M. Banasik

Serum and urine metabolomic fingerprinting in diagnostics of inflammatory bowel diseases.

AIM To evaluate the utility of serum and urine metabolomic analysis in diagnosing and monitoring of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS Serum and urine samples were collected from 24 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 19 patients with the Crohns disease (CD) and 17 healthy controls. The activity of UC was assessed with the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, while the activity of CD was determined using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index. The analysis of serum and urine samples was performed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. All spectra were exported to Matlab for preprocessing which resulted in two data matrixes for serum and urine. Prior to the chemometric analysis, both data sets were unit variance scaled. The differences in metabolite fingerprints were assessed using partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under curves were used to evaluate the quality and prediction performance of the obtained PLS-DA models. Metabolites responsible for separation in models were tested using STATISTICA 10 with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test and the Students t test (α = 0.05). RESULTS The comparison between the group of patients with active IBD and the group with IBD in remission provided good PLS-DA models (P value 0.002 for serum and 0.003 for urine). The metabolites that allowed to distinguish these groups were: N-acetylated compounds and phenylalanine (up-regulated in serum), low-density lipoproteins and very low-density lipoproteins (decreased in serum) as well as glycine (increased in urine) and acetoacetate (decreased in urine). The significant differences in metabolomic profiles were also found between the group of patients with active IBD and healthy control subjects providing the PLS-DA models with a very good separation (P value < 0.001 for serum and 0.003 for urine). The metabolites that were found to be the strongest biomarkers included in this case: leucine, isoleucine, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, N-acetylated compounds, acetoacetate, glycine, phenylalanine and lactate (increased in serum), creatine, dimethyl sulfone, histidine, choline and its derivatives (decreased in serum), as well as citrate, hippurate, trigonelline, taurine, succinate and 2-hydroxyisobutyrate (decreased in urine). No clear separation in PLS-DA models was found between CD and UC patients based on the analysis of serum and urine samples, although one metabolite (formate) in univariate statistical analysis was significantly lower in serum of patients with active CD, and two metabolites (alanine and N-acetylated compounds) were significantly higher in serum of patients with CD when comparing jointly patients in the remission and active phase of the diseases. Contrary to the results obtained from the serum samples, the analysis of urine samples allowed to distinguish patients with IBD in remission from healthy control subjects. The metabolites of importance included in this case up-regulated acetoacetate and down-regulated citrate, hippurate, taurine, succinate, glycine, alanine and formate. CONCLUSION NMR-based metabolomic fingerprinting of serum and urine has the potential to be a useful tool in distinguishing patients with active IBD from those in remission.

The influence of non‐HLA antibodies directed against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) on early renal transplant outcomes

Non‐HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are thought to have an impact on renal transplant injury. Anti‐angiotensin II type 1‐receptor‐activating antibodies (anti‐AT1R) have been mentioned to stimulate a severe vascular rejection, but the pretransplant screening has not been introduced yet. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti‐AT1R antibodies and their influence on renal transplant in the 1st year of observation. We prospectively evaluated the presence of anti‐AT1R antibodies in 117 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre‐ and post‐transplant screening. Anti‐AT1R antibodies were observed in 27/117 (23%) of the analyzed recipients already before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was considerably worse in anti‐AT1R(+) group. The patients with anti‐AT1R Abs >9 U/ml lost their graft more often. Biopsy‐proven AR was described in 4/27 (15%) pts in the anti‐AT1R(+) group and 13/90 (14.4%) in the anti‐AT1R(−) group, but more severe cases of Banff IIB or antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) were more often observed in anti‐AT1R (+) 4/27 (15%) vs. 1/90 (1.1%) in anti‐AT1R(+) (P = 0.009). Patients with anti‐AT1R Abs level >9 U/ml run a higher risk of graft failure independently of classical immunological risk factors. The recipients with anti‐AT1R Abs developed more severe acute rejections described as IIB or AMR in Banff classification. More recipients among the anti‐AT1R‐positive ones lost the graft. Our study suggests monitoring of anti‐AT1R Abs before renal transplantation for assessment of immunologic risk profiles and the identification of patients highly susceptible to immunologic events, graft failure, and graft loss.

