Oktawia Mazanowska

Cytokine gene expression in kidney allograft biopsies after donor brain death and ischemia-reperfusion injury using in situ reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis.

Background. This study focuses on the cytokine genes expression after brain-death, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and during allograft rejection. Methods. A total of 49 needle core biopsies from kidney transplant recipients, performed before and during transplantation procedures were studied. The first biopsy was taken during procurement of the organ, the second after cold ischemia, and the third after approximately 30 min of reperfusion. We also assessed 34 allograft biopsies obtained during acute rejection. Tubular and glomerular expression of interferon (IFN)-&ggr;, transforming growth factor (TGF)-&bgr;1, platelet-desired growth factor-B (PDGF-B), interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-10 mRNA was analyzed with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in situ technique, which allows to detect a few copies of the target gene without destruction of the tissue architecture. Results. Compared with normal kidney tissue from living donor, high gene expression of IFN-&ggr;, TGF-&bgr;1, PDGF-B, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10 was detected in all procurement specimens. After reperfusion gene expressions of IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10 were significantly upregulated in renal tubules compared to biopsies taken after cold ischemia. The gene expression of IFN-&ggr;, TGF-&bgr;1, and PDGF-B remained stable after organ procurement, during cold ischemia, and after reperfusion. Gene expression of IFN-&ggr;, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and PDGF-B in procurement biopsies, as well as in those taken after cold ischemia and reperfusion, were significantly higher than during the period of acute rejection. Conclusion. The data presented herein strongly point out the importance of the immunological and morphological injury that occurs before and during transplantation. The increase of inflammatory response after brain death is important for further stimulation of the immune response and long-term kidney survival.

The impact of non-HLA antibodies directed against endothelin-1 type A receptors (ETAR) on early renal transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND Non-HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are considered to have an influence on renal transplant injury. Anti-endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) antibodies were associated with cellular and antibody-mediated rejection and early onset of vasculopathy in heart transplant patients but their role in renal transplantation remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti-ETAR antibodies and their impact on renal transplant during the first year observation. METHODS We evaluated the presence of anti-ETAR antibodies in 116 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre- and post-transplant screening (before and in 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month after transplantation). Additionally, we assessed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-ETAR antibodies were assayed by ELISA. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on the Banff criteria. RESULTS Anti-ETAR antibodies were observed in 55 (47.4%) of the analyzed recipients before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was significantly worse in the anti-ETAR(+) group compared to the anti-ETAR(-) group during the first post-transplant year. One month after transplantation the serum creatinine in anti-ETAR (+) patients (pts) was 1.86±0.8mg/dl and 1.51±0.5 in anti-ETAR(-) pts (p=0.009). Twelve months after transplantation the difference between the groups was still observed 1.70±0.7 vs. 1.40±0.4 (p=0.04). Biopsy proven acute rejection was recognized in 8/55 (14.5%) in ETAR(+) and 9/61 (14.8%) in ETAR(-) patients but cases with mild to severe intimal arteritis (v1-v3) were more often observed in patients with the presence of anti-ETAR Abs 4/55 (7.2%) comparing with 1/61 (1.6%) in anti-ETAR(-) patients. The anti-ETAR antibody levels varied at different measurement intervals during the one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The presence of anti-ETAR antibodies is associated with a worse renal transplant function during the first 12months after transplantation. Including anti-ETAR antibodies in the diagnostics of renal transplant recipient immune status should be considered to provide comprehensive assessment of humoral alloimmunity.

Long-term Follow-up of Non-HLA and Anti-HLA Antibodies: Incidence and Importance in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND Detection of antibody-mediated injury is becoming increasingly important in post-transplant patient care. The role of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in kidney transplant damage is known, whereas the significance of non-HLA antibodies remains an unresolved concern. The aim of the study was to determine the presence and influence on renal function of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies in stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation. METHODS We evaluated the antibodies in 35 consecutive patients with stable renal function at 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS Pretransplant screening for donor-specific antibodies by CDC cross-matches was negative in all patients. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R), and anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR) were assayed as non-HLA antibodies. Non-HLA antibodies were observed in 12 (34%) patients, including AECA (n = 5; 14%), anti- AT1R (n = 6; 17%), anti-ETAR (n = 4; 11%), and both anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR (n = 3). Among 13 (37%) patients with anti-HLA antibodies, 7 also had both non-HLA antibodies: AECA (n = 1), anti-AT1R (n = 3), and anti-ETAR (n = 3). The antibody-negative group (n = 13) showed significantly better renal function than the antibody-positive group (non-HLA and/or anti-HLA; n = 22). Biopsy-proven acute rejection had occurred in 2 of 13 (15%) antibody-negative versus 8 of 22 (36%) antibody-positive patients. These preliminary data revealed an high prevalence of autoantibody and alloantibody production among stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation. CONCLUSION Simultaneous production of these antibodies and their association with reduced renal function suggests that active humoral immune responses are poorly controlled by immunosuppression.

The Impact of De Novo Donor-specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies on 5-Year Renal Transplant Outcome

Numerous studies have shown that circulating donor-specific antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with accelerated renal transplant failure, but many patients with these antibodies have good graft function. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term graft function and survival in patients with de novo post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Our prospective study included 78 consecutive recipients with a negative crossmatch before transplantation. Recipient serum samples were assayed for DSA in week 2 and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months after transplantation using a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic technique with donor lymphocytes. Additionally, patients with DSA and stable renal function in the first year were tested with a more sensitive flow-panel-reactive antibody. DSA were present in 34 (44%) of our patients during the first 12 months after transplantation. Biopsy-proved acute rejection occurred in 11 DSA-positive and 10 DSA-negative patients. Seven DSA-positive patients had antibody-mediated rejection and no DSA-negative ones developed humoral rejection. The serum creatinine level in DSA-positive patients was significantly higher (2.48 vs 1.43 mg/dL) in year 5. The 13 (38%) DSA-positive patients with good graft function in month 12 were stable during a 5-year follow-up: their serum creatinine was 1.46 ± 0.4 in year 1 and 1.56 ± 0.4 mg/dL in year 5 and nobody lost their allograft. One- and 5- year graft survivals were appropriately 85% and 59% in DSA-positive patients compared to 93% and 93% in DSA-negative patients. To sum up, post-transplant DSA had a significant influence on kidney function and graft survival but in 38% of patients the presence of DSA did not decrease a 5-year renal function. A good renal allograft function in the presence of DSA in the first year after transplantation and cessation of their production in the subsequent years may be a good prognostic marker for a long-term allograft function and survival.

Non-HLA antibodies: angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) are associated with renal allograft injury and graft loss.

INTRODUCTION Non-HLA antibodies specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) of vascular cells activate signaling pathways leading to cell proliferation and vascular injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of non-HLA antibodies on kidney allograft morphology and function in patients who underwent a kidney biopsy due to renal function impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 65 consecutive renal transplant patients who were evaluated for the presence of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplant biopsy. Results of pre-transplant CDC cross-match were negative. A kidney allograft biopsy was performed between 6 days and 13 years (42 ± 49 months) after transplantation, and the diagnosis was made on the basis of the Banff criteria. The level >9 U/L of anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies was considered high. RESULTS A high level of non-HLA antibodies (anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR) was found in 7 (10.7%) of 65 patients at the time of biopsy. Graft loss in the non-HLA-positive patients was significantly higher (71% in non-HLA-positive cases after 7.8 ± 2.6 months vs 11% after 6 months in non-HLA-negative cases [P = .00099]). In these non-HLA-positive patients, the mean anti-AT1R level was 15.3 ± 9.4 U/L and the mean anti-ETAR level was 13.8 ± 8.6 U/L. In only 2 of these patients were anti-HLA antibodies additionally detected: anti-class I in 1 and anti-class II in both patients. The mean serum creatinine level was 2.34 ± 0.6 mg/dL at the time of biopsy. Results of an early biopsy revealed acute vascular rejection (Banff grade IIB). Chronic allograft injury was found (grading cg1-3, cv1-2, ci1-2, ct1-2) in the remaining 6 patients. C4d was present in 3 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS High levels of anti-AT1R and/or anti-ETAR antibodies were associated with morphological and functional allograft injury and graft loss in these study patients. Non-HLA antibodies can be helpful in assessing the risk of graft failure.

Kidney ischemic injury genes expressed after donor brain death are predictive for the outcome of kidney transplantation.

