M. Ballarè
University of Eastern Piedmont
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Ballarè.
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2006
M. Del Piano; Lorenzo Morelli; Gian Paolo Strozzi; Serena Allesina; M. Barba; Francesca Deidda; Paola Lorenzini; M. Ballarè; F. Montino; M. Orsello; M. Sartori; E. Garello; S. Carmagnola; M. Pagliarulo; Lucio Capurso
Intestinal microflora has metabolic, trophic and protective functions, and can be modified in pathological conditions and by the exogenous administration of probiotics. Probiotics are defined as living microorganisms which resist gastric, bile, and pancreatic secretions, attach to epithelial cells and colonize the human intestine. In the last twenty years research has been focused on the identification of the role of planktonic flora and adhesive bacteria in health and disease, and on the requisite of bacterial strains to become probiotic product which can be marketed. Probiotics can be commercialized either as nutritional supplements, pharmaceuticals or foods, but the marketing as a pharmaceutical product requires significant time, complex and costly research, and the demonstration of a well-defined therapeutic target. This review examines the sequential steps of research which, from the identification of a possible probiotic strain, lead to its production and marketing, summarizing the whole process existing behind its development, through its growth in laboratory, the studies performed to test its resistance to human secretions and stability, microencapsulation technologies, and safety tests.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2005
Mario Del Piano; M. Ballarè; F. Montino; Annalisa Todesco; M. Orsello; Corrado Magnani; E. Garello
BACKGROUND The treatment of gastroduodenal outflow obstruction (GOO) caused by malignant diseases represents a significant challenge. Open surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been the treatment of choice, but it has high morbidity and mortality rates. More recently, endoscopic placement of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) has been proposed and the results of small, preliminary studies are encouraging. This study compared technical and clinical success, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay in patients undergoing endoscopic and surgical treatment of GOO. METHODS Medical records of 60 consecutive patients with GOO seen between April 1997 and November 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Because of extremely short life expectancy, 13 patients were treated by insertion of a double-lumen nasogastric-jejunal tube. The remaining 47 patients (28 men, 19 women; mean age 73.5 years, range 48-92 years) with unresectable pancreatic (33), gastric (7), metastatic lymph nodal (4), papillary (2), and biliary (1) tumors were treated by placement of a SEMS (24) or open surgical GJ (23). RESULTS The technical success rates were similar, but clinical success was lower in the GJ group (92% vs. 56%, p = 0.0067). The SEMS group had a shorter length of hospital stay (3.0 [1.4] days vs. 24.1 [10.3], p < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 30% in the GJ group, and 0% in the SEMS group ( p = 0.004). Morbidity was higher in the GJ compared with the SEMS group (61% vs. 17%, p = 0.0021). Mean survival was longer in the SEMS group (96.1 [9.6] days vs. 70.2 [36.2] days, p = 0.0165 for a single test of hypothesis; Bonferroni correction for a multiple testing removes this significance), consequently, out-of-hospital survival was longer for the SEMS group (93.2 [9.3] days vs. 46.0 [31.5] days, p < 0.001). None of the endoscopic procedures required the assistance of an anesthesiologist or the use of an operating room. CONCLUSIONS The results of this retrospective study suggest that SEMS insertion is better than surgical GJ for palliation of patients with GOO in terms of clinical success, morbidity, and mortality. Technical success rates were similar. SEMS placement should be proposed as the first-line treatment for relief of GOO. However, a randomized, comparative, prospective study of SEMS vs. laparoscopic GJ is needed.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | 2004
Mario Del Piano; M. Ballarè; F. Montino; M. Orsello; E. Garello; Patrizio Ferrari; T. Cinzia Masini; Gian Paolo Strozzi; Filomena Sforza
Background: Recent data support that after 2 years of age, intestinal microflora remains relatively constant over time, except in elderly people, who harbor fewer bifidobacteria and a higher population of fungi and enterobacteria than young adults. Diet supplementation with probiotics may improve the nutritional status and reduce the impaired immunity associated with aging. The goal of this study was to establish the effect on bifidobacteria fecal counts, and some clinical parameters, of bifidobacteria supplementation to elderly patients in total parenteral nutrition. Methods: Thirteen patients (6 men and 7 women; mean age, 69 years; range, 65–76 years) affected by permanent vegetative status (PVS) and fed by total enteral nutrition (TEN) were studied. Bifidobacteria and clostridia were investigated by microbiologic and molecular biology methods in stool specimens collected twice at basal time (T–2 and T0) and after 12 and 15 days (T12 and T15, respectively). Seven patients with basal bifidobacteria counts less than 10−7 were supplemented with Bifidobacterium longum W 11 for 12 days. The remaining 6 patients were used as control subjects. For 1 month diarrhea and fever episodes, use of antibiotics, and nutritional status (BMI) were assessed. Results: In the 7 patients with bifidobacteria counts less than 107, the administration of B. longum W 11 resulted in a 1 log increase in 6 of 7 patients at T12. No statistically significant difference in episodes of fever or diarrhea, use of antibiotics, or BMI was observed between the treatment and control groups. Conclusion: The administration of B. longum W11 in PVS patients fed by TEN is effective in increasing the population of bifidobacteria. Larger studies with longer follow-up could demonstrate the influence of these microbiologic changes in a clinical setting.
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2011
M. Del Piano; Livio Cipolletta; M.A. Bianco; A. Zambelli; F. Chilovi; E. Di Giulio; E. Ricci; G. Frosini; P. Leo; G. Di Matteo; L. Ficano; P. Loriga; Alberto Prada; L. Buri; M. Pagliarulo; M. Ballarè; F. Montino; M. Battisti-matscher; G. Rotondano
TIMING OF ENDOSCOPY ANDMORTALITY FROM NONVARICEAL UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING (NVUGIB): THE SOONER IS NOT ALWAYS THE BETTER R. Marmo1, G. Rotondano∗ ,2, M. Koch3, M. Del Piano4, M.A. Bianco2, A. Zambelli 5 , G. Di Matteo6 , L. Cipolletta 2 1Ospedale Curto, Polla, Italy; 2Ospedale Maresca, Torre Del Greco, Italy; 3Aco San Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy; 4Ao Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Italy; 5Ao Ospedale Maggiore, Crema, Italy; 6Irccs De Bellis, Castellana Grotte, Italy
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2008
M. Del Piano; M. Ballarè; S. Carmagnola; M. Orsello; E. Garello; M. Pagliarulo; M. Sartori; F. Montino
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2004
M. Ballarè; M. Orsello; M. Del Piano
Endoscopy | 2015
Elia Armellini; Stefano Francesco Crinò; M. Ballarè; Pietro Occhipinti
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2006
M. Del Piano; A. Anderloni; M. Ballarè; S. Carmagnola; F. Montino; E. Garello; M. Orsello; M. Pagliarulo; Lorenzo Morelli; Lucio Capurso
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2006
M. Del Piano; M. Ballarè; A. Anderloni; S. Carmagnola; F. Montino; E. Garello; M. Orsello; M. Pagliarulo; Lorenzo Morelli; Lucio Capurso
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2012
A. Anderloni; M. Ballarè; Marianna Galeazzi; M. Pagliarulo; S. Andorno; M. Del Piano