Makoto Naganuma

Treatment of ulcerative colitis by feeding with germinated barley foodstuff: first report of a multicenter open control trial

Background. Germinated barley foodstuff (GBF) is a prebiotic foodstuff that effectively increases luminal butyrate production by stimulating the growth of protective bacteria. In the first pilot study, GBF has been shown to reduce both clinical activity and mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of GBF in the treatment of UC in a multicenter open control trial. Methods. Eighteen patients with mildly to moderately active UC were divided into two groups using a random allocation protocol. The control group (n = 7) were given a baseline anti-inflammatory therapy for 4 weeks. In the GBF-treated group (n = 11), patients received 20–30 g GBF daily, together with the baseline treatment, for 4 weeks. The response to the treatments was evaluated clinically and endoscopically. Fecal micro-flora were also analyzed. Results. After 4 weeks of observation, the GBF-treated group showed a significant decrease in clinical activity index scores compared with the control group (P < 0.05). No side effects related to GBF were observed. GBF therapy increased fecal concentrations of Bifidobacterium and Eubacterium limosum. Conclusions. Oral GBF therapy may have the potency to reduce clinical activity of UC. We believe that these results support the use of GBF administration as a new adjunct therapy for UC.

Granulocytapheresis is useful as an alternative therapy in patients with steroid-refractory or -dependent ulcerative colitis

Background:Recently, granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis (GCAP) has been shown to be safe and effective for active ulcerative colitis (UC). We analyzed the safety and efficacy of GCAP (G-1 Adacolumn) in patients with steroid-refractory and -dependent UC. G-1 Adacolumn is filled with cellulose acetate carriers that selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. Methods:Forty-four patients with UC were treated with GCAP. These patients received 5 apheresis sessions over 4 weeks. Twenty patients had steroid-refractory UC (group 1) and 10 had steroid-dependent UC (group 2). Fourteen patients who did not want re-administration of steroids were treated with GCAP at the time of relapse, just after discontinuation of steroid therapy (group 3). Results:Of 44 patients treated with GCAP, 24 (55%) obtained remission (CAI ≤ 4), 9 (20%) showed a clinical response, and 11 (25%) remained unchanged. Only 2 of 10 patients (20%) with severe steroid-refractory UC (CAI ≥ 12) achieved remission, whereas 7 of 10 patients (70%) with moderate steroid-refractory UC achieved remission (p < 0.05). The dose of corticosteroids was tapered in 9 of 10 (90%) patients with steroid-dependent UC after GCAP therapy. Twelve (86%) of 14 patients in group 3 showed an improvement in symptoms and could avoid re-administration of steroids after GCAP. No severe adverse effects occurred. Conclusions:The findings of this study suggest that GCAP may be a useful alternative therapy for patients with moderate steroid-refractory or -dependent UC, although cyclosporin A or colectomy is necessary in patients with severe UC. GCAP may also be useful for avoiding re-administration of steroids at the time of relapse. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Low-dose azathioprine is effective and safe for maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background. 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine (AZA) have been used in patients with Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) for reducing the dose of steroids and maintaining remission. However, some patients treated with 6-MP/AZA develop bone marrow suppression, one of the most serious side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose AZA (0.6–1.2 mg/kg per day) for maintaining remission in patients with UC. We also investigated the relationship between bone marrow suppression and thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) mutation in the Japanese population. Methods. Study 1. To investigate the frequency of TPMT mutation, findings for 82 patients among 141 patients with UC or CD who were treated with AZA or 6-MP were analyzed retrospectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods were used to analyze allele mutations of the TPMT gene. Study 2. A multicenter prospective trial was performed. The subjects were 22 patients with UC with presence of remission for 3 months or more. They were treated with 50 mg/day of AZA, and we evaluated the remission rate at 6 months, adverse side effects, and changes in prednisone doses after the initiation of AZA. Results. Study 1. Seventy-four (91%) of the 82 patients analyzed had no TPMT mutation, 7 (8%) had one mutant allele, and 1 (1%) had two mutant alleles. Of the total of 141 patients, 4 (44%) of the 9 patients who were treated with 50 mg/day of 6-MP or 100 mg/day of AZA developed bone marrow suppression, although no mutation of TPMT was seen in any of these patients. On the other hand, 8 (6%) of the 132 patients who were treated with 30 mg/day of 6-MP or 50 mg/day of AZA developed bone marrow suppression. Seven of 8 patients (88%) who developed bone marrow suppression with a low dose of AZA had a mutant TPMT allele. Study 2. In the 17 patients who could continue taking low-dose AZA for 6 months, 15 (88%) maintained remission. Of 8 patients treated with low-dose prednisone (5–10 mg/day), 3 patients (38%) could discontinue oral prednisone and 4 (50%) could reduce its dose. Six of the 22 patients (27%) had some adverse side effects. These side effects were ameliorated, or disappeared spontaneously, or disappeared with the discontinuation of AZA. Conclusions. A dose of 50 mg/day of AZA is effective and safe for maintenance of remission in the Japanese population. Investigation of the TPMT allele may be useful for predicting the appearance of bone marrow suppression, when low-dose 6-MP or AZA is given.

