M. Brandi

First-Line Treatment With Epirubicin and Vinorelbine in Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE This phase II multicenter trial was aimed at investigating the activity of epirubicin-vinorelbine combination as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-seven patients with metastatic breast cancer and no prior exposure to anthracyclines received the following regimen: epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) by intravenous (IV) bolus infusion on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) by 30-minute IV infusion on days 1 and 5, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. All patients also received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G- CSF) on days 7 to 12 of every cycle. RESULTS Objective responses, confirmed at least 4 weeks after the first documentation, were observed in 65 out of 92 assessable patients (70.6%; 95% CI, 62% to 80%). Disease remained stable in 17 patients (18.5%). Responses were observed in all disease sites, being 94% in soft tissue, 60% in bone, and 66% in visceral disease. Median time to response, median duration of response, median time to progression, and median overall survival were 2, 9, 10, and 26 months, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 4 in 36% of the patients, and was accompanied by fever in 26% of the cases. Grade 3 to 4 mucositis was encountered in 28% of the patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. No cardiotoxicity was observed. CONCLUSION The epirubicin-vinorelbine combination with G-CSF support has been shown in this study to be highly active as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients, with significant although transient toxicity. This justifies further evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting and in early-stage breast cancer.

Revertant and potentiating activity of lonidamine in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum.

PURPOSE Lonidamine (LND) is an energolytic derivative of indazol-carboxylic acid that has been shown to enhance cisplatin (CDDP) activity in both sensitive (A2780) and resistant (A2780/Cp8) ovarian cancer cell lines. The aim of this study was to confirm the potentiating or reverting activity of LND on CDDP activity obtained in experimental models in a phase II study of advanced ovarian cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-seven consecutive women with histologically proven and measurable ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum compounds were treated with CDDP plus LND. CDDP was administered at 1 mg/kg intravenously (IV) once weekly for 6 weeks and every 3 weeks thereafter until disease progression or toxicity. LND was administered at 450 mg daily (1 tablet every 8 hours) for the entire period of therapy starting 3 days before the first CDDP administration. In addition, a higher LND dosage was provided on the day of CDDP administration in an attempt to maximize the synergy of this drug with CDDP. RESULTS Ten patients achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 55%). In particular, responses were observed in five of 18 (28%) refractory or early relapsed patients (one CR and four PRs) and in five of nine patients (55%) in the late-relapsed group (two CRs and three PRs). Grade 3 or 4 anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 19%, 15%, and 11% of patients, respectively, whereas seven of 27 patients (26%) showed LND-related myalgia. Grade 3 renal toxicity was observed in two patients (8%). Neurotoxicity, often concealed by LND-related myalgia, was recorded as grade 1 or 2 in six patients (22%) and as grade 3 in one (4%). CONCLUSION The 37% response rate observed in this study (28% in refractory or early-relapsed patients), suggests that the synergism between CDDP and LND observed in vitro against ovarian cancer cell lines can be clinically confirmed. However, larger series and randomized studies are needed to assess definitely the revertant activity of LND on CDDP-refractory patients.

Comparison of CHOP-B vs CEOP-B in ‘poor prognosis’ non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. A randomized trial

Sixty consecutive previously untreated patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (intermediate or high grade and/or bulky disease and/or presence of constitutional symptoms), were randomized to receive either CHOP-B or CEOP-B (31 and 29 patients, respectively) to compare the therapeutic activity and toxicity.Complete response was observed in 65% of the patients treated with CHOP-B and 62% with CEOP-B; relapse of the disease occurred, respectively, in 5/20 (25%) and 6/18 (33%) of CR. Relapse-free survival and overall survival at 5 yr resulted in both groups (RFS 68% and 62% and overall survival 62% and 62%, respectively).In addition, increasing the dosage of epirubicin did not result in an increase in the haematologic toxicity or percent of CR. The haematologic toxicity was slightly lower in CEOP-B.The cardiologic monitoring (Eco 2D and EKG-Holter) at 400 mg mq−1 of EDX and ADM did not demonstrate variations in cardiac function in the CEOP-B group, while in the ADM patients the ejection fraction was statistically lower as regards basal values.In conclusion, in our randomized study, substitution of ADM with EDX in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in the CHOP-B regimen, did not decrease the therapeutic activity of the combined chemotherapy, while less toxicity (haematologic and cardiac) was observed. For these reasons, in our opinion, epirubicin can substitute adriamycin in second and third generation regimens for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in which the major drawback for a wider diffusion is the severe toxicity observed.

5-Fluorouracil and levofolinic acid with or without recombinant interferon-2b in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma : A randomized multicenter study with stratification for tumor burden and liver involvement by the Southern Italy Oncology Group

The objectives of the current study were: 1) to verify whether the addition of modulating low doses of interferon‐2b (IFN) to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) and levofolinic acid (1‐FA) could improve clinical results in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma; and 2) to evaluate the role of tumor burden and liver involvement as prognostic factors.

