Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lynne T. Braun is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lynne T. Braun.


Stroke | 2011

Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

James F. Meschia; Cheryl Bushnell; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Lynne T. Braun; Dawn M. Bravata; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A. Creager; Robert H. Eckel; Mitchell S.V. Elkind; Myriam Fornage; Larry B. Goldstein; Steven M. Greenberg; Susanna E. Horvath; Costantino Iadecola; Edward C. Jauch; Wesley S. Moore; John A. Wilson

The aim of this updated statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of stroke among individuals who have not previously experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. Evidence-based recommendations are included for the control of risk factors, interventional approaches to atherosclerotic disease of the cervicocephalic circulation, and antithrombotic treatments for preventing thrombotic and thromboembolic stroke. Further recommendations are provided for genetic and pharmacogenetic testing and for the prevention of stroke in a variety of other specific circumstances, including sickle cell disease and patent foramen ovale.


Circulation | 2011

AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 Update A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation

Sidney C. Smith; Emelia J. Benjamin; Robert O. Bonow; Lynne T. Braun; Mark A. Creager; Barry A. Franklin; Raymond J. Gibbons; Scott M. Grundy; Loren F. Hiratzka; Daniel W. Jones; Donald M. Lloyd-Jones; Margo Minissian; Lori Mosca; Eric D. Peterson; Ralph L. Sacco; John A. Spertus; James H. Stein; Kathryn A. Taubert

Since the 2006 update of the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) guidelines on secondary prevention,1 important evidence from clinical trials has emerged that further supports and broadens the merits of intensive risk-reduction therapies for patients with established coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease, including peripheral artery disease, atherosclerotic aortic disease, and carotid artery disease. In reviewing this evidence and its clinical impact, the writing group believed it would be more appropriate to expand the title of this guideline to “Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.” Indeed, the growing body of evidence confirms that in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, comprehensive risk factor management reduces risk as assessed by a variety of outcomes, including improved survival, reduced recurrent events, the need for revascularization procedures, and improved quality of life. It is important not only that the healthcare provider implement these recommendations in appropriate patients but also that healthcare systems support this implementation to maximize the benefit to the patient. Compelling evidence-based results from recent clinical trials and revised practice guidelines provide the impetus for this update of the 2006 recommendations with evidence-based results2–165 (Table 1). Classification of recommendations and level of evidence are expressed in ACCF/AHA format, as detailed in Table 2. Recommendations made herein are largely based on major practice guidelines from the National Institutes of Health and updated ACCF/AHA practice guidelines, as well as on results from recent clinical trials. Thus, the development of the present guideline involved a process of partial adaptation of other guideline statements and reports and supplemental literature searches. The recommendations listed in this document are, whenever possible, evidence based. Writing group members performed these relevant supplemental literature searches with key search phrases including but not limited …


Stroke | 1995

Physiological Outcomes of Aerobic Exercise Training in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients

Kathleen Potempa; Martita Lopez; Lynne T. Braun; J. Peter Szidon; Louis Fogg; Tyler Tincknell

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In hemiparetic individuals, low endurance to exercise may compound the increased energy cost of movement and contribute to poor rehabilitation outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to describe how hemiparetic stroke patients responded to intense exercise and aerobic training. METHODS Forty-two subjects were randomly assigned to an exercise training group or to a control group. Treatments were given three times per week for 10 weeks in similar laboratory settings. Baseline and posttest measurements were made of maximal oxygen consumption, heart rate, workload, exercise time, resting and submaximal blood pressures, and sensorimotor function. RESULTS Only experimental subjects showed significant improvement in maximal oxygen consumption, workload, and exercise time. Improvement in sensorimotor function was significantly related to the improvement in aerobic capacity. After treatment, experimental subjects showed significantly lower systolic blood pressure at submaximal workloads during the graded exercise test. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that hemiparetic stroke patients may improve their aerobic capacity and submaximal exercise systolic blood pressure response with training. Sensorimotor improvement is related to the improvement in aerobic capacity.


Journal of Clinical Lipidology | 2015

National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2

Terry A. Jacobson; Kevin C. Maki; Carl E. Orringer; Peter H. Jones; Penny M. Kris-Etherton; Geeta Sikand; Ralph La Forge; Stephen R. Daniels; Don P. Wilson; Pamela B. Morris; Robert A. Wild; Scott M. Grundy; Martha L. Daviglus; Keith C. Ferdinand; Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan; Prakash Deedwania; Judith A. Aberg; Katherine P. Liao; James M. McKenney; Joyce L. Ross; Lynne T. Braun; Matthew K. Ito; Harold E. Bays; W. Virgil Brown

An Expert Panel convened by the National Lipid Association previously developed a consensus set of recommendations for the patient-centered management of dyslipidemia in clinical medicine (part 1). These were guided by the principle that reducing elevated levels of atherogenic cholesterol (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) reduces the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This document represents a continuation of the National Lipid Association recommendations developed by a diverse panel of experts who examined the evidence base and provided recommendations regarding the following topics: (1) lifestyle therapies; (2) groups with special considerations, including children and adolescents, women, older patients, certain ethnic and racial groups, patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and patients with residual risk despite statin and lifestyle therapies; and (3) strategies to improve patient outcomes by increasing adherence and using team-based collaborative care.


