Lukas Endler
European Bioinformatics Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lukas Endler.
BMC Systems Biology | 2010
Chen Li; Marco Donizelli; Nicolas Rodriguez; Harish Dharuri; Lukas Endler; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Lu Li; Enuo He; Arnaud Henry; Melanie I. Stefan; Jacky L. Snoep; Michael Hucka; Nicolas Le Novère; Camille Laibe
BackgroundQuantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems are used to answer a variety of questions in the biological sciences. The number of published quantitative models is growing steadily thanks to increasing interest in the use of models as well as the development of improved software systems and the availability of better, cheaper computer hardware. To maximise the benefits of this growing body of models, the field needs centralised model repositories that will encourage, facilitate and promote model dissemination and reuse. Ideally, the models stored in these repositories should be extensively tested and encoded in community-supported and standardised formats. In addition, the models and their components should be cross-referenced with other resources in order to allow their unambiguous identification.DescriptionBioModels Database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/ is aimed at addressing exactly these needs. It is a freely-accessible online resource for storing, viewing, retrieving, and analysing published, peer-reviewed quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. The structure and behaviour of each simulation model distributed by BioModels Database are thoroughly checked; in addition, model elements are annotated with terms from controlled vocabularies as well as linked to relevant data resources. Models can be examined online or downloaded in various formats. Reaction network diagrams generated from the models are also available in several formats. BioModels Database also provides features such as online simulation and the extraction of components from large scale models into smaller submodels. Finally, the system provides a range of web services that external software systems can use to access up-to-date data from the database.ConclusionsBioModels Database has become a recognised reference resource for systems biology. It is being used by the community in a variety of ways; for example, it is used to benchmark different simulation systems, and to study the clustering of models based upon their annotations. Model deposition to the database today is advised by several publishers of scientific journals. The models in BioModels Database are freely distributed and reusable; the underlying software infrastructure is also available from SourceForge https://sourceforge.net/projects/biomodels/ under the GNU General Public License.
Journal of the Royal Society Interface | 2009
Lukas Endler; Nicolas Rodriguez; Nick Juty; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Camille Laibe; Chen Li; Nicolas Le Novère
A key component of any synthetic biology effort is the use of quantitative models. These models and their corresponding simulations allow optimization of a system design, as well as guiding their subsequent analysis. Once a domain mostly reserved for experts, dynamical modelling of gene regulatory and reaction networks has been an area of growth over the last decade. There has been a concomitant increase in the number of software tools and standards, thereby facilitating model exchange and reuse. We give here an overview of the model creation and analysis processes as well as some software tools in common use. Using markup language to encode the model and associated annotation, we describe the mining of components, their integration in relational models, formularization and parametrization. Evaluation of simulation results and validation of the model close the systems biology ‘loop’.
Bioinformatics | 2009
Andreas Dräger; Hannes Planatscher; Dieudonné Motsou Wouamba; Adrian Schröder; Michael Hucka; Lukas Endler; Martin Golebiewski; Wolfgang Müller; Andreas Zell
Summary: The XML-based Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) has emerged as a standard for storage, communication and interchange of models in systems biology. As a machine-readable format XML is difficult for humans to read and understand. Many tools are available that visualize the reaction pathways stored in SBML files, but many components, e.g. unit declarations, complex kinetic equations or links to MIRIAM resources, are often not made visible in these diagrams. For a broader understanding of the models, support in scientific writing and error detection, a human-readable report of the complete model is needed. We present SBML2LaTEX, a Java-based stand-alone program to fill this gap. A convenient web service allows users to directly convert SBML to various formats, including DVI, LaTEX and PDF, and provides many settings for customization. Availability: Source code, documentation and a web service are freely available at http://www.ra.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/software/SBML2LaTeX. Contact:[email protected] Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
data integration in the life sciences | 2009
Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Lukas Endler; Nick Juty; Camille Laibe; Chen Li; Nicolas Rodriguez; Nicolas Le Novère
The rise of Systems Biology approaches, in conjunction with the availability of numerous powerful and user-friendly modeling environments, brought computational models out of the dusty closets of theoreticians to the forefront of research in biology. Those models are becoming larger, more complex and more realistic. As any other type of data in life sciences, models have to be stored, exchanged and re-used. This was made possible by the development of a series of standards, that, when used in conjunction, can cover the whole life-cycle of a model, including the specification of its structure and syntax, the simulations to be run, and the description of its behaviour and resulting numerical output. We will review those standards, well-accepted or still under development, including the Minimal requirements (MIRIAM, MIASE), the description formats (SBML, SED-ML, SBRML) and the associated ontologies (SBO, KiSAO, TEDDY). We will show how their use by the community, through a rich toolkit of complementary software, can permit to leverage on everyones efforts, to integrate models and simulations with other types of biological knowledge, and eventually lead to the fulfillment of one of Systems Biologys tenets of collaboration between biology, mathematics and computing science.
Methods of Molecular Biology | 2013
Nicolas Le Novère; Lukas Endler
Chemical kinetics is the study of the rate of reactions transforming some chemical entities into other chemical entities. Over the twentieth century it has become one of the cornerstones of biochemistry. When in the second half of the century basic knowledge of cellular processes became sufficient to understand quantitatively metabolic networks, chemical kinetics associated with systems theory led to the development of what would become an important branch of systems biology. In this chapter we introduce basic concepts of chemical and enzyme kinetics, and show how the temporal evolution of a reaction system can be described by ordinary differential equations. Finally we present a method to apply this type of approach to model any regulatory network.
Archive | 2012
Lukas Endler; Melanie I. Stefan; Stuart J. Edelstein; Nicolas Le Novère
Understanding the physical principles and mechanisms underlying biochemical reactions allows to create mechanistic mathematical models of complex biological processes, such as those occurring during neuronal signal transduction. In this chapter we introduce basic concepts of chemical and enzyme kinetics, and reaction thermodynamics. Furthermore we show, how the temporal evolution of a reaction system can be described by ordinary differential equations, that can numerically solved on a computer. Finally we give a short overview of different approaches to modelling cooperative binding to, and allosteric control of, receptors and ion channels.
Nature Biotechnology | 2013
Ines Thiele; Neil Swainston; Ronan M. T. Fleming; Andreas Hoppe; Swagatika Sahoo; Maike Kathrin Aurich; Hulda S. Haraldsdóttir; Monica L. Mo; Ottar Rolfsson; Miranda D. Stobbe; Stefan Gretar Thorleifsson; Rasmus Agren; Christian Bölling; Sergio Bordel; Arvind K. Chavali; Paul D. Dobson; Warwick B. Dunn; Lukas Endler; David Hala; Michael Hucka; Duncan Hull; Daniel Jameson; Neema Jamshidi; Jon J. Jonsson; Nick Juty; Sarah M. Keating; Intawat Nookaew; Nicolas Le Novère; Naglis Malys; Alexander Mazein
BMC Bioinformatics | 2010
Ron Henkel; Lukas Endler; Andre Peters; Nicolas Le Novère; Dagmar Waltemath
Nature Precedings | 2011
Michael Schubert; Ishan Ajmera; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Lukas Endler; Nicolas Rodriguez; Camille Laibe; Nicolas Le Novère
Nature Precedings | 2010
Ron Henkel; Dagmar Waltemath; Andre Peters; Lukas Endler; Nicolas Le Novère