M.C.M. Arkesteijn
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M.C.M. Arkesteijn.
American Journal of Evaluation | 2010
Barbara van Mierlo; M.C.M. Arkesteijn; Cees Leeuwis
Networks aiming for fundamental changes bring together a variety of actors who are part and parcel of a problematic context. These system innovation projects need to be accompanied by a monitoring and evaluation approach that supports and maintains reflexivity to be able to deal with uncertainties and conflicts while challenging current practices and related institutions. This article reports on experiences with reflexive process monitoring (RPM)—an approach that has been applied in several networks in the Dutch agricultural sector, which strive for sustainable development. Particular attention is paid to conducting system analyses—a core element of the methodology. The first results show that system analyses indeed have the potential to enhance reflexivity if carried out collectively. However, regular patterns of thinking and acting within projects interfere in subtle ways with the new knowledge generated and limit the transformation of the reflexive feedback and insights into action.
Evaluation | 2015
M.C.M. Arkesteijn; Barbara van Mierlo; Cees Leeuwis
Within development cooperation, development issues are increasingly recognized as complex problems requiring new paths towards solving them. In addition to the commonly used two dimensions of complex problems (uncertainty and disagreement), we introduce a third dimension: systemic stability; that is, stability provided by rules, relations and complementary technology. This article reflects on how development evaluation methodologies and especially those introducing a complexity perspective address these three dimensions. Inferring that this third dimension deserves more attention, we explore the characteristics of reflexive evaluation approaches that challenge systemic stability and support processes of learning and institutional change. We conclude that reflexive evaluation approaches may well complement current system approaches in development evaluation practice.
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2010
B.C. van Mierlo; B.J. Regeer; M. van Amstel; M.C.M. Arkesteijn; V. Beekman; Joske Bunders; T. de Cock Buning; Boelie Elzen; A.C. Hoes; Cees Leeuwis
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2010
B.C. van Mierlo; B.J. Regeer; M. van Amstel; M.C.M. Arkesteijn; V. Beekman; Joske Bunders; T. de Cock Buning; Boelie Elzen; A.C. Hoes; Cees Leeuwis
Veterinary Microbiology | 2007
M.C.M. Arkesteijn; B.C. van Mierlo; J.I. Potters
Syscope Magazine | 2008
M.C.M. Arkesteijn; B.C. van Mierlo
Archive | 2013
M.C.M. Arkesteijn; B. van Mierlo
Archive | 2010
B.C. van Mierlo; M. van Amstel; M.C.M. Arkesteijn; Boelie Elzen
Transitions towards sustainable agriculture and food chains in peri-urban areas | 2009
B.C. van Mierlo; M.C.M. Arkesteijn
Catena | 2009
B. van Mierlo; M.C.M. Arkesteijn; Boelie Elzen; Cees Leeuwis