The results of deceased donor kidney transplantation largely depend on the extent of organ injury induced by brain death and the transplantation procedure. In this study, we analyzed the preprocurement intragraft expression of 29 genes involved in apoptosis, tissue injury, immune cell migration, and activation. We also assessed their influence on allograft function. Before flushing with cold solution we obtained 50 kidney core biopsies of deceased donor kidneys immediately after organ retrieval. The control group included 18 biopsies obtained from living donors. Gene expression was analyzed with low-density arrays (Taqman). LCN2/lipocalin-2 is considered a biomarker of kidney epithelial ischemic injury with a renoprotective function. HAVCR1/KIM-1 is associated with acute tubular injury. Comparison of deceased donor kidneys to control organs revealed a significantly higher expression of LCN2 (8.0-fold P=.0006) and HAVCR1 (4.7-fold, P<.0001). Their expressions positively correlated with serum creatinine concentrations after 6 months after transplantation: LCN2 (r=.65, P<.0001), HAVCR1 (r=.44, P=.006). Kidneys displaying delayed graft function and/or an acute rejection episode in the first 6 months after showed higher LCN2 expression compared to event-free ones (1.7-fold, P=.027). A significantly higher increase in expression of TLR2 (5.2-fold), Interleukin (IL) 18 (4.6-fold), HMGB1 (4.1-fold), GUSB (2.4-fold), CASP3 (2.0-fold) FAS (1.8-fold), and TP53 (1.6-fold) was observed among deceased donor kidneys compared with the control group. Their expression levels were not related to clinical outcomes: however, they showed significant correlations with one another (r>.6, P<.0001). We also observed a slightly reduced expression of IL10 (0.6-fold, P=.004). Our data suggested that increased LCN2 and HAVCR1 expression observed in the kidneys after donor brain death were hallmarks of the organ injury process. LCN2 expression level in retrieved kidneys can predict kidney transplantation outcomes.

Pretransplantation Cellular Alloreactivity Is Predictive of Acute Graft Rejection and 1-Year Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVE To study cellular alloimmunity in kidney allograft recipients using an interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISPOT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Donor splenocyte peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained during kidney recovery in 53 kidney recipients including 11 with positive panel-reactive antibodies pretransplantation. For ELISPOT data analysis, the spot number, size, and intensity were calculated, reflecting the volume of cytokine secretion at the single-cell level. Results were recalculated as the ratio of the values observed for donor-stimulated to unstimulated recipient cells corrected for residual donor activity. RESULTS Significantly greater pretransplantation donor-stimulated activity was observed in recipients who experienced an acute rejection episode (ARE) within 1 year (P < .05). Mean change in spot number, size, and intensity in patients without or with AREs was 0.99 vs 3.33, 1.60 vs 6.05, and 1.40 vs 6.31, respectively. The assessed parameters were prognostic of high risk of ARE: 1.5-fold increase in spot number (ARE incidence, 52% vs 9%), 2.5-fold increase in spot size (ARE incidence, 53% vs 13%), and 2.7-fold increase in spot intensity (ARE incidence, 52% vs 9%). The 3 parameters correlated with 1-year serum creatinine concentration (P < .05). In 14 recipients, AREs could have been predicted in 11 using pretransplantation ELISPOT results, and in only 2 on the basis of panel-reactive antibodies. CONCLUSION The ELISPOT-determined capacity of donor-induced reactivity observed in recipient cells obtained just before transplantation is predictive of risk of graft rejection and 1-year allograft function.

Cytokine gene expression in kidney allograft donor biopsies after cold ischemia and reperfusion using in situ RT-PCR analysis.

