Louise Fairall

Structure of HDAC3 bound to co-repressor and inositol tetraphosphate

Histone deacetylase enzymes (HDACs) are emerging cancer drug targets. They regulate gene expression by removing acetyl groups from lysine residues in histone tails, resulting in chromatin condensation. The enzymatic activity of most class I HDACs requires recruitment into multi-subunit co-repressor complexes, which are in turn recruited to chromatin by repressive transcription factors. Here we report the structure of a complex between an HDAC and a co-repressor, namely, human HDAC3 with the deacetylase activation domain (DAD) from the human SMRT co-repressor (also known as NCOR2). The structure reveals two remarkable features. First, the SMRT-DAD undergoes a large structural rearrangement on forming the complex. Second, there is an essential inositol tetraphosphate molecule—d-myo-inositol-(1,4,5,6)-tetrakisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5,6)P4)—acting as an ‘intermolecular glue’ between the two proteins. Assembly of the complex is clearly dependent on the Ins(1,4,5,6)P4, which may act as a regulator—potentially explaining why inositol phosphates and their kinases have been found to act as transcriptional regulators. This mechanism for the activation of HDAC3 appears to be conserved in class I HDACs from yeast to humans, and opens the way to novel therapeutic opportunities.

TRF1 binds a bipartite telomeric site with extreme spatial flexibility

TRF1 is a key player in telomere length regulation. Because length control was proposed to depend on the architecture of telomeres, we studied how TRF1 binds telomeric TTAGGG repeat DNA and alters its conformation. Although the single Myb‐type helix–turn–helix motif of a TRF1 monomer can interact with telomeric DNA, TRF1 predominantly binds as a homodimer. Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential enrichment (SELEX) with dimeric TRF1 revealed a bipartite telomeric recognition site with extreme spatial variability. Optimal sites have two copies of a 5′–YTAGGGTTR–3′ half‐site positioned without constraint on distance or orientation. Analysis of binding affinities and DNase I footprinting showed that both half‐sites are simultaneously contacted by the TRF1 dimer, and electron microscopy revealed looping of the intervening DNA. We propose that a flexible segment in TRF1 allows the two Myb domains of the homodimer to interact independently with variably positioned half‐sites. This unusual DNA binding mode is directly relevant to the proposed architectural role of TRF1.

A Death Effector Domain Chain DISC Model Reveals a Crucial Role for Caspase-8 Chain Assembly in Mediating Apoptotic Cell Death

Summary Formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) is a critical step in death receptor-mediated apoptosis, yet the mechanisms underlying assembly of this key multiprotein complex remain unclear. Using quantitative mass spectrometry, we have delineated the stoichiometry of the native TRAIL DISC. While current models suggest that core DISC components are present at a ratio of 1:1, our data indicate that FADD is substoichiometric relative to TRAIL-Rs or DED-only proteins; strikingly, there is up to 9-fold more caspase-8 than FADD in the DISC. Using structural modeling, we propose an alternative DISC model in which procaspase-8 molecules interact sequentially, via their DED domains, to form a caspase-activating chain. Mutating key interacting residues in procaspase-8 DED2 abrogates DED chain formation in cells and disrupts TRAIL/CD95 DISC-mediated procaspase-8 activation in a functional DISC reconstitution model. This provides direct experimental evidence for a DISC model in which DED chain assembly drives caspase-8 dimerization/activation, thereby triggering cell death.

How the human telomeric proteins TRF1 and TRF2 recognize telomeric DNA: a view from high-resolution crystal structures.

Human telomeres consist of tandem arrays of TTAGGG sequence repeats that are specifically bound by two proteins, TRF1 and TRF2. They bind to DNA as preformed homodimers and have the same architecture in which the DNA‐binding domains (Dbds) form independent structural units. Despite these similarities, TRF1 and TRF2 have different functions at telomeres. The X‐ray crystal structures of both TRF1‐ and TRF2‐Dbds in complex with telomeric DNA (2.0 and 1.8 Å resolution, respectively) show that they recognize the same TAGGGTT binding site by means of homeodomains, as does the yeast telomeric protein Rap1p. Two of the three G‐C base pairs that characterize telomeric repeats are recognized specifically and an unusually large number of water molecules mediate protein–DNA interactions. The binding of the TRF2‐Dbd to the DNA double helix shows no distortions that would account for the promotion of t‐loops in which TRF2 has been implicated.

Structure of the TRFH Dimerization Domain of the Human Telomeric Proteins TRF1 and TRF2

TRF1 and TRF2 are key components of vertebrate telomeres. They bind to double-stranded telomeric DNA as homodimers. Dimerization involves the TRF homology (TRFH) domain, which also mediates interactions with other telomeric proteins. The crystal structures of the dimerization domains from human TRF1 and TRF2 were determined at 2.9 and 2.2 A resolution, respectively. Despite a modest sequence identity, the two TRFH domains have the same entirely alpha-helical architecture, resembling a twisted horseshoe. The dimerization interfaces feature unique interactions that prevent heterodimerization. Mutational analysis of TRF1 corroborates the structural data and underscores the importance of the TRFH domain in dimerization, DNA binding, and telomere localization. A possible structural homology between the TRFH domain of fission yeast telomeric protein Taz1 with those of the vertebrate TRFs is suggested.

Class I Hdacs Share a Common Mechanism of Regulation by Inositol Phosphates.

Summary Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3) are recruited by cognate corepressor proteins into specific transcriptional repression complexes that target HDAC activity to chromatin resulting in chromatin condensation and transcriptional silencing. We previously reported the structure of HDAC3 in complex with the SMRT corepressor. This structure revealed the presence of inositol-tetraphosphate [Ins(1,4,5,6)P4] at the interface of the two proteins. It was previously unclear whether the role of Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 is to act as a structural cofactor or a regulator of HDAC3 activity. Here we report the structure of HDAC1 in complex with MTA1 from the NuRD complex. The ELM2-SANT domains from MTA1 wrap completely around HDAC1 occupying both sides of the active site such that the adjacent BAH domain is ideally positioned to recruit nucleosomes to the active site of the enzyme. Functional assays of both the HDAC1 and HDAC3 complexes reveal that Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 is a bona fide conserved regulator of class I HDAC complexes.

Mapping of the sites of protection on a 5 S RNA gene by the Xenopus transcription factor IIIA: a model for the interaction

The contact points of transcription factor IIIA with the internal control region of the 5 S RNA gene of Xenopus have been investigated by probing the accessibility of the DNA in the protein-DNA complex to dimethylsulphate and to micrococcal nuclease. The results of quantitative measurements, combined with those from earlier DNase I and DNase II protection studies, are consistent with a series of multiple contacts about five base-pairs apart, or half a double-helical turn, along the whole length of the internal control region. The nine patches of contact we have mapped could correspond to nine DNA-binding fingers in the protein. A model for the overall geometry of the interaction is presented in which the protein lies on one face of the DNA double helix.

Nuclear hormone receptor co-repressors: Structure and function

Highlights ► Co-repressors SMRT/NCoR act as “hub proteins”. ► SMRT/NCoR integrate transcription factor and histone modifying enzyme signaling. ► Structures of co-repressor complexes. ► Structural studies provide mechanistic, and potentially therapeutic, insights.

Structural Basis for the Assembly of the Smrt/Ncor Core Transcriptional Repression Machinery.

Eukaryotic transcriptional repressors function by recruiting large coregulatory complexes that target histone deacetylase enzymes to gene promoters and enhancers. Transcriptional repression complexes, assembled by the corepressor NCoR and its homolog SMRT, are crucial in many processes, including development and metabolic physiology. The core repression complex involves the recruitment of three proteins, HDAC3, GPS2 and TBL1, to a highly conserved repression domain within SMRT and NCoR. We have used structural and functional approaches to gain insight into the architecture and biological role of this complex. We report the crystal structure of the tetrameric oligomerization domain of TBL1, which interacts with both SMRT and GPS2, and the NMR structure of the interface complex between GPS2 and SMRT. These structures, together with computational docking, mutagenesis and functional assays, reveal the assembly mechanism and stoichiometry of the corepressor complex.

Negative regulation by nuclear receptors: a plethora of mechanisms

Nuclear receptors are arguably the best understood transcriptional regulators. We know a great deal about the mechanisms through which they activate transcription in response to ligand binding and about the mechanisms through which they repress transcription in the absence of ligand. However, endocrine regulation often requires that ligand-bound receptors repress transcription of a subset of genes. An understanding of the mechanism for ligand-induced repression and how this differs from activation has proven elusive. A number of recent studies have directly or indirectly addressed this problem. Yet it seems the more evidence that accumulates, the more complex the mystery becomes.