M. C. Stroh
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. C. Stroh.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2010
J. Tueller; W. H. Baumgartner; Craig B. Markwardt; G. K. Skinner; R. F. Mushotzky; M. Ajello; S. D. Barthelmy; A. P. Beardmore; W. N. Brandt; D. N. Burrows; Guido Chincarini; Sergio Campana; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; P. A. Evans; E. E. Fenimore; N. Gehrels; Olivier Godet; Dirk Grupe; S. T. Holland; J. A. Kennea; Hans A. Krimm; M. Koss; A. Moretti; Koji Mukai; J. P. Osborne; Takashi Okajima; Claudio Pagani; Kim L. Page; David M. Palmer
We present the catalog of sources detected in the first 22 months of data from the hard X-ray survey (14-195 keV) conducted with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) coded mask imager on the Swift satellite. The catalog contains 461 sources detected above the 4.8σ level with BAT. High angular resolution X-ray data for every source from Swift-XRT or archival data have allowed associations to be made with known counterparts in other wavelength bands for over 97% of the detections, including the discovery of ~30 galaxies previously unknown as active galactic nuclei and several new Galactic sources. A total of 266 of the sources are associated with Seyfert galaxies (median redshift z ~ 0.03) or blazars, with the majority of the remaining sources associated with X-ray binaries in our Galaxy. This ongoing survey is the first uniform all-sky hard X-ray survey since HEAO-1 in 1977. Since the publication of the nine-month BAT survey we have increased the number of energy channels from four to eight and have substantially increased the number of sources with accurate average spectra. The BAT 22 month catalog is the product of the most sensitive all-sky survey in the hard X-ray band, with a detection sensitivity (4.8σ) of 2.2 × 10–11 erg cm–2 s–1 (1 mCrab) over most of the sky in the 14-195 keV band.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Guido Chincarini; A. Moretti; Patrizia Romano; A. Falcone; David C. Morris; Judith Lea Racusin; Sergio Campana; S. Covino; C. Guidorzi; G. Tagliaferri; D. N. Burrows; Claudio Pagani; M. C. Stroh; Dirk Grupe; Milvia Capalbi; G. Cusumano; N. Gehrels; P. Giommi; V. La Parola; Vanessa Mangano; T. Mineo; John A. Nousek; P. T. O’Brien; Kim L. Page; Matteo Perri; E. Troja; R. Willingale; Bing Zhang
We present the first systematic investigation of the morphological and timing properties of flares in GRBs observed by Swift XRT. We consider a large sample drawn from all GRBs detected by Swift, INTEGRAL, and HETE-2 prior to 2006 January 31, which had an XRT follow-up and which showed significant flaring. Our sample of 33 GRBs includes long and short, at low and high redshift, and a total of 69 flares. The strongest flares occur in the early phases, with a clear anticorrelation between the flare peak intensity and the flare time of occurrence. Fitting each X-ray flare with a Gaussian model, we find that the mean ratio of the width and peak time is --> ? t/t = 0.13 ? 0.10, albeit with a large scatter. Late flares at times >2000 s have long durations, -->? t > 300 s, and can be very energetic compared to the underlying continuum. We further investigated whether there is a clear link between the number of pulses detected in the prompt phase by BAT and the number of X-ray flares detected by XRT, finding no correlation. However, we find that the distribution of intensity ratios between successive BAT prompt pulses and that between successive XRT flares is the same, an indication of a common origin for gamma-ray pulses and X-ray flares. All evidence indicates that flares are indeed related to the workings of the central engine and, in the standard fireball scenario, originate from internal shocks rather than external shocks. While all flares can be explained by long-lasting engine activity, 29/69 flares may also be explained by refreshed shocks. However, 10 can only be explained by prolonged activity of the central engine.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
A. Falcone; David C. Morris; Judith Lea Racusin; Guido Chincarini; A. Moretti; Patrizia Romano; D. N. Burrows; Claudio Pagani; M. C. Stroh; Dirk Grupe; Sergio Campana; S. Covino; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; R. Willingale; N. Gehrels
GRB observations with Swift produced the initially surprising result that many bursts have large, late-time X-ray flares. The flares were sometimes intense, had rapid rise and decay phases, and occurred late relative to the prompt phase. Many GRBs have had several flares, which were sometimes overlapping. The origin of the flares can be investigated by comparing the spectra during the flares to those of the afterglow and the initial prompt emission. In this work we have analyzed all significant X-ray flares from the first 110 GRBs observed by Swift. Significant X-ray flares (>3 -->σ ) were found in 33 of these GRBs, with 77 flares detected. A variety of spectral models have been fit to each flare. We find that the spectral fits sometimes favor a Band function model, which is more akin to the prompt emission than to that of the afterglow. While some flares are approximately as energetic as the prompt GRB emission, we find that the average fluence of the flares is approximately 10 times below the average prompt GRB fluence. We also find that the peak energy of the observed flares is typically in the soft X-ray band, as one might expect due to the X-ray selection of the sample. These results, when combined with those presented in the companion paper on temporal properties of flares, support the hypothesis that many X-ray flares are from late-time activity of the internal engine that spawned the initial GRB, not from an afterglow-related effect.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
Dirk Grupe; Caryl Gronwall; Xiang-Yu Wang; Peter W. A. Roming; J. R. Cummings; Bing Zhang; P. Meszaros; Maria Diaz Trigo; P. T. O’Brien; Kim L. Page; A. P. Beardmore; Olivier Godet; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Peter J. Brown; S. Koch; David C. Morris; M. C. Stroh; David N. Burrows; John A. Nousek; Margaret Chester; Stefan Immler; Vanessa Mangano; Patrizia Romano; Guido Chincarini; Julian P. Osborne; Takanori Sakamoto; Neil Gehrels
We report the results of the Swift and XMM observations of the Swift-discovered long Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 060729 (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Stephen D. Bongiorno; A. Falcone; M. C. Stroh; Jamie Holder; J. L. Skilton; J. A. Hinton; Neil Gehrels; Jeff Grube
T_{90}
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2013
Bindu Rani; T. P. Krichbaum; L. Fuhrmann; Markus Böttcher; B. Lott; Hugh D. Aller; Margo F. Aller; E. Angelakis; U. Bach; D. Bastieri; A. Falcone; Yasushi Fukazawa; K. E. Gabanyi; Alok C. Gupta; M. A. Gurwell; R. Itoh; Koji S. Kawabata; M. Krips; A. Lähteenmäki; Xiao-Lan Liu; N. Marchili; W. Max-Moerbeck; I. Nestoras; E. Nieppola; G. Quintana-Lacaci; Anthony C. S. Readhead; J. L. Richards; Mahito Sasada; A. Sievers; K. V. Sokolovsky
=115s). The afterglow of this burst was exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as at UV/Optical wavelengths showing an unusually long slow decay phase (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2009
V. A. Acciari; E. Aliu; T. Arlen; M. Bautista; M. Beilicke; W. Benbow; M. Böttcher; S. M. Bradbury; V. Bugaev; Yousaf M. Butt; K. L. Byrum; A. Cannon; A. Cesarini; Y. C. Chow; L. Ciupik; P. Cogan; P. Colin; W. Cui; M. K. Daniel; R. Dickherber; T. Ergin; A. Falcone; S. J. Fegan; J. P. Finley; P. Fortin; L. Fortson; A. Furniss; D. Gall; G. H. Gillanders; J. Grube
\alpha
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2007
D. N. Burrows; A. Falcone; Guido Chincarini; David C. Morris; Patrizia Romano; J. E. Hill; Olivier Godet; A. Moretti; Hans A. Krimm; J.P Osborne; Judith Lea Racusin; Vanessa Mangano; Kim L. Page; Matteo Perri; M. C. Stroh
=0.14\plm0.02) suggesting a larger energy injection phase at early times than in other bursts. The X-ray light curve displays a break at about 60 ks after the burst. The X-ray decay slope after the break is
web science | 2010
A. Falcone; J. Grube; J. A. Hinton; Jamie Holder; G. Maier; R. Mukherjee; J. L. Skilton; M. C. Stroh
\alpha
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Matthew Pryal; Abe D. Falcone; M. C. Stroh
=1.29\plm0.03. Up to 125 days after the burst we do not detect a jet break, suggesting that the jet opening angle is larger than 28 degrees. In the first 2 minutes after the burst (rest frame) the X-ray spectrum of the burst changed dramatically from a hard X-ray spectrum to a very soft one. We find that the X-ray spectra at this early phase can all be fitted by an absorbed single power law model or alternatively by a blackbody plus power law model. The power law fits show that the X-ray spectrum becomes steeper while the absorption column density decreases. In Swifts UV/Optical telescope the afterglow was clearly detected up to 9 days after the burst in all 6 filters and even longer in some of the UV filters with the latest detection in the UVW1 31 days after the burst. A break at about 50 ks is clearly detected in all 6 UVOT filters from a shallow decay slope of about 0.3 and a steeper decay slope of 1.3. In addition to the \swift observations we also present and discuss the results from a 61 ks ToO observation by XMM. (Abriviated)We report the results of the Swift and XMM-Newton observations of the Swift -discovered GRB 060729 (T90 = 115 s). The afterglow of this burst was exceptionally bright in X-rays as well as at UV/optical wavelengths, showing an unusually long slow decay phase (? = 0.14 ? 0.02), suggesting a larger energy injection phase at early times than in other bursts. The X-ray light curve displays a break at about 60 ks after the burst. The X-ray decay slope after the break is ? = 1.29 ? 0.03. Up to 125 days after the burst we do not detect a jet break, suggesting that the jet opening angle is larger than 28?. We find that the X-ray spectra of the early phase change dramatically and can all be fitted by an absorbed single-power-law models or alternatively by a blackbody plus power-law model. The power-law fits show that the X-ray spectrum becomes steeper while the absorption column density decreases. In the blackbody model the temperature decreases from kT = 0.6 to 0.1 keV between 85 and 160 s after the burst in the rest frame. The afterglow was clearly detected up to 9 days after the burst in all six UVOT filters and in UVW1 even for 31 days. A break at about 50 ks is clearly detected in all six UVOT filters from a shallow decay slope of about 0.3 and a steeper decay slope of 1.3.The XMM-Newton observations started about 12 hr after the burst and show a typical afterglow X-ray spectrum with ?X = 1.1 and absorption column density of 1 ? 1021 cm-2.