Luigi Padeletti

2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).

2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

### Abbreviations 1st AV : First-degree atrioventricular block AF : atrial fibrillation AT : atrial tachyarrhythmia ATP : Anti-tachycardia pacing AV : atrioventricular BBB : bundle branch block CHF : congestive heart failure CI : confidence interval CPG : Committee for Practice Guidelines CRT : cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D : cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator CRT-P : cardiac resynchronization therapy and pacemaker ECG : electrocardiogram EDMD : Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy EF : ejection fraction EPS : electrophysiological study ESC : European Society of Cardiology HCM : hypertrophic cardiomyopathy HF : heart failure HR : hazard ratio HV : His-ventricular ICD : implantable cardioverter defibrillator ILR : implantable loop recorder IVCD : intraventricular conduction delay LBBB : left bundle branch block LQTS : long QT syndrome LV : left ventricular LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction LVSD : left ventricular systolic dysfunction MR : mitral regurgitation MRI : magnetic resonance imaging NYHA : New York Heart Association PM : pacemaker OR : odds ratio QALY : quality-adjusted life year RBBB : right bundle branch block RCT : randomized controlled trial RV : right ventricular SB : sinus bradycardia SNRT : sinus node recovery time SR : sinus rhythm SSS : sick sinus syndrome TAVI : transcatheter aortic valve implantation VF : ventricular fibrillation VT : ventricular tachycardia VV : interventricular (delay) ### Acronyms of the trials referenced in the recommendations or reported in the tables ADEPT : ADvanced Elements of Pacing Randomized Controlled Trial ADOPT : Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial AOPS : Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study APAF : Ablate and Pace in Atrial Fibrillation ASSERT : ASymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial ATTEST : ATrial Therapy Efficacy and Safety Trial AVAIL CLS/CRT : AV Node Ablation with CLS and CRT Pacing Therapies for Treatment of AF trial B4 : Bradycardia detection in Bundle Branch Block BELIEVE : Bi vs. Left Ventricular Pacing: an International Pilot Evaluation on Heart Failure Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias BIOPACE : Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block to prevent cardiac desynchronization BLOCK-HF : Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with AV block B-LEFT : Biventricular versus LEFT Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients CARE-HF : CArdiac REsynchronization in Heart Failure CLEAR : CLinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization COMBAT : COnventional vs. Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Bradyarrhythmia COMPANION : COmparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure DANPACE : DANish Multicenter Randomized Trial on Single Lead Atrial PACing vs. Dual Chamber Pacing in Sick Sinus Syndrome DECREASE-HF : The Device Evaluation of CONTAK RENEWAL 2 and EASYTRAK 2: Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness in Heart Failure FREEDOM : Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method GREATER-EARTH : Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure in Patients with a QRS Duration GREATER Than 120 ms LESSER-EARTH : Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure in Patients with a QRS Duration Lower Than 120 ms HOBIPACE : HOmburg BIventricular PACing Evaluation IN-CHF : Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure ISSUE : International Study on Syncope of Unexplained Etiology MADIT : Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial MIRACLE : Multicenter InSync RAndomized CLinical Evaluation MOST : MOde Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction MUSTIC : MUltisite STimulation In Cardiomyopathies OPSITE : Optimal Pacing SITE PACE : Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement PAVE : Left Ventricular-Based Cardiac Stimulation Post AV Nodal Ablation Evaluation PATH-CHF : PAcing THerapies in Congestive Heart Failure II Study Group PIPAF : Pacing In Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Study PIRAT : Prevention of Immediate Reinitiation of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias POT : Prevention Or Termination Study PREVENT-HF : PREventing VENTricular Dysfunction in Pacemaker Patients Without Advanced Heart Failure PROSPECT : PRedictors Of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy RAFT : Resynchronization–Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial RethinQ : Cardiac REsynchronization THerapy IN Patients with Heart Failure and Narrow QRS REVERSE : REsynchronization reVErses Remodelling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction SAFARI : Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction SCD HeFT : Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial SMART-AV : The SMARTDelay Determined AV Optimization: a Comparison with Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy SYDIT : The SYncope DIagnosis and Treatment SYNPACE : Vasovagal SYNcope and PACing TARGET : TARgeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy THEOPACE : Effects of Oral THEOphylline and of Permanent PACEmaker on the Symptoms and Complications of Sick Sinus Syndrome VASIS-PM : VAsovagal Syncope International Study on PaceMaker therapy V-HeFT : Vasodilator in HEart Failure Trial VPSII : Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II) Additional references are mentioned with ‘w’ in the main text and can be found on the online addenda along with 5 figures (1, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12) and 10 tables (3, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 19, 21, 22, 23). They are available on the ESC website only at http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/Pages/cardiac-pacing-and-cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy.aspx Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue, with the …

HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy.