A multicenter phase III prospective randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) versus docetaxel followed by EC in node-positive breast cancer. GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale) 9902 study

BACKGROUND The Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale 9902 trial compared four cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) with four cycles of docetaxel (Taxotere, D) followed by four cycles of EC as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to EC (E 120 mg/m2, C 600 mg/m2, arm A) for four cycles or four cycles of D (100 mg/m2) followed by four cycles of EC (arm B), both regimens every 21 days. Hormone receptor-positive patients were given hormonal therapy for 5 years. Primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS There were 750 patients enrolled. With a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year DFS was 73.4% in both arms, and 5-year OS was 89.5% versus 90.7% in arm A and B [hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval for DFS 0.75-1.31; P = 0.95)], respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more common in arm B. CONCLUSIONS This study did not show advantages from the addition of docetaxel to high-dose EC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. The small sample size and low number of DFS events may have limited the ability to observe statistically significant difference between the two arms.BACKGROUND The Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale 9902 trial compared four cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) with four cycles of docetaxel (Taxotere, D) followed by four cycles of EC as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to EC (E 120 mg/m(2), C 600 mg/m(2), arm A) for four cycles or four cycles of D (100 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of EC (arm B), both regimens every 21 days. Hormone receptor-positive patients were given hormonal therapy for 5 years. Primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS There were 750 patients enrolled. With a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year DFS was 73.4% in both arms, and 5-year OS was 89.5% versus 90.7% in arm A and B [hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval for DFS 0.75-1.31; P = 0.95)], respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more common in arm B. CONCLUSIONS This study did not show advantages from the addition of docetaxel to high-dose EC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. The small sample size and low number of DFS events may have limited the ability to observe statistically significant difference between the two arms.

Italian position statement on hormone replacement therapy following the National Conference on Menopause and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Villa Tuscolana, Frascati (Rome), May 8-9, 2007

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pisa, Psychiatry, Milan, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turin, Endocrinology, Florence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trieste, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turin, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cagliari, Psychiatry, Milan, Cardiology, Modena, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naples, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pavia, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brescia, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siena, Cardiology, Rome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turin, Internal Medicine, Pisa, and General Surgery, Florence

CEOP-B alternated with VIMB in intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study.

PURPOSE To improve response and toxicity in treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHLs), a prospective single-arm trial was initiated using cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (CEOP-B) alternated with etoposide (VP-16), ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and bleomycin (VIMB). PATIENTS AND METHODS From December 1988 to April 1992, 60 consecutive previously untreated patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL were admitted to the study and were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: 32% greater than 60 years of age, 63% with stage III to IV disease, 42% with a performance status (PS) of 2 or 3, 23% with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and 22% with two or more extranodal disease sites. Stage I and II patients received three cycles of CEOP-B/VIMB plus radiotherapy (RT) to involved fields; stage III and IV patients received four cycles of chemotherapy alone. RESULTS The complete remission (CR) rate was 77%; actuarial 48-month overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) rates were 70% and 59%, respectively. With univariate analysis, CR, OS, and TTF rates were significantly influenced by serum LDH levels (P = .0485, P = .0017, and P = .0064, respectively) and performance status (P = .0005, P < .00005, and P = .0001, respectively). The actuarial 48-month disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 83% and was negatively influenced only by high-grade histology (P < .004). Toxicity was mild. A lower epirubicin dose-intensity (DI) was found in patients older than 60 years of age, with a borderline P value. Patients were divided into four groups according to the International Prognostic Factor Project; low-risk and low-intermediate-risk groups had similar OS and TTF rates; when considered together, they showed superior, but not statistically significant, OS and TTF rates as compared with the high-intermediate-risk group, which in turn had significantly superior OS and TTF rates when compared with the high-risk group. CONCLUSION CEOP-B/VIMB compares favorably with third-generation regimens and results in lower toxicity.

Three cycles of ABDV plus extended field radiotherapy in patients with poor prognosis early-intermediate stage Hodgkin's disease

The aim of the study was to verify the possibility of treating patients with poor prognosis early-intermediate Hodgkins disease with a combined modality therapy consisting of three cycles of ABVD followed by extended field irradiation (EFRT). No patient had bulky mediastinum or had previously been administered chemo- or radiotherapy. At pathological restaging, 40/44 (91%) evaluable patients achieved complete responses (CR). After a ten-year followup, freedom from progression (FFP), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 80%, 83% and 81%, respectively. Of the prognostic factors, univariate analysis showed that only stage III negatively influenced RFS, but not OS. Toxicity was mild except for subclinical mediastinal fibrosis in 32.5% of CR patients. No patient reported reduced fertility. Two cases of second neoplasms were recorded: one ameboid glioma and one thymoma, both occurring within five years after discontinuing chemo-radiotherapy. Our data suggest that three cycles of ABVD preceeding EFRT is an effective treatment for poor prognosis early-intermediate stage Hodgkins disease; nevertheless, stage III patients and some stage II patients with unfavorable prognostic factors should be treated with a more aggressive approach.

Cyclophosphamide, Novantrone, Fluorouracil (CNF) + G-CSF Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

Chemotherapy as the primary treatment of breast cancer (Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy) will become a common therapeutic option even in operable disease. In fact, it has been demonstrated that breast conserving surgery in women with small tumors (< 2 cm), can achieve results comparable to radical mastectomy [1, 2], and that in locally advanced disease, optimal results can be obtained by the multidisciplinary approach (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy) [3, 4].