Malte Peters

Phase I, Dose-Escalation Study of BKM120, an Oral Pan-Class I PI3K Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE This phase I dose-escalation study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of BKM120, a potent and highly specific oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients with advanced solid tumors received daily BKM120 12.5 to 150 mg. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Assessments included archival tumor molecular status, response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), positron emission tomography tracer uptake ([(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [FDG-PET]), fasting plasma C-peptide, and phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) in skin biopsies. RESULTS Overall, treatment was well tolerated. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 2 mood alteration (80 mg), grade 3 epigastralgia, grade 3 rash, grade 2 and grade 3 mood alteration (100 mg), and two grade 4 hyperglycemia (150 mg). The MTD was 100 mg/d. Frequent treatment-related adverse events included rash, hyperglycemia, diarrhea, anorexia, and mood alteration (37% each); nausea (31%); fatigue (26%); pruritus (23%); and mucositis (23%). BKM120 demonstrated rapid absorption, half-life of ∼40 hours, ∼three-fold steady-state accumulation, dose-proportional exposure, and moderate interpatient variability. One patient demonstrated a confirmed partial response (triple-negative breast cancer); seven patients (20%) were on study for ≥ 8 months. BKM120 demonstrated dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects on [(18)F]FDG-PET, fasting C-peptide, fasting blood glucose, and pS6. No significant trends were seen to correlate tumor molecular alterations with clinical activity. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates feasibility and proof-of-concept of class I PI3K inhibition in patients with advanced cancers. BKM120, at the MTD of 100 mg/d, is safe and well tolerated, with a favorable PK profile, clear evidence of target inhibition, and preliminary antitumor activity.

MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study

BACKGROUND Patients with melanoma harbouring Val600 BRAF mutations benefit from treatment with BRAF inhibitors. However, no targeted treatments exist for patients with BRAF wild-type tumours, including those with NRAS mutations. We aimed to assess the use of MEK162, a small-molecule MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with NRAS-mutated or Val600 BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. METHODS In our open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study, we assigned patients with NRAS-mutated or BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma to one of three treatment arms on the basis of mutation status. Patients were enrolled at university hospitals or private cancer centres in Europe and the USA. The three arms were: twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for NRAS-mutated melanoma, twice-daily MEK162 45 mg for BRAF-mutated melanoma, and twice-daily MEK162 60 mg for BRAF-mutated melanoma. Previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors was permitted, but previous MEK inhibitor therapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an objective response (ie, a complete response or confirmed partial response). We report data for the 45 mg groups. We assessed clinical activity in all patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 and in patients assessable for response (with two available CT scans). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01320085, and is currently recruiting additional patients with NRAS mutations (based on a protocol amendment). FINDINGS Between March 31, 2011, and Jan 17, 2012, we enrolled 71 patients who received at least one dose of MEK162 45 mg. By Feb 29, 2012 (data cutoff), median follow-up was 3·3 months (range 0·6-8·7; IQR 2·2-5·0). No patients had a complete response. Six (20%) of 30 patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma had a partial response (three confirmed) as did eight (20%) of 41 patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma (two confirmed). The most frequent adverse events were acneiform dermatitis (18 [60%] patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and 15 [37%] patients with the BRAF-mutated melanoma), rash (six [20%] and 16 [39%]), peripheral oedema (ten [33%] and 14 [34%]), facial oedema (nine [30%] and seven [17%]), diarrhoea (eight [27%] and 15 [37%]), and creatine phosphokinase increases (11 [37%] and nine [22%]). Increased creatine phosphokinase was the most common grade 3-4 adverse event (seven [23%] and seven [17%]). Four patients had serious adverse events (two per arm), which included diarrhoea, dehydration, acneiform dermatitis, general physical deterioration, irregular heart rate, malaise, and small intestinal perforation. No deaths occurred from treatment-related causes. INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, MEK162 is the first targeted therapy to show activity in patients with NRAS -mutated melanoma and might offer a new option for a cancer with few effective treatments. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Activation of MET via Diverse Exon 14 Splicing Alterations Occurs in Multiple Tumor Types and Confers Clinical Sensitivity to MET Inhibitors

