Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Schraner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Schraner.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007

Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; G. E. Bodeker; Eugene C. Cordero; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; S. R. Beagley; B. A. Boville; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; Rudolf Deckert; Makoto Deushi; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Daniel R. Marsh; Sigrun Matthes; Tatsuya Nagashima; Paul A. Newman; J. E. Nielsen; S. Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer

[1] Simulations from eleven coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) employing nearly identical forcings have been used to project the evolution of stratospheric ozone throughout the 21st century. The model-to-model agreement in projected temperature trends is good, and all CCMs predict continued, global mean cooling of the stratosphere over the next 5 decades, increasing from around 0.25 K/decade at 50 hPa to around 1 K/ decade at 1 hPa under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario. In general, the simulated ozone evolution is mainly determined by decreases in halogen concentrations and continued cooling of the global stratosphere due to increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs). Column ozone is projected to increase as stratospheric halogen concentrations return to 1980s levels. Because of ozone increases in the middle and upper stratosphere due to GHGinduced cooling, total ozone averaged over midlatitudes, outside the polar regions, and globally, is projected to increase to 1980 values between 2035 and 2050 and before lowerstratospheric halogen amounts decrease to 1980 values. In the polar regions the CCMs simulate small temperature trends in the first and second half of the 21st century in midwinter. Differences in stratospheric inorganic chlorine (Cly) among the CCMs are key to diagnosing the intermodel differences in simulated ozone recovery, in particular in the Antarctic. It is found that there are substantial quantitative differences in the simulated Cly, with the October mean Antarctic Cly peak value varying from less than 2 ppb to over 3.5 ppb in the CCMs, and the date at which the Cly returns to 1980 values varying from before 2030 to after 2050. There is a similar variation in the timing of recovery of Antarctic springtime column ozone back to 1980 values. As most models underestimate peak Clynear 2000, ozone recovery in the Antarctic could occur even later, between 2060 and 2070. In the Arctic the column ozone increase in spring does not follow halogen decreases as closely as in the Antarctic, reaching 1980 values before Arctic halogen amounts decrease


Climate Dynamics | 2012

A multi-data set comparison of the vertical structure of temperature variability and change over the Arctic during the past 100 years

Stefan Brönnimann; Andrea N. Grant; Gilbert P. Compo; Tracy Ewen; Thomas Griesser; Andreas M. Fischer; M. Schraner; Alexander Stickler

We compare the daily, interannual, and decadal variability and trends in the thermal structure of the Arctic troposphere using eight observation-based, vertically resolved data sets, four of which have data prior to 1948. Comparisons on the daily scale between historical reanalysis data and historical upper-air observations were performed for Svalbard for the cold winters 1911/1912 and 1988/1989, the warm winters 1944/1945 and 2005/2006, and the International Geophysical Year 1957/1958. Excellent agreement is found at mid-tropospheric levels. Near the ground and at the tropopause level, however, systematic differences are identified. On the interannual time scale, the correlations between all data sets are high, but there are systematic biases in terms of absolute values as well as discrepancies in the magnitude of the variability. The causes of these differences are discussed. While none of the data sets individually may be suitable for trend analysis, consistent features can be identified from analyzing all data sets together. To illustrate this, we examine trends and 20-year averages for those regions and seasons that exhibit large sea-ice changes and have enough data for comparison. In the summertime Pacific Arctic and the autumn eastern Canadian Arctic, the lower tropospheric temperature anomalies for the recent two decades are higher than in any previous 20-year period. In contrast, mid-tropospheric temperatures of the European Arctic in the wintertime of the 1920s and 1930s may have reached values as high as those of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.


Environmental Research Letters | 2009

The Impact of Geoengineering Aerosols on Stratospheric Temperature and Ozone

Patricia Heckendorn; Debra Weisenstein; S. Fueglistaler; Beiping Luo; E. Rozanov; M. Schraner; Larry W. Thomason; Th. Peter


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2008

Technical Note: Chemistry-climate model SOCOL: version 2.0 with improved transport and chemistry/microphysics schemes

M. Schraner; E. Rozanov; C. Schnadt Poberaj; P. Kenzelmann; Andreas M. Fischer; V. Zubov; Beiping Luo; C. R. Hoyle; T. Egorova; S. Fueglistaler; Stefan Brönnimann; W. Schmutz; Th. Peter


Geoscientific Model Development | 2012

The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry-climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm

Andrea Stenke; M. Schraner; E. Rozanov; T. Egorova; Beiping Luo; T. Peter


Geophysical Research Letters | 2009

Exceptional atmospheric circulation during the “Dust Bowl”

Stefan Brönnimann; Alexander Stickler; Thomas Griesser; Tracy Ewen; Andrea N. Grant; Andreas M. Fischer; M. Schraner; Th. Peter; E. Rozanov; T. Ross


Meteorologische Zeitschrift | 2009

Variability of large-scale atmospheric circulation indices for the northern hemisphere during the past 100 years

Stefan Brönnimann; Alexander Stickler; Thomas Griesser; Andreas M. Fischer; Andrea N. Grant; Tracy Ewen; Tianjun Zhou; M. Schraner; E. Rozanov; Thomas Peter


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2009

The simulation of the Antarctic ozone hole by chemistry-climate models

Hamish Struthers; Greg Bodeker; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; Irene Cionni; Martin Dameris; Marco A. Giorgetta; Volker Grewe; Frank Lefèvre; François Lott; Elisa Manzini; Thomas Peter; E. Rozanov; M. Schraner


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2008

Interannual-to-decadal variability of the stratosphere during the 20th century: ensemble simulations with a chemistry-climate model

Andreas M. Fischer; M. Schraner; E. Rozanov; P. Kenzelmann; C. Schnadt Poberaj; Dominik Brunner; A. Lustenberger; Beiping Luo; G. E. Bodeker; T. Egorova; W. Schmutz; Th. Peter; Stefan Brönnimann


Geophysical Research Letters | 2008

Stratospheric winter climate response to ENSO in three chemistry‐climate models

Andreas M. Fischer; Drew T. Shindell; Barbara Winter; M. S. Bourqui; G. Faluvegi; E. Rozanov; M. Schraner; Stefan Brönnimann

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Schraner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. E. Bodeker

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge