Lynda Hanson
Royal Botanic Gardens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lynda Hanson.
Annals of Botany | 2008
Ilia J. Leitch; Lynda Hanson; K.Y. Lim; Ales Kovarik; Mark W. Chase; James J. Clarkson; Andrew R. Leitch
BACKGROUND In studies looking at individual polyploid species, the most common patterns of genomic change are that either genome size in the polyploid is additive (i.e. the sum of parental genome donors) or there is evidence of genome downsizing. Reports showing an increase in genome size are rare. In a large-scale analysis of 3008 species, genome downsizing was shown to be a widespread biological response to polyploidy. Polyploidy in the genus Nicotiana (Solanaceae) is common with approx. 40 % of the approx. 75 species being allotetraploid. Recent advances in understanding phylogenetic relationships of Nicotiana species and dating polyploid formation enable a temporal dimension to be added to the analysis of genome size evolution in these polyploids. METHODS Genome sizes were measured in 18 species of Nicotiana (nine diploids and nine polyploids) ranging in age from <200,000 years to approx. 4.5 Myr old, to determine the direction and extent of genome size change following polyploidy. These data were combined with data from genomic in situ hybridization and increasing amounts of information on sequence composition in Nicotiana to provide insights into the molecular basis of genome size changes. KEY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS By comparing the expected genome size of the polyploid (based on summing the genome size of species identified as either a parent or most closely related to the diploid progenitors) with the observed genome size, four polyploids showed genome downsizing and five showed increases. There was no discernable pattern in the direction of genome size change with age of polyploids, although with increasing age the amount of genome size change increased. In older polyploids (approx. 4.5 million years old) the increase in genome size was associated with loss of detectable genomic in situ hybridization signal, whereas some hybridization signal was still detected in species exhibiting genome downsizing. The possible significance of these results is discussed.
Annals of Botany | 2009
Ilia J. Leitch; Imalka M. Kahandawala; Jan Suda; Lynda Hanson; Martin J. Ingrouille; Mark W. Chase; Michael F. Fay
BACKGROUND The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable groups with genome sizes varying nearly 2000-fold. Nevertheless within angiosperms the majority of families are characterized by genomes which are small and vary little. Species with large genomes are mostly restricted to a few monocots families including Orchidaceae. SCOPE A survey of the literature revealed that genome size data for Orchidaceae are comparatively rare representing just 327 species. Nevertheless they reveal that Orchidaceae are currently the most variable angiosperm family with genome sizes ranging 168-fold (1C = 0.33-55.4 pg). Analysing the data provided insights into the distribution, evolution and possible consequences to the plant of this genome size diversity. CONCLUSIONS Superimposing the data onto the increasingly robust phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae revealed how different subfamilies were characterized by distinct genome size profiles. Epidendroideae possessed the greatest range of genome sizes, although the majority of species had small genomes. In contrast, the largest genomes were found in subfamilies Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae. Genome size evolution within this subfamily was analysed as this is the only one with reasonable representation of data. This approach highlighted striking differences in genome size and karyotype evolution between the closely related Cypripedium, Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium. As to the consequences of genome size diversity, various studies revealed that this has both practical (e.g. application of genetic fingerprinting techniques) and biological consequences (e.g. affecting where and when an orchid may grow) and emphasizes the importance of obtaining further genome size data given the considerable phylogenetic gaps which have been highlighted by the current study.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology | 2007
Ilia J. Leitch; Jeremy M. Beaulieu; K. Cheung; Lynda Hanson; Martin A. Lysak; Michael F. Fay
Most angiosperms possess small genomes (mode 1C = 0.6 pg, median 1C = 2.9 pg). Those with truly enormous genomes (i.e. ≥ 35 pg) are phylogenetically restricted to a few families and include Liliaceae – with species possessing some of the largest genomes so far reported for any plant as well as including species with much smaller genomes. To gain insights into when and where genome size expansion took place during the evolution of Liliaceae and the mode and tempo of this change, data for 78 species were superimposed onto a phylogenetic tree and analysed. Results suggest that genome size in Liliaceae followed a punctuated rather than gradual mode of evolution and that most of the diversification evolved recently rather than early in the evolution of the family. We consider that the large genome sizes of Liliaceae may have emerged passively rather than being driven primarily by selection.
Plant Systematics and Evolution | 1998
Paula J. Rudall; E. Mark Engleman; Lynda Hanson; Mark W. Chase
A detailed description of ovule development and embryology ofHemiphylacus alatostylus is given, together with a chromosome count and karyotype. Comparative data are presented forAsparagus andAnemarrhena, since earlier analysis ofrbcL sequence data indicated a relationship between them.Hemiphylacus should be included inAsparagaceae. A close relationship between them is strongly supported byrbcL analysis, and they are further linked by the shape and histology of the fertilised ovule. However, both morphological and molecular data indicate thatAnemarrhena is a more isolated taxon.
Annals of Botany | 1998
Michael D. Bennett; Ilia J. Leitch; Lynda Hanson
Annals of Botany | 2002
Renate Obermayer; Ilia J. Leitch; Lynda Hanson; Michael D. Bennett
Annals of Botany | 2005
Mark W. Chase; Lynda Hanson; Victor A. Albert; W. Mark Whitten; Norris H. Williams
Annals of Botany | 2001
Lynda Hanson; Kathryn A. McMahon; Margaret A. T. Johnson; Michael D. Bennett
Annals of Botany | 2001
Ilia J. Leitch; Lynda Hanson; Mark Winfield; John S. Parker; Michael D. Bennett
Annals of Botany | 2001
Lynda Hanson; Kathryn A. McMahon; Margaret A. T. Johnson; Michael D. Bennett