Lucy A. Howey
Nova Southeastern University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lucy A. Howey.
Frontiers in Marine Science | 2017
Tristan L. Guttridge; Maurits P. M. Van Zinnicq Bergmann; Chris Bolte; Lucy A. Howey; Jean S. Finger; Steven T. Kessel; Jill L. Brooks; William Winram; Mark E. Bond; Lance K. B. Jordan; Rachael C. Cashman; Emily R. Tolentino; R. Dean Grubbs; Samuel H. Gruber
A thorough understanding of movement patterns of a species is critical for designing effective conservation and management initiatives. However, generating such information for large marine vertebrates is challenging, as they typically move over long distances, live in concealing environments, are logistically difficult to capture and, as upper-trophic predators, are naturally low in abundance. As a large bodied, broadly distributed tropical shark typically restricted to coastal and shelf habitats, the great hammerhead shark Sphyrna mokarran epitomizes such challenges. Highly valued for its fins, it suffers high bycatch mortality coupled with conservative fecundity, and as a result, is vulnerable to over-exploitation and population depletion. Although there is very little species specific data available, the absence of recent catch records give cause to suspect substantial declines across its range. Here, we used biotelemetry techniques (acoustic and satellite), conventional tagging, laser-photogrammetry, and photo-identification to investigate; the level of site fidelity, and or residency for great hammerheads to coastal areas in the Bahamas and U.S. and the extent of movements and connectivity of great hammerheads between the U.S. and Bahamas. Results revealed large scale return migrations (3030 km), seasonal residency to local areas (some for 5 months), site fidelity (annual return to Bimini and Jupiter for many individuals) and numerous international movements. These findings enhance the understanding of movement ecology of the great hammerhead shark and have the potential to contribute to improved conservation and management.
Ecology and Evolution | 2016
Lucy A. Howey; Emily R. Tolentino; Yannis P. Papastamatiou; Edward J. Brooks; Debra L. Abercrombie; Yuuki Y. Watanabe; Sean Williams; Annabelle Brooks; Demian D. Chapman; Lance K. B. Jordan
Abstract Comprehension of ecological processes in marine animals requires information regarding dynamic vertical habitat use. While many pelagic predators primarily associate with epipelagic waters, some species routinely dive beyond the deep scattering layer. Actuation for exploiting these aphotic habitats remains largely unknown. Recent telemetry data from oceanic whitetip sharks (Carcharhinus longimanus) in the Atlantic show a strong association with warm waters (>20°C) less than 200 m. Yet, individuals regularly exhibit excursions into the meso‐ and bathypelagic zone. In order to examine deep‐diving behavior in oceanic whitetip sharks, we physically recovered 16 pop‐up satellite archival tags and analyzed the high‐resolution depth and temperature data. Diving behavior was evaluated in the context of plausible functional behavior hypotheses including interactive behaviors, energy conservation, thermoregulation, navigation, and foraging. Mesopelagic excursions (n = 610) occurred throughout the entire migratory circuit in all individuals, with no indication of site specificity. Six depth‐versus‐time descent and ascent profiles were identified. Descent profile shapes showed little association with examined environmental variables. Contrastingly, ascent profile shapes were related to environmental factors and appear to represent unique behavioral responses to abiotic conditions present at the dive apex. However, environmental conditions may not be the sole factors influencing ascents, as ascent mode may be linked to intentional behaviors. While dive functionality remains unconfirmed, our study suggests that mesopelagic excursions relate to active foraging behavior or navigation. Dive timing, prey constituents, and dive shape support foraging as the most viable hypothesis for mesopelagic excursions, indicating that the oceanic whitetip shark may regularly survey extreme environments (deep depths, low temperatures) as a foraging strategy. At the apex of these deep‐water excursions, sharks exhibit a variable behavioral response, perhaps, indicating the presence or absence of prey.