The impact of non-HLA antibodies directed against endothelin-1 type A receptors (ETAR) on early renal transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND Non-HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are considered to have an influence on renal transplant injury. Anti-endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) antibodies were associated with cellular and antibody-mediated rejection and early onset of vasculopathy in heart transplant patients but their role in renal transplantation remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti-ETAR antibodies and their impact on renal transplant during the first year observation. METHODS We evaluated the presence of anti-ETAR antibodies in 116 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre- and post-transplant screening (before and in 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month after transplantation). Additionally, we assessed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-ETAR antibodies were assayed by ELISA. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on the Banff criteria. RESULTS Anti-ETAR antibodies were observed in 55 (47.4%) of the analyzed recipients before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was significantly worse in the anti-ETAR(+) group compared to the anti-ETAR(-) group during the first post-transplant year. One month after transplantation the serum creatinine in anti-ETAR (+) patients (pts) was 1.86±0.8mg/dl and 1.51±0.5 in anti-ETAR(-) pts (p=0.009). Twelve months after transplantation the difference between the groups was still observed 1.70±0.7 vs. 1.40±0.4 (p=0.04). Biopsy proven acute rejection was recognized in 8/55 (14.5%) in ETAR(+) and 9/61 (14.8%) in ETAR(-) patients but cases with mild to severe intimal arteritis (v1-v3) were more often observed in patients with the presence of anti-ETAR Abs 4/55 (7.2%) comparing with 1/61 (1.6%) in anti-ETAR(-) patients. The anti-ETAR antibody levels varied at different measurement intervals during the one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The presence of anti-ETAR antibodies is associated with a worse renal transplant function during the first 12months after transplantation. Including anti-ETAR antibodies in the diagnostics of renal transplant recipient immune status should be considered to provide comprehensive assessment of humoral alloimmunity.

Long-term Follow-up of Non-HLA and Anti-HLA Antibodies: Incidence and Importance in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND Detection of antibody-mediated injury is becoming increasingly important in post-transplant patient care. The role of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in kidney transplant damage is known, whereas the significance of non-HLA antibodies remains an unresolved concern. The aim of the study was to determine the presence and influence on renal function of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies in stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation. METHODS We evaluated the antibodies in 35 consecutive patients with stable renal function at 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS Pretransplant screening for donor-specific antibodies by CDC cross-matches was negative in all patients. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R), and anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR) were assayed as non-HLA antibodies. Non-HLA antibodies were observed in 12 (34%) patients, including AECA (n = 5; 14%), anti- AT1R (n = 6; 17%), anti-ETAR (n = 4; 11%), and both anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR (n = 3). Among 13 (37%) patients with anti-HLA antibodies, 7 also had both non-HLA antibodies: AECA (n = 1), anti-AT1R (n = 3), and anti-ETAR (n = 3). The antibody-negative group (n = 13) showed significantly better renal function than the antibody-positive group (non-HLA and/or anti-HLA; n = 22). Biopsy-proven acute rejection had occurred in 2 of 13 (15%) antibody-negative versus 8 of 22 (36%) antibody-positive patients. These preliminary data revealed an high prevalence of autoantibody and alloantibody production among stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation. CONCLUSION Simultaneous production of these antibodies and their association with reduced renal function suggests that active humoral immune responses are poorly controlled by immunosuppression.

