Lynn Verhey

Advanced prostate cancer: The results of a randomized comparative trial of high dose irradiation boosting with conformal protons compared with conventional dose irradiation using photons alone☆

PURPOSE Following a thorough Phase I/II study, we evaluated by a Phase III trial high versus conventional dose external beam irradiation as mono-therapy for patients with Stage T3-T4 prostate cancer. Patient outcome following standard dose radiotherapy or following a 12.5% increase in total dose to 75.6 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) using a conformal perineal proton boost was compared for local tumor control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS Stage T3-T4, Nx, N0-2, M0 patients received 50.4 Gy by four-field photons and were randomized to receive either an additional 25.2 CGE by conformal protons (arm 1--the high dose arm, 103 patients, total dose 75.6 CGE) or an additional 16.8 Gy by photons (arm 2--the conventional dose arm, 99 patients, total dose 67.2 Gy). Actuarial overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), total recurrence-free survival (TRFS), (clinically free, prostate specific antigen (PSA) less than 4ng/ml and a negative prostate rebiopsy, done in 38 patients without evidence of disease) and local control (digital rectal exam and rebiopsy negative) were evaluated. RESULTS The protocol completion rate was 90% for arm 1 and 97% for arm 2. With a median follow-up of 61 months (range 3 to 139 months) 135 patients are alive and 67 have died, 20 from causes other than prostate cancer. We found no significant differences in OS, DSS, TRFS or local control between the two arms. Among those completing randomized treatment (93 in arm 1 and 96 in arm 2), the local control at 5 and 8 years for arm 1 is 92% and 77%, respectively and is 80% and 60%, respectively for arm 2 (p = .089) and there are no significant differences in OS, DSS, and TRFS. The local control for the 57 patients with poorly differentiated (Gleason 4 or 5 of 5) tumors at 5 and 8 years for arm 1 is 94% and 84% and is 64% and 19% on arm 2 (p = 0.0014). In patients whose digital rectal exam had normalized following treatment and underwent prostate rebiopsy there was a lower positive rebiopsy rate for arm 1 versus arm 2 patients (28 vs. 45%) and also for those with well and moderately differentiated tumors versus poorly differentiated tumors (32 and 50%). These differences were not statistically significant. Grade 1 and 2 rectal bleeding is higher (32 vs. 12%, p = 0.002) as may be urethral stricture (19 vs. 8%, p = 0.07) in the arm 1 versus arm 2. CONCLUSIONS An increase in prostate tumor dose by external beam of 12.5% to 75.6 CGE by a conformal proton boost compared to a conventional dose of 67.2 Gy by a photon boost significantly improved local control only in patients with poorly differentiated tumors. It has increased late radiation sequelae, and as yet, has not increased overall survival, disease-specific survival, or total recurrence-free survival in any subgroup. These results have led us to test by a subsequent Phase III trial the potential beneficial effect on local control and disease-specific survival of a 12.5% increase in total dose relative to conventional dose in patients with T1, T2a, and T2b tumors.

Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans with conventional treatment plans for a case of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study case was planned using two types of IMRT techniques, as well as a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT), and a traditional treatment method using bilateral opposing fields. These four plans were compared with respect to dose conformality, dose-volume histogram (DVH), dose to the sensitive normal tissue structures, and ease of treatment delivery. RESULTS The planned dose distributions were more conformal to the tumor target volume in the IMRT plans than those in the conventional plans. With similar dose coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), defined as delivery of minimum of 60 Gy to >/= 95% of CTV, the IMRT plans achieved better sensitive normal tissue structure sparing, while concomitantly delivering a minimum dose of 68 Gy to >/= 95% of the gross tumor volume (GTV) at a higher dose per fraction. CONCLUSIONS Compared to conventional techniques, IMRT techniques provide improved tumor target coverage with significantly better sparing of sensitive normal tissue structures in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. With improvement of the delivery efficiency, IMRT should provide the optimal treatment for all nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Further studies are needed to establish the true clinical advantage of this new modality.

Three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the University of California–San Francisco experience