Royal Society Open Science | 2017
Oliver N. Shipley; Lucy A. Howey; Emily R. Tolentino; Lance K. B. Jordan; Jonathan L. W. Ruppert; Edward J. Brooks
Despite the ecological and economic importance of the Caribbean reef shark (Carcharhinus perezi), little data exist regarding the movements and habitat use of this predator across its range. We deployed 11 pop-up satellite archival tags on Caribbean reef sharks captured in the northeast Exuma Sound, The Bahamas, to assess their horizontal and vertical movements throughout the water column. Sharks showed high site fidelity to The Bahamas suggesting Bahamian subpopulations remain protected within the Bahamian Shark Sanctuary. Depth data indicate that Caribbean reef sharks spent a significant proportion (72–91%) of their time above 50 m in narrow vertical depth bands, which varied considerably on an individual basis. This may be indicative of high site fidelity to specific bathymetric features. Animals exhibited three broadly categorized sporadic off-bank excursions (more than 50 m excursions) down to a depth of 436.1 m, which were more frequent during the night. These deeper excursions during night may be indicative of foraging in relation to prey on mesophotic reefs, as well as diel-vertically migrating prey from the deeper meso- and bathypelagic zones. These vertical movements suggest that Caribbean reef sharks can be significant vectors of ecosystem connectivity further warranting holistic multi-system management and conservation approaches.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Samantha Andrzejaczek; Adrian C. Gleiss; Lance K. B. Jordan; Charitha Pattiaratchi; Lucy A. Howey; Edward J. Brooks; Mark G. Meekan
Large-bodied pelagic ectotherms such as sharks need to maintain internal temperatures within a favourable range in order to maximise performance and be cost-efficient foragers. This implies that behavioural thermoregulation should be a key feature of the movements of these animals, although field evidence is limited. We used depth and temperature archives from pop-up satellite tags to investigate the role of temperature in driving vertical movements of 16 oceanic whitetip sharks, Carcharhinus longimanus, (OWTs). Spectral analysis, linear mixed modelling, segmented regression and multivariate techniques were used to examine the effect of mean sea surface temperature (SST) and mixed layer depth on vertical movements. OWTs continually oscillated throughout the upper 200 m of the water column. In summer when the water column was stratified with high SSTs, oscillations increased in amplitude and cycle length and sharks reduced the time spent in the upper 50 m. In winter when the water column was cooler and well-mixed, oscillations decreased in amplitude and cycle length and sharks frequently occupied the upper 50 m. SSTs of 28 oC marked a distinct change in vertical movements and the onset of thermoregulation strategies. Our results have implications for the ecology of these animals in a warming ocean.
Animal Biotelemetry | 2017
Emily R. Tolentino; Russell P. Howey; Lucy A. Howey; Lance K. B. Jordan; R. Dean Grubbs; Annabelle Brooks; Sean Williams; Edward J. Brooks; Oliver N. Shipley
AbstractBackground Biologging and tracking instruments provide valuable, remote surveillance on otherwise unobservable marine animals. Instruments can be consumed (ingested) by predators while collecting data, and if not identified, the retrieved dataset could be assigned to the incorrect individual and/or species. Consumption events of instruments, such as pop-up satellite archival tags and data loggers that record ambient light, are typically identified by negligible light levels and visual assessment of data records. However, when light-level data are not available (e.g., environments below the euphotic zone, instrument model), instrument consumption is not easily discernible. Instruments that record concurrent, time-series temperature and depth data provide detailed information on the ambient temperature in the water column. However, if the instrument is consumed, the temperature profile may dissociate from the depth profile, providing evidence and a means for detecting consumption.ResultsTo quantify the dissociation between time-series depth and temperature profiles, we applied the cross-correlation function to evaluate the time delay and uncoupling between time-series depth and temperature profiles, suggestive of instrument consumption. Given that instruments may be consumed midway through the deployment duration, we extended the cross-correlation function to systematically slide across time-series profiles, sequentially considering subsets of data, to infer time of consumption. This method was applied to datasets from both deep-water (disphotic and aphotic) and epipelagic (euphotic) environments to evaluate instrument consumption. Results were dependent on ambient environment, data sampling rate, predator physiology, and function parameters.ConclusionsUtilization of the cross-correlation function objectively indicates potential instrument consumption events without the bias induced by subjective methods such as visual assessment of tag-recorded data, and does not require the simultaneous collection of light-level data. This methodology aids in the appropriate biological interpretation of tag-recorded data, ensures that data are not attributed to the incorrect species, and can be used to authenticate data during the validation process. Additionally, it is particularly useful for contrasting datasets from comparable studies (i.e., same location and species) and is applicable across taxa and electronic biologging instrument variations.
Marine Ecology Progress Series | 2015
Daniel J. Madigan; Edward J. Brooks; Mark E. Bond; James Gelsleichter; Lucy A. Howey; Debra L. Abercrombie; Annabelle Brooks; Demian D. Chapman
Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers | 2017
Oliver N. Shipley; Lucy A. Howey; Emily R. Tolentino; Lance K. B. Jordan; Edward J. Brooks
Animal Biotelemetry | 2015
Mark E. Bond; Emily R. Tolentino; Sangeeta Mangubhai; Lucy A. Howey
Marine Ecology Progress Series | 2017
Caine R. Delacy; Aaron Olsen; Lucy A. Howey; Demian D. Chapman; Edward J. Brooks; Mark E. Bond
Scientific Reports | 2018
Yannis P. Papastamatiou; Gil Iosilevskii; Vianey Leos-Barajas; Edd J. Brooks; Lucy A. Howey; Demian D. Chapman; Yuuki Y. Watanabe