M. Mar Carrió

Protein aggregation in recombinant bacteria: biological role of inclusion bodies

Protein aggregation is an ordinary consequence of thermal stress. In recombinant bacteria, the over-expression of plasmid-encoded genes triggers transcription of heat-shock genes and other stress responses and often results in the aggregation of the encoded protein as inclusion bodies. The formation of these deposits represents a major obstacle for the production of biologically active polypeptides and restricts the spectrum of protein products being available for the industrial-biomedical market. Inclusion body formation was formerly considered to occur passively by the irretrievable deposition of partially-folded intermediates. Increasing evidence, however, indicates that protein aggregation in bacteria occurs as a reversible process deeply integrated in the cell mechanisms for coping with thermal stress, and that inclusion bodies are structurally dynamic structures. Inclusion body formation might actually be supported by the cellular machinery that when operated under specific stress conditions, transiently stores misfolded polypeptides until they could be further processed: either refolded or proteolysed. A better understanding of protein aggregation in cell physiology could allow not only inclusion body formation to be minimized more efficiently for a higher soluble yield, but also to comprehend in detail the intricacy of cell mechanisms committed to handling the misfolding danger.

Protein aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies is reversible

Inclusion bodies are refractile, intracellular protein aggregates usually observed in bacteria upon targeted gene overexpression. Since their occurrence has a major economical impact in protein production bio‐processes, in vitro refolding strategies are under continuous exploration. In this work, we prove spontaneous in vivo release of both β‐galactosidase and P22 tailspike polypeptides from inclusion bodies resulting in their almost complete disintegration and in the concomitant appearance of soluble, properly folded native proteins with full biological activity. Since, in particular, the tailspike protein exhibits an unusually slow and complex folding pathway involving deep interdigitation of β‐sheet structures, its in vivo refolding indicates that bacterial inclusion body proteins are not collapsed into an irreversible unfolded state. Then, inclusion bodies can be observed as transient deposits of folding‐prone polypeptides, resulting from an unbalanced equilibrium between in vivo protein precipitation and refolding that can be actively displaced by arresting protein synthesis. The observation that the formation of big inclusion bodies is reversible in vivo can be also relevant in the context of amyloid diseases, in which deposition of important amounts of aggregated protein initiates the pathogenic process.

Fine architecture of bacterial inclusion bodies.

The molecular organisation of protein aggregates, formed under physiological conditions, has been explored by in vitro trypsin treatment and electron microscopy analysis of bacterially produced inclusion bodies (IBs). The kinetic modelling of protein digestion has revealed variable proteolysis rates during protease exposure that are not compatible with a surface‐restricted erosion of body particles but with a hyper‐surfaced disintegration by selective enzymatic attack. In addition, differently resistant species of the IB proteins coexist within the particles, with half‐lives that differ among them up to 50‐fold. During in vivo protein incorporation throughout IB growth, a progressive increase of proteolytic resistance in all these species is observed, indicative of folding transitions and dynamic reorganisations of the body structure. Both the heterogeneity of the folding state and the time‐dependent folding transitions undergone by the aggregated polypeptides indicate that IBs are not mere deposits of collapsed, inert molecules but plastic reservoirs of misfolded proteins that would allow, at least up to a certain extent, their in vivo recovery and transference to the soluble cell fraction.

Role of molecular chaperones in inclusion body formation

Protein misfolding and aggregation are linked to several degenerative diseases and are responsible for the formation of bacterial inclusion bodies. Roles of molecular chaperones in promoting protein deposition have been speculated but not proven in vivo. We have investigated the involvement of individual chaperones in inclusion body formation by producing the misfolding‐prone but partially soluble VP1LAC protein in chaperone null bacterial strains. Unexpectedly, the absence of a functional GroEL significantly reduced aggregation and favoured the incidence of the soluble protein form, from 4 to 35% of the total VP1LAC protein. On the other hand, no regular inclusion bodies were then formed but more abundant small aggregates up to 0.05 μm3. Contrarily, in a DnaK− background, the amount of inclusion body protein was 2.5‐fold higher than in the wild‐type strain and the average volume of the inclusion bodies increased from 0.25 to 0.38 μm3. Also in the absence of DnaK, the minor fraction of soluble protein appears as highly proteolytically stable, suggesting an inverse connection between proteolysis and aggregation managed by this chaperone. In summary, GroEL and DnaK appear as major antagonist controllers of inclusion body formation by promoting and preventing, respectively, the aggregation of misfolded polypeptides. GroEL might have, in addition, a key role in driving the protein transit from the soluble to the insoluble cell fraction and also in the opposite direction. Although chaperones ClpB, ClpA, IbpA and IbpB also participate in these processes, the impact of the respective null mutations on bacterial inclusion body formation is much more moderate.

Localization of Chaperones DnaK and GroEL in Bacterial Inclusion Bodies

By immunostaining and transmission electron microscopy, chaperones DnaK and GroEL have been identified at the solvent-exposed surface of bacterial inclusion bodies and entrapped within these aggregates, respectively. Functional implications of this distinct localization are discussed in the context of Escherichia coli protein quality control.

The impact of dnaKJ overexpression on recombinant protein solubility results from antagonistic effects on the control of protein quality

We have produced increasing levels of DnaK and its co-chaperone DnaJ along with the model VP1LAC misfolding-prone protein, to explore the role of DnaK on the management of Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. While relative solubility of VP1LAC is progressively enhanced, the heat-shock response is down-regulated as revealed by decreasing levels of GroEL. This is accompanied by an increasing yield of VP1LAC and a non-regular evolution of its insoluble fraction, at moderate levels of DnaK resulting in more abundant inclusion bodies. Also, the impact of chaperone co-expression is much more pronounced in wild type cells than in a DnaK− mutant, probably due to the different background of heat shock proteins in these cells. The involvement of DnaK in the supervision of misfolding proteins is then pictured as a dynamic balance between its immediate holding and folding activities, and the side-effect downregulation of the heat shock response though the limitation of other chaperone and proteases activities.