Lupe G. Salazar

Concurrent Trastuzumab and HER2/neu-Specific Vaccination in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE The primary objectives of this phase I/II study were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of combination therapy consisting of concurrent trastuzumab and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu-specific vaccination in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-two patients with stage IV HER2/neu-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab therapy were vaccinated with an HER2/neu T-helper peptide-based vaccine. Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute criteria, and antigen specific T-cell immunity was assessed by interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. Data on progression-free and overall survival were collected. RESULTS Concurrent trastuzumab and HER2/neu vaccinations were well tolerated, with 15% of patients experiencing an asymptomatic decline in left ventricular ejection fraction below the normal range during combination therapy. Although many patients had pre-existing immunity specific for HER2/neu and other breast cancer antigens while treated with trastuzumab alone, that immunity could be significantly boosted and maintained with vaccination. Epitope spreading within HER2/neu and to additional tumor-related proteins was stimulated by immunization, and the magnitude of the T-cell response generated was significantly inversely correlated with serum transforming growth factor beta levels. At a median follow-up of 36 months from the first vaccine, the median overall survival in the study population has not been reached. CONCLUSION Combination therapy with trastuzumab and a HER2/neu vaccine is associated with minimal toxicity and results in prolonged, robust, antigen-specific immune responses in treated patients.

Effect of dose on immune response in patients vaccinated with an HER-2/neu intracellular domain protein-based vaccine

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety of an HER-2/neu intracellular domain (ICD) protein vaccine and to estimate whether vaccine dose impacts immunogenicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast or ovarian cancer and with no evidence of disease after standard therapy received a low- (25 microg), intermediate- (150 microg), or high-dose (900 microg) HER-2/neu ICD protein vaccine. The vaccine was administered intradermally, monthly for 6 months, with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant. Toxicity and both cellular and humoral HER-2/neu-specific immunity was evaluated. RESULTS The vaccine was well tolerated. The majority of patients (89%) developed HER-2/neu ICD-specific T-cell immunity. The dose of vaccine did not predict the magnitude of the T-cell response. The majority of patients (82%) also developed HER-2/neu-specific immunoglobulin G antibody immunity. Vaccine dose did not predict magnitude or avidity of the HER-2/neu-specific humoral immune response. Time to development of detectable HER-2/neu-specific immunity, however, was significantly earlier for the high- versus low-dose vaccine group (P =.003). Over half the patients retained HER-2/neu-specific T-cell immunity 9 to 12 months after immunizations had ended. CONCLUSION The HER-2/neu ICD protein vaccine was well tolerated and effective in eliciting HER-2/neu-specific T-cell and antibody immunity in the majority of breast and ovarian cancer patients who completed the vaccine regimen. Although the dose of vaccine did not impact the magnitude of T-cell or antibody immunity elicited, patients receiving the highest dose developed HER-2/neu-specific immunity more rapidly than those who received the lowest dose.

CD4 regulatory T cells in human cancer pathogenesis

Over the past decade, there has been an accelerated understanding of immune regulatory mechanisms. Peripheral immune regulation is linked to a collection of specialized regulatory cells of the CD4+ T cell lineage (i.e., CD4+ Tregs). This collection consists of Tregs that are either thymically derived (i.e., natural) or peripherally induced. Tregs are important for controlling potentially autoreactive immune effectors and immunity to foreign organisms and molecules. Their importance in maintaining immune homeostasis and the overall health of an organism is clear. However, Tregs may also be involved in the pathogenesis of malignancies as now compelling evidence shows that tumors induce or recruit CD4+ Tregs to block immune priming and antitumor effectors. Efforts are underway to develop approaches that specifically inhibit the function of tumor-associated Tregs which could lead to an increased capability of the body’s immune system to respond to tumors but without off-target immune-related pathologies (i.e., autoimmune disease). In this review, the biology of human CD4+ Tregs is discussed along with their involvement in malignancies and emerging strategies to block their function.

Antibody Immunity to the p53 Oncogenic Protein Is a Prognostic Indicator in Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE Presence of intratumoral T-cell infiltration has been linked to improved survival in ovarian cancer patients. We questioned whether antibody immunity specific for ovarian cancer tumor antigens would predict disease outcome. We evaluated humoral immune responses against ovarian cancer antigens p53, HER-2/neu, and topoisomerase IIalpha. PATIENTS AND METHODS Serum was collected from 104 women (median age, 59 years; range, 34 to 89 years) at the time of their initial definitive surgery for ovarian cancer. Serum was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to p53, HER-2/neu, and topoisomerase IIalpha proteins. Antibody immunity to tetanus toxoid was assessed as a control. The incidence of humoral immunity at the time of diagnosis to any of these three antigens was tabulated. For patients with advanced-stage disease (III/IV), correlation was made between the presence of tumor-specific immunity at the time of diagnosis and overall survival. Patients were followed for a median of 1.8 years. RESULTS Multivariate analysis showed the presence of p53 antibodies to be an independent variable for prediction of overall survival in advanced-stage patients. Overall survival was significantly higher for patients with antibodies to p53 when compared with patients without p53 antibodies (P = .01). The median survival for p53 antibody-positive patients was 51 months (95% CI, 23.5 to 60.5 months) compared with 24 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 28.6 months) for patients without antibodies to p53. CONCLUSION Data presented here demonstrate that advanced stage ovarian cancer patients can have detectable tumor-specific antibody immunity and that immunity to p53 may predict improved overall survival in patients with advanced-stage disease.

Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers

Purpose: To facilitate development of innovative immunotherapy approaches, especially for treatment concepts exploiting the potential benefits of personalized therapy, there is a need to develop and validate tools to identify patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. Despite substantial effort, we do not yet know which parameters of antitumor immunity to measure and which assays are optimal for those measurements. Experimental Design: The iSBTc-SITC (International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer), FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and NCI (National Cancer Institute) partnered to address these issues for immunotherapy of cancer. Here, we review the major challenges, give examples of approaches and solutions, and present our recommendations. Results and Conclusions: Although specific immune parameters and assays are not yet validated, we recommend following standardized (accurate, precise, and reproducible) protocols and use of functional assays for the primary immunologic readouts of a trial; consideration of central laboratories for immune monitoring of large, multi-institutional trials; and standardized testing of several phenotypic and functional potential potency assays specific to any cellular product. When reporting results, the full QA (quality assessment)/QC (quality control) should be conducted and selected examples of truly representative raw data and assay performance characteristics should be included. Finally, to promote broader analysis of multiple aspects of immunity, and gather data on variability, we recommend that in addition to cells and serum, RNA and DNA samples be banked (under standardized conditions) for later testing. We also recommend that sufficient blood be drawn to allow for planned testing of the primary hypothesis being addressed in the trial, and that additional baseline and posttreatment blood is banked for testing novel hypotheses (or generating new hypotheses) that arise in the field. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3064–76. ©2011 AACR.

Level of HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer may affect the development of endogenous HER-2/neu-specific immunity

We questioned whether the incidence or magnitude of the humoral or cellular immune response to the self-tumor antigen HER-2/neu is influenced by the level of HER-2/neu protein overexpression as defined by immunohistochemical staining of tumors in breast cancer patients. We obtained peripheral blood from 104 women with stage II, III, and IV pathologically confirmed HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer. Patients were categorized with +1 (n = 14), +2 (n = 20), or +3 (n = 70) HER-2/neu overexpression by institutional pathologic report. Circulating antibodies to HER-2/neu were evaluated using ELISA. T-cell responses to HER-2/neu were measured using an antigen-specific tritiated thymidine incorporation assay. Eighty-two percent of subjects with HER-2/neu antibodies were +3 overexpressors compared with 18% +2 overexpressors and 0% +1 overexpressors, a highly significant difference (P < 0.001), and there were significant differences in the magnitude of the HER-2/neu-specific antibodies between groups with varying HER-2/neu protein expression (P = 0.022). In addition, 65% of subjects with HER-2/neu-specific T cells were +3 overexpressors compared with 16% +2 overexpressors and 19% +1 overexpressors (P = 0.001). Data presented here indicate that endogenous HER-2/neu-specific humoral and T-cell immunity is greater in patients with +3 protein overexpression in their tumors than in patients with lower levels of HER-2/neu expression. Overexpression of a self-tumor-associated protein is a potential mechanism by which immunogenicity is enhanced and may aid in the identification of biologically relevant proteins to target for immune-based molecular cancer therapies. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(3):449–54]

Recognition of breast cancer cells by CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell clones specific for NY-BR-1.

Immunotherapy for breast cancer using cytotoxic T cells (CTL) is hindered by the lack of well-characterized breast cancer antigens that are expressed in most breast tumor cells and recognized by CD8+ CTL. A recently described breast tissue differentiation antigen, NY-BR-1, is expressed in >80% breast tumors and elicits a humoral response in a subset of breast cancer patients. To identify potential NY-BR-1 epitopes that are recognized by CTL, CD8+ T cells were stimulated in vitro with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with NY-BR-1 peptides that were predicted to bind to HLA-A2. In multiple normal female donors and breast cancer patients, specific CD8+ CTL responses were detected by enzyme-linked immunospot assay against several NY-BR-1 peptides after two cycles of stimulation. CD8+ CTL clones against three NY-BR-1 epitopes were isolated and recognized peptide-pulsed target cells with high avidity. T-cell clones specific for one of the NY-BR-1 epitopes (p904) also recognized breast tumor cells expressing NY-BR-1, NY-BR-1(-) cells transfected with a cDNA encoding the NY-BR-1 protein, and autologous dendritic cells pulsed with opsonized NY-BR-1+ breast tumor cells. Taken together, these results show that the p904 epitope derived from NY-BR-1 is efficiently processed and presented endogenously and identify NY-BR-1 as a promising target for T-cell-based immunotherapy for breast cancer.

Tumor Antigen ^ Specific T-Cell Expansion Is Greatly Facilitated by In vivo Priming

Purpose: Adoptive T-cell therapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with established tumors but is often limited to specific cancers where tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the source of T cells for ex vivo culture, can be obtained. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of expanding HER-2/neu–specific T cells derived from peripheral blood ex vivo following in vivo priming with a HER-2/neu peptide vaccine. Experimental Design: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cytomegalovirus (CMV)–seronegative and CMV-seropositive donors as well as HER-2/neu–positive cancer patients who had or had not been vaccinated with a HER-2/neu peptide–based vaccine was used as a source of T lymphocytes. Antigen-specific T-cell lines were generated by in vitro stimulation with antigen followed by nonspecific expansion on CD3/CD28 beads. The ability to expand antigen-specific T cells was assessed using IFN-γ and granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot. The phenotype of the resultant T-cell lines was evaluated by flow cytometry, including the presence of FOXP3-expressing CD4+ T cells. Results: The frequencies of CMV-specific T cells generated from CMV+ donors were >11-fold higher than the frequencies from CMV− donors (P = 0.001), with 22-fold increase of total number of CD3+ T cells. The frequencies of HER-2/neu–specific T cells generated from the primed patients were >25-fold higher than the frequencies from unvaccinated patients (P = 0.006), with an average of a 19-fold increase of total number of CD3+ T cells. Using peripheral blood as the source of T cells did not result in concurrent expansion of FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells despite the use of interleukin-2 in in vitro culture. Both CD4+ and CD8+ HER-2/neu–specific T cells could be expanded. The extent of ex vivo expansion correlated with the magnitude of immunity achieved during immunization (P = 0.008). Conclusion: Tumor-specific T cells can be efficiently expanded from the peripheral blood ex vivo following in vivo priming with a vaccine. This approach provides an effective method to generate tumor-specific polyclonal T cells for therapeutic use that could be applied to cancer patients with any tumor type.

Cancer Vaccines: The Role of Tumor Burden in Tipping the Scale Toward Vaccine Efficacy

Cancer vaccines have significant theoretical therapeutic advantages over more standard methods of cancer treatment. If a robust cellular immune response could be elicited, then immunologic memory could be long lasting, eradicatingcancerattimesquitedistantfrominitialtherapy.Tcells potentiallycanmigratetotumorsites,leavethevasculature, and invade tissues eradicating deep-seated disease at any metastatic site. Furthermore, T cells are extremely specific in their attack, as opposed to the generalized toxicities seen with some chemotherapies. Finally, as long as there is antigen available for T-cell recognition, T cells have the potential to continue to respond until disease is eradicated. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, investigators fromWalterReedArmyMedicalCenter(Washington,DC) and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) present data from a trial in which breast cancer patients were immunized with a vaccine targeting the HER-2/neu oncogenic protein to prevent disease relapse. 1

Immunologic principles and immunotherapeutic approaches in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is an immunogenic tumor, and numerous antigens have been identified in recent years. Several of these antigens are important in regulating tumor growth and may be ideal targets for the development of immune-based strategies. In the absence of immunologic intervention, tumors evade the immune system by several mechanisms, most notably tolerance and immunosuppression. As understanding of the immune response improves, strategies are being designed to circumvent T-cell tolerance to self-antigens through modulation of APC function. In addition, techniques are being developed to identify reverse ovarian cancer-induced immune evasion tactics. The type of the immune-based therapy to apply varies with disease burden. It is hoped that discoveries at the bench along with lessons learned in prior clinical trials soon will allow clinicians to develop rationally based immunologic strategies to treat and prevent ovarian cancer.