosis, stoma formation, and permanent stoma, while it failed to show an improvement in mortality and morbidity risk.

EFFECTS OF PROBIOTICS FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF RADIATION-INDUCED DIARRHEA

Background and Aims Probiotic supplementation seems to provide beneficial effects in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation for prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea. Methods Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and on-line clinical trials registers (up to January 2009) for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of probiotic supplementation for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea. Each clinical trial was separately evaluated for study characteristics, methodologic quality and outcomes. Results of the randomized controlled trials were pooled in a meta-analysis. Results Four randomized controlled trials were included. Three clinical trials, with a total of 632 subjects, evaluated the preventive effects of probiotic supplementation and 1 study evaluated the therapeutic role. Random effects meta-analysis of the preventive trials did not show significant differences between probiotic supplementation and control groups (odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-1.67). However, the few available trials and the presence of significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity limited the analysis. Similarly, the therapeutic clinical trial did not show significant differences between active and placebo groups. No major adverse events owing to probiotic supplementation were reported in any study. Conclusions Probiotic supplementation showed beneficial effect in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea in experimental animal studies. Encouraging results have been observed in humans; however, the few available clinical studies do not allow firm conclusions. More well-performed, randomized placebo-controlled studies are needed.

Endoscopic Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia-Related Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Background and Aim: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a cause of bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the most used endoscopic treatment for GAVE-related bleeding. Treatment failures have been described in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis; post-procedure complications include haemorrhages and septicaemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of APC treatment of GAVE-related bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: Patients included were suffering from GAVE-related bleeding and liver cirrhosis. APC treatment was performed until eradication. Resolution of transfusion-dependent anaemia and evaluation of complications were the primary outcomes. Results: 20 patients (16 Child C and 4 Child B) were enrolled and prospectively followed for a mean period of 28 months. GAVE eradication was achieved in all patients after a median of 3 sessions (range 1–10). Resolution of anaemia was achieved in 18 patients. Six patients had relapse of GAVE after a mean of 7.7 months, successfully retreated by APC. Hyperplastic polyps developed in 3 patients causing active bleeding in 2 cases. Five patients had liver transplants and 1 had a relapse of GAVE after transplantation. Conclusion: APC is an effective and safe endoscopic treatment for GAVE in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Forward-view Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and therapeutic procedures have been performed by a curved linear array (CLA) echoendoscope since the early 1990s. This particular echoendoscope, allowing real time visualization of aspiration needles and of other devices, has substantially remained unchanged since its introduction to the market. In a context of rapidly expanding indications for EUS-guided procedures, a dedicated forward view (FV) echoendoscope has been developed and tested under different clinical conditions. The FV echoendoscope is equipped with front endoscopic and EUS view, allowing deployment of needles and other devices through the working channel in straight direction. Several new diagnostic and therapeutic applications may thereby potentially be feasible with the FV echoendoscope and the established ones may prove easier to accomplish. The published literature with the FV echoendoscope has been systematically reviewed and the results are presented analytically and discussed in detail. EUS-FNA and therapeutic procedures, including pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, treatment of gastric fundal varices, celiac plexus neurolysis, and duct drainage were reported. The FV echoendoscope showed some unique advantages, opening new possibilities such as EUS-FNA in difficult gastrointestinal tracts and combined endoscopic/EUS treatment with frontal approach. However, no statistically significant evidence of superiority of the FV echoendoscope vs. the CLA echoendoscope was found in pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. No complications specifically attributable to the use of the FV echoendoscope were reported.

Contrast Harmonic-Endoscopic Ultrasound Is Useful to Identify Neoplastic Features of Pancreatic Cysts (With Videos).

Objectives To evaluate the potential role of contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts and detection of malignancy. Methods Patients who underwent CH-EUS for evaluation of cyst wall, septae, and solid components of pancreatic cysts were included. The findings were compared to fine needle aspiration and surgery. Results Seventy-six patients were included. Serous and mucinous cysts were both hyperenhanced (86% and 89%, respectively; P = ns), whereas pseudocysts were hypoenhanced in 90% of the cases (P = 0.000004 vs serous cysts and P = 0.000005 vs mucinous cysts). Patients showing hyperenhanced solid components were finally diagnosed with malignancy (2 malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 2 cystic neuroendocrine tumors), in contrast to the patients with nonenhanced solid components who resulted to have either benign cysts with internal mucus clots (n = 10) or pseudocysts with internal debris (n = 8). Conclusions CH-EUS allowed differentiation between pseudocysts and other pancreatic cysts but not mucinous versus serous cysts. Malignant vegetations inside pancreatic cystic lesions were clearly shown by CH-EUS as solid components with features of hyperenhancement, directing EUS-fine needle aspiration of potential neoplastic areas and avoiding puncture of debris and mucus plugs.

Colorectal stenting as a bridge to surgery reduces morbidity and mortality in left-sided malignant obstruction: a predictive risk score-based comparative study.

BACKGROUND The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity model, and its Portsmouth and colorectal modifications are used to predict postoperative mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery. AIMS To compare stent placement as a bridge to surgery vs. emergency surgical resection in patients with acute left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction using P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM. METHODS From January 2008 to December 2009, the physiological and operative scores, morbidity and mortality predicted by the P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores were collected in all consecutive patients with LCCO who underwent surgical resection directly (Group A) or after stent placement (Group B). RESULTS Eighty-six patients were enrolled (Group A-41 and Group B-45). The observed 30-day mortality rate was 9.8% (4/41) in Group A and 2.4% (1/45) in Group B. The 30-day morbidity rate was 61% (25/41) in Group A and 29% (13/45) in Group B. The mean values of P-POSSUM morbidity (A=70.5% vs. B=34.3%; p=0.001), P-POSSUM mortality (A=13.6% vs. B=2.4%; p=0.001) and CR-POSSUM mortality (A=15.1% vs. B=4.9%; p=0.001) were significantly lower in the Group B patients than in the Group A patients. CONCLUSIONS Bridge to surgery strategy reduces the surgical risks in LCCO, and P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores represent a good tool for comparing the two strategies.

Side-viewing endoscope for colonic self-expandable metal stenting in patients with malignant colonic obstruction

Malignant colon obstruction is a medical emergency and endoscopic decompression, achieved by self-expandable metal stent placement, has been broadly used for both palliation in patients with advanced, nonresectable carcinoma and as a bridge to surgery in those patients with resectable disease. We propose stent insertion assisted by a side-viewing endoscope, in sharply angulated and remarkably stenotic lesions located at the distal sigmoid. Endoscopists should consider, at least for lesions situated in the distal colon, the insertion of a side-viewing endoscope for stenting of technically difficult cases of malignant intestinal obstruction.