Luke P. Akard

High-Dose Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: High Rates of Rapid Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses

PURPOSE Long-term clinical outcome data have established imatinib 400 mg/d as standard front-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). PATIENTS AND METHODS The Rationale and Insight for Gleevec High-Dose Therapy (RIGHT) trial is a multicenter study of imatinib 400 mg twice a day as initial therapy in 115 patients (70% Sokal low risk) with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase who were observed for both molecular and cytogenetic responses for up to 18 months. Eighty-three patients (72%) completed the study, 10 patients (9%) discontinued the study because of adverse events, and six patients (5%) discontinued because of unsatisfactory therapeutic effect. RESULTS Polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated rapid kinetics of major molecular response (MMR), with 48% of patients achieving MMR by 6 months, 54% by 12 months, and 63% by 18 months. Corresponding complete molecular response rates were 39%, 44%, and 55%, respectively. Median dose-intensity was 98%. Overall, 79% of patients who received at least 90% dose-intensity achieved MMR. The most frequent adverse events included myelosuppression, rash, fatigue, and musculoskeletal symptoms. CONCLUSION This study suggests that imatinib 400 mg twice a day results in more rapid reduction in tumor burden than imatinib 400 mg/d with minimal added toxicity.

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood

Hematopoietic stem cells can be collected from the peripheral blood. These hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), or better progenitor cells, are mostly expressed as the percentage of cells than react with CD34 antibodies or that form colonies in semi‐solid medium (CFU‐GM). Under steady‐state conditions the number of HSC is much lower in peripheral blood than in bone marrow. Mobilization with chemotherapy and/or growth factors may lead to a concentration of HSC in the peripheral blood that equals or exceeds the concentration in bone marrow. Transplantation of HSC from the peripheral blood results in faster hematologic recovery than HSC from bone marrow. This decreases the risk of infection and the need for blood‐product support. For autologous stem‐cell transplantation (SCT), the use of peripheral blood cells has completely replaced the use of bone marrow. For allogeneic SCT, on the other hand, the situation is more complex. Since peripheral blood contains more T‐lymphocytes than bone marow, the use of HSC from the peripheral blood increases the risk of graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic SCT. For patients with goodrisk leukemia, bone marrow is still preferred, but for patients with high‐risk disease, peripheral blood SCT has become the therapy of choice.

Alpha-Interferon and Immune Hemolytic Anemia

Excerpt To the editor: Interferons have been shown to cause regression in several malignancies (1-3). Although the proper role of interferons in the treatment of cancer has yet to be defined, they ...

Effects of extensive splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing a reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Changes in spleen size postallogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with primary myelofibrosis have been poorly characterized. We analysed 10 patients with myelofibrosis and splenomegaly following a reduced‐intensity allogeneic HSCT. All patients fully engrafted donor cells including five patients with extensive splenomegaly. Extensive splenomegaly was associated with a prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet recovery. In all 10 patients, a progressive reduction of splenomegaly was documented within 12 months post‐transplant and paralleled the reduction of marrow fibrosis. These findings suggest that myelofibrosis patients with extensive splenomegaly may proceed with allogeneic HSCT without prior splenectomy.

Final Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Patients With Chronic- or Accelerated-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results With 24 Months of Follow-Up

Omacetaxine, a protein synthesis inhibitor, is indicated in the United States for the treatment of patients with chronic‐phase (CP) or accelerated‐phase (AP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance and/or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, colony‐forming unit–granulocyte‐macrophage, or both?

BACKGROUND: The rate of hematologic recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation is influenced by the dose of progenitor cells. Enumeration of cells that express CD34+ on their surface is the most frequently used method to determine progenitor cell dose. In vitro growth of myeloid progenitor cells (colony‐forming unit–granulocyte‐macrophage [CFU‐GM]) requires more time and resources, but may add predictive information.

