Lotte Asveld

Responsible Innovation 1

This book discusses issues regarding conceptualization, governance and implementation of responsible innovation. It treats different approaches to making responsible innovation a reality and it contains new case studies that illustrate challenges and solutions. Research on Responsible Innovation is by its nature highly multidisciplinary, and also pro-active, design-oriented and policy-relevant. Until a few years back, the concept of Responsible Innovation was hardly used - nowadays it is increasingly receiving attention from both researchers and policy makers. This is indispensable reading for anyone interested in or working on innovation.

The Need for Governance by Experimentation: The Case of Biofuels

The policies of the European Union concerning the development of biofuels can be termed a lock-in. Biofuels were initially hailed as a green, sustainability technology. However evidence to the contrary quickly emerged. The European Commission proposed to alter its policies to accommodate for these effects but met with fierce resistance from a considerable number of member states who have an economic interest in these first generation biofuels. In this paper I argue that such a lock-in might have been avoided if an experimental approach to governance had been adopted. Existing approaches such as anticipation and niche management either do not reduce uncertainty sufficiently or fail to explicitly address conflicts between values motivating political and economic support for new technologies. In this paper, I suggest to apply an experimental framework to the development of sustainable biobased technologies. Such an approach builds on insights from adaptive management and transition management in that it has the stimulation of learning effects at its core. I argue that these learning effects should occur on the actual impacts of new technologies, on the institutionalisation of new technologies and most specifically on the norms and values that underly policies supporting new technologies. This approach can be relevant for other emerging technologies.

Introduction: Responsible Research and Innovation for Sustainability

This chapter begins with a short description of the societal challenges that constitute the context in which Responsible Research and Innovation concept is developing. Subsequently the emerging Responsible Research and Innovation concept is mapped out. It ends with an overview of the different chapters.

Creative tensions: mutual responsiveness adapted to private sector research and development

The concept of mutual responsiveness is currently based on little empirical data in the literature of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). This paper explores RRI’s idea of mutual responsiveness in the light of recent RRI case studies on private sector research and development (R&D). In RRI, responsible innovation is understood as a joint endeavour of innovators and societal stakeholders, who become mutually responsive to each other in defining the ‘right impacts’ of the innovation in society, and in steering the innovation towards realising those impacts. Yet, the case studies identified several reasons for why the idea of mutual responsiveness does not always appear feasible or desirable in actual R&D situations. Inspired by the discrepancies between theory and practice, we suggest three further elaborations for the concept of responsiveness in RRI. Process-responsiveness is suggested for identifying situations that require stakeholder involvement specifically during R&D. Product-responsiveness is suggested for mobilising the potential of innovation products to be adaptable according to diverse stakeholder needs. Presponsiveness is suggested as responsiveness towards stakeholders that are not (yet) reachable at a given time of R&D. Our aim is to contribute to a more tangible understanding of responsiveness in RRI, and suggest directions for further analysis in upcoming RRI case studies.

Social Learning and Identity: Some Implications for RRI

The core of the concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI) is the principle of mutual responsiveness; that is, actors should engage in a transparent and interactive exchange of values, concerns and hopes regarding a new technology to arrive at a shared perspective. As such, RRI can be considered a form of social learning. However, whether such mutual responsiveness is feasible depends on the identities of the actors involved. Identities consist of moral framework and a collection of social roles. Identities influence our willingness and capacity to engage in social learning exercises such as RRI. In this paper, I argue that taking the issue of identity into account can help structure RRI exercises to enhance their effectiveness. It can also make us more precise about which societal goals we can achieve through RRI and for which goals we need additional measures.