1 RS Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of ardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) in atients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy his document was developed in collaboration and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology ACC), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS), the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative edicine (AAHPM); the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm ssociation (EHRA), and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA).

EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy

The purpose of this Consensus Statement is to focus on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) deactivation in patients with irreversible or terminal illness. This statement summarizes the opinions of the Task Force members, convened by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), based on ethical and legal principles, as well as their own clinical, scientific, and technical experience. It is directed to all healthcare professionals who treat patients with implanted ICDs, nearing end of life, in order to improve the patient dying process. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote device deactivation. Rather, the ultimate judgement regarding this procedure must be made by the patient (or in special conditions by his/her legal representative) after careful communication about the deactivations consequences, respecting his/her autonomy and clarifying that he/she has a legal and ethical right to refuse it. Obviously, the physician asked to deactivate the ICD and the industry representative asked to assist can conscientiously object to and refuse to perform device deactivation.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is more effective in women than in men: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors related to sex-specific outcomes for death and heart failure events in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. BACKGROUND In the MADIT-CRT trial, women seemed to achieve a better result from resynchronization therapy than men. METHODS All 1,820 patients (453 female and 1,367 male) enrolled in the MADIT-CRT trial were included in this sex-specific outcome analysis that compared the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) relative to implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) on death or heart failure (whichever came first), heart failure only, and death at any time. RESULTS Female patients were more likely to have nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block and less likely to have renal dysfunction than male patients. Overall, female patients had a better result from CRT-D therapy than male patients, with a significant 69% reduction in death or heart failure (hazard ratio: 0.31, p < 0.001) and 70% reduction in heart failure alone (hazard ratio: 0.30, p < 0.001). Women had a significant 72% reduction in all-cause mortality in the total population (hazard ratio: 0.28, p = 0.02) and significant 82% and 78% reductions in mortality in those with QRS ≥ 150 ms and with left bundle branch block conduction disturbance, respectively, with sex-by-treatment interactions for mortality reduction significant at p < 0.05 in each of these 3 patient groups. These beneficial CRT-D effects among women were associated with consistently greater echocardiographic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS Women in the MADIT-CRT trial obtained significantly greater reductions in death or heart failure (whichever came first), heart failure alone, and all-cause mortality with CRT-D therapy than men, with consistently greater echocardiographic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling in women than in men. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).

Combined Efficacy of Atrial Septal Lead Placement and Atrial Pacing Algorithms for Prevention of Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmia

Introduction: The combined role of atrial septal lead location and atrial pacing algorithms in the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT/AF), including both atrial fibrillation and flutter, is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that atrial prevention pacing algorithms could decrease AT/AF frequency in patients with atrial septal leads, bradycardia, and paroxysmal AT/AF.

Improving Stroke Risk Stratification Using the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Scores in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation by Continuous Arrhythmia Burden Monitoring

Background and Purpose— In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke risk stratification schema do not consider AF parameters. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of combining risk factors with continuous AF burden monitoring. Methods— In this retrospective study 568 patients implanted with a DDDR-P pacemaker (AT-500; Medtronic) and a history of AF were continuously monitored for 1 year. Results— During follow-up, 14 patients (2.5%) had a thromboembolic event. Patients were divided into 3 groups: AF burden ⩽5 minutes per day (AF-free; n=223 [39%]), AF burden >5 minutes but <24 hours per day (AF-5 minutes; n=179 [32%]), and AF burden ≥24 hours (AF-24 hours; n=166 [29%]). Patients were also classified according to CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores. The discrimination ability of each risk score was evaluated performing a logistic regression analysis and calculating the corresponding C-statistic. The addition of AF burden improved C-statistics: for CHADS2 from 0.653 (P=0.051) to 0.713 (P=0.007); for CHA2DS2-VASc, from 0.898 (P<0.0001) to 0.910 (P<0.0001). Conclusions— The CHA2DS2-VASc score had a high sensitivity to predict thromboembolism. Implementation of device data on AF presence/duration/burden has the potential to contribute to improved clinical risk stratification and should be tested prospectively.

ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)

We are in the midst of a rapidly evolving era of technology-assisted medicine. The field of telemedicine provides the opportunity for highly individualized medical management in a way that has never been possible before. Evolving medical technologies using cardiac implantable devices (CIEDs) with capabilities for remote monitoring permit evaluation of multiple parameters of cardiovascular physiology and risk, including cardiac rhythm, device function, blood pressure values, the presence of myocardial ischaemia, and the degree of compensation of congestive heart failure. Cardiac risk, device status, and response to therapies can now be assessed with these electronic systems of detection and reporting. This document reflects the extensive experience from investigators and innovators around the world who are shaping the evolution of this rapidly expanding field, focusing in particular on implantable pacemakers (IPGs), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (both, with and without defibrillation properties), loop recorders, and haemodynamic monitoring devices. This document covers the basic methodologies, guidelines for their use, experience with existing applications, and the legal and reimbursement aspects associated with their use. To adequately cover this important emerging topic, the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology (ISHNE) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) combined their expertise in this field. We hope that the development of this field can contribute to improve care of our cardiovascular patients.

Interatrial septum pacing: A new approach to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation.

Background. There are a variety of approaches to the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pacing. Aim of this study was to test the safety and feasibility of interatrial septum pacing at the posterior triangle of Koch for AF prevention and to exclude potential arrhythmic effects.Matherial and Methods.Interatrial septum pacing was performed in 34 patients (21 males, 13 females, mean age 69±12 years): 9 without a history and clinical evidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (6 with sinus bradycardia, 2 with second-degree AV block, and 1 with carotid sinus hypersensitivity) and 25 with sinus bradycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (mean symptomatic episodes/month 6.2±10). In all patients a screw-in bipolar lead was positioned in the interatrial septum superiorly to the coronary sinus.Results.At implant the mean P wave amplitude was 2.5±1.5 mV, the pacing threshold was 1±0.6 V and the impedance was 907±477 Ohm. Mean P wave duration was 118±17 ms in sinus rhythm and 82±15 during interatrial septum pacing (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 10±7 months, no patients without atrial tachyarrhythmias before implantation experienced AF. During a 9±6 months follow-up we observed only 2 symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences between AF patients (mean symptomatic episodes/month 0.006±0.0022) (p < 0.01 vs before implant period).Conclusions. Our data indicate that interatrial septal pacing is safe and feasible. A significant less incidence of arrhythmic episodes has been observed during follow-up. Further controlled randomized prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact role of this technique respect to conventional or multisite stimulation when patients with paroxysmal AF need to be permanently paced.

Device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias predict adverse outcome in real-world patients with implantable biventricular defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the correlation between atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial fibrillation (AF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). BACKGROUND In HF patients, AT and AF have high prevalence and are associated with compromised hemodynamic function. METHODS Forty-four Italian cardiological centers followed up 1,193 patients who received a CRT-D according to current guidelines for advanced HF, New York Heart Association functional class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and QRS complex ≥ 120 ms. All patients were in sinus rhythm at implant. RESULTS During a median follow-up period of 13 months, AT/AF >10 min occurred in 361 of 1,193 (30%) patients. The composite end point (deaths or HF hospitalizations) occurred in 174 of 1,193 (14.6%). Multivariate time-dependent Cox regression analyses showed that composite end point risk was higher among patients with device-detected AT/AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.16, p = 0.032), New York Heart Association functional class III or IV compared with II (HR: 2.09, p = 0.002), and absence of beta-blockers (HR: 1.36, p = 0.036). Furthermore, the composite end point risk was inversely associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 1.04, p = 0.045), increasing by a factor of 4% for each 1% decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS In HF patients with CRT-D, device-detected AT/AF is associated with a worse prognosis. Continuous device diagnostics monitoring and Web-based alerts may inform the physician of AT/AF occurrences and identify patients at risk of cardiac deterioration or patients with suboptimal rate or rhythm control. (Italian ClinicalService Project; NCT01007474).