Infection prevention in severely myelosuppressed patients : a comparison between ciprofloxacin and a regimen of selective antibiotic modulation of the intestinal flora

PURPOSE To study whether oral ciprofloxacin would be as effective in preventing bacterial infections in severely myelosuppressed patients as selective antibiotic modulation of the gut flora with neomycin/polymyxin B sulfate/nalidixic acid (NPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and five patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplant, or induction therapy for acute leukemia in 1988 and 1989 were studied. Patients were stratified according to the type of therapy, and randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID, or a combination of oral neomycin 250 mg QID, polymyxin-B 100 mg QID, and oral nalidixic acid 1,000 mg BID. Treatment began on admission and continued until the absolute granulocyte count was greater than 500/mm3 for 3 consecutive days. RESULTS The 96 evaluable patients were evenly distributed over the 3 treatment groups; 63 patients received ciprofloxacin and 33 received NPN. Fever developed in 92% of patients on ciprofloxacin and in 97% of patients on NPN. (P = 0.66), 6.6 +/- 5.8 and 7.2 +/- 5.3 days from the start of prophylaxis, respectively. Twenty-five patients on ciprofloxacin developed 29 microbiologically documented infections, fewer than the 26 infections in the 22 patients on NPN (P = 0.02). Patients on ciprofloxacin had fewer bacteremias (33%) than did the NPN patients (55%) (P = 0.05). Gram-negative bacteremias were very rare (2 cases; no Enterobacteriaceae), but streptococcal bacteremias were frequent in both arms (27 cases). Side effects were not significantly different, but compliance with ciprofloxacin was better. CONCLUSIONS Ciprofloxacin is at least as effective as the combination of neomycin/polymyxin/nalidixic acid in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in myelosuppressed patients, and is better tolerated. Additional agents to prevent streptococcal infections are needed.

Transportation of peripheral blood progenitor cell products: effects of time, temperature and cell concentration

BACKGROUND AIMS Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) products are often transported at high cell concentrations (>200x10(9)/L) over long distances, requiring >36 h transport time. METHODS Fresh PBPC samples from 12 healthy donors were studied with various viability assays regarding the effects of temperature, cell concentration and duration of storage. RESULTS Trypan blue exclusion was far less sensitive to cell damage than two-color fluorescence for CD34 and 7-AAD, and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assays; the latter assay proved the most sensitive. All products stored at 4 degrees C maintained their viability for up to 4 days. Thus, at 96 h, recovery of viable CD34(+) cells was still 82%, and of CFU-GM 57%, even at concentrations of 200x10(9)/L. Higher storage temperatures rapidly decreased the viability, with extensive variation between donors. At room temperature 80% of viable CD34(+) cells and >90% of CFU-GM were lost after 48 h of storage at 200x10(9)/L. Lower cell concentrations allowed storage at higher temperatures: at 17 degrees C a concentration of 50x10(9)/L resulted in only 5% loss of viable CD34(+) cells after 48 h, while the loss was >30% at 200x10(9)/L. CONCLUSIONS PBPC products should be transported at 4 degrees C. Dilution of the product may partly compensate for slightly higher temperatures. Trypan blue exclusion should be abandoned as a method for assessing viability after prolonged transportation. Proliferative assays should be used to validate transportation conditions.

Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: Enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective

Using matched-pair analysis, we compared two popular methods of stem cell mobilization in 24 advanced-stage breast cancer patients who underwent two consecutive mobilizing procedures as part of a tandem transplant protocol. For the first cycle, 10 microg/kg/day granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given and apheresis commenced on day 4 and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). One week after the first cycle of apheresis, 4000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/m2 etoposide, and 10 microg/kg G-CSF were administered for < or =16 days (cycle 2). Apheresis was initiated when the white blood cell (WBC) count exceeded 5000 cells/microL and continued for < or =5 days (median 3 days). Mean values of peripheral blood WBC (31,700+/-3200 vs. 30,700+/-3300/microL) were not significantly different between cycles 1 and 2. Mean number of mononuclear cells (MNC) collected per day was slightly greater with G-CSF mobilization than with the combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF (2.5+/-0.21x10(8) vs. 1.8+/-0.19x10(8) cells/kg). Mean daily CD34+ cell yield, however, was nearly six times higher (12.9+/-4.4 vs. 2.2+/-0.5x10(6)/kg; p = 0.01) with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. With G-CSF alone, 13% of aphereses reached the target dose of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one collection vs. 57% with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Transfusions of red blood cells or platelets were necessary in 18 of 24 patients in cycle 2. Three patients were hospitalized with fever for a median of 3 days after cycle 2. No patients received transfusions or required hospitalization during mobilization with G-CSF alone. Resource utilization (cost of drugs, aphereses, cryopreservation, transfusions, hospitalization) was calculated comparing the median number of collections to obtain a target CD34+ cell dose of 5x10(6) cells/kg: four using G-CSF vs. one using the combination in this data set. Resources for G-CSF mobilization cost

Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF

7326 vs.