Makoto Kitamura

Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure at admission on in-hospital outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Data regarding the relationship between systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission and in-hospital outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still lacking in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 1475 primary PCI-treated AMI patients were classified into quintiles based on admission SBP (<105 mmHg, n=300; 105-125 mmHg, n=294; 126-140 mmHg, n=306; 141-158 mmHg, n=286; and ≥159 mmHg n=289). The patients with SBP<105 mmHg tended to have higher age, previous myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD), Killip class≥3 at admission, right coronary artery, left main trunk (LMT), or multivessels as culprit lesions, larger number of diseased vessels, lower Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade in the infarct-related artery before primary PCI, and higher value of peak creatine phosphokinase concentration. Patients with SBP<105 mmHg had a significantly higher mortality, while mortality was not significantly different among the other quintiles: 24.3% (<105 mmHg), 4.8% (105-125 mmHg), 4.9% (126-140 mmHg), 2.8% (141-158 mmHg), and 5.2% (≥159 mmHg) (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, Killip class≥3 at admission, LMT or multivessels as culprit lesions, admission SBP<105 mmHg, CKD, and age were the independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality, whereas admission SBP 141-158 mmHg and TIMI 3 flow after PCI were the negative ones, but admission SBP 105-125 mmHg, admission SBP 126-140 mmHg, and admission SBP≥159 mmHg were not. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that admission SBP 141-158 mmHg might be correlated with better in-hospital prognosis, whereas admission SBP<105 mmHg was associated with in-hospital death in Japanese AMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Prognostic impact of pulse pressure at admission on in-hospital outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Data regarding relationship between pulse pressure (PP) at admission and in-hospital outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still lacking. A total of 1413 primary PCI-treated AMI patients were classified into quintiles based on admission PP (<40, n = 280; 40–48, n = 276; 49–57, n = 288; 58–70, n = 288; and ≥71 mmHg, n = 281). The patients with PP < 40 mmHg tended to have higher prevalence of male, smoking, and Killip class ≥3 at admission; right coronary artery, left main trunk (LMT), or multivessels as culprit lesions; larger number of diseased vessels; lower Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade in the infarct-related artery before/after primary PCI; and higher value of peak creatine phosphokinase concentration. Patients with PP < 40 mmHg had highest mortality, while patients with PP 49–57 mmHg had the lowest: 11.8 % (<40), 7.2 % (40–48), 2.8 % (49–57), 5.9 % (58–70), and 6.0 % (≥71 mmHg). On multivariate analysis, Killip class ≥3 at admission, LMT or multivessels as culprit lesions, chronic kidney disease, and age were the independent positive predictors of the in-hospital mortality, whereas admission PP 49–57 mmHg, hypercholesterolemia, and TIMI 3 flow before/after PCI were the negative ones, but admission PP < 40 mmHg was not. These results suggest that admission PP 49–57 mmHg might be correlated with better in-hospital prognosis in Japanese AMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical manifestations, and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Several clinical studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, data on the relation between admission SBP and in-hospital prognosis in AMI patients are still lacking in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 1211 AMI patients were classified into quintiles based on SBP at hospital admission (<106 mmHg, n = 241; 106-125 mmHg, n = 239; 126-140 mmHg, n = 244; 141-159 mmHg, n = 238; and ≥ 160 mmHg, n = 249). The patients with SBP < 106 mmHg tended to have higher age, Killip class ≥ 3 at admission, right coronary artery, left main trunk, or multivessels as culprit lesions, larger number of diseased vessels, lower Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade in the infarct-related artery before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and higher value of peak creatine phosphokinase concentration. Patients with SBP <106 mmHg had a significantly higher mortality, while mortality was not significantly different among the other quintiles: 25.7% (<106 mmHg), 5.4% (106-125 mmHg), 5.7% (126-140 mmHg), 2.5% (141-159 mmHg), and 5.6% (≥ 160 mmHg) (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, Killip class ≥ 3 at admission, admission SBP <106 mmHg, and age were the independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality, whereas admission SBP 141-159 mmHg and primary PCI were the negative ones, but admission SBP 106-125 mmHg, admission SBP 126-140 mmHg, and admission SBP ≥ 160 mmHg were not. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that admission SBP 141-159 mmHg might be correlated with better in-hospital prognosis, whereas admission SBP <106 mmHg was associated with in-hospital death in Japanese patients hospitalized for AMI.

