Louise M. Nott

Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Cetuximab Plus Brivanib Alaninate Versus Cetuximab Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic, Chemotherapy-Refractory, Wild-Type K-RAS Colorectal Carcinoma: The NCIC Clinical Trials Group and AGITG CO.20 Trial

PURPOSE The antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab has improved survival in patients with metastatic, chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type K-RAS colorectal cancer. The addition of brivanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and fibroblast growth factor receptor, to cetuximab has shown encouraging early clinical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with combination chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) intravenous loading dose followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m(2) plus either brivanib 800 mg orally daily (arm A) or placebo (arm B). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 750 patients were randomly assigned (376 in arm A and 374 in arm B). Median OS in the intent-to-treat population was 8.8 months in arm A and 8.1 months in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P = .12). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0 months in arm A and 3.4 months in arm B (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84; P < .001). Partial responses observed (13.6% v 7.2%; P = .004) were higher in arm A. Incidence of any grade ≥ 3 adverse events was 78% in arm A and 53% in arm B. Fewer patients received ≥ 90% dose-intensity of both cetuximab (57% v 83%) and brivanib/placebo (48% v 87%) in arm A versus arm B, respectively. CONCLUSION Despite positive effects on PFS and objective response, cetuximab plus brivanib increased toxicity and did not significantly improve OS in patients with metastatic, chemotherapy-refractory, wild-type K-RAS colorectal cancer.

Hyperammonemia encephalopathy: An important cause of neurological deterioration following chemotherapy

Idiopathic hyperammonemic encephalopathy is an uncommon but frequently fatal complication of chemotherapy. It is characterised by abrupt alteration in mental status with markedly elevated plasma ammonia levels in the absence of obvious liver disease or any other identifiable cause, and frequently results in intractable coma and death. It usually occurs in patients with haematologic malignancies during the period of neutropenia following cytoreductive therapy or bone marrow transplantation, and in solid organ malignancies treated with 5-fluorouracil. Although the aetiology of this syndrome is yet to be determined, it appears to be multi-factorial in nature. Optimal management remains to be formally established, and the critical step is increased awareness of the syndrome by measurement of plasma ammonium levels in patients with neurological symptoms, leading to early diagnosis and the prompt implementation of therapy.

Response to Cetuximab With or Without Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Harboring the KRAS G13D Mutation: Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group ICECREAM Study

PURPOSE RAS mutations predict lack of response to epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but preclinical studies and retrospective clinical data suggest that patients with tumors harboring the exon 2 KRAS G13D mutation may benefit from cetuximab. We aimed to assess cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with molecularly selected (G13D mutation) chemotherapy-refractory mCRC in a randomized phase II trial of this rare molecular subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS G13D mutation-positive mCRC who had progressed within 6 months of irinotecan therapy were randomly assigned to cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and then 250 mg/m(2) once per week with or without irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival; secondary end points were response rate, overall survival, quality of life, and toxicity. RESULTS Fifty-one of 53 patients recruited over 2 years were eligible. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 10% (95% CI, 2% to 26%) for cetuximab versus 23% (95% CI, 9% to 40%) for cetuximab plus irinotecan with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.32). Response and stable disease rates were 0% and 58% for monotherapy versus 9% and 70% for combination treatment, respectively. Overall survival and quality of life were similar; toxicities were higher with combination therapy. CONCLUSION In patients with G13D-mutated chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, there was no statistically significant improvement in disease control at 6 months with either cetuximab monotherapy or cetuximab plus irinotecan. No responses were seen with single-agent cetuximab. The responses observed with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan may reflect true drug synergy or persistent irinotecan sensitivity. The ICECREAM (Irinotecan Cetuximab Evaluation and Cetuximab Response Evaluation Among Patients with a G13D Mutation) study demonstrates the need to prospectively evaluate hypotheses that were previously supported by retrospective analyses and exemplifies the value of international collaboration in trials of rare molecular subtypes.

Developing a national database for metastatic colorectal cancer management: perspectives and challenges

The changing treatment landscape for metastatic colorectal cancer creates multiple potential treatment strategies. An Australian‐centric database capturing comprehensive information across a range of treatment locations would create a valuable resource enabling multiple important research questions to be addressed.

Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy associated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy.

Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy has been infrequently reported after both standard and high‐dose chemotherapy for solid and haematological malignancies. It is important to consider this diagnosis for patients with unexplained behaviour changes or encephalopathy and this case report emphasizes this condition and the importance of early diagnosis and is the first reported in association with rituximab‐containing chemotherapy.

