M. Sugihara
ITER
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Sugihara.
Physica Scripta | 2014
T. Hirai; F. Escourbiac; S Carpentier-Chouchana; A Durocher; A. Fedosov; L. Ferrand; T. Jokinen; V. Komarov; M. Merola; R. Mitteau; R.A. Pitts; W. Shu; M. Sugihara; V. Barabash; V Kuznetsov; B. Riccardi; S. Suzuki
The full tungsten divertor qualification program was defined for the R&D activity in domestic agencies. The qualification program consists of two steps: (i) technology development and validation and (ii) a full-scale demonstration. Small-scale mock-ups were manufactured in Japanese and European industries and delivered to the ITER divertor test facility in Russia for high heat flux testing. In parallel activity to the qualification program, both domestic agencies demonstrated that W monoblock technologies withstanding up to 20 MW m−2 were available.
Physica Scripta | 2014
S Carpentier-Chouchana; T. Hirai; F. Escourbiac; A Durocher; A. Fedosov; L. Ferrand; M. Firdaouss; M. Kocan; A.S. Kukushkin; T. Jokinen; V. Komarov; M Lehnen; M. Merola; R. Mitteau; R.A. Pitts; P.C. Stangeby; M. Sugihara
In September 2011, the ITER Organization (IO) proposed to begin operation with a full-tungsten (W) armoured divertor, with the objective of taking a decision on the final target material (carbon fibre composite or W) by the end of 2013. This period of 2 years would enable the development of a full-W divertor design compatible with nuclear operations, the investigation of further several physics R&D aspects associated with the use of W targets and the completion of technology qualification. Beginning with a brief overview of the reference heat load specifications which have been defined for the full-W engineering activity, this paper will report on the current status of the ITER divertor shaping and will summarize the results of related three-dimensional heat load distribution analysis performed as part of the design validation.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2010
K. Ioki; V. Barabash; C. Bachmann; P. Chappuis; C.H. Choi; J.J. Cordier; B. Giraud; Y. Gribov; Ph. Heitzenroeder; G. Johnson; L. Jones; C. Jun; B.C. Kim; E. Kuzmin; D. Loesser; A. Martin; J.-M. Martinez; M. Merola; H. Pathak; P. Readman; M. Sugihara; A. Terasawa; Yu. Utin; X. Wang; S. Wu
Abstract According to recent design review results, the original reference vacuum vessel (VV) design was selected with a number of modifications including 3D shaping of the outboard inner shell. The VV load conditions were updated based on reviews of the plasma disruption and vertical displacement event (VDE) database. The lower port gussets have been reinforced based on structural analysis results, including non-linear buckling. Design of in-vessel coils for the mitigation of edge localized modes (ELM) and plasma vertical stabilization (VS) has progressed. Design of the in-wall-shielding (IWS) has progressed in details. The detailed layout of ferritic steel plates and borated steel plates is optimized based on the toroidal field ripple analysis. The procurement arrangements (PAs) for the VV including ports and IWS have been prepared or signed. Final design reviews were carried out to check readiness for the PA signature. The procedure for licensing the ITER VV according to the French Order on Nuclear Pressure Equipment (ESPN) has started and conformity assessment is being performed by an Agreed Notified Body (ANB). A VV design description document, VV load specification document, hazard and stress analysis reports and particular material appraisal were submitted according to the guideline and RCC-MR requirements.
Physica Scripta | 2011
R. Mitteau; M. Sugihara; R. Raffray; S. Carpentier-Chouchana; H. Labidi; M. Merola; R.A. Pitts; P.C. Stangeby
The lifetime of the beryllium armor of the ITER first wall is evaluated for normal and off-normal operation. For the individual events considered, the lifetime spans between 930 and 35×106 discharges. The discrepancy between low and high estimates is caused by uncertainties about the behavior of the melt layer during off-normal events, variable plasma operation parameters and variability of the sputtering yields. These large uncertainties in beryllium armor loss estimates are a good example of the experimental nature of the ITER project and will not be truly resolved until ITER begins burning plasma operation.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2010
M. Merola; D. Loesser; A. Martin; P. Chappuis; R. Mitteau; V. Komarov; R.A. Pitts; Stefan Gicquel; V. Barabash; L.M. Giancarli; J. Palmer; Masataka Nakahira; A. Loarte; D.J. Campbell; R. Eaton; A. Kukushkin; M. Sugihara; Fu Zhang; C.S. Kim; R. Raffray; L. Ferrand; D. Yao; S. Sadakov; A. Furmanek; V. Rozov; T. Hirai; F. Escourbiac; T. Jokinen; B. Calcagno; Seiji Mori
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2013
T. Hirai; F. Escourbiac; S. Carpentier-Chouchana; A. Fedosov; L. Ferrand; T. Jokinen; V. Komarov; A.S. Kukushkin; M. Merola; R. Mitteau; R.A. Pitts; W. Shu; M. Sugihara; B. Riccardi; S. Suzuki; R. Villari
Journal of Nuclear Materials | 2009
M. Shimada; R.A. Pitts; A. Loarte; D.J. Campbell; M. Sugihara; V. Mukhovatov; A.S. Kukushkin; V. Chuyanov
symposium on fusion technology | 2009
K. Ioki; C. Bachmann; P. Chappuis; J.J. Cordier; B. Giraud; Y. Gribov; L. Jones; C. Jun; B.C. Kim; E. Kuzmin; H. Pathak; P. Readman; M. Sugihara; Yu. Utin; X. Wang; S. Wu
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2012
V. Rozov; A.R. Raffray; E.A. Lamzin; R. Roccella; M. Sugihara; S.E. Sytchevsky; M. Ulrickson
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2012
S. Miyamoto; M. Sugihara; K. Shinya; Y. Nakamura; S. Toshimitsu; V.E. Lukash; R.R. Khayrutdinov; T. Sugie; Y. Kusama; Ryuji Yoshino