Journal of Clinical Lipidology | 2011

Clinical utility of inflammatory markers and advanced lipoprotein testing: Advice from an expert panel of lipid specialists

Michael Davidson; Christie M. Ballantyne; Terry A. Jacobson; Vera Bittner; Lynne T. Braun; Alan S. Brown; W. Virgil Brown; William C. Cromwell; Ronald B. Goldberg; James M. McKenney; Alan T. Remaley; Allan D. Sniderman; Peter P. Toth; Sotirios Tsimikas; Paul E. Ziajka; Kevin C. Maki; Mary R. Dicklin

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines have established low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals, and secondary non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C treatment goals for persons with hypertriglyceridemia. The use of lipid-lowering therapies, particularly statins, to achieve these goals has reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; however, significant residual risk for events remains. This, combined with the rising prevalence of obesity, which has shifted the risk profile of the population toward patients in whom LDL-C is less predictive of CVD events (metabolic syndrome, low HDL-C, elevated triglycerides), has increased interest in the clinical use of inflammatory and lipid biomarker assessments. Furthermore, the cost effectiveness of pharmacological intervention for both the initiation of therapy and the intensification of therapy has been enhanced by the availability of a variety of generic statins. This report describes the consensus view of an expert panel convened by the National Lipid Association to evaluate the use of selected biomarkers [C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), apolipoprotein B, LDL particle concentration, lipoprotein(a), and LDL and HDL subfractions] to improve risk assessment, or to adjust therapy. These panel recommendations are intended to provide practical advice to clinicians who wrestle with the challenges of identifying the patients who are most likely to benefit from therapy, or intensification of therapy, to provide the optimum protection from CV risk.


Sports Medicine | 1996

Benefits of Aerobic Exercise After Stroke

Kathleen Potempa; Lynne T. Braun; Tyler Tinknell; Judith Popovich

SummaryThe debilitating loss of function after a stroke has both primary and secondary effects on sensorimotor function. Primary effects include paresis, paralysis, spasticity, and sensory-perceptual dysfunction due to upper motor neuron damage. Secondary effects, contractures and disuse muscle atrophy, are also debilitating. This paper presents theoretical and empirical benefits of aerobic exercise after stroke, issues relevant to measuring peak capacity, exercise training protocols, and the clinical use of aerobic exercise in this patient population. A stroke, and resulting hemiparesis, produces physiological changes in muscle fibres and muscle metabolism during exercise. These changes, along with comorbid cardiovascular disease, must be considered when exercising stroke patients. While few studies have measured peak exercise capacity in hemiparetic populations, it has been consistently observed in these studies that stroke patients have a lower functional capacity than healthy populations. Hemiparetic patients have low peak exercise responses probably due to a reduced number of motor units available for recruitment during dynamic exercise, the reduced oxidative capacity of paretic muscle, and decreased overall endurance. Consequently, traditional methods to predict aerobic capacity are not appropriate for use with stroke patients. Endurance exercise training is increasingly recognised as an important component in rehabilitation. An average improvement in maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) of 13.3% in stroke patients who participated in a 10-week aerobic exercise training programme has been reported compared with controls. This study underscored the potential benefits of aerobic exercise training in stroke patients. In this paper, advantages and disadvantages of exercise modalities are discussed in relation to stroke patients. Recommendations are presented to maximise physical performance and minimise potential cardiac risks during exercise.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2009

ACCF/AHA 2009 Performance Measures for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease)

Rita F. Redberg; Emelia J. Benjamin; Vera Bittner; Lynne T. Braun; David C. Goff; Stephen Havas; Darwin R. Labarthe; Marian C. Limacher; Donald M. Lloyd-Jones; Samia Mora; Thomas A. Pearson; Martha J. Radford; Gerald W. Smetana; John A. Spertus; Erica W. Swegler

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association Endorsed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine, and Society for Women’s Health Research


Circulation | 2013

Pet Ownership and Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Glenn N. Levine; Karen Allen; Lynne T. Braun; Hayley Christian; Erika Friedmann; Kathryn A. Taubert; Sue A. Thomas; Deborah L. Wells; Richard A. Lange

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States.1 Despite efforts promoting primary and secondary CVD prevention,2–8 obesity and physical inactivity remain at epidemic proportions, with >60% of Americans adults overweight or obese and >50% not performing recommended levels of physical activity.9 Similarly, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and other CVD risk factors remain poorly controlled in many Americans. Despite numerous pharmacological and device-based advances in the management of patients with established CVD, morbidity and mortality associated with this condition remain substantial. Hence, a critical need exists for novel strategies and interventions that can potentially reduce the risk of CVD and its attendant morbidity and mortality. Numerous studies have explored the relationship between pet (primarily dog or cat) ownership and CVD, with many reporting beneficial effects, including increased physical activity, favorable lipid profiles, lower systemic blood pressure, improved autonomic tone, diminished sympathetic responses to stress, and improved survival after an acute coronary syndrome. Accordingly, the potential cardiovascular benefits of pet ownership have received considerable lay press and medical media coverage and attention from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention10 and have been the focus of a meeting sponsored by the National Institutes of Health.11 The purpose of this American Heart Association Scientific Statement is to critically assess the data regarding the influence of pet ownership on the presence and reduction of CVD risk factors and CVD risk. Some, but not all, studies of pet ownership and systemic blood pressure have found an association between pet ownership and lower blood pressure. An Australian study of 5741 participants attending a free screening clinic found that pet owners had significantly ( P =0.03) lower systolic blood pressures than pet nonowners despite similar body mass index (BMI) and socioeconomic profiles.12 In a study of 240 married couples …


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2014

The need to advance nutrition education in the training of health care professionals and recommended research to evaluate implementation and effectiveness

Penny M. Kris-Etherton; Sharon R. Akabas; Connie W. Bales; Bruce R. Bistrian; Lynne T. Braun; Marilyn S. Edwards; Celia Laur; Carine Lenders; Matthew D Levy; Carole A. Palmer; Charlotte A. Pratt; Sumantra Ray; Cheryl L. Rock; Edward Saltzman; Douglas L. Seidner; Linda Van Horn

Nutrition is a recognized determinant in 3 (ie, diseases of the heart, malignant neoplasms, cerebrovascular diseases) of the top 4 leading causes of death in the United States. However, many health care providers are not adequately trained to address lifestyle recommendations that include nutrition and physical activity behaviors in a manner that could mitigate disease development or progression. This contributes to a compelling need to markedly improve nutrition education for health care professionals and to establish curricular standards and requisite nutrition and physical activity competencies in the education, training, and continuing education for health care professionals. This article reports the present status of nutrition and physical activity education for health care professionals, evaluates the current pedagogic models, and underscores the urgent need to realign and synergize these models to reflect evidence-based and outcomes-focused education.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2014

Team-Based Care and Improved Blood Pressure Control: A Community Guide Systematic Review

Krista K. Proia; Anilkrishna B. Thota; Gibril J. Njie; Ramona K.C. Finnie; David P. Hopkins; Qaiser Mukhtar; Nicolaas P. Pronk; Donald Zeigler; Thomas E. Kottke; Kimberly J. Rask; Daniel T. Lackland; Joy F. Brooks; Lynne T. Braun; Tonya Cooksey

CONTEXT Uncontrolled hypertension remains a widely prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in the U.S. team-based care, established by adding new staff or changing the roles of existing staff such as nurses and pharmacists to work with a primary care provider and the patient. Team-based care has the potential to improve the quality of hypertension management. The goal of this Community Guide systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of team-based care in improving blood pressure (BP) outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An existing systematic review (search period, January 1980-July 2003) assessing team-based care for BP control was supplemented with a Community Guide update (January 2003-May 2012). For the Community Guide update, two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality of eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-eight studies in the prior review (1980-2003) and an additional 52 studies from the Community Guide update (2003-2012) qualified for inclusion. Results from both bodies of evidence suggest that team-based care is effective in improving BP outcomes. From the update, the proportion of patients with controlled BP improved (median increase=12 percentage points); systolic BP decreased (median reduction=5.4 mmHg); and diastolic BP also decreased (median reduction=1.8 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS Team-based care increased the proportion of people with controlled BP and reduced both systolic and diastolic BP, especially when pharmacists and nurses were part of the team. Findings are applicable to a range of U.S. settings and population groups. Implementation of this multidisciplinary approach will require health system-level organizational changes and could be an important element of the medical home.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lynne T. Braun's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annabelle S. Volgman

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

JoEllen Wilbur

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Louis Fogg

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura L. Hayman

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David C. Goff

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Weber Buchholz

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arlene Michaels Miller

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge