M. Woodford

Preliminary analysis of the care of injured patients in 33 British hospitals: first report of the United Kingdom major trauma outcome study.

OBJECTIVE--To measure the effectiveness of management of major trauma in the United Kingdom. DESIGN--Review of the care of all seriously injured patients seen over two years. SETTING--33 hospitals which receive patients who have sustained major trauma. SUBJECTS--14,648 injured patients admitted for more than three days, transferred or admitted into an intensive care bed, or dying from their injuries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Death or survival in hospital within three months of the injury. RESULTS--21% of seriously injured patients (1299) took longer than one hour to reach hospital. Time before arrival at hospital was not related to severity of injury. A senior house officer was in charge of initial hospital resuscitation in 57% (826/1445) of patients with an injury severity score > or = 16. More senior staff were commonly responsible for definitive operations, but only 46% (165/355) of patients judged to require early operation arrived in theatre within two hours. Mortality for 6111 patients sustaining blunt trauma and treated in the 14 busiest hospitals was significantly higher (actual 408, predicted 295.6, p < 0.001) than in a comparable North American dataset. Large differences in the 14 hospitals assessed could not be explained by variations in case load or facilities. In contrast, the outcome of the 4.1% (597) of patients with penetrating injuries was better than that of a comparable group in the United States. Analysis of the 415 penetrating injuries with complete data showed that 15 patients died (19.3 predicted; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS--The initial management of major trauma in the United Kingdom remains unsatisfactory. There are delays in providing experienced staff and timely operations. Mortality varies inexplicably between hospitals and, for blunt trauma, is generally higher than in the United States.

Trends in trauma care in England and Wales 1989–97

BACKGROUNDnIn 1988, the Royal College of Surgeons reported major deficiencies in trauma care in UK hospitals. We investigated whether and how that care has changed in the last decade by use of data collected by the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network.nnnMETHODSnWe analysed injury-severity, process, and outcome variables from 91602 patients records on the database at the end of 1997, collected from 97 (49% of trauma-receiving) hospitals in England, Wales, and two in Ireland. We did longitudinal analyses of odds of death, process variables, and individual hospitals performance. We took account of potential selection bias from missing data and recruitment of new hospitals.nnnFINDINGSnThe severity-adjusted odds of death after trauma declined gradually from 1989 (odds ratio 1997/1989 0.63 [95% CI [0.49-0.82]). In 1997, the reduction in odds of death was significant even after adjustment for missing data (ratio 1997/1989 0.72 [0.55-0.92]) and recruitment of new hospitals (0.64 [0.44-0.93]). There was significant variability in the proportion of survivors (adjusted for severity of injury and age) between the highest and lowest 10% of UK hospitals. The time between the call to the emergency services and arrival at hospital increased from 32 min in 1989 to 45 min in 1997, irrespective of injury severity. The proportion of severely injured patients seen first by senior doctors increased from 32% to 60%.nnnINTERPRETATIONnHospital care has made a valuable but variable contribution to reductions in case fatality after injury in the UK in the past 10 years, though further improvement is possible.

Unexpected contribution of moderate traumatic brain injury to death after major trauma.

BACKGROUNDnThe cardiovascular reflex responses to injury and simple hemorrhage are coordinated in the central nervous system. Coincidental brain injury, which is present in 64% of trauma patients who die, could impair these homeostatic responses. The occurrence of hemorrhagic shock in the patient with head injury is also known to increase mortality. Therefore, there is a potential bidirectional interaction between traumatic brain injury and peripheral injury, which would result in an increased mortality when these two injuries coexist. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that moderate traumatic brain injury is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with multisystem trauma.nnnMETHODSnWe carried out an analysis of the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network Database. Moderate traumatic brain injury was defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3. The study population included 2,717 patients with multisystem injury: 378 patients had a moderate brain injury with peripheral injury, and 2,339 patients had extracranial injury alone. Mortality rates for both groups were compared at increasing injury severity.nnnRESULTSnModerate brain injury alone was associated with a mortality rate of 4.2%. However, when combined with extracranial injury, the risk of death was double that attributable to extracranial injury alone (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.77).nnnCONCLUSIONnThis study confirms that the coexistence of moderate traumatic brain injury with extracranial injury is associated with a doubling of the predicted mortality rate throughout the injury severity ranges studied.

The association between admission systolic blood pressure and mortality in significant traumatic brain injury: A multi-centre cohort study

INTRODUCTIONnLow systolic blood pressure (SBP) is an important secondary insult following traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its exact relationship with outcome is not well characterised. Although a SBP of <90 mmHg represents the threshold for hypotension in consensus TBI treatment guidelines, recent studies suggest redefining hypotension at higher levels. This study therefore aimed to fully characterise the association between admission SBP and mortality to further inform resuscitation endpoints.nnnMETHODSnWe conducted a multicentre cohort study using data from the largest European trauma registry. Consecutive adult patients with AIS head scores >2 admitted directly to specialist neuroscience centres between 2005 and July 2012 were studied. Multilevel logistic regression models were developed to examine the association between admission SBP and 30 day inpatient mortality. Models were adjusted for confounders including age, severity of injury, and to account for differential quality of hospital care.nnnRESULTSn5057 patients were included in complete case analyses. Admission SBP demonstrated a smooth u-shaped association with outcome in a bivariate analysis, with increasing mortality at both lower and higher values, and no evidence of any threshold effect. Adjusting for confounding slightly attenuated the association between mortality and SBP at levels <120 mmHg, and abolished the relationship for higher SBP values. Case-mix adjusted odds of death were 1.5 times greater at <120 mmHg, doubled at <100 mmHg, tripled at <90 mmHg, and six times greater at SBP<70 mmHg, p<0.01.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese findings indicate that TBI studies should model SBP as a continuous variable and may suggest that current TBI treatment guidelines, using a cut-off for hypotension at SBP<90 mmHg, should be reconsidered.

Trauma care in China: challenge and development

The Peoples Republic of China has significantly improved the general health of its people by a concerted effort in primary health care but trauma care and its prevention remains a problem. This paper provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the trauma-care system in China and proposes a strategy for its future development. This includes public-health legislation, the integration of military and civilian practice to provide comprehensive care from the scene of the incident through to rehabilitation, medical audit, the introduction of postgraduate trauma-management training courses and international academic exchanges.

Trauma audit — closing the loop

The philosophy of medical audit and methods of data collection and statistical analysis have been extensively reviewed but less has been written about the effect of audit on medical practice. The measurement of performance is only valuable if it identifies areas of concern and stimulates appropriate change. This paper describes the work of the Salford Trauma Audit Group which has been developed at Hope Hospital, the problems that have been recognized, the strategies that have been introduced to effect change and their influence on management and outcome. Analysis of performance reveals an initial fall in adjusted mortality rate from severe injury after the introduction of resuscitation teams, the adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols and an integrated multidisciplinary approach to trauma care. Problems remain and there is continuing concern about trauma management in the hospital. This has been reinforced by performance feedback through the Trauma Audit Group which has attracted the interest of senior clinicians in several specialties.

The accuracy of alternative triage rules for identification of significant traumatic brain injury: a diagnostic cohort study

Introduction Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in young adults. Reorganisation of trauma services with direct triage of suspected head injury patients to trauma centres may improve outcomes following TBI. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity of principal English triage tools for identifying significant TBI. Methods We performed a diagnostic cohort study using data prospectively collated from the Trauma Audit and Research Network database between 2005 and 2011. Adult head injury patients were retrospectively classified according to London Ambulance Service (LAS) and Head Injury Transportation Straight to Neurosurgery study (HITS-NS) triage criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were then calculated against a reference standard of significant TBI, comprising head region abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥3 or neurosurgical operation. Results 6559 patients were included in complete case analyses. The LAS and HITS-NS triage tools demonstrated sensitivities of 44.5% (95% CI 43.2 to 45.9) and 32.6% (95% CI 31.4 to 33.9), respectively, for identifying significant TBI patients. False negative significant TBI cases were relatively older, more likely to be female, more frequently secondary to low-level falls, and were less likely to have very severe AIS five or six head injuries, p<0.01. Conclusions A considerable proportion of significant head injury patients may not be triaged directly to trauma centres. Investment is therefore necessary to improve the accuracy of existing triage rules and maintain expertise in TBI diagnosis and management in non-specialist emergency departments.

Scoring systems for trauma.

![][1] nnCopyrighted Material, used by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons Limited. For personal use only, must not be reproduced or shared with third parties. Anyone wishing to reproduce this content in whole or in part, in print or in electronic format, should contact digitalrightsuk@wiley.comnnBrowse the ABC series at www.wiley.comnn### OVERVIEWnnTrauma care systems deal with patients who have an almost infinite variety of injuries requiring complex treatment. The assessment of such systems is a major challenge in clinical measurement and audit. Which systems are most effective in delivering best outcomes? Implementing recommendations for improved procedures will often incur additional costs: will the expense be worthwhile? Clearly, casemix-adjusted outcome analysis must replace anecdote and dogma. Outcome prediction in trauma is a developing science which enables the assessment of trauma system effectiveness. An improvement in trauma care is essential; audit is one of the tools that can be used.nnThe effects of injury can be defined in terms of input (an anatomical component and the physiological response) and outcome (mortality and morbidity) (Boxxa01). These must be coded numerically before we can comment with confidence on treatment or process of care. Elderly people survive trauma less well than others, so age must be taken into account and the association between gender and age is also considered to be important. Most recent work has been concerned with measurement of injury severity and its relation to mortality. Assessment of morbidity has been largely neglected, yet for every person who dies as a result of trauma, there …nn [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif