Lucas Moreno

How can attrition rates be reduced in cancer drug discovery

Attrition is a major issue in anticancer drug development with up to 95% of drugs tested in Phase I trials not reaching a marketing authorisation making the drug development process enormously costly and inefficient. It is essential that this problem is addressed throughout the whole drug development process to improve efficiency which will ultimately result in increased patient benefit with more profitable drugs. The approach to reduce cancer drug attrition rates must be based on three pillars. The first of these is that there is a need for new pre-clinical models which can act as better predictors of success in clinical trials. Furthermore, clinical trials driven by tumour biology with the incorporation of predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers would be beneficial in drug development. Finally, there is a need for increased collaboration to combine the unique strengths between industry, academia and regulators to ensure that the needs of all stakeholders are met.

Ependymoma: An Update

The authors provide an update on most issues related to biology, diagnosis, and treatment of children with ependymoma based on a literature review. Ependymoma is the third most common brain tumor in children and overall survival ranges from 24% to 75% at 5 years. The extent of surgical resection remains the principal risk factor that clearly influences outcome. The influence of age, location, grade, or stage has proved to be more controversial. Current standard therapy includes surgical resection and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy has a role in infants to avoid/delay radiotherapy and can be helpful to improve resectability. About half of patients will experience relapse, and outcome is dismal. New radiation modalities, reirradiation, chemotherapy, or targeted agents have been tested with promising results. Results of multi-institutional clinical trials are awaited to determine the best first-line treatment, while results of early phase I/ II trials will explore directed therapies based on new biologic factors.

Does chemotherapy affect the visual outcome in children with optic pathway glioma? A systematic review of the evidence

INTRODUCTION Overall prognosis for optic pathway glioma (OPG) in children is excellent. Little is known, however, about the effect of chemotherapy on visual outcome of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify all studies published in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library between 1990 and 2008 reporting visual outcome in children with OPG after chemotherapy. Studies were included when they included 10 or more children with OPG, main treatment was chemotherapy and visual outcome was described. Cochrane guidelines for meta-analysis of non-randomised clinical trials were followed and levels of quality were assigned. RESULTS Eighty-five potentially relevant publications were retrieved for detailed evaluation and only 8 were included. The review revealed 0 randomised controlled trials, 0 non-randomised controlled trials, 3 (37.5%) single-arm trials (1 multi-institutional and 2 single institution trials) and 5 (62.5%) retrospective series. All studies achieved a level of evidence of 4 according to CEBM classification (case-series and poor quality cohort and case-control studies). Only 25 of 174 children experienced improvement in vision after chemotherapy (14.4%), responses ranged from 0% to 45.5%. Vision was stable in 82 children (47.1%, range 27-100%). No study documented the duration of the visual response. DISCUSSION Published studies on childhood low grade gliomas have not shown satisfactorily whether chemotherapy improves outcome of vision in children with OPG. Based on our systematic review it appears that treatment with chemotherapy does not improve resulting vision in the majority of children with OPG. The data available does not allow us to assess whether vision is stabilised sufficiently prior to treatment with radiotherapy.

Creating a unique, multi-stakeholder Paediatric Oncology Platform to improve drug development for children and adolescents with cancer.

Seven years after the launch of the European Paediatric Medicine Regulation, limited progress in paediatric oncology drug development remains a major concern amongst stakeholders - academics, industry, regulatory authorities, parents, patients and caregivers. Restricted increases in early phase paediatric oncology trials, legal requirements and regulatory pressure to propose early Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs), missed opportunities to explore new drugs potentially relevant for paediatric malignancies, lack of innovative trial designs and no new incentives to develop drugs against specific paediatric targets are some unmet needs. Better access to new anti-cancer drugs for paediatric clinical studies and improved collaboration between stakeholders are essential. The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF), previously Biotherapy Development Association (BDA), with Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Consortium (ITCC), European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) and European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents (ENCCA) has created a unique Paediatric Oncology Platform, involving multiple stakeholders and the European Union (EU) Commission, with an urgent remit to improve paediatric oncology drug development. The Paediatric Oncology Platform proposes to recommend immediate changes in the implementation of the Regulation and set the framework for its 2017 revision; initiatives to incentivise drug development against specific paediatric oncology targets, and repositioning of drugs not developed in adults. Underpinning these changes is a strategy for mechanism of action and biology driven selection and prioritisation of potential paediatric indications rather than the current process based on adult cancer indications. Pre-competitive research and drug prioritisation, early portfolio evaluation, cross-industry cooperation and multi-compound/sponsor trials are being explored, from which guidance for innovative trial designs will be provided.

Long‐term follow‐up of children with high‐risk neuroblastoma: The ENSG5 trial experience

Therapy for high‐risk neuroblastoma is intensive and multimodal, and significant long‐term adverse effects have been described. The aim of this study was to identify the nature and severity of late complications of metastatic neuroblastoma survivors included in the ENSG5 clinical trial.

