M. Jarvis
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Jarvis.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2006
Catherine Heymans; Ludovic Van Waerbeke; David J. Bacon; Joel Bergé; G. M. Bernstein; Emmanuel Bertin; Sarah Bridle; Michael L. Brown; Douglas Clowe; Haakon Dahle; Thomas Erben; Meghan E. Gray; Marco Hetterscheidt; Henk Hoekstra; P. Hudelot; M. Jarvis; Konrad Kuijken; V. E. Margoniner; Richard Massey; Y. Mellier; Reiko Nakajima; Alexandre Refregier; Jason Rhodes; Tim Schrabback; David Michael Wittman
The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper, we present the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with shear measurements accurate to better than 7 per cent. The dominant source of measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the measured shear is over or underestimated by a constant multiplicative factor. This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself, selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current surveys. Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2007
Richard Massey; Catherine Heymans; Joel Bergé; G. M. Bernstein; Sarah Bridle; Douglas Clowe; H. Dahle; Richard S. Ellis; Thomas Erben; Marco Hetterscheidt; F. William High; Christopher M. Hirata; Henk Hoekstra; P. Hudelot; M. Jarvis; David E. Johnston; Konrad Kuijken; V. E. Margoniner; Rachel Mandelbaum; Y. Mellier; Reiko Nakajima; Stephane Paulin-Henriksson; Molly S. Peeples; Chris Roat; Alexandre Refregier; Jason Rhodes; Tim Schrabback; Mischa Schirmer; Uros Seljak; Elisabetta Semboloni
The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of weak-lensing measurement, in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. We review 16 current and emerging shear-measurement methods in a common language, and assess their performance by running them (blindly) on simulated images that contain a known shear signal. We determine the common features of algorithms that most successfully recover the input parameters. A desirable goal would be the combination of their best elements into one ultimate shear-measurement method. In this analysis, we achieve previously unattained discriminatory precision via a combination of more extensive simulations and pairs of galaxy images that have been rotated with respect to each other. That removes the otherwise overwhelming noise from their intrinsic ellipticities. Finally, the robustness of our simulation approach is confirmed by testing the relative calibration of methods on real data. Weak-lensing measurements have improved since the first STEP paper. Several methods now consistently achieve better than 2 per cent precision, and are still being developed. However, we can now distinguish all methods from perfect performance. Our main concern continues to be the potential for a multiplicative shear calibration bias: not least because this cannot be internally calibrated with real data. We determine which galaxy populations are responsible for bias and, by adjusting the simulated observing conditions, we also investigate the effects of instrumental and atmospheric parameters. The simulated point spread functions are not allowed to vary spatially, to avoid additional confusion from interpolation errors. We have isolated several previously unrecognized aspects of galaxy shape measurement, in which focused development could provide further progress towards the sub-per cent level of precision desired for future surveys. These areas include the suitable treatment of image pixellization and galaxy morphology evolution. Ignoring the former effect affects the measurement of shear in different directions, leading to an overall underestimation of shear and hence the amplitude of the matter power spectrum. Ignoring the second effect could affect the calibration of shear estimators as a function of galaxy redshift, and the evolution of the lensing signal, which will be vital to measure parameters including the dark energy equation of state.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010
Sarah Bridle; Sreekumar T. Balan; Matthias Bethge; Marc Gentile; Stefan Harmeling; Catherine Heymans; Michael Hirsch; Reshad Hosseini; M. Jarvis; D. Kirk; Thomas D. Kitching; Konrad Kuijken; Antony Lewis; Stephane Paulin-Henriksson; Bernhard Schölkopf; Malin Velander; Lisa Voigt; Dugan Witherick; Adam Amara; G. M. Bernstein; F. Courbin; M. S. S. Gill; Alan Heavens; Rachel Mandelbaum; Richard Massey; Baback Moghaddam; A. Rassat; Alexandre Refregier; Jason Rhodes; Tim Schrabback
We present the results of the Gravitational LEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge, a blind analysis challenge to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted results during the 6-month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million simulated galaxies with a range in signal-to-noise ratio, point spread function ellipticity, galaxy size and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a re-examination of the process of combining information from different galaxies, which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT Challenges, meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional developments in shear measurement algorithms.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
M. Jarvis; Bhuvnesh Jain; G. M. Bernstein; D Dolney
We perform a cosmological parameter analysis of the 75 deg2 CTIO lensing survey in conjunction with cosmic microwave background (CMB) and Type Ia supernovae data. For ΛCDM cosmologies, we find that the amplitude of the power spectrum at low redshift is given by σ8 = 0.81 (95% confidence level), where the error bound includes both statistical and systematic errors. The total of all systematic errors is smaller than the statistical errors, but they do make up a significant fraction of the error budget. We find that weak lensing improves the constraints on dark energy as well. The (constant) dark energy equation of state parameter, w, is measured to be -0.89 (95% c.l.). Marginalizing over a constant w slightly changes the estimate of σ8 to 0.79 (95% c.l.). We also investigate variable w cosmologies but find that the constraints weaken considerably; next-generation surveys are needed to obtain meaningful constraints on the possible time evolution of dark energy.
The Annals of Applied Statistics | 2009
Sarah Bridle; John Shawe-Taylor; Adam Amara; Douglas E. Applegate; Sreekumar T. Balan; Joel Bergé; G. M. Bernstein; H. Dahle; Thomas Erben; M. S. S. Gill; Alan Heavens; Catherine Heymans; F. William High; Henk Hoekstra; M. Jarvis; D. Kirk; Thomas D. Kitching; Jean-Paul Kneib; Konrad Kuijken; David Lagatutta; Rachel Mandelbaum; Richard Massey; Y. Mellier; Baback Moghaddam; Yassir Moudden; Reiko Nakajima; Stephane Paulin-Henriksson; Sandrine Pires; A. Rassat; Alexandre Refregier
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge focuses on a problem that is of crucial importance for future observations in cosmology. The shapes of distant galaxies can be used to determine the properties of dark energy and the nature of gravity, because light from those galaxies is bent by gravity from the intervening dark matter. The observed galaxy images appear distorted, although only slightly, and their shapes must be precisely disentangled from the effects of pixelisation, convolution and noise. The worldwide gravitational lensing community has made significant progress in techniques to measure these distortions via the Shear TEsting Program (STEP). Via STEP, we have run challenges within our own community, and come to recognise that this particular image analysis problem is ideally matched to experts in statistical inference, inverse problems and computational learning. Thus, in order to continue the progress seen in recent years, we are seeking an infusion of new ideas from these communities. This document details the GREAT08 Challenge for potential participants. Please visit www.great08challenge.info for the latest information.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
M. Jarvis; E. Sheldon; J. Zuntz; Tomasz Kacprzak; Sarah Bridle; Adam Amara; Robert Armstrong; M. R. Becker; G. M. Bernstein; C. Bonnett; C. L. Chang; Ritanjan Das; J. P. Dietrich; A. Drlica-Wagner; T. F. Eifler; C. Gangkofner; D. Gruen; Michael Hirsch; Eric Huff; Bhuvnesh Jain; S. Kent; D. Kirk; N. MacCrann; P. Melchior; A. A. Plazas; Alexandre Refregier; Barnaby Rowe; E. S. Rykoff; S. Samuroff; C. Sanchez
We present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera (DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We describe our object selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies respectively. We detail a set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing science applications using the SV data. We also discuss some of the planned algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently accurate shear catalogues for the full 5-year DES, which is expected to cover 5000 square degrees.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2014
Rachel Mandelbaum; Barnaby Rowe; James Bosch; C. Chang; F. Courbin; M. S. S. Gill; M. Jarvis; Arun Kannawadi; Tomasz Kacprzak; Claire Lackner; Alexie Leauthaud; Hironao Miyatake; Reiko Nakajima; Jason Rhodes; Melanie Simet; Joe Zuntz; Bob Armstrong; Sarah Bridle; Jean Coupon; J. P. Dietrich; Marc Gentile; Catherine Heymans; Alden S. Jurling; Stephen M. Kent; D. Kirkby; Daniel Margala; Richard Massey; P. Melchior; J. R. Peterson; A. Roodman
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 3 (GREAT3) challenge is the third in a series of image analysis challenges, with a goal of testing and facilitating the development of methods for analyzing astronomical images that will be used to measure weak gravitational lensing. This measurement requires extremely precise estimation of very small galaxy shape distortions, in the presence of far larger intrinsic galaxy shapes and distortions due to the blurring kernel caused by the atmosphere, telescope optics, and instrumental effects. The GREAT3 challenge is posed to the astronomy, machine learning, and statistics communities, and includes tests of three specific effects that are of immediate relevance to upcoming weak lensing surveys, two of which have never been tested in a community challenge before. These effects include many novel aspects including realistically complex galaxy models based on high-resolution imaging from space; a spatially varying, physically motivated blurring kernel; and a combination of multiple different exposures. To facilitate entry by people new to the field, and for use as a diagnostic tool, the simulation software for the challenge is publicly available, though the exact parameters used for the challenge are blinded. Sample scripts to analyze the challenge data using existing methods will also be provided. See http://great3challenge.info and http://great3.projects.phys.ucl.ac.uk/leaderboard/ for more information.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Eduardo Rozo; E. S. Rykoff; Alexandra Abate; C. Bonnett; M. Crocce; C. Davis; B. Hoyle; Boris Leistedt; Hiranya V. Peiris; Risa H. Wechsler; T. D. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; M. Banerji; A. Bauer; A. Benoit-Lévy; G. M. Bernstein; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; E. Buckley-Geer; D. L. Burke; D. Capozzi; A. Carnero Rosell; Daniela Carollo; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; Francisco J. Castander; Michael J. Childress; C. E. Cunha; C. B. D'Andrea; Tamara M. Davis
We introduce redMaGiC, an automated algorithm for selecting luminous red galaxies (LRGs). The algorithm was specifically developed to minimize photometric redshift uncertainties in photometric large-scale structure studies. redMaGiC achieves this by self-training the colour cuts necessary to produce a luminosity-thresholded LRG sample of constant comoving density. We demonstrate that redMaGiC photo-zs are very nearly as accurate as the best machine learning-based methods, yet they require minimal spectroscopic training, do not suffer from extrapolation biases, and are very nearly Gaussian. We apply our algorithm to Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data to produce a redMaGiC catalogue sampling the redshift range z is an element of [0.2, 0.8]. Our fiducial sample has a comoving space density of 10(-3) (h(-1) Mpc)(-3), and a median photo-z bias (z(spec) - z(photo)) and scatter (sigma(z)/(1 + z)) of 0.005 and 0.017, respectively. The corresponding 5 sigma outlier fraction is 1.4 per cent. We also test our algorithm with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 8 and Stripe 82 data, and discuss how spectroscopic training can be used to control photo-z biases at the 0.1 per cent level.
Astroparticle Physics | 2015
Dragan Huterer; D. Kirkby; Rachel Bean; Andrew J. Connolly; Kyle S. Dawson; Scott Dodelson; August E. Evrard; Bhuvnesh Jain; M. Jarvis; Eric V. Linder; Rachel Mandelbaum; M. May; Alvise Raccanelli; Beth Reid; E. Rozo; Fabian Schmidt; Neelima Sehgal; Anže Slosar; Alexander van Engelen; Hao Yi Wu; Gong-Bo Zhao
The quantity and quality of cosmic structure observations have greatly accelerated in recent years, and further leaps forward will be facilitated by imminent projects. These will enable us to map the evolution of dark and baryonic matter density fluctuations over cosmic history. The way that these fluctuations vary over space and time is sensitive to several pieces of fundamental physics: the primordial perturbations generated by GUT-scale physics; neutrino masses and interactions; the nature of dark matter and dark energy. We focus on the last of these here: the ways that combining probes of growth with those of the cosmic expansion such as distance-redshift relations will pin down the mechanism driving the acceleration of the Universe.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2008
Joseph J. Mohr; Darren Adams; Wayne A. Barkhouse; Cristina E. Beldica; Emmanuel Bertin; Y. Dora Cai; Luiz Nicolaci da Costa; J. Anthony Darnell; Gregory Daues; M. Jarvis; Michelle Gower; Huan Lin; Leandro Martelli; Eric H. Neilsen; Chow-Choong Ngeow; R. Ogando; Alex Parga; E. Sheldon; Douglas L. Tucker; N. Kuropatkin; Chris Stoughton
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration will study cosmic acceleration with a 5000 deg2 griZY survey in the southern sky over 525 nights from 2011-2016. The DES data management (DESDM) system will be used to process and archive these data and the resulting science ready data products. The DESDM system consists of an integrated archive, a processing framework, an ensemble of astronomy codes and a data access framework. We are developing the DESDM system for operation in the high performance computing (HPC) environments at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) and Fermilab. Operating the DESDM system in an HPC environment offers both speed and flexibility. We will employ it for our regular nightly processing needs, and for more compute-intensive tasks such as large scale image coaddition campaigns, extraction of weak lensing shear from the full survey dataset, and massive seasonal reprocessing of the DES data. Data products will be available to the Collaboration and later to the public through a virtual-observatory compatible web portal. Our approach leverages investments in publicly available HPC systems, greatly reducing hardware and maintenance costs to the project, which must deploy and maintain only the storage, database platforms and orchestration and web portal nodes that are specific to DESDM. In Fall 2007, we tested the current DESDM system on both simulated and real survey data. We used Teragrid to process 10 simulated DES nights (3TB of raw data), ingesting and calibrating approximately 250 million objects into the DES Archive database. We also used DESDM to process and calibrate over 50 nights of survey data acquired with the Mosaic2 camera. Comparison to truth tables in the case of the simulated data and internal crosschecks in the case of the real data indicate that astrometric and photometric data quality is excellent.