PURPOSE To review our experience with three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the records of 35 patients who underwent 3D IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the University of California-San Francisco between April 1995 and March 1998. According to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification, 4 (12%) patients had Stage I disease, 6 (17%) had Stage II, 11 (32%) had Stage III, and 14 (40%) had Stage IV disease. IMRT of the primary tumor was delivered using one of the following three techniques: (1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, (2) computer-controlled autosequencing static multileaf collimator (MLC), and (3) Peacock system using a dynamic multivane intensity-modulating collimator (MIMiC). A forward 3D treatment-planning system was used for the first two methods, and an inverse treatment planning system was used for the third method. The neck was irradiated with a conventional technique using lateral opposed fields to the upper neck and an anterior field to the lower neck and supraclavicular fossae. The prescribed dose was 65-70 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), and 50-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck. Eleven (32%) patients had fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost to the primary tumor 1-2 weeks following external beam radiotherapy. Thirty-two (91%) patients also received cisplatin during, and cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil after, radiotherapy. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Local-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 5-49 months), the local-regional progression-free rate was 100%. The 4-year overall survival was 94%, and the distant metastasis-free rate was 57%. The worst acute toxicity was Grade 2 in 16 (46%) patients, Grade 3 in 18 (51%) patients and Grade 4 in 1 (3%) patient. The worst late toxicity was Grade 1 in 15 (43%), Grade 2 in 13 (37%), and Grade 3 in 5 (14%) patients. Only 1 patient had a transient Grade 4 soft-tissue necrosis. At 24 months after treatment, 50% of the evaluated patients had Grade 0, 50% had Grade 1, and none had Grade 2 xerostomia. Analysis of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) showed that the average maximum, mean, and minimum dose delivered were 79.5 Gy, 75.8 Gy, and 56.5 Gy to the GTV, and 78.9 Gy, 71.2 Gy, and 45.4 Gy to the CTV, respectively. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 2% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. The average dose to 5% of the brain stem, optic chiasm, and right and left optic nerves was 48.3 Gy, 23.9 Gy, 15.0 Gy, and 14.9 Gy, respectively. The average dose to 1 cc of the cervical spinal cord was 41.7 Gy. The doses delivered were within the tolerance of these critical normal structures. The average dose to 50% of the right and left parotids, pituitary, right and left T-M joints, and ears was 43. 2 Gy, 41.0 Gy, 46.3 Gy, 60.5 Gy, 58.3 Gy, 52.0 Gy, and 52.2 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION 3D intensity-modulated radiotherapy provided improved target volume coverage and increased dose to the gross tumor with significant sparing of the salivary glands and other critical normal structures. Local-regional control rate with combined IMRT and chemotherapy was excellent, although distant metastasis remained unabated.

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: Relationship of dose and pattern of enhancement to local control

PURPOSE This study aimed to analyze dose, initial pattern of enhancement, and other factors associated with freedom from progression (FFP) of brain metastases after radiosurgery (RS). METHODS AND MATERIALS All brain metastases treated with gamma-knife RS at the University of California, San Francisco, from 1991 to 1994 were reviewed. Evaluable lesions were those with follow-up magnetic resonance or computed tomographic imaging. Actuarial FFP was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, measuring FFP from the date of RS to the first imaging study showing tumor progression. Controlled lesions were censored at the time of the last imaging study. Multivariate analyses were performed using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 261 lesions treated in 119 patients, 219 lesions in 100 patients were evaluable. Major histologies included adenocarcinoma (86 lesions), melanoma (77), renal cell carcinoma (21), and carcinoma not otherwise specified (17). The median prescribed RS dose was 18.5 Gy (range, 10-22) and the median tumor volume was 1.3 ml (range, 0.02-30.9). The initial pattern of contrast enhancement was homogeneous in 68% of lesions, heterogeneous in 12%, and ring-enhancing in 19%. The actuarial FFP was 82% at 6 months and 77% at 1 year for all lesions, and 93 and 90%, respectively, for 145 lesions receiving > or = 18 Gy. Multivariate analysis showed that longer FFP was significantly associated with higher prescribed RS dose, a homogeneous pattern of contrast enhancement, and a longer interval between primary diagnosis and RS. Adjusted for these factors, adenocarcinomas had longer FFP than melanomas. No significant differences in FFP were noted among lesions undergoing RS for recurrence after prior radiotherapy (119 lesions), RS alone as initial treatment (45), or RS boost (55). CONCLUSION A minimum prescribed radiosurgical dose > or = 18 Gy yields excellent local control of brain metastases. The influence of pattern of enhancement on local control, a new finding in this retrospective analysis, needs to be confirmed.

Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy.

To evaluate the use of the ultrasound-based BAT system for daily prostate alignment. Prostate alignments using the BAT system were compared with alignments using radiographic images of implanted radiopaque markers. The latter alignments were used as a reference. The difference between the BAT and marker alignments represents the displacements that would remain if the alignments were done using ultrasonography. The inter-user variability of the contour alignment process was assessed. On the basis of the marker alignments, the initial displacement of the prostate in the AP, superoinferior, and lateral direction was -0.9 +/- 3.9, 0.1 +/- 3.9, and 0.2 +/- 3.4 mm respectively. The directed differences between the BAT and marker alignments in the respective directions were 0.2 +/- 3.7, 2.7 +/- 3.9, and 1.6 +/- 3.1 mm. The occurrence of displacements >/=5 mm was reduced by a factor of two in the AP direction after the BAT system was used. Among eight users, the average range of couch shifts due to contour alignment variability was 7, 7, and 5 mm in the antero-posterior (AP), superoinferior, and lateral direction, respectively. In our study, the BAT alignments were systematically different from the marker alignments in the superoinferior, and lateral directions. The remaining random variability of the prostate position after the ultrasound-based alignment was similar to the initial variability. However, the occurrence of displacements >/=5 mm was reduced in the AP direction. The inter-user variation of the contour alignment process was significant.

