M. L. Slevin

Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

The extent to which a doctor or health professional can make a valid assessment of a patients quality of life, anxiety and depression was investigated in a series of cancer patients. Doctors and patients filled out the same forms, viz. the Karnofsky, Spitzer, Linear Analogue Self Assessment Scales and a series of simple scales designed for this study, at the same time. Correlations between the two sets of scores were poor, suggesting that the doctors could not accurately determine what the patients felt. A further study examining the reproducibility of these scales demonstrated considerable variability in results between different doctors. It is concluded that if a reliable and consistent method of measuring quality of life in cancer patients is required, it must come from the patients themselves and not from their doctors and nurses.

Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.

OBJECTIVE--To compare responses of patients with cancer with those of a matched control group, cancer specialists, general practitioners, and cancer nurses in assessing personal cost-benefit of chemotherapy. DESIGN--Prospective study of consecutively recruited patients with cancer and other groups by questionnaire; half of the patients received the questionnaire again three months after starting treatment. SETTING--A medical oncology ward of a London teaching hospital. SUBJECTS--106 Patients with newly diagnosed solid tumours referred to the unit for consideration of treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy, 100 of whom were able to complete the questionnaire. 100 Matched controls, 315 cancer doctors (238 radiotherapists and 77 medical oncologists), 1500 randomly chosen general practitioners, and 1000 randomly chosen cancer nurses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Percentage chance of cure, prolonging life, or palliation of symptoms required to make treatment worth while with two hypothetical chemotherapy treatments, with severe and mild side effects respectively. RESULTS--Respondents to the questionnaire comprised 100 patients, 100 controls, 60 (78%) medical oncologists, 88 (37%) radiotherapists, 790 (53%) general practitioners, and 303 (30%) cancer nurses. Most patients were willing to accept intensive chemotherapy for a very small chance of benefit. The median benefit required to make the hypothetical intensive treatments worth while for patients compared with controls were: for chance of a cure (range 1 to 100%) 1% v 50%, for prolonging life (range three months to five years) 12 months v 24-60 months, and for relief of symptoms (range 1 to 100%) 10% v 75% respectively. There were no significant differences in the responses of the 50 patients completing the questionnaire on a second occasion. Doctors and nurses were less likely to accept radical treatment for minimal benefit compared with the patients (median scores 10-50%, 12-24 months, and 50-75%, for chance of cure, prolonging life, and relief of symptoms respectively). Significantly more patients than controls accepted treatments giving the minimal benefit for each category (cure 53.1 v 19.0%, 67.0 v 35.0%; prolonging life 42.1 v 10.0%, 53.0 v 25.0%; relief of symptoms 42.6 v 10.0%, 58.7 v 19.0% for intensive and mild treatments respectively, p less than 0.001) as was the case for comparison of patients with other groups. CONCLUSION--Patients with cancer are much more likely to opt for radical treatment with minimal chance of benefit than people who do not have cancer, including medical and nursing professionals. This could be taken into account when discussing treatment options with patients and their relatives.

A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Etoposide is an increasingly used and well-tolerated drug in cancer medicine. Its cytotoxic action is phase-specific and it has demonstrated schedule dependency in both in vitro and animal studies, but clinical evidence of the importance of drug scheduling is uncertain. The two administration schedules of etoposide that have been compared in this randomized study of 39 patients with previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer treated with single-agent etoposide were 500 mg/m2 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours or five consecutive daily 2-hour infusions each of 100 mg/m2. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of six cycles. Patients received combination chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or radiotherapy on failure to respond or at relapse, depending on their Karnofsky performance status. The same therapy was used in both arms of the study. All patients are evaluable for response to etoposide. In the 24-hour arm, two patients achieved a partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 10%. In the 5-day schedule, 16 patients had a partial response and one had a complete remission, producing an overall response rate of 89%, which was significantly superior to that in the 24-hour arm (P less than .001). The median duration of remission to etoposide in the 5-day arm was 4.5 months. Bone marrow toxicity was similar in both schedules. Etoposide pharmacokinetics were measured in all patients, and total areas under the concentration versus time curves (AUCs) were equivalent in both regimens. This study has clearly demonstrated the importance of etoposide scheduling in humans, and the superiority of five daily infusions over a 24-hour continuous infusion. The response rate to single-agent etoposide using an efficacious schedule in extensive small-cell lung cancer has been determined to be in excess of 80%.

Morphine and metabolite behavior after different routes of morphine administration: demonstration of the importance of the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine, morphine‐6‐glucuronide, and morphine‐3‐glucuronide were studied after single‐dose morphine administration by five different routes. The quantitative significance of the active metabolite morphine‐6‐glucuronide was assessed, and the effects of novel dosing forms on morphine metabolism and distribution were examined. After administration of intravenous morphine the morphine‐6‐glucuronide plasma AUC exceeded that of morphine. After administration of oral morphine very low morphine levels were observed—the morphine‐6‐glucuronide plasma AUC exceeded that of morphine by a factor of 9:1. Sublingual, buccal, and sustained‐release buccal morphine tablet administration resulted in delayed absorption, with attenuation and delay of peak morphine and metabolite levels. Morphine bioavailability and morphine glucuronide production were not altered.

Morphine intoxication in renal failure: the role of morphine-6-glucuronide.