UNLABELLED Focal amplification and activating point mutation of the MET gene are well-characterized oncogenic drivers that confer susceptibility to targeted MET inhibitors. Recurrent somatic splice site alterations at MET exon 14 (METex14) that result in exon skipping and MET activation have been characterized, but their full diversity and prevalence across tumor types are unknown. Here, we report analysis of tumor genomic profiles from 38,028 patients to identify 221 cases with METex14 mutations (0.6%), including 126 distinct sequence variants. METex14 mutations are detected most frequently in lung adenocarcinoma (3%), but also frequently in other lung neoplasms (2.3%), brain glioma (0.4%), and tumors of unknown primary origin (0.4%). Further in vitro studies demonstrate sensitivity to MET inhibitors in cells harboring METex14 alterations. We also report three new patient cases with METex14 alterations in lung or histiocytic sarcoma tumors that showed durable response to two different MET-targeted therapies. The diversity of METex14 mutations indicates that diagnostic testing via comprehensive genomic profiling is necessary for detection in a clinical setting. SIGNIFICANCE Here we report the identification of diverse exon 14 splice site alterations in MET that result in constitutive activity of this receptor and oncogenic transformation in vitro. Patients whose tumors harbored these alterations derived meaningful clinical benefit from MET inhibitors. Collectively, these data support the role of METex14 alterations as drivers of tumorigenesis, and identify a unique subset of patients likely to derive benefit from MET inhibitors.

Convergent loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to a PI(3)Kα inhibitor

Broad and deep tumour genome sequencing has shed new light on tumour heterogeneity and provided important insights into the evolution of metastases arising from different clones. There is an additional layer of complexity, in that tumour evolution may be influenced by selective pressure provided by therapy, in a similar fashion to that occurring in infectious diseases. Here we studied tumour genomic evolution in a patient (index patient) with metastatic breast cancer bearing an activating PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha, PI(3)Kα) mutation. The patient was treated with the PI(3)Kα inhibitor BYL719, which achieved a lasting clinical response, but the patient eventually became resistant to this drug (emergence of lung metastases) and died shortly thereafter. A rapid autopsy was performed and material from a total of 14 metastatic sites was collected and sequenced. All metastatic lesions, when compared to the pre-treatment tumour, had a copy loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) and those lesions that became refractory to BYL719 had additional and different PTEN genetic alterations, resulting in the loss of PTEN expression. To put these results in context, we examined six other patients also treated with BYL719. Acquired bi-allelic loss of PTEN was found in one of these patients, whereas in two others PIK3CA mutations present in the primary tumour were no longer detected at the time of progression. To characterize our findings functionally, we examined the effects of PTEN knockdown in several preclinical models (both in cell lines intrinsically sensitive to BYL719 and in PTEN-null xenografts derived from our index patient), which we found resulted in resistance to BYL719, whereas simultaneous PI(3)K p110β blockade reverted this resistance phenotype. We conclude that parallel genetic evolution of separate metastatic sites with different PTEN genomic alterations leads to a convergent PTEN-null phenotype resistant to PI(3)Kα inhibition.

Serum concentrations of DKK‐1 correlate with the extent of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma

Objectives:  Lytic bone disease is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and is caused by osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition. Secretion of Dickkopf (DKK)‐1 by myeloma cells is a major factor which causes inhibition of osteoblast precursors. So far, there is no study showing a significant difference in serum DKK‐1 levels in MM patients with or without lytic bone lesions.