Treatment and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: defining differences between public and private practice

Prior studies have suggested improved outcomes for cancer patients managed in private centres, despite universal healthcare within Australia.

Patterns of care and outcomes for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia

OBJECTIVES The elderly accounts for a large proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study reviews patterns of care and outcomes for elderly patients with mCRC in the community setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with mCRC on the TRACC (Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer) registry were identified. Treatment, bevacizumab-related adverse events, and overall survival (OS) were analysed by age cohorts, comparing those aged 65-74 vs. 75-84 vs. ≥ 85 years and correlated with potential prognostic factors. Factors affecting chemotherapy and bevacizumab administration were analysed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 1439 patients, 363, 352, and 106 were aged 65-74, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years, respectively. 584 (71%) patients received first-line chemotherapy, with chemotherapy use declining with advancing age (84%, 69%, and 34% in 65-74-, 75-84- and ≥ 85-year-olds, respectively). Seven (10%) patients aged ≥ 85 years were not treated with chemotherapy on the basis of age alone. Only 10 of 36 very elderly patients who received chemotherapy also received bevacizumab. Factors affecting bevacizumab administration included age, treatment location, and comorbidities. There was no impact of age on bevacizumab-related adverse events. Resection of metastatic disease occurred in 173 (21%) patients overall, with rates declining with age (26% vs. 21% vs. 6%). CONCLUSION Chemotherapy usage and resection of metastatic disease decline with advancing age. A minority of patients are not treated with systemic therapy due to advanced age alone. Our cohort suggests underutilisation of bevacizumab in older patients, but where given, toxicity rates did not increase with age.

Multicenter randomized, open‐label phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy as first‐line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS two patients with advanced NSCLC

The potential beneficial interaction between erlotinib and chemotherapy may require sequencing or pharmacodynamic separation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine versus gemcitabine monotherapy as first‐line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS‐2 patients with advanced non‐small cell lung carcinoma.

Radiation recall pneumonitis induced by erlotinib after palliative thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer: Case report and literature review

Radiation lung injury usually develops 1–6 months after cessation of radiation therapy to the lung. Acute change in the previously irradiated lung after administration of antineoplastic agent is known as radiation recall pneumonitis. Erlotinib is a reversible epidemal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which is effective for patients with advanced lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Here we report a rare case of radiation recall pneumonitis following treatment with erlotinib 4 months after palliative radiotherapy to the lung. A 76‐year‐old man with non–small cell lung cancer was treated with polychemotherapy, palliative thoracic irradiation (30 Gy in 12 fractions) and erlotinib thereafter. Two months after administration of erlotinib he developed of severe dyspnea, cough, anorexia and lack of energy. CT chest revealed extensive radiation pneumonitis. Erlotinib was ceased and high‐dose steroids were started. The symptoms ultimately resolved and erlotinib was resumed cautiously after 11 weeks. On dosimetric analysis, lung V20 and the mean lung dose were 20.33% and 10.7 Gy, respectively, and hence, the risk of radiation pneumonitis is very low. These data indicate that systemic administration of erlotinib after low‐dose palliative radiation therapy can be associated with unexpected toxicity when visceral organs are within the radiation field.

32LBA The AGITG ICECREAM Study: The Irinotecan Cetuximab Evaluation and Cetuximab Response Evaluation Amongst Patients with a G13D Mutation – analysis of outcomes in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer harbouring the KRAS G13D mutation

Methods: Based on the presence of molecular alterations, pts are treated with a MTT (among sorafenib, everolimus, pazopanib, lapatinib, nilotinib). After 12 weeks of treatment (induction period), pts with objective response are proposed to continue the MTT, while pts with stable disease are randomly assigned (1:1, maintenance period) to continuation or interruption of MTT. Analyses are carried out per MTT cohort using a sequential Bayesian approach. Primary endpoint of the induction period is the 12-week progression-free rate (PFR12w as per RECIST1.1). Secondary endpoints include toxicity and PFS. This abstract reports the preliminary results of the induction period for the sorafenib and everolimus cohorts. Results: From Feb.2014 to Apr. 2015, 48 and 30 pts were enrolled and evaluable at 12 weeks in the sorafenib and everolimus cohorts, respectively. The PFR12w were 32% and 29% in the sorafenib and everolimus cohorts, respectively. The PFR12w according to molecular alterations are presented in Table 1. No major safety issues were reported. Updated PFS will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: This molecular-driven approach warrants further investigation in specific molecular subtypes. Clinical trial information: NCT02029001 No conflict of interest.