M. MacInnis
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. MacInnis.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2015
F. Matichard; B. Lantz; R. Mittleman; K. Mason; J. S. Kissel; B. Abbott; S. Biscans; J. McIver; R. Abbott; S. Abbott; E. Allwine; S. Barnum; J. Birch; C. Celerier; Damon A. Clark; D. C. Coyne; D. DeBra; R. T. Derosa; M. Evans; S. Foley; P. Fritschel; J. A. Giaime; C. Gray; G. Grabeel; J. Hanson; C. Hardham; M. Hillard; W. Hua; C. Kucharczyk; M. Landry
The new generation of gravitational waves detectors require unprecedented levels of isolation from seismic noise. This article reviews the seismic isolation strategy and instrumentation developed for the Advanced LIGO observatories. It summarizes over a decade of research on active inertial isolation and shows the performance recently achieved at the Advanced LIGO observatories. The paper emphasizes the scientific and technical challenges of this endeavor and how they have been addressed. An overview of the isolation strategy is given. It combines multiple layers of passive and active inertial isolation to provide suitable rejection of seismic noise at all frequencies. A detailed presentation of the three active platforms that have been developed is given. They are the hydraulic pre-isolator, the single-stage internal isolator and the two-stage internal isolator. The architecture, instrumentation, control scheme and isolation results are presented for each of the three systems. Results show that the seismic isolation sub-system meets Advanced LIGOs stringent requirements and robustly supports the operation of the two detectors.
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2014
S. Wen; R. Mittleman; K. Mason; J. A. Giaime; R. Abbott; J. Kern; B OʼReilly; R. Bork; M. Hammond; C. Hardham; B. Lantz; W. Hua; D. C. Coyne; G. Traylor; H. Overmier; T. Evans; J. Hanson; O. Spjeld; M. MacInnis; K. Mailand; D. J. Ottaway; D. Sellers; K. Carter; P. Sarin
The hydraulic external pre-isolator (HEPI) is the first six degrees of freedom active seismic isolation system implemented at the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO). Implementation was first completed at the LIGO Livingston Observatory (LLO) prior to LIGOʼs fifth science run, successfully cutting down the disturbance seen by LLOʼs suspended optics in the two most prominent seismic disturbance bands, the microseism (0.1–0.3 Hz) and the anthropogenic (1–3 Hz) bands, by a factor of a few to tens. The improvement in seismic isolation contributed directly to LLOʼs much improved duty cycle of 66.7% and LIGOʼs triple coincident duty cycle of 53%. We report the design, control scheme, and isolation performance of HEPI at LLO in this paper. Aided by this success, funding for incorporating HEPI into the LIGO Hanford Observatory was approved and installation is currently underway.
ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference | 2012
F. Matichard; K. Mason; R. Mittleman; B. Lantz; Ben Abbott; M. MacInnis; Adrien LeRoux; Michael Hillard; Celine Ramet; S. Barnum; Andy Stein; S. Foley; H. Radkins; Jeff Kissel; S. Biscans; Vincent Lhuillier
The control bandwidth and performance of active vibration isolation systems are usually directly related to the system dynamic characteristics. In this paper, we present results from a 4 years study carried out to improve the dynamical response and control performance on the two-stage isolator designed for Advanced LIGO detectors. The paper will focus on the platform’s first stage to illustrate prototyping, optimization, final design and the experimental results obtained during this program. The system concept, architecture and prototype will be presented. The factors initially limiting the prototype’s performance will be analyzed. Solutions based on sensors relocation, payload reduction, structural stiffening and passive techniques to damp the residual high frequency flexible modes will be presented. Experimental results obtained with the prototype will be compared with the system’s final version. The series of improvement obtained help not only to increase the system’s bandwidth, robustness and performance but also to simplify and speed up the control commissioning, which is very important for the Advanced LIGO project that will be using 5 of these platforms in each of its 3 detectors.Copyright
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2016
F. Matichard; M. Evans; R. Mittleman; M. MacInnis; S. Biscans; K. L. Dooley; H. Sohier; A. Lauriero; H. Paris; J. Koch; P. Knothe; A. Carbajo; C. Dufort
Tilt-horizontal coupling in inertial sensors limits the performance of active isolation systems such as those used in gravitational wave detectors. Inertial rotation sensors can be used to subtract the tilt component from the signal produced by horizontal inertial sensors, but such techniques are often limited by the sensor noise of the tilt measurement. A different approach is to mechanically filter the tilt transmitted to the horizontal inertial sensor, as discussed in this article. This technique does not require an auxiliary rotation sensor and can produce a lower noise measurement. The concept investigated uses a mechanical suspension to isolate the inertial sensor from input tilt. Modeling and simulations show that such a configuration can be used to adequately attenuate the tilt transmitted to the instrument, while maintaining translation sensitivity in the frequency band of interest. The analysis is supported by experimental results showing that this approach is a viable solution to overcome the tilt problem in the field of active inertial isolation.
