M. J. Mulcahey

International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011)

This article represents the content of the booklet, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2011, published by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). For further explanation of the clarifications and changes in this revision, see the accompanying article (Kirshblum S., et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011:doi 10.1179/107902611X13186000420242 The spinal cord is the major conduit through which motor and sensory information travels between the brain and body. The spinal cord contains longitudinally oriented spinal tracts (white matter) surrounding central areas (gray matter) where most spinal neuronal cell bodies are located. The gray matter is organized into segments comprising sensory and motor neurons. Axons from spinal sensory neurons enter and axons from motor neurons leave the spinal cord via segmental nerves or roots. In the cervical spine, there are 8 nerve roots. Cervical roots of C1-C7 are named according to the vertebra above which they exit (i.e. C1 exits above the C1 vertebra, just below the skull and C6 nerve roots pass between the C5 and C6 vertebrae) whereas C8 exists between the C7 and T1 vertebra; as there is no C8 vertebra. The C1 nerve root does not have a sensory component that is tested on the International Standards Examination. The thoracic spine has 12 distinct nerve roots and the lumbar spine consists of 5 distinct nerve roots that are each named accordingly as they exit below the level of the respective vertebrae. The sacrum consists of 5 embryonic sections that have fused into one bony structure with 5 distinct nerve roots that exit via the sacral foramina. The spinal cord itself ends at approximately the L1-2 vertebral level. The distal most part of the spinal cord is called the conus medullaris. The cauda equina is a cluster of paired (right and left) lumbosacral nerve roots that originate in the region of the conus medullaris and travel down through the thecal sac and exit via the intervertebral foramen below their respective vertebral levels. There may be 0, 1, or 2 coccygeal nerves but they do not have a role with the International Standards examination in accordance with the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Each root receives sensory information from skin areas called dermatomes. Similarly each root innervates a group of muscles called a myotome. While a dermatome usually represents a discrete and contiguous skin area, most roots innervate more than one muscle, and most muscles are innervated by more than one root. Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects conduction of sensory and motor signals across the site(s) of lesion(s), as well as the autonomic nervous system. By systematically examining the dermatomes and myotomes, as described within this booklet, one can determine the cord segments affected by the SCI. From the International Standards examination several measures of neurological damage are generated, e.g., Sensory and Motor Levels (on right and left sides), NLI, Sensory Scores (Pin Prick and Light Touch), Motor Scores (upper and lower limb), and ZPP. This booklet also describes the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) Impairment Scale (AIS) to classify the severity (i.e. completeness) of injury. This booklet begins with basic definitions of common terms used herein. The section that follows describes the recommended International Standards examination, including both sensory and motor components. Subsequent sections cover sensory and motor scores, the AIS classification, and clinical syndromes associated with SCI. For ease of reference, a worksheet (Appendix 1) of the recommended examination is included, with a summary of steps used to classify the injury (Appendix 2). A full-size version for photocopying and use in patient records has been included as an enclosure and may also be downloaded from the ASIA website (www.asia-spinalinjury.org). Additional details regarding the examination and e-Learning training materials can also be obtained from the website15.

Reference for the 2011 revision of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury

Abstract The latest revision of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) was available in booklet format in June 2011, and is published in this issue of the Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. The ISNCSCI were initially developed in 1982 to provide guidelines for the consistent classification of the neurological level and extent of the injury to achieve reliable data for clinical care and research studies. This revision was generated from the Standards Committee of the American Spinal Injury Association in collaboration with the International Spinal Cord Societys Education Committee. This article details and explains the updates and serves as a reference for these revisions and clarifications.

2009 Review and Revisions of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract Summary: The International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) were recently reviewed by the ASIAs Education and Standards Committees, in collaboration with the International Spinal Cord Societys Education Committee. Available educational materials for the ISNCSCI were also reviewed. The last citable reference for the ISNCSCIs methodology is the ISNCSCI Reference Manual, published in 2003 by ASIA. The Standards Committee recommended that the numerous items that were revised should be published and a precedent established for a routine published review of the ISNCSCI. The Standards Committee also noted that, although the 2008 reprint pocket booklet is current, the reference manual should be revised after proposals to modify/revise the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS as modified from Frankel) are considered. In addition, the Standards Committee adopted a process for thorough and transparent review of requests to revise the ISNCSCI.