Predictors of nonoptimal coronary flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND Predictors of suboptimal coronary flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) after stent-based primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not been fully investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study database, we retrospectively compared clinical manifestations and in-hospital prognosis between AMI patients undergoing stent-based primary PCI with final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade < or = 2 in the IRA (nonoptimal group, n=69) and those with final TIMI grade 3 (optimal group, n=1200). The nonoptimal group had higher prevalence of Killip class > or = 3 at admission, higher frequency of mechanical support devices during procedures, larger value of maximal creatine phosphokinase, and a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate (27.5% for nonoptimal vs. 9.0% for optimal, P<0.001), compared with the optimal group. On multivariate analysis, Killip class > or = 3 at admission was the independent predictor of the final nonoptimal flow (odds ratio 2.33, 95% confidence intervals 1.27-4.26 P=0.006), but TIMI 3 flow before primary PCI and elapsed time (symptom onset-to-admission time)<24h were not. CONCLUSIONS Killip class > or = 3 at admission is an independent predictor of the final nonoptimal flow in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI with stent implantation.

Clinical Outcome After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With a High Percentage of Ventricular Pacing

Previous reports have suggested that right ventricular apical pacing may lead to cardiac dysfunction. Septal pacing is thought to be superior to apical pacing in the prevention of cardiac dyssynchrony, however, there have been no reports on the contribution of septal pacing to improving clinical outcome.We retrospectively evaluated factors associated with cardiac events in patients with right ventricular pacing.The study population consisted of 256 consecutive patients newly implanted with permanent pacemakers and followed-up for 29 ± 18 months. Cardiac events, consisting of cardiac death or heart failure requiring hospitalization, occurred in 22 patients. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with a high percentage of ventricular pacing (> 90%, n = 101, group H) had a higher incidence of cardiac events than patients with a low percentage of ventricular pacing (< 10%, n = 83, group L) (P = 0.002). In group H, multivariate analysis showed that age (HR: 1.174, 95%CI: 1.066-1.291, P = 0.001), ejection fraction (EF) (HR: 0.898, 95%CI: 0.836-0.964, P = 0.003), QRS duration during cardiac pacing (HR: 1.059, 95%CI: 1.017-1.103, P = 0.006), and existing basal cardiac diseases (HR: 13.080, 95%CI: 2.463-69.479, P = 0.003) were significant predictors of cardiac events, although pacing site had no significant association with prognosis (P = 0.56).Higher age, lower EF, longer QRS duration during cardiac pacing, and existing basal cardiac diseases are associated with poor prognosis in patients with a high percentage of ventricular pacing.

Influence of previous myocardial infarction site on in-hospital outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for repeat myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a disastrous condition with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. However, the relation between location of previous myocardial infarction (MI) and in-hospital outcome in repeat-AMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study database, clinical background, angiographic findings, results of primary PCI, and in-hospital prognosis were retrospectively compared between primary PCI-treated AMI patients with previous anterior MI (anterior group, n=151) and those with previous non-anterior MI (non-anterior group, n=157). Clinical backgrounds, angiographic findings, results of primary PCI, and in-hospital outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, Killip class > or =3 at admission, number of diseased vessels > or =2 or diseased left main trunk at initial coronary angiography, and age were the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in the recurrent-AMI patients, but not the anterior location of previous MI. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that among recurrent-AMI patients undergoing primary PCI, in-hospital prognosis mostly depends on the severity of acute heart failure at the onset and the residual myocardial ischemia rather than previous MI sites.

Clinical manifestations and effects of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with delayed pre-hospital time in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Prolonged pre-hospital time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with decreased indication for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy of primary PCI in AMI patients with prolonged pre-hospital time has not been fully investigated in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 3010 consecutive AMI patients admitted to AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical characteristics and in-hospital prognosis of these patients were reviewed. Patients with pre-hospital delay [elapsed time (ET)>12 h] had a lower frequency of Killip≥3 (9.3%) and less frequently received primary PCI (77.7%) compared with patients with ET≤12 h. In the ET>12 h group, older patients or patients with MI history tended to be complicated by heart failure. Primary PCI was performed for patients with ET>12 h, irrespective of the severity of heart failure [Killip 1 (78.7%) vs Killip≥2 (74.0%); p=0.3827]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.053], MI history (OR 2.860), Killip≥2 (OR 10.235), and multi-vessels or left main coronary artery as culprit (OR 11.712) were significant independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET>12 h. Practice of primary PCI was not a significant negative predictor for patients with ET>12 h (OR 0.812), but it was for patients with ET≤12 h (OR 0.425). CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that patients with ET>12 h have a less severe condition and less frequently receive primary PCI compared with patients with ET≤12 h. Although primary PCI is often performed for these patients irrespective of the severity of heart failure, no preferable effect of primary PCI on the in-hospital mortality is demonstrated. In contrary, practice of primary PCI is a significant negative predictor of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET≤12 h.