Precision Engineering-journal of The International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology | 2015
F. Matichard; B. Lantz; K. Mason; R. Mittleman; B. Abbott; S. Abbott; E. Allwine; S. Barnum; J. Birch; S. Biscans; Damon A. Clark; D. C. Coyne; D. DeBra; R. T. Derosa; S. Foley; P. Fritschel; J. A. Giaime; C. Gray; G. Grabeel; J. Hanson; M. Hillard; J. S. Kissel; C. Kucharczyk; A. Le Roux; V. Lhuillier; M. MacInnis; B. O’Reilly; D. J. Ottaway; H. Paris; M. Puma
Precision Engineering-journal of The International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology | 2015
F. Matichard; B. Lantz; K. Mason; R. Mittleman; B. Abbott; S. Abbott; E. Allwine; S. Barnum; J. Birch; S. Biscans; Damon A. Clark; D. C. Coyne; D. DeBra; R. T. Derosa; S. Foley; P. Fritschel; J. A. Giaime; C. Gray; G. Grabeel; J. Hanson; M. Hillard; J. S. Kissel; C. Kucharczyk; A. Le Roux; V. Lhuillier; M. MacInnis; B. O’Reilly; D. J. Ottaway; H. Paris; M. Puma
Physics Letters A | 2011
John B. Miller; M. Evans; L. Barsotti; P. Fritschel; M. MacInnis; R. Mittleman; B. Shapiro; Jonathan Soto; C. I. Torrie
Archive | 2005
C. Hardham; B. Abbott; R. Abbott; Gabrielle Allen; R. Bork; C Campbell; K. Carter; D. C. Coyne; D. DeBra; T. Evans; J Faludi; A Ganguli; J. A. Giaime; M. Hammond; W. Hua; J. Kern; J LaCour; B. Lantz; M. MacInnis; K. Mailand; K. Mason; R. Mittleman; J Nichol; J Niekerk; B. O'Reilly; D. J. Ottaway; H. Overmier; C. Parameswariah; J Phinney; B Rankin
Proceedings of SPIE | 2004
Wensheng Hua; R. Adhikari; D. DeBra; J. A. Giaime; G. Hammond; C. Hardham; Mike Hennessy; Jonathan P. How; B. Lantz; M. MacInnis; R. Mittleman; S. Richman; N. A. Robertson; J. Rollins; D. H. Shoemaker; Robin T. Stebbins
American Astronomical Society | 2014
N. Aggarwal; L. Barsotti; T. P. Bodiya; F. Donovan; R. C. Essick; M. Evans; P. Fritschel; Slawek Gras; T. Isogai; E. Katsavounidis; J. S. Kissel; Jin-Wook Lee; M. MacInnis; K. Mason; F. Matichard; N. Mavalvala; R. Mittleman; E. Oelker; D. H. Shoemaker; R. Vaulin; Salvatore Vitale; Rainer Weiss; C. C. Wipf; S. Barnum; S. Foley; P. Kwee; S.J. Waldman; F. Zhang