An Innovative Technique of Vertebral Body Stapling for the Treatment of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis : A Feasibility, Safety, and Utility Study

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objectives. To report the feasibility, safety, and utility of vertebral body stapling without fusion as an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The success rate of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ranges from 50% to 82%. However, poor self-image and brace compliance are issues for the patient. An alternative method of treatment such as a motion-preserving vertebral body stapling to provide curve stability would be desirable. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients (27 curves) with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with vertebral body stapling. Patients were immature as defined by Risser sign ≤2. Results. The concept of vertebral body stapling of the convex side of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is feasible. The procedure was safe, with no major complications and three minor complications. One patient had an intraoperative segmental vein bleed resulting in an increased estimated blood loss of 1500 cc as compared to the average estimated blood loss of 247 cc for all patients. One patient had a chylothorax and one pancreatitis. No patient has had a staple dislodge or move during the follow-up period (mean 11 months, range 3–36 months), and no adverse effects specifically from the staples have been identified. Utility (defined as curve stability) was evaluated in 10 patients with stapling with greater than 1-year follow-up (mean 22.6 months) and preoperative curve <50°. Progression of ≥6° or beyond 50° was considered a failure of treatment. Of these 10 patients, 6 (60%) remained stable or improved and 4 (40%) progressed. One of 10 (10%) in the stapling group had progressed beyond 50° and went on to fusion. Six patients required stapling of a second curve, three as part of the primary surgery, and three as a second stage, because a second untreated curve progressed. The results need to be considered with caution, as the follow-up is still short. Conclusions. The data demonstrate that vertebral body stapling for the treatment of scoliosis in the adolescent was feasible and safe in this group of 21 patients. In the short-term, stapling appears to have utility in stabilizing curves of progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: Recent assessments and recommendations for future directions

Study design:Review by the spinal cord outcomes partnership endeavor (SCOPE), which is a broad-based international consortium of scientists and clinical researchers representing academic institutions, industry, government agencies, not-for-profit organizations and foundations.Objectives:Assessment of current and evolving tools for evaluating human spinal cord injury (SCI) outcomes for both clinical diagnosis and clinical research studies.Methods:a framework for the appraisal of evidence of metric properties was used to examine outcome tools or tests for accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and validity for human SCI.Results:Imaging, neurological, functional, autonomic, sexual health, bladder/bowel, pain and psychosocial tools were evaluated. Several specific tools for human SCI studies have or are being developed to allow the more accurate determination for a clinically meaningful benefit (improvement in functional outcome or quality of life) being achieved as a result of a therapeutic intervention.Conclusion:Significant progress has been made, but further validation studies are required to identify the most appropriate tools for specific targets in a human SCI study or clinical trial.

Functional Recovery Measures for Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinical Practice and Research

Abstract Background/Objective: The end goal of clinical care and clinical research involving spinal cord injury (SCI) is to improve the overall ability of persons living with SCI to function on a daily basis. Neurologic recovery does not always translate into functional recovery. Thus, sensitive outcome measures designed to assess functional status relevant to SCI are important to develop. Method: Evaluation of currently available SCI functional outcome measures by a multinational work group. Results: The 4 measures that fit the prespecified inclusion criteria were the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). The MBI and the QIF were found to have minimal evidence for validity, whereas the FIM and the SCIM were found to be reliable and valid. The MBI has little clinical utility for use in the SCI population. Likewise, the FIM applies mainly when measuring burden of care, which is not necessarily a reflection of functional recovery. The QIF is useful for measuring functional recovery but only in a subpopulation of people with SCI, and substantial validity data are still required. The SCIM is the only functional recovery outcome measure designed specifically for SCI. Conclusions: The multinational work group recommends that the latest version of the SCIM (SCIM III) continue to be refined and validated and subsequently implemented worldwide as the primary functional recovery outcome measure for SCI. The QIF may continue to be developed and validated for use as a supplemental tool for the nonambulatory tetraplegic population.

