Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Hucka is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Hucka.


Bioinformatics | 2003

The systems biology markup language (SBML) : a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models

Michael Hucka; Andrew Finney; Herbert M. Sauro; Hamid Bolouri; John C. Doyle; Hiroaki Kitano; Adam P. Arkin; Benjamin J. Bornstein; Dennis Bray; Athel Cornish-Bowden; Autumn A. Cuellar; S. Dronov; E. D. Gilles; Martin Ginkel; Victoria Gor; Igor Goryanin; W. J. Hedley; T. C. Hodgman; J.-H.S. Hofmeyr; Peter Hunter; Nick Juty; J. L. Kasberger; A. Kremling; Ursula Kummer; N. Le Novere; Leslie M. Loew; D. Lucio; Pedro Mendes; E. Minch; Eric Mjolsness

MOTIVATION Molecular biotechnology now makes it possible to build elaborate systems models, but the systems biology community needs information standards if models are to be shared, evaluated and developed cooperatively. RESULTS We summarize the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 1, a free, open, XML-based format for representing biochemical reaction networks. SBML is a software-independent language for describing models common to research in many areas of computational biology, including cell signaling pathways, metabolic pathways, gene regulation, and others. AVAILABILITY The specification of SBML Level 1 is freely available from http://www.sbml.org/


Nucleic Acids Research | 2006

BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems

Nicolas Le Novère; Benjamin J. Bornstein; Alexander Broicher; Mélanie Courtot; Marco Donizelli; Harish Dharuri; Lu Li; Herbert M. Sauro; Maria J. Schilstra; Bruce E. Shapiro; Jacky L. Snoep; Michael Hucka

BioModels Database (), part of the international initiative BioModels.net, provides access to published, peer-reviewed, quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. Each model is carefully curated to verify that it corresponds to the reference publication and gives the proper numerical results. Curators also annotate the components of the models with terms from controlled vocabularies and links to other relevant data resources. This allows the users to search accurately for the models they need. The models can currently be retrieved in the SBML format, and import/export facilities are being developed to extend the spectrum of formats supported by the resource.


Nature Biotechnology | 2009

The Systems Biology Graphical Notation

Nicolas Le Novère; Michael Hucka; Huaiyu Mi; Stuart L. Moodie; Falk Schreiber; Anatoly A. Sorokin; Emek Demir; Katja Wegner; Mirit I. Aladjem; Sarala M. Wimalaratne; Frank T. Bergman; Ralph Gauges; Peter Ghazal; Hideya Kawaji; Lu Li; Yukiko Matsuoka; Alice Villéger; Sarah E. Boyd; Laurence Calzone; Mélanie Courtot; Ugur Dogrusoz; Tom C. Freeman; Akira Funahashi; Samik Ghosh; Akiya Jouraku; Sohyoung Kim; Fedor A. Kolpakov; Augustin Luna; Sven Sahle; Esther Schmidt

Circuit diagrams and Unified Modeling Language diagrams are just two examples of standard visual languages that help accelerate work by promoting regularity, removing ambiguity and enabling software tool support for communication of complex information. Ironically, despite having one of the highest ratios of graphical to textual information, biology still lacks standard graphical notations. The recent deluge of biological knowledge makes addressing this deficit a pressing concern. Toward this goal, we present the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN), a visual language developed by a community of biochemists, modelers and computer scientists. SBGN consists of three complementary languages: process diagram, entity relationship diagram and activity flow diagram. Together they enable scientists to represent networks of biochemical interactions in a standard, unambiguous way. We believe that SBGN will foster efficient and accurate representation, visualization, storage, exchange and reuse of information on all kinds of biological knowledge, from gene regulation, to metabolism, to cellular signaling.


Nature Biotechnology | 2010

The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing

Emek Demir; Michael P. Cary; Suzanne M. Paley; Ken Fukuda; Christian Lemer; Imre Vastrik; Guanming Wu; Peter D'Eustachio; Carl F. Schaefer; Joanne S. Luciano; Frank Schacherer; Irma Martínez-Flores; Zhenjun Hu; Verónica Jiménez-Jacinto; Geeta Joshi-Tope; Kumaran Kandasamy; Alejandra López-Fuentes; Huaiyu Mi; Elgar Pichler; Igor Rodchenkov; Andrea Splendiani; Sasha Tkachev; Jeremy Zucker; Gopal Gopinath; Harsha Rajasimha; Ranjani Ramakrishnan; Imran Shah; Mustafa Syed; Nadia Anwar; Özgün Babur

Biological Pathway Exchange (BioPAX) is a standard language to represent biological pathways at the molecular and cellular level and to facilitate the exchange of pathway data. The rapid growth of the volume of pathway data has spurred the development of databases and computational tools to aid interpretation; however, use of these data is hampered by the current fragmentation of pathway information across many databases with incompatible formats. BioPAX, which was created through a community process, solves this problem by making pathway data substantially easier to collect, index, interpret and share. BioPAX can represent metabolic and signaling pathways, molecular and genetic interactions and gene regulation networks. Using BioPAX, millions of interactions, organized into thousands of pathways, from many organisms are available from a growing number of databases. This large amount of pathway data in a computable form will support visualization, analysis and biological discovery.