It was previously reported that ischemia-reperfusion injury initiates an inflammatory response and may significantly affect the transplanted organ function. The aim of this study was to assess changes of intragraft cytokine mRNA expression in kidneys after cold ischemia (CI) and following reperfusion. We examined mRNA of a product of activated T lymphocytes (IFN-gamma) and a monocyte product (IL-6). Eleven kidneys were transplanted after CI time ranging from 16 to 39 hours. Renal needle core biopsies were obtained from donors after cold ischemia and approximately after 20 minutes of reperfusion. Tubular and glomerular expression of IFN-gamma and IL-6 mRNA were assessed using semiquantitative evaluation of the RT-PCR in situ. After reperfusion an intense increase of IL-6 mRNA expression was observed in four specimens, a slight increase was noticed in five specimens, and a very slight decrease in two specimens. Changes in IL-6 mRNA expression were limited only to tubules. In contrast, the glomerular and tubular mRNA expression of IFN-gamma and glomerular of IL-6 remained stable. Mean CI time for patients with an intense increase was higher than for patients with a slight increase and with the decrease of IL-6 mRNA expression (32.0 +/- 6.8 vs 25.2 +/- 7.3 and 26.0 +/- 5.7 hours). Our results suggest that early inflammatory changes at the time of implantation of renal allografts depends mainly on monocyte/macrophage-associated products. The observed intensity of their expression in tubules was connected to longer CI time.

Imbalance of Metallaproteinase/Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinase System in Renal Transplant Recipients With Chronic Allograft Injury

INTRODUCTION Nowadays, renal allografts continue to be lost at the rate of 2% to 4% per year beyond the first year after transplantation due to chronic allograft injury. Excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix results from overproduction and/or defective degradation by proteolytic enzymes, among which metalloproteinases (MMPs) play a major role. The aim of this study was to assess the role of MMPs in renal transplant recipients (RTR) in the context of allograft injury or proteinuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plasma and urine MMP-2 and MMP-9 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunoassay in 150 RTR including 66% males with an overall mean age of 49.2±11.5 years. The subjects were examined at a mean of 73.4±41.2 months (range=12-240) after kidney transplantation. Thirty-seven healthy volunteers including 54% male with an overall mean age of 48.4±14.1 years served as a control group. RESULTS Renal transplant recipients displayed significantly decreased plasma MMP-2 activity compared with healthy controls (P<.000) probably due to increased inhibitory plasma (p) TIMP-2 activity (P=.0029), and lower plasma MMP-2:TIMP-2 index (P<.0001). Plasma MMP-9 and pTIMP-1 activities were twofold increased in RTR compared with controls (P=.0015 and P<.000) but with a nearly stable plasma MMP-9:TIMP-1 index (P=NS). There was no difference between RTR and controls according to urine (u) MMP-2 activity, but uMMP-9 was increased in RTR compared with healthy controls (P=.0032). Urine MMP-9 potential was probably diminished by increased uTIMPs (uTIMP-2, P=.017; uTIMP-1, P=.000), which contributed to graft impairment or proteinuria. CONCLUSION Our study revealed profibrotic MMP/TIMP constellations in RTR that show an imbalance in plasma MMP-2 and MMP-9 with increased plasma and urinary TIMPs. The net proteolytic potential of increased plasma and urinary MMP-9 may be diminished significantly by enhanced plasma and urine TIMP activities.

Impact of Donor-Dependent Genetic Factors on Long-Term Renal Graft Function

Our aim was to study the association of donor genetic features with long-term graft function as well as the impact of donor age, gender compatibility, cold ischemia time (CIT), and delayed graft function (DGF). We observed the outcomes of 125 kidney recipients for a minimum of 12 months (mean, 30.9 +/- 13.0 months). Grafts were obtained from 89 donors who underwent profiling for AHSG 1/2, MMP9 -1562C/T, IL6 -174G/C, IL1beta 3954C/T, MTHFR 677C/T, MTHFR 1298A/C, NOS3 -786C/T, and PAI1 4G/5G single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using sequence-specific probe (SSP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and MPO -463G/A and CRP -390C/T/A with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. NOS3 IVa/b VNTR polymorphism was genotyped by gel electrophoresis of the respective PCR-generated DNA fragment. The presence of the aa eNOS genotype was connected with worse graft function. The aa genotype was also linked to acute rejection episodes. The lowest values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were displayed by recipients of grafts from donors with homozygotic PAI1 gene 5G polymorphism, linking paradoxically with lower PAI-1 synthesis suggesting that the intensity of proteolysis led to increased alloantigen specificity stimulating alloresponses. Graft function depended significantly on donor age with an influence of gender matching. GFR showed a significant dependence on DGF. Genetic features of the donor influenced long-term graft function. Variant eNOS gene polymorphism, which produced decreased eNOS activity, was linked to worse remote graft function. A similar negative impact was observed in the case of donor PAI1 polymorphism, with the functional consequence of lower gene product synthesis.