M. Eric Lyall
Air Force Research Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Eric Lyall.
The 15th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring | 2008
Brandon Arritt; Steven Buckley; J. Ganley; Jeffry S. Welsh; Benjamin K. Henderson; M. Eric Lyall; Andrew D. Williams; Jeffrey C. Preble; John DiPalma; Greg Mehle; R. Roopnarine
The Air Force Research Laboratory/Space Vehicles Directorate (AFRL/RV) is developing a satellite structural architecture in support of the Department of Defenses Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) initiative. Such a structural architecture must enable rapid Assembly, Integration, and Test (AI&T) of the satellite, accommodate multiple configurations (to include structural configurations, components, and payloads), and incorporate structurally integrated thermal management and electronics, while providing sufficient strength, stiffness, and alignment accuracy. The chosen approach will allow a wide range of satellite structures to be assembled from a relatively small set of structural components. This paper details the efforts of AFRL, and its contractors, to develop the technology necessary to realize these goals.
ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2013 | 2013
Keith Sangston; Jesse Little; M. Eric Lyall; Rolf Sondergaard
The hypothesis, posed in Part I [1], that excessive endwall loss of high lift low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoils is due to the influence of high stagger angles on the endwall pressure distribution and not front-loading is evaluated in a linear cascade at Re = 100,000 using both experimental and computational studies. A nominally high lift and high stagger angle front-loaded profile (L2F) with aspect ratio 3.5 is contoured at the endwall to reduce the stagger angle while maintaining the front loading. The contouring process effectively generates a fillet at the endwall, so the resulting airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (Endwall Fillet). Although referred to as a fillet, this profile contouring process is novel in that it is designed to isolate the effect of stagger angle on endwall loss. Total pressure loss measurements downstream of the blade row indicate that the use of the lower stagger angle at the endwall reduces mixed out mass averaged endwall and passage losses approximately 23% and 10% respectively. This is in good agreement with computational results used to design the contour which predict 18% and 7% loss reductions. The endwall flow field of the L2F and L2F-EF models is measured using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the passage. These data are used to quantify changes in the endwall flow field due to the contouring. PIV results show that this loss reduction is characterized by reduced inlet boundary layer separation as well as a change in strength and location of the suction side horseshoe vortex (SHV) and passage vortex (PV). The endwall profile contouring also produces a reduction in all terms of the Reynolds stress tensor consistent with a decrease in deformation work and overall flow unsteadiness. These results confirm that the stagger angle has a significant effect on high-lift front-loaded LPT endwall loss. Low stagger profiling is successful in reducing endwall loss by limiting the development and migration of the low momentum fluid associated with the SHV and PV interaction.Copyright
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2014
M. Eric Lyall; Paul I. King; John P. Clark; Rolf Sondergaard
The hypothesis, posed in Part I, that excessive end wall loss of high lift low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoils is due to the influence of high stagger angles on the end wall pressure distribution and not front loading is evaluated in a linear cascade at Re = 100,000 using both experimental and computational studies. A nominally high lift and high stagger angle front-loaded profile (L2F) with aspect ratio 3.5 is contoured at the end wall to reduce the stagger angle while maintaining the front loading. The contouring process effectively generates a fillet at the end wall, so the resulting airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (end wall fillet). Although referred to as a fillet, this profile contouring process is novel in that it is designed to isolate the effect of stagger angle on end wall loss. Total pressure loss measurements downstream of the blade row indicate that the use of the lower stagger angle at the end wall reduces mixed out mass averaged end wall and passage losses approximately 23% and 10%, respectively. This is in good agreement with computational results used to design the contour which predict 18% and 7% loss reductions. The end wall flow field of the L2F and L2F-EF models is measured using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the passage. These data are used to quantify changes in the end wall flow field due to the contouring. PIV results show that this loss reduction is characterized by reduced inlet boundary layer separation as well as a change in strength and location of the suction side horseshoe vortex (SHV) and passage vortex (PV). The end wall profile contouring also produces a reduction in all terms of the Reynolds stress tensor consistent with a decrease in deformation work and overall flow unsteadiness. These results confirm that the stagger angle has a significant effect on high-lift front-loaded LPT end wall loss. Low stagger profiling is successful in reducing end wall loss by limiting the development and migration of the low momentum fluid associated with the SHV and PV interaction.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2009
Andrew D. Williams; M. Eric Lyall; Derek W. Hengeveld; Quinn Young
The traditional approach to satellite design is a customized and highly optimized satellite bus. The primary design driver is to minimize mass but often at the expense of schedule and non-recurring engineering costs. The result after years of development is a high performance system with minimal flexibility. Consequently, there is a need for responsive, small satellites that are able to accommodate different missions, changing threats, and emerging technologies for which the traditional development approach is unable to satisfy. Instead, systems must be modular and/or robust. One of the subsystems that will be challenging for the development of modular and/or robust architectures is the thermal control subsystem (TCS). To design a traditional TCS, virtually every aspect of the mission, the satellite, and the components must be known before an intense design program can be completed. However, the mission, payload, components, and requirements are largely unknown before mission initiation. To provide a baseline for the TCS design and to help bound the problem for the development of robust thermal systems, the range of external and internal heat loads for small satellites were evaluated. From this analysis, the realistic worst design cases were identified along with other requirements for robust thermal control systems. Finally, the paper will discuss the merits of various thermal architectures and the challenges associated with achieving the requirements for robust thermal control for responsive satellite buses.
ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2012
M. Eric Lyall; Paul I. King; Rolf Sondergaard
A high lift LPT profile designated L2A is used as a test bed for studying the origin of endwall mixing loss and the role of vortical structures in loss development. It is shown analytically and experimentally that the mixing forces within the endwall wake can be decoupled into either mean flow or turbulent forces, and can be further classified as either reversible or irreversible. Among the irreversible forces, mean flow shear is negligible compared to turbulent shear, suggesting that turbulence dissipation is the dominant cause of loss generation. As a result, the mean flow components of the vortical structures do not generate significant mixing losses. Rather than mixing effects, the mean flow of the vortices cause the suction surface boundary layer to separate inside the passage, thereby generating the large low energy regions typical of endwall flows. Losses are generated as the low energy regions mix out. This vortex separation effect is demonstrated with an experiment using a profile fence and pressure surface modification near the endwall. The findings in this paper suggest that profile modifications near the endwall that suppress suction surface separation may provide loss reductions additive to those that weaken vortical structures, such as endwall contouring.
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2012
M. Eric Lyall; Paul I. King; Rolf Sondergaard; John P. Clark; Mark McQuilling
Archive | 2009
M. Eric Lyall; Andrew D. Williams; Derek W. Hengeveld; Quinn Young
ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition | 2017
M. Eric Lyall; Fred J. Eisert; Douglas C. Rabe; Patrick M. Fleisher
Journal of Turbomachinery-transactions of The Asme | 2016
Keith Sangston; Jesse Little; M. Eric Lyall; Rolf Sondergaard
Archive | 2008
Andrew D. Williams; Brandon Arritt; M. Eric Lyall