Vertebral body stapling: a fusionless treatment option for a growing child with moderate idiopathic scoliosis.

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. To report the results of vertebral body stapling (VBS) with minimum 2-year follow-up in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. While bracing for idiopathic scoliosis is moderately successful, its efficacy has been called into question, and it carries associated psychosocial ramifications. VBS has been shown to be a safe, feasible alternative to bracing for idiopathic scoliosis. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 28 of 29 patients (96%) with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBS followed for a minimum of 2 years. Inclusion criteria: Risser sign of 0 or 1 and coronal curve measuring between 20° and 45°. Results. There were 26 thoracic and 15 lumbar curves. Average follow-up was 3.2 years. The procedure was considered a success if curves corrected to within 10° of preoperative measurement or decreased >10°. Thoracic curves measuring <35° had a success rate of 77.7%. Curves which reached ≤20° on first erect radiograph had a success rate of 85.7%. Flexible curves >50% correction on bend film had a success rate of 71.4%. Of the 26 curves, 4 (15%) showed correction >10°. Kyphosis improved in 7 patients with preoperative hypokyphosis (<10° of kyphosis T5–T12). Of the patients, 83.5% had remaining normal thoracic kyphosis of 10° to 40°. Lumbar curves demonstrated a success rate of 86.7%. Four of the 15 lumbar curves (27%) showed correction >10°. Major complications include rupture of a unrecognized congenital diaphragmatic hernia and curve overcorrection in 1 patient. Two minor complications included superior mesenteric artery syndrome and atelectasis due to a mucous plug. There were no instances of staple dislodgement or neurovascular injury. Conclusion. Analysis of patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) with high-risk progression treated with vertebral body stapling (VBS) and minimum 2-year follow-up shows a success rate of 87% in all lumbar curves and in 79% of thoracic curves <35°. Thoracic curves >35° were not successful and require alternative treatments.

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: reliability of data when applied to children and youths

Study design:Intra-rater reliability study, cross-sectional design.Objectives:To determine reliability of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI) motor and sensory exam in children.Setting:Nonprofit pediatric hospital.Methods:In all, 74 subjects had two trials of the motor and sensory exams. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated for total motor (TM), pin prick (PP) and light touch (LT) scores for the entire sample, four age groups, severity and type of injury. Coefficients >0.90=high reliability; 0.75–0.90=moderate reliability and <0.75=inadequate reliability.Results:Children <four years (N=7) were unable to participate in the exams. TM ICC, CI=0.888, 0.821–0.93 (N=73); PP ICC, CI=0.975, 0.96–0.98 (N=67) and LT ICC, CI=0.974, 0.974–0.985 (N=68). When age was considered, 4–5 year: TM ICC, CI=0.917, 0.69–0.98 (N=11), PP=0.912, 0.49–0.985 (N=7), LT=0.948, 0.63–0.993 (N=6); for 6–11 year: TM ICC, CI=0.711, 0.226–0.892 (N=18), PP=0.952, 0.867–0.983 (M=17), LT=0.952, 0.867–0.983 (N=17); for 12–15 year: TM ICC, CI=0.893, 0.723–0.959 (N=19), PP=0.982, 0.953–0.993 (N=19), LT=0.982, 0.953–0.993 (N=19); for 16–21 year: TM ICC, CI=0.912, 0.80–0.961 (N=25), PP=0.98, 0.954–0.991 (N=25), LT=0.98, 0.954–0.991 (N=25). ICC for severity and type of injury >0.90 except for TM in complete injuries (0.808).Conclusion:The ISCSCI exams may have poor utility in children under 4 years. While reliability values for the motor and sensory exams met or exceeded recommended values, wide CI suggest poor precision of the motor exam in children under 15 years of age and sensory exams in children under 5 years.Sponsorship:This study was supported by the Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia Hospital.

Implanted functional electrical stimulation hand system in adolescents with spinal injuries: An evaluation

OBJECTIVE To study the utility and functional benefits of an implanted functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for hand grasp and release in adolescents with tetraplegia secondary to spinal cord injuries. DESIGN Intervention study with before-after trial measurement with each subject as his or her own control. SETTING Nonprofit pediatric orthopedic rehabilitation facility specializing in spinal cord injury. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of five adolescents between 16 and 18 years of age with C5 or C6 level tetraplegia at least 1 year after traumatic spinal cord injury. Key muscles for palmar and lateral grasp and release were excitable by electrical stimulation. INTERVENTIONS A multichannel stimulator/receiver and eight electrodes were surgically implanted to provide stimulated palmar and lateral grasp and release. In conjunction with implantation of the FES hand system, surgical reconstruction in the form of tendon transfers, tendon lengthenings and releases, and joint arthrodeses was performed to augment stimulated hand function. Rehabilitation of the tendon transfers and training in the use of the FES hand system were provided. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Measurements of pinch and grasp force, the Grasp and Release Test (GRT), and an assessment of six activities of daily living (ADL) were administered before implantation of the FES hand system and at regular follow-up intervals. Results of the stimulated response of individual muscles and surgical reconstruction were evaluated using standard and stimulated muscle testing techniques and standard assessment of joint range of motion. All subjects completed followup testing. RESULTS Lateral and palmar forces were significantly greater than baseline forces (p = .043). Heavy objects on the GRT could only be manipulated with FES, and FES increased the level of independence in 25 of 30 ADL comparisons (5 subjects, 6 activities) as compared to baseline. After training, FES was preferred in 21 of 30 comparisons over the typical means of task completion. Of the 40 electrodes implanted, 37 continue to provide excellent stimulated responses and all of the implanted stimulators have functioned without problems. The surgical reconstruction procedures greatly enhanced FES hand function by either expanding the workspace in which to utilize FES (deltoid to triceps transfer), stabilizing the wrist (brachioradialis to wrist extensor transfer), or stabilizing joints (intrinsic tenodesis transfer, FPL split transfer). CONCLUSION For five adolescents with tetraplegia, the combination of FES and surgical reconstruction provided active palmar and lateral grasp and release. Laboratory-based assessments demonstrated that the FES system increased pinch force, improved the manipulation of objects, and typically increased independence in six standard ADL as compared to pre-FES hand function. The study also showed that the five adolescents generally preferred FES for most of the ADL tested. Data on the benefits of the implanted FES hand system outside of the laboratory are needed to understand the full potential of FES.

Prospective evaluation of biceps to triceps and deltoid to triceps for Elbow extension in tetraplegia

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the deltoid to triceps and biceps to triceps transfers for restoration of elbow extension in young persons with tetraplegia. METHODS This was a prospective randomized study. Sixteen arms of 9 subjects between 8 and 20 years of age with cervical-level spinal cord injuries were assigned randomly to undergo either a deltoid to triceps transfer or a biceps to triceps transfer. All arms were followed-up prospectively for at least 2 years after surgery. RESULTS Elbow extension was restored in 8 arms via the deltoid and in 8 arms via the biceps transfers. At the 24-month follow-up evaluation 7 of the 8 biceps transfers produced antigravity strength (grade 3 or better); in contrast only one arm with the deltoid transfer was able to extend against gravity. There was a considerable but subclinical loss (no subject appreciated any functional deficit) of elbow flexion torque after both transfers. Three months after surgery the deltoid group showed a 51% loss of elbow flexion torque and the biceps group showed a 52% loss of elbow flexion torque. By 24 months after surgery both groups improved but still showed a loss of flexion torque (deltoid 32%, biceps 47%). After gaining elbow extension the subjects in both groups rated the performance of most activities of daily living (ADL) and all self-selected activities as better, as measured on the Modified University of Minnesota Tendon Transfer Functional Improvement Questionnaire and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, respectively. Likewise all subjects were more satisfied with performance of their goals after undergoing elbow extension reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS This study showed the benefits of restoring elbow extension in persons with tetraplegia and provided support for the biceps transfer as an alternative to the deltoid to triceps transfer in individuals with good brachialis and supinator strength.