BMC Systems Biology | 2010

BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models

Chen Li; Marco Donizelli; Nicolas Rodriguez; Harish Dharuri; Lukas Endler; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Lu Li; Enuo He; Arnaud Henry; Melanie I. Stefan; Jacky L. Snoep; Michael Hucka; Nicolas Le Novère; Camille Laibe

BackgroundQuantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems are used to answer a variety of questions in the biological sciences. The number of published quantitative models is growing steadily thanks to increasing interest in the use of models as well as the development of improved software systems and the availability of better, cheaper computer hardware. To maximise the benefits of this growing body of models, the field needs centralised model repositories that will encourage, facilitate and promote model dissemination and reuse. Ideally, the models stored in these repositories should be extensively tested and encoded in community-supported and standardised formats. In addition, the models and their components should be cross-referenced with other resources in order to allow their unambiguous identification.DescriptionBioModels Database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/ is aimed at addressing exactly these needs. It is a freely-accessible online resource for storing, viewing, retrieving, and analysing published, peer-reviewed quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. The structure and behaviour of each simulation model distributed by BioModels Database are thoroughly checked; in addition, model elements are annotated with terms from controlled vocabularies as well as linked to relevant data resources. Models can be examined online or downloaded in various formats. Reaction network diagrams generated from the models are also available in several formats. BioModels Database also provides features such as online simulation and the extraction of components from large scale models into smaller submodels. Finally, the system provides a range of web services that external software systems can use to access up-to-date data from the database.ConclusionsBioModels Database has become a recognised reference resource for systems biology. It is being used by the community in a variety of ways; for example, it is used to benchmark different simulation systems, and to study the clustering of models based upon their annotations. Model deposition to the database today is advised by several publishers of scientific journals. The models in BioModels Database are freely distributed and reusable; the underlying software infrastructure is also available from SourceForge https://sourceforge.net/projects/biomodels/ under the GNU General Public License.


Science Signaling | 2006

Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems

William S. Hlavacek; James R. Faeder; Michael L. Blinov; Richard G. Posner; Michael Hucka; Walter Fontana

Formalized rules for protein-protein interactions have recently been introduced to represent the binding and enzymatic activities of proteins in cellular signaling. Rules encode an understanding of how a system works in terms of the biomolecules in the system and their possible states and interactions. A set of rules can be as easy to read as a diagrammatic interaction map, but unlike most such maps, rules have precise interpretations. Rules can be processed to automatically generate a mathematical or computational model for a system, which enables explanatory and predictive insights into the system’s behavior. Rules are independent units of a model specification that facilitate model revision. Instead of changing a large number of equations or lines of code, as may be required in the case of a conventional mathematical model, a protein interaction can be introduced or modified simply by adding or changing a single rule that represents the interaction of interest. Rules can be defined and visualized by using graphs, so no specialized training in mathematics or computer science is necessary to create models or to take advantage of the representational precision of rules. Rules can be encoded in a machine-readable format to enable electronic storage and exchange of models, as well as basic knowledge about protein-protein interactions. Here, we review the motivation for rule-based modeling; applications of the approach; and issues that arise in model specification, simulation, and testing. We also discuss rule visualization and exchange and the software available for rule-based modeling. Signaling molecules that control cellular regulation operate in complex networks of molecular interactions within the cell. Many of the individual proteins undergo multiple posttranslational modifications and can thus exist in numerous biochemically distinct states. We explore how mathematical models can cope with such complexity when intuition is insufficient to understand a regulatory scheme. We review approaches to creation of mathematical models of signaling systems with strategies that keep the models from being unwieldy but still allow them to accurately reflect biological systems. We discuss the translation of information about such signaling pathways into a computer-readable language that could allow interoperability of various models. The review has 10 figures and 155 citations and contains Web links to Web sites relevant to the various modeling efforts discussed.


Bioinformatics | 2008

LibSBML: An API Library for SBML

Benjamin J. Bornstein; Sarah M. Keating; Akiya Jouraku; Michael Hucka

UNLABELLED LibSBML is an application programming interface library for reading, writing, manipulating and validating content expressed in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) format. It is written in ISO C and C++, provides language bindings for Common Lisp, Java, Python, Perl, MATLAB and Octave, and includes many features that facilitate adoption and use of both SBML and the library. Developers can embed libSBML in their applications, saving themselves the work of implementing their own SBML parsing, manipulation and validation software. AVAILABILITY LibSBML 3 was released in August 2007. Source code, binaries and documentation are freely available under LGPL open-source terms from http://sbml.org/software/libsbml.