A Simple Risk Stratification Model for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) from the Combination of Blood Examination Variables: Acute Myocardial Infarction-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group.

Background Many mortality risk scoring tools exist among patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). A risk stratification model that evaluates STEMI prognosis more simply and rapidly is preferred in clinical practice. Methods and Findings We developed a simple stratification model for blood examination by using the STEMI data of AMI-Kyoto registry in the derivation set (n = 1,060) and assessed its utility for mortality prediction in the validation set (n = 521). We selected five variables that significantly worsen in-hospital mortality: white blood cell count, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, and blood sugar levels at >10,000/μL, <10 g/dL, >1.0 mg/dL, >1.0 mg/dL, and >200 mg/dL, respectively. In the derivation set, each of the five variables significantly worsened in-hospital mortality (p < 0.01). We developed the risk stratification model by combining laboratory variables that were scored based on each beta coefficient obtained using multivariate analysis and divided three laboratory groups. We also found a significant trend in the in-hospital mortality rate for three laboratory groups. Therefore, we assessed the utility of this model in the validation set. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of our laboratory stratification model was comparable to that of the full multivariable model (c-statistic: derivation set vs validation set, 0.81 vs 0.74). In addition, we divided all cases (n = 1,581) into three thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index groups based on an In TIME II substudy; the cases were further subdivided based on this laboratory model. The high laboratory group had significantly high in-hospital mortality rate in each TIMI risk index group (trend of in-hospital mortality; p < 0.01). Conclusions This laboratory stratification model can predict in-hospital mortality of STEMI simply and rapidly and might be useful for predicting in-hospital mortality of STEMI by further subdividing the TIMI risk index.

Impact of Door-to-Balloon Time in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Arrived by Self-Transport : Acute Myocardial Infarction-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group

BACKGROUND Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who arrive at a hospital via self-transport reportedly have a delayed door-to-balloon time (DBT). However, the clinical impacts of delayed DBT on in-hospital mortality among such patients are not well known.Methods and Results:In total, 1,172 STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2009 and December 2013 from the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Kyoto Registry were analyzed. Compared with the emergency medical service (EMS) group (n=804), the self-transport group (n=368) was younger and had a significantly longer DBT (115 min vs. 90 min, P<0.01), with fewer patients having a Killip classification of 2 or higher. The in-hospital mortality rate was lower in the self-transport group than in the EMS group (3.3% vs. 7.1%, P<0.01). A DBT >90 min was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in EMS patients (odds ratio (OR)=2.43, P=0.01) but not in self-transport patients (OR=0.89, P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrated that there was no relationship between in-hospital prognosis and DBT ≤90 min in STEMI patients using self-transport. The prognosis of these patients cannot be improved by focusing only on DBT. Treatment strategies based on means of transport should also be considered.

573 Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of Losartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. high-dose angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: Kamanza Anti-Hypertensive Treatment Trial (KAHT-Trial)

Objectives: According to the current guidelines, archiving strict blood pressure control is essential to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Los/HCTZ) combination drug vs. high-dose angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Methods: This study was conducted at 11 centers for the KAHT-Trial group. A total of 65 hypertensive patients receiving regular-dose ARB therapy whose BP remained above 140/90 mmHg were prospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to receive Los/HCTZ combination drug (Los/HTCZ group, n = 67) or high-dose ARB (high-dose ARB group, n = 68) and followed for 1year. Results: After 3 months of treatment, BP significantly decreased from 157 ± 12/87 ± 9 mmHg to 137 ± 14/78 ± 8 mmHg in the Los/HCTZ group and from 158 ± 12 /91 ± 12 mmHg to 139 ± 12/80 ± 8 mmHg in the high-dose ARB group. Decreases in BP were well-maintained for 1year in the both groups. However, decreases in BP were not different between the two groups. After 1 year of treatment, levels of HbA1c, eGFR, plasma glucose, cholesterol and uric acid showed no significant changes in the both groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Los/HCTZ combined therapy was effective in reducing uncontrolled hypertension without deteriorating glucose, lipid and uric acid metabolism as well as high-dose ARB. Los/HCTZ combined therapy may have beneficial effect in terms of tolerability and medical economics.