MR-spectroscopy guided target delineation for high-grade gliomas☆

PURPOSE Functional/metabolic information provided by MR-spectroscopy (MRSI) suggests MRI may not be a reliable indicator of active and microscopic disease in malignant brain tumors. We assessed the impact MRSI might have on the target volumes used for radiation therapy treatment planning for high-grade gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-four patients (22 Grade III; 12 Grade IV astrocytomas) were evaluated; each had undergone MRI and MRSI studies before surgery. MRI data sets were contoured for T1 region of contrast enhancement (T1), region of necrosis, and T2 region of hyperintensity (T2). The three-dimensional MRSI peak parameters for choline (Cho) and N-acetylaspartate (NAA), acquired by a multivoxel technique, were categorized based on an abnormality index (AI), a quantitative assessment of tissue metabolite levels. The AI data were aligned to the MRI and displayed as three-dimensional contours. AI vs. T conjoint and disjoint volumes were compared. RESULTS For both grades, although T2 estimated the region at risk of microscopic disease as being as much as 50% greater than by MRSI, metabolically active tumor still extended outside the T2 region in 88% of patients by as many as 28 mm. In addition, T1 suggested a lesser volume and different location of active disease compared to MRSI. CONCLUSION The use of MRSI to define target volumes for RT treatment planning would increase, and change the location of, the volume receiving a boost dose as well as reduce the volume receiving a standard dose. Incorporation of MRSI into the treatment-planning process may have the potential to improve control while reducing complications.

Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Recent studies supported by histopathological correlation suggest that the combined use of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) allows differentiation of normal and carcinomatous prostate. The goal of this study was to use static field intensity modulated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (SF-IMRT) to treat the entire prostate to a total dose of >70 Gy, while concurrently treating a dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) defined by MRI+MRS to 90 Gy while not exceeding normal tissue tolerances. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the example chosen, the DIL consisted of a large portion of the peripheral zone of the left lobe of the prostate. University of Michigan (UM-PLAN) three-dimensional treatment planning software was used to design a partially shielded 7 field conformal isodose plan that would treat the entire prostate to >70 Gy at 1.8 Gy per day (80% isodose line), while concurrently treating the DIL to 2.25 Gy per day for a total dose of 90 Gy. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were used to compare the rectal doses to rectum and other adjacent normal tissues using these two techniques. RESULTS SF-IMRT as described, allowed a total dose of 90 Gy to encompass the DIL, while the rectal dose was slightly lower than that using the standard 7 field technique to the prostate alone. For example, the dose to 30 cm3 of the rectum was 40 Gy using SF-IMRT and 48 Gy for the standard 7 field technique. Because of differences in the dose per fraction the biologic advantages of the SF-IMRT technique are likely to be even greater. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of using SF-IMRT to treat a DIL involving a single lobe of the prostate, as defined by MRI/MRS, to 90 Gy, while simultaneously treating the prostate to >70 Gy without increasing the dose to surrounding normal tissues. A similar approach could be used to treat multifocal disease. This method of treatment is an alternative to dynamic intensity modulation. It is less expensive, and can be adapted to any radiation therapy department without the use of an inverse treatment planning programs.

Long-term results of proton beam irradiated uveal melanomas

The first 128 consecutive patients with uveal melanomas treated with proton beam irradiation were studied in order to evaluate survival and visual acuity status of patients with relatively long-term follow-up. The median follow-up was 5.4 years, and no patient was lost to follow-up. All tumors showed regression. The most recent visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 35% and 20/100 or better in 58%. Eight eyes were enucleated because of complications. Metastasis developed in 26 patients (20.5%) from 3 months to 7 years after treatment. Results indicate that proton irradiation is quite successful for achieving local control of uveal melanomas. A large proportion of the treated eyes maintained useful vision. Five-year follow-up data indicate that proton irradiation has no deleterious effect on the likelihood of the development of metastasis.

Definitive radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of base of skull and cervical spine.

: Proton-beam radiation therapy has been developed for the treatment of chordomas or sarcomas of bone or soft tissue that abut the central nervous system. The authors report the results of treatment of 10 patients, six with chordoma, three with chondrosarcoma, and one with a neurofibrosarcoma. Local control has been achieved for all patients (with, however, one marginal failure) with a follow-up period ranging from 2 months to 6 years. High doses of radiation, up to 76 Cobalt Gray Equivalents (CGE), have been delivered without significant morbidity. In particular, no neurological sequelae have been observed.

Proton Beam Irradiation: An Alternative to Enucleation for Intraocular Melanomas

Proton irradiation was used in the treatment of uveal melanomas in 36 eyes. The average follow-up period was 16 months. One patient developed metastatic disease and died. No eye has been enucleated and tumor regression has been observed in all 22 eyes with a follow-up of more than 12 months. This type of treatment offers definite advantages over previously used methods, can be used for the treatment of relatively large melanomas, and should be considered before enucleation.