Molecular Systems Biology | 2014

Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology

Mélanie Courtot; Nick Juty; Christian Knüpfer; Dagmar Waltemath; Anna Zhukova; Andreas Dräger; Michel Dumontier; Andrew Finney; Martin Golebiewski; Janna Hastings; Stefan Hoops; Sarah M. Keating; Douglas B. Kell; Samuel Kerrien; James Lawson; Allyson L. Lister; James Lu; Rainer Machné; Pedro Mendes; Matthew Pocock; Nicolas Rodriguez; Alice Villéger; Darren J. Wilkinson; Sarala M. Wimalaratne; Camille Laibe; Michael Hucka; Nicolas Le Novère

The use of computational modeling to describe and analyze biological systems is at the heart of systems biology. Model structures, simulation descriptions and numerical results can be encoded in structured formats, but there is an increasing need to provide an additional semantic layer. Semantic information adds meaning to components of structured descriptions to help identify and interpret them unambiguously. Ontologies are one of the tools frequently used for this purpose. We describe here three ontologies created specifically to address the needs of the systems biology community. The Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) provides semantic information about the model components. The Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology (KiSAO) supplies information about existing algorithms available for the simulation of systems biology models, their characterization and interrelationships. The Terminology for the Description of Dynamics (TEDDY) categorizes dynamical features of the simulation results and general systems behavior. The provision of semantic information extends a models longevity and facilitates its reuse. It provides useful insight into the biology of modeled processes, and may be used to make informed decisions on subsequent simulation experiments.


BMC Systems Biology | 2011

Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML - The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language

Dagmar Waltemath; Richard Adams; Frank Bergmann; Michael Hucka; Fedor A. Kolpakov; Andrew K. Miller; Ion I. Moraru; David Nickerson; Sven Sahle; Jacky L. Snoep; Nicolas Le Novère

BackgroundThe increasing use of computational simulation experiments to inform modern biological research creates new challenges to annotate, archive, share and reproduce such experiments. The recently published Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) proposes a minimal set of information that should be provided to allow the reproduction of simulation experiments among users and software tools.ResultsIn this article, we present the Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML). SED-ML encodes in a computer-readable exchange format the information required by MIASE to enable reproduction of simulation experiments. It has been developed as a community project and it is defined in a detailed technical specification and additionally provides an XML schema. The version of SED-ML described in this publication is Level 1 Version 1. It covers the description of the most frequent type of simulation experiments in the area, namely time course simulations. SED-ML documents specify which models to use in an experiment, modifications to apply on the models before using them, which simulation procedures to run on each model, what analysis results to output, and how the results should be presented. These descriptions are independent of the underlying model implementation. SED-ML is a software-independent format for encoding the description of simulation experiments; it is not specific to particular simulation tools. Here, we demonstrate that with the growing software support for SED-ML we can effectively exchange executable simulation descriptions.ConclusionsWith SED-ML, software can exchange simulation experiment descriptions, enabling the validation and reuse of simulation experiments in different tools. Authors of papers reporting simulation experiments can make their simulation protocols available for other scientists to reproduce the results. Because SED-ML is agnostic about exact modeling language(s) used, experiments covering models from different fields of research can be accurately described and combined.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2015

BioModels: ten-year anniversary

Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Nick Juty; Ishan Ajmera; Raza Ali; Marine Dumousseau; Mihai Glont; Michael Hucka; Gaël Jalowicki; Sarah M. Keating; Vincent Knight-Schrijver; Audald Lloret-Villas; Kedar Nath Natarajan; Jean-Baptiste Pettit; Nicolas Rodriguez; Michael Schubert; Sarala M. Wimalaratne; Yangyang Zhao; Henning Hermjakob; Nicolas Le Novère; Camille Laibe

BioModels (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/) is a repository of mathematical models of biological processes. A large set of models is curated to verify both correspondence to the biological process that the model seeks to represent, and reproducibility of the simulation results as described in the corresponding peer-reviewed publication. Many models submitted to the database are annotated, cross-referencing its components to external resources such as database records, and terms from controlled vocabularies and ontologies. BioModels comprises two main branches: one is composed of models derived from literature, while the second is generated through automated processes. BioModels currently hosts over 1200 models derived directly from the literature, as well as in excess of 140 000 models automatically generated from pathway resources. This represents an approximate 60-fold growth for literature-based model numbers alone, since BioModels’ first release a decade ago. This article describes updates to the resource over this period, which include changes to the user interface, the annotation profiles of models in the curation pipeline, major infrastructure changes, ability to perform online simulations and the availability of model content in Linked Data form. We also outline planned improvements to cope with a diverse array of new challenges.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Hucka's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Finney

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah M. Keating

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolas Rodriguez

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John C. Doyle

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge