Maija Nousiainen

Concept Networks in Learning and the Epistemic Support of Their Key Concepts

Concept maps are used in teaching and learning as representations of students’ understanding of conceptual knowledge. Concept maps are basically networks of interlinked web of concepts. A long-standing problem in educational research is identifying the key concepts of importance in such networks. Here we use network analysis to examine students’ representations of the relatedness of physics concepts in the form of concept maps, and suggest how key concepts and their epistemic support can be identified. The concept maps are analysed as directed and weighted networks, where nodes are concepts and links represent different types of connections between concepts. The notion of key concept is operationalised through the communicability, separately for out-going and in-coming weighted links. Using a collated concept network based on a sample of 12 original concept maps constructed by university students we show that the communicability is a simple and reliable way to identify the key concepts and examine their epistemic justification within the network.

Concept networks of students’ knowledge of relationships between physics concepts: finding key concepts and their epistemic support

Concept maps, which are network-like visualisations of the inter-linkages between concepts, are used in teaching and learning as representations of students’ understanding of conceptual knowledge and its relational structure. In science education, research on the uses of concept maps has focused much attention on finding methods to identify key concepts that are of the most importance either in supporting or being supported by other concepts in the network. Here we propose a method based on network analysis to examine students’ representations of the relational structure of physics concepts in the form of concept maps. We suggest how the key concepts and their epistemic support can be identified through focusing on the pathways along which the information is passed from one node to another. Towards this end, concept maps are analysed as directed and weighted networks, where nodes are concepts and links represent different types of connections between concepts, and where each link is assumed to provide epistemic support to the node it is connected to. The notion of key concept can then be operationalised through the directed flow of information from one node to another in terms of communicability between the nodes, separately for out-going and in-coming weighted links. Here we analyse a collated concept network based on a sample of 12 original concept maps constructed by university students. We show that communicability is a simple and reliable way to identify the key concepts and examine their epistemic justification within the collated network. The communicabilities of the key nodes in the collated network are compared with communicabilities averaged over the set of 12 individual concept maps. The comparison shows the collated network contains an extensive set of key concepts with good epistemic support. Every individual networks contain a sub-set of these key concepts but with a limited overlap of the sub-sets with other individual networks. The epistemically well substantiated knowledge is thus sparsely distributed over the 12 individual networks.