Patients with impaired renal function may experience severe and prolonged respiratory depression when treated with morphine. This has been attributed to accumulation of the drug during renal failure. Three patients are described who had classical signs of intoxication with morphine in the absence of measurable quantities of morphine in the plasma. The observed clinical effect is attributed to accumulation of the pharmacologically active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide, which is usually renally excreted. It is concluded that morphine does not accumulate in patients with renal failure but that accumulation of metabolites does occur. The previously reported observations of morphine accumulation during renal failure probably result from the use of radioimmunoassays that cannot distinguish between morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide. Thus the apparent morphine concentration measured with these assays in fact reflects the total quantity of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide present.

Multiple myeloma treated with high dose intravenous melphalan

High dose melphalan (HDM, 140 mg/m2 i.v.) has been evaluated in 58 patients under 63 years with multiple myeloma. Among previously untreated patients 11/41 (27%) entered a complete remission (CR: no measurable myeloma protein and a normal bone marrow) and 21 (51%) entered a partial remission (more than 50% reduction in myeloma protein and improvement in all other features). Median duration of remission is 19 months. Two patients who had responded to previous conventional treatment entered CR after HDM. Among 15 patients who had failed on previous chemotherapy the response rate was 66% including two CRs. However, in this group all patients have relapsed within 1 year. Profound myelosuppression, moderate nausea, vomiting, mucositis and diarrhoea with reversible alopecia occurred in all patients. There were 10 deaths within 2 months of treatment mainly due to sepsis and haemorrhage.

The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

SummaryEtoposide and teniposide are semisynthetic derivatives of podophyllotoxin and are increasingly used in cancer medicine. Teniposide is more highly protein-bound than etoposide, and its uptake and binding to cells is also greater. Etoposide and teniposide are phase-specific cytotoxic drugs acting in the late S and early G2 phases of the cell cycle. They appear to act by causing breaks in DNA via an interaction with DNA topoisomerase II or by the formation of free radicals. Teniposide is more potent as regards the production of DNA damage and cytotoxicity.Most studies show a biexponential decay following intravenous administration of etoposide and teniposide. The terminal elimination half-life of etoposide is less than that of teniposide, and the plasma and renal clearances of etoposide are greater. The peak plasma concentrations of drug and the area under the concentration versus time curve are linearly related to the intravenous dose of both drugs. Considerable interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters exists following intravenous etoposide and teniposide. Various metabolites of etoposide and teniposide have been identified but then titation are disputed. Approximately 30 to 70% of a dose of etoposide is accounted for by excretion, whereas the figure appears to be only 5 to 20% for teniposide.The bioavailability of oral etoposide is about 50% but its absorption is not linear with increasing dose within the range in clinical use. There is considerable inter- and intrapatient variability in the pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide. There is no evidence of accumulation of etoposide and teniposide after multiple consecutive doses by the intravenous or oral routes. The exact roles of the liver and kidney in metabolism and excretion of etoposide and teniposide are uncertain.Etoposide has been shown to be a highly schedule-dependent drug in clinical studies. This together with the phase-specific action of etoposide and teniposide and their increasingly widespread use in cancer medicine make the clinical pharmacology of these drugs of great clinical importance.

INTENSIVE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND CRITERIA FOR COMPLETE REMISSION

50 previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma received two-phase treatment: repeated cycles of 4 day infusion with vincristine, doxorubicin, and methylprednisolone (VAMP) followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM), with autologous bone marrow transplantation where possible. The overall response rate was 74% (37/50), with 25 patients (50%) achieving complete haematological and biochemical remission. These remissions were associated with a good quality of life as measured by performance status, pain grade, and the reversal of humoral immunosuppression. 6 patients died during the VAMP phase and there was 1 death related to HDM. The achievement of complete remission, as defined here, in such a high proportion of patients is exceptional and may represent a useful advance in the management of myeloma.

The pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine glucuronides in kidney failure

The pharmacokinetics of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites were investigated in three groups of patients with kidney failure (nondialyzed, receiving dialysis, and transplantation) and compared with a group of normal healthy volunteers. Patients in all three renal groups were undergoing surgical procedures (nondialyzed group undergoing arteriovenous fistula formation, dialysis group undergoing placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter, and the transplant group undergoing live donor kidney transplant). A sensitive, specific high‐performance liquid chromatographic assay was used to quantitate morphine, morphine‐3‐glucuronide, and morphine‐6‐glucuronide. Patients with kidney failure had a significantly increased morphine area under the curve (AUC) compared with control subjects. There was also an increase in the metabolites morphine‐3‐glucuronide and morphine‐6‐glucuronide that was severalfold greater than the increase in morphine AUC. This metabolite accumulation was reversed by kidney transplantation, providing an elegant confirmation on the role of the kidney in morphine pharmacology.

Demonstration of hepatic steatosis by computerized tomography in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

The frequency and severity of fatty infiltration of the liver in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid has not been documented systematically. Its development can result in difficulty assessing disease progression, and treatment may be altered inappropriately. Twenty-seven patients with colon cancer and liver metastases receiving 5-FU and folinic acid were studied with computerized tomography (CT) before treatment and after six or 12 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-seven per cent of patients developed hepatic steatosis during treatment. There was no correlation between development of hepatic steatosis and the dose of chemotherapy or the liver function tests. Hepatic steatosis occurs commonly in patients receiving 5-FU and folinic acid and can be severe. Its development can make hepatic metastases difficult to assess and if its benign nature is not appreciated treatment may be inappropriately altered.