The Impact of De Novo Donor-specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies on 5-Year Renal Transplant Outcome

Numerous studies have shown that circulating donor-specific antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with accelerated renal transplant failure, but many patients with these antibodies have good graft function. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term graft function and survival in patients with de novo post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Our prospective study included 78 consecutive recipients with a negative crossmatch before transplantation. Recipient serum samples were assayed for DSA in week 2 and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after transplantation using a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic technique with donor lymphocytes. Additionally, patients with DSA and stable renal function in the first year were tested with a more sensitive flow-panel-reactive antibody. DSA were present in 34 (44%) of our patients during the first 12 months after transplantation. Biopsy-proved acute rejection occurred in 11 DSA-positive and 10 DSA-negative patients. Seven DSA-positive patients had antibody-mediated rejection and no DSA-negative ones developed humoral rejection. The serum creatinine level in DSA-positive patients was significantly higher (2.48 vs 1.43 mg/dL) in year 5. The 13 (38%) DSA-positive patients with good graft function in month 12 were stable during a 5-year follow-up: their serum creatinine was 1.46 ± 0.4 in year 1 and 1.56 ± 0.4 mg/dL in year 5 and nobody lost their allograft. One- and 5- year graft survivals were appropriately 85% and 59% in DSA-positive patients compared to 93% and 93% in DSA-negative patients. To sum up, post-transplant DSA had a significant influence on kidney function and graft survival but in 38% of patients the presence of DSA did not decrease a 5-year renal function. A good renal allograft function in the presence of DSA in the first year after transplantation and cessation of their production in the subsequent years may be a good prognostic marker for a long-term allograft function and survival.

Non-HLA antibodies: angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) are associated with renal allograft injury and graft loss.

INTRODUCTION Non-HLA antibodies specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) of vascular cells activate signaling pathways leading to cell proliferation and vascular injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of non-HLA antibodies on kidney allograft morphology and function in patients who underwent a kidney biopsy due to renal function impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 65 consecutive renal transplant patients who were evaluated for the presence of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplant biopsy. Results of pre-transplant CDC cross-match were negative. A kidney allograft biopsy was performed between 6 days and 13 years (42 ± 49 months) after transplantation, and the diagnosis was made on the basis of the Banff criteria. The level >9 U/L of anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies was considered high. RESULTS A high level of non-HLA antibodies (anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR) was found in 7 (10.7%) of 65 patients at the time of biopsy. Graft loss in the non-HLA-positive patients was significantly higher (71% in non-HLA-positive cases after 7.8 ± 2.6 months vs 11% after 6 months in non-HLA-negative cases [P = .00099]). In these non-HLA-positive patients, the mean anti-AT1R level was 15.3 ± 9.4 U/L and the mean anti-ETAR level was 13.8 ± 8.6 U/L. In only 2 of these patients were anti-HLA antibodies additionally detected: anti-class I in 1 and anti-class II in both patients. The mean serum creatinine level was 2.34 ± 0.6 mg/dL at the time of biopsy. Results of an early biopsy revealed acute vascular rejection (Banff grade IIB). Chronic allograft injury was found (grading cg1-3, cv1-2, ci1-2, ct1-2) in the remaining 6 patients. C4d was present in 3 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS High levels of anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR antibodies were associated with morphological and functional allograft injury and graft loss in these study patients. Non-HLA antibodies can be helpful in assessing the risk of graft failure.

Influence of hypercholesterolemia and acute graft rejection on chronic nephropathy development in renal transplant recipients

Graft endothelial lesions resulting from acute rejection may be sustained by concomitant hypercholesterolemia, thus increasing the risk of chronic graft failure. The present study was undertaken to examine the influence of hypercholesterolemia and acute graft rejection (AGR) episodes on graft function and graft loss due to chronic nephropathy. A cohort of 336 patients transplanted between 1993 and 2000 having graft function at 12 months after transplantation were examined. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of CsA, azathioprine, and corticosteroids in 90% with 10% of patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil in place of azathioprine. During the first year after transplantation, AGR occurred in 134 (39.8%) and hypercholesterolemia (6.2 mmol/L) in 132 (39.2%) of patients. The population was divided into four groups according to AGR occurrence and cholesterol concentrations during the first year after transplantation for analysis of serum creatinine concentrations and graft loss at 5 years of follow-up. Patients with AGR irrespective of cholesterol levels displayed significantly higher creatinine concentrations. Graft loss in these patients increased over twofold compared to the remaining groups. Patients without hypercholesterolemia and AGR showed normal creatinine concentrations and low graft loss rates during 5 years of follow-up.

Advanced age of renal transplant recipients correlates with increased plasma concentrations of interleukin-6, chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), and matrix metalloproteinase 2, and urine concentrations of CCL2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1.

BACKGROUND Advanced age of renal transplant recipients (RTRs) has a negative impact on kidney allograft survival through impaired extracellular matrix degradation by the matrix metalloproteinases/tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (MMPs/TIMPs) system. Moreover, older RTRs are at risk of smoldering inflammation, known as inflammaging. AIM The aim of the study was to assess the impact of a RTRs age on plasma and urine concentrations of interleukin 6 (IL-6), chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), and the MMPs/TIMPs system. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred fifty adult RTRs (8.7% ≥ 65 years) and 37 adult healthy volunteers (10.8% ≥ 65 years) were enrolled in the study. The studied factors (IL-6, CCL2, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) were quantified in plasma and urine with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearmans (rs) rank correlation were applied, and differences with a P < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS There was a weak but significant positive correlation between increasing RTRs age and plasma IL-6 (rs = 0.18, P = .028), CCL2 (rs = 0.27, P = .001), and MMP-2 (rs = 0.20, P = .017), as well as urine CCL2 (rs = 0.16, P = 0.050) and TIMP-1 (rs = 0.20, P = .014) concentrations. CONCLUSIONS Advancing age of RTRs correlates with increasing plasma IL-6 and CCL2 concentrations, reflecting smoldering inflammation (known as inflammaging) and alterations in MMPs/TIMPs profiles, especially with increased plasma MMP-2 and urine TIMP-1 concentrations.

Humoral immunity in hand transplantation: Anti-HLA and non-HLA response

UNLABELLED Antibodies against donors HLA antigens and B cell activity are recognized modulators of immune response to allograft. The role of both anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies is understood in solid organ transplantation, but has not been addressed in composite tissue allografts. AIM We decided to evaluate the presence and role of anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies after hand transplantation. METHODS We assayed anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies in 5 consecutive hand transplant patients. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies was tested by flow-PRA method (One Lambda). Non-HLA antibodies were defined as anti-endothelial cell (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R), anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR). RESULTS Anti-HLA antibodies were present in 1 patient in class I and in another one in class II. Both patients developed one episode of acute rejection. AECA were present in only one recipient with borderline activity. Both anti-AT1R and Anti-ETAR were found strongly positive in one patient who repeatedly developed acute rejection episodes. CONCLUSION The presence of non-HLA antibodies (anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR) and the occurrence of multiple rejection episodes found in one patient here require further investigation into a possible association and role of humoral immunity in composite tissue rejection.

Increased Plasma Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinase Concentrations as Negative Predictors Associated With Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function Upon Long-Term Observation

Chronic allograft injury (CAI) is the most frequent cause of progressive kidney allograft impairment and eventual loss, which is due to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Mechanisms of CAI are not fully understood. Chemokines, cytokines, metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) play roles in fibrosis development. The aims of this study were to evaluate plasma and urine TIMPs (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2), MMPs (MMP-2 and MMP-9), proinflammatory interleukin-6 (IL-6), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2 chemokines previously known as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1]) among 150 recipients beyond 1 year post-renal transplantations and to explore the usefulness of these potential biomarkers of ongoing allograft injury. Renal transplant recipients compared with healthy volunteers (control group) showed significantly increased plasma and urine IL-6, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2, as well as lower plasma MMP-2 and urine CCL2 concentrations. Compared with recipients showing good function those with impairments displayed higher plasma TIMP-1 (P < .001) and TIMP-2 (P = .003) concentrations. The recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values negatively correlated with plasma TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 levels (r = -0.43; P < .0001 and rs = -0.42; P < .0001, respectively) and with urine IL-6 excretion (rs = -0.33; P < .0001). Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed TIMP-1 plasma level assessments to be useful estimates of allograft injury.