A Phase I Trial of AT9283 (a Selective Inhibitor of Aurora Kinases) in Children and Adolescents with Solid Tumors: A Cancer Research UK Study

Purpose: A phase I trial of AT9283 (a multitargeted inhibitor of Aurora kinases A and B) was conducted in children and adolescents with solid tumors, to identify maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic (PD) activity. Experimental Design: AT9283 was administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. A rolling-six design, explored six dose levels (7, 9, 11.5, 14.5, 18.5, and 23 mg/m2/d). Pharmacokinetic and PD assessments, included inhibition of phospho-histone 3 (pHH3) in paired skin punch biopsies. Results: Thirty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity. There were six dose-limiting toxicities and the MTD was 18.5 mg/m2/d. Most common drug-related toxicities were hematologic (neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia in 36.4%, 18.2%, and 21.2% of patients), which were grade ≥3 in 30.3%, 6.1%, and 3% of patients. Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, infections, febrile neutropenia and ALT elevation. One patient with central nervous system–primitive neuroectodermal tumor (CNS-PNET) achieved a partial response after 16 cycles and 3 cases were stable for four or more cycles. Plasma concentrations were comparable with those in adults at the same dose level, clearance was similar although half-life was shorter (4.9 ± 1.5 hours, compared with 8.4 ± 3.7 hours in adults). Inhibition of Aurora kinase B was shown by reduction in pHH3 in 17 of 18 patients treated at ≥11.5 mg/m2/d. Conclusion: AT9283 was well tolerated in children and adolescents with solid tumors with manageable hematologic toxicity. Target inhibition was demonstrated. Disease stabilization was documented in intracranial and extracranial pediatric solid tumors and a phase II dose determined. Clin Cancer Res; 21(2); 267–73. ©2014 AACR.

Toxicity and Outcome of Children and Adolescents Participating in Phase I/II Trials of Novel Anticancer Drugs: The Royal Marsden Experience

Early phase trials are crucial in developing new therapies for poor prognosis childhood malignancies. Outcomes and toxicities of children treated on phase I/II trials at the Royal Marsden, one of the largest pediatric oncology early phase trial units in Europe, were examined to provide a baseline dataset and generate hypotheses. All patients recruited over a 10-year period to December 2011 were included. Variables including baseline characteristics, time on study, survival, toxicities, and admissions were collected. Seventy-two patients were recruited to 21 trials (5 phase I, 16 phase II; overall 12 involved molecularly targeted agents). Median age at consent was 12.4 years. Dose-limiting toxicities were rare in phase I trial participants (2 of 15 evaluable patients, 13%); the most common reason for leaving trials was disease progression (76%), rather than drug toxicity (1.7%). Median time on trial was 1.3 months (phase I patients) and 3.3 months (phase II). Early phase trials in children are safe and unexpected toxic side effects are infrequent. Patients and their families are willing to travel to access novel therapies, although the overall prognosis for these individuals is poor. Continued expansion of the portfolio is needed ultimately to improve the outcomes for those with resistant disease.

At the frontier of progress for paediatric oncology: the neuroblastoma paradigm

INTRODUCTION Neuroblastoma is one of the commonest and deadliest forms of childhood cancer and major initiatives are ongoing to improve the outcome of these patients. SOURCES OF DATA Data for this review were obtained from PubMed and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Advances in Neuroblastoma Research. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Collaborative clinical trials have led to major improvements in treatment outcomes for low and intermediate risk neuroblastoma, and international initiatives such as the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group have produced a very refined risk stratification incorporating clinical and biological risk factors. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY Despite many efforts, the outcome for high-risk neuroblastoma is still poor and the only new strategy incorporated into frontline treatment is anti-GD2 immunotherapy. It is unclear how new drugs targeting specific molecular aberrations will be incorporated. GROWING POINTS Genomic characterization and drug development have undergone major advances in the last 5 years leading to a much deeper understanding of tumour biology as well as active biomarker-driven preclinical and clinical research on new molecules that will hopefully progress faster and more efficiently into frontline combination treatment strategies. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH Significant effort remains to be done in integrating the different new strategies, combining new molecularly targeted agents to maximize therapeutic benefit and incorporate immunotherapy together with targeted therapies.

Outcome of children with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: A meta‐analysis of ITCC/SIOPEN European phase II clinical trials

Few randomized trials have been conducted in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma and data about outcomes including progression‐free survival (PFS) in these patients are scarce.

Preclinical drug development for childhood cancer

Importance of the field: More effective drugs are needed to treat poor prognosis paediatric malignancies. Development of anticancer agents for childhood cancers faces several unique challenges compared with their adult counterparts. Areas covered in this review: We demonstrate how recent advances in preclinical drug development may overcome these difficulties and challenges. We explain the role of academia, regulators and industry in this field, address issues with preclinical models and illustrate several examples of biology-driven drug development in childhood cancers. What the reader will gain: Increased knowledge about preclinical drug development in paediatric oncology including different preclinical models, established preclinical research networks, and relationships among academia, industry and regulators, as illustrated by several examples of targeted agents in childhood solid malignancies. Take home message: It is anticipated that emerging advanced preclinical models and testing platforms will provide a more efficient, biologically-driven rationale to support the use of targeted therapies in several malignancies such as neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma or high grade glioma which account for the majority of deaths related to childhood cancer.