Reactivation of hepatitis B in a patient with Crohn’s disease treated using infliximab

We encountered a case of reactivation of hepatitis B virus after administration of infliximab for Crohn’s disease. The use of infliximab was considered because the patient displayed abdominal symptoms and perianal lesions. Transaminases were normal, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was undetectable before treatment, so no antiviral treatment was used, and infliximab and low-dose 6-mercaptopurine were administered. This treatment was effective, but liver dysfunction and reactivation of HBV were observed after the fourth injection of infliximab. This is the first report of Crohn’s disease for which infliximab use was continued even after reactivation of HBV was observed. However, liver dysfunction was not improved by lamivudine. Antiviral treatment should be considered before administration of infliximab for patients with HBV.

Appendectomy protects against the development of ulcerative colitis and reduces its recurrence: results of a multicenter case-controlled study in Japan

OBJECTIVES: Studies in the US and Europe have shown that appendectomy may prevent the development of ulcerative colitis, but no detailed study has been conducted in Japan, where ulcerative colitis is uncommon and the population is racially homogeneous. In addition, there has been no detailed analysis of the relationship between appendectomy and the clinical course of ulcerative colitis. In this multicenter clinical study, we evaluated the effects of appendectomy on ulcerative colitis in Japan. METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken in seven medical institutions comparing the incidence of appendectomy and tonsillectomy in 325 patients with ulcerative colitis and 325 controls matched for age (10-yr intervals) and sex. Disease duration, extent, and prognosis were determined in 21 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent appendectomies and 304 patients with ulcerative colitis who did not undergo appendectomies. RESULTS: Appendectomy was performed in a significantly lower percentage of patients in the ulcerative colitis group (21/325, 6.5%) than in the control group (53/325, 16.3%) (p < 0.001) (odds ratios = 0.355, 95% CI = 0.208–0.603). In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to tonsillectomy. The mean age (25.7 ± 10.9 yr) of patients with ulcerative colitis at the time of appendectomy was significantly higher than the mean age (20.1 ± 8.7 yr) of patients in the control group at the time of appendectomy (p < 0.05). The incidence of proctitis was higher in the appendectomy group than in the group that did not undergo appendectomies (38.1% vs 18.1%). In addition, the recurrence rates were significantly lower in the appendectomy group than in the group that did not undergo appendectomies (57.1% vs 78.6%, p < 0.05), although both groups were similar in composition as to sex, age, duration of disease, smoking status, and previous medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that appendectomy has a negative association with and perhaps a preventive effect on the development of ulcerative colitis in the Japanese population. Furthermore, appendectomy also appears to reduce the extent and recurrence of ulcerative colitis.

Efficacy of infliximab for induction and maintenance of remission in intestinal Behçet's disease

Background: Intestinal Behçet disease (BD) is characterized by intestinal inflammation with round and oval ulcers associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Although several cases have been reported that infliximab is effective for induction of remission, the efficacy of infliximab for maintaining remission is unknown. Methods: Six cases with fulminant intestinal BD were treated with infliximab. All patients were steroid‐dependent and refractory to immunosuppressants; 3 patients were treated with 6‐mercaptopurine, 1 patient with azathioprine, 1 patient with cyclosporine A, and 1 patient with methotrexate. Results: Four patients achieved remission by infliximab and all of these patients maintained remission with scheduled treatments of infliximab, with the longest duration of remission being about 3 years. Another 2 patients with ileal ulceration required surgery; however, 1 patient has maintained remission by scheduled treatment of infliximab for 2 years after surgery. Conclusions: Infliximab appears to offer an option for fulminant intestinal BD to induce and maintain remission, although a randomized control trial is needed.

Comparison of magnetic resonance and balloon enteroscopic examination of the small intestine in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography is a recommended imaging technique for detecting intestinal involvement in Crohns disease (CD). However, the diagnostic accuracy of MR enterography has not been compared directly what that of enteroscopy of the jejunum and proximal ileum. We evaluated the usefulness of MR enterocolonography (MREC) by comparing its findings with those from balloon-assisted enteroscopy. METHODS In a prospective study, MREC and enteroscopy were performed within 3 days of each other on 100 patients. Ulcerative lesions and all mucosal lesions were evaluated. Physicians and radiologists were blinded to results from other studies. Findings from MREC were compared directly with those from enteroscopy; the sensitivity and specificity with which MREC detected CD lesions were assessed. RESULTS MREC detected ulcerative lesions and all mucosal lesions in the small intestine with 82.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.4%-87.7%) and 67.5% sensitivity (95% CI, 63.1%-70.0%); specificity values were 87.6% (95% CI, 83.7%-90.6%) and 94.8% (95% CI, 90.1%-97.5%). MREC detected major stenosis with 58.8% sensitivity (95% CI, 37.6%-77.2%) and 90.0% specificity (95% CI, 88.4%-91.5%) and all stenoses with 40.8% sensitivity (95% CI, 30.8%-49.4%) and 93.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.1%-95.9%). CONCLUSIONS MREC is useful for detecting active lesions in the small intestine. However, MR imaging is less sensitive for detecting intestinal damage, such as stenoses. Enteroscopy is preferred for identifying intestinal damage. Suitable imaging approaches should be selected to assess CD lesions in deep small intestine.

Measurement of colonic mucosal concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid is useful for estimating its therapeutic efficacy in distal ulcerative colitis: comparison of orally administered mesalamine and sulfasalazine.

ObjectivesOral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations have been used frequently in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. However, there have been few reports investigating the relationship between colonic mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA and its clinical efficacy when oral sulfasalazine or 5-ASA compounds were administered. The aim of this study is to compare the mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA ensured by sulfasalazine or mesalamine, and to define the clinical significance of the measurement of 5-ASA concentrations in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Materials and MethodsBiopsies were taken from the rectum and sigmoid colon of the oral sulfasalazine group (n = 13) and the slow-release 5-ASA (mesalamine) group with (n = 5) or without (n = 11) rectal administration of 5-ASA. High-pressure liquid chromatography was used to measure the tissue concentrations of 5-ASA and its metabolites. We compared the 5-ASA concentrations of the sulfasalazine group with the mesalamine group. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between tissue 5-ASA concentrations and the Disease Activity Index (DAI). ResultsThe concentrations of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-ASA in the sulfasalazine group were higher than those in the group taking oral mesalamine alone (p < 0.01). The concentration of 5-ASA was much higher in the patients who received oral and rectal mesalamine in an enema than in the patients who had oral mesalamine alone. There was a significant inverse correlation between the DAI and concentrations of 5-ASA in the rectum (r = 0.712, p < 0.001). ConclusionsWe demonstrated that the colonic mucosal concentration of 5-ASA was significantly higher in the sulfasalazine group than in the mesalamine group. Furthermore, the concentrations of mucosal 5-ASA may be a good marker for the estimation of its efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Analysis of clinical course and long-term prognosis of surgical and nonsurgical patients with intestinal Behcet's disease

Analysis of clinical course and long-term prognosis of surgical and nonsurgical patients with intestinal Behcets disease

Magnetic resonance enterocolonography is useful for simultaneous evaluation of small and large intestinal lesions in Crohn's disease

Background: We developed novel magnetic resonance enterocolonography (MREC) for simultaneously evaluating both small and large bowel lesions in patients with Crohns disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MREC by comparing results of this procedure to those of endoscopies for evaluating the small and large bowel lesions of patients with CD. Methods: Thirty patients with established CD were prospectively examined by newly developed MREC. Patients underwent ileocolonoscopy (ICS) (24 procedures) or double‐balloon endoscopy (DBE) (10 procedures) after MREC on the same day. Two gastroenterologists and two radiologists who were blinded to the results of another study evaluated endoscopy and MREC findings, respectively. Results: In colonic lesions the sensitivities of the MREC for deep mucosal lesions (DML), all CD lesions, and stenosis were 88.2, 61.8, and 71.4%, respectively, while the specificities were 98.1, 95.3, and 97.7%, respectively. In small intestinal lesions, MREC sensitivities for DML, all CD lesions, and stenosis were 100, 85.7, and 100%, respectively, while specificities were 100, 90.5, and 93.1%, respectively. Endoscopic scores were significantly correlated with MREC scores. Eleven (46%) of the 24 patients who were clinically not suspected to show stricture were observed to demonstrate stricture by radiologists. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that MREC can simultaneously detect the CD lesions of the small and large intestine. MREC can be performed without radiation exposure, the use of enema, or the placement of a naso‐jejunal catheter. MREC and endoscopy have comparable abilities for evaluating mucosal lesions of patients with CD. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;)