A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of the Oral Pan-PI3K Inhibitor Buparlisib (BKM120) in Combination with the Oral MEK1/2 Inhibitor Trametinib (GSK1120212) in Patients with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways play important roles in many tumors. In this study, safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of buparlisib (pan class PI3K inhibitor) and trametinib (MEK inhibitor) were evaluated. Experimental Design: This open-label, dose-finding, phase Ib study comprised dose escalation, followed by expansion part in patients with RAS- or BRAF-mutant non–small cell lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer. Results: Of note, 113 patients were enrolled, 66 and 47 in dose-escalation and -expansion parts, respectively. MTD was established as buparlisib 70 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily [5/15, 33% patients with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)] and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) buparlisib 60 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily (1/10, 10% patients with DLTs). DLTs included stomatitis (8/103, 8%), diarrhea, dysphagia, and creatine kinase (CK) increase (2/103, 2% each). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 73 patients (65%); mainly CK increase, stomatitis, AST/ALT (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) increase, and rash. For all (21) patients with ovarian cancer, overall response rate was 29% [1 complete response, 5 partial responses (PR)], disease control rate 76%, and median progression-free survival was 7 months. Minimal activity was observed in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (1/17 PR) and pancreatic cancer (best overall response was SD). Relative to historical data, buparlisib exposure increased and trametinib exposure slightly increased with the combination. Conclusions: At RP2D, buparlisib 60 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily shows promising antitumor activity for patients with KRAS-mutant ovarian cancer. Long-term tolerability of the combination at RP2D is challenging, due to frequent dose interruptions and reductions for toxicity. Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 730–8. ©2014 AACR.

Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Purpose: To test second-line personalized medicine combination therapies, based on genomic and proteomic data, in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Experimental Design: We established 12 PDXs from BRAF inhibitor–progressed melanoma patients. Following expansion, PDXs were analyzed using targeted sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. By using multi-arm preclinical trial designs, we identified efficacious precision medicine approaches. Results: We identified alterations previously described as drivers of resistance: NRAS mutations in 3 PDXs, MAP2K1 (MEK1) mutations in 2, BRAF amplification in 4, and aberrant PTEN in 7. At the protein level, re-activation of phospho-MAPK predominated, with parallel activation of PI3K in a subset. Second-line efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 with either BRAF (encorafenib)/MEK (binimetinib) inhibitor combination or the ERK inhibitor VX-11e was confirmed in vivo. Amplification of MET was observed in 3 PDX models, a higher frequency than expected and a possible novel mechanism of resistance. Importantly, MET amplification alone did not predict sensitivity to the MET inhibitor capmatinib. In contrast, capmatinib as single agent resulted in significant but transient tumor regression in a PDX with resistance to BRAF/MEK combination therapy and high pMET. The triple combination capmatinib/encorafenib/binimetinib resulted in complete and sustained tumor regression in all animals. Conclusions: Genomic and proteomic data integration identifies dual-core pathway inhibition as well as MET as combinatorial targets. These studies provide evidence for biomarker development to appropriately select personalized therapies of patients and avoid treatment failures. Clin Cancer Res; 22(7); 1592–602. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Hartsough and Aplin, p. 1550

Preclinical Therapeutic Synergy of MEK1/2 and CDK4/6 Inhibition in Neuroblastoma

Purpose: Neuroblastoma is treated with aggressive multimodal therapy, yet more than 50% of patients experience relapse. We recently showed that relapsed neuroblastomas frequently harbor mutations leading to hyperactivated ERK signaling and sensitivity to MEK inhibition therapy. Here we sought to define a synergistic therapeutic partner to potentiate MEK inhibition. Experimental Design: We first surveyed 22 genetically annotated human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines (from 20 unique patients) for sensitivity to the MEK inhibitor binimetinib. After noting an inverse correlation with sensitivity to ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor), we studied the combinatorial effect of these two agents using proliferation assays, cell-cycle analysis, Ki67 immunostaining, time-lapse microscopy, and xenograft studies. Results: Sensitivity to binimetinib and ribociclib was inversely related (r = −0.58, P = 0.009). MYCN amplification status and expression were associated with ribociclib sensitivity and binimetinib resistance, whereas increased MAPK signaling was the main determinant of binimetinib sensitivity and ribociclib resistance. Treatment with both compounds resulted in synergistic or additive cellular growth inhibition in all lines tested and significant inhibition of tumor growth in three of four xenograft models of neuroblastoma. The augmented growth inhibition was attributed to diminished cell-cycle progression that was reversible upon removal of drugs. Conclusions: Here we demonstrate that combined binimetinib and ribociclib treatment shows therapeutic synergy across a broad panel of high-risk neuroblastoma preclinical models. These data support testing this combination therapy in relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients, with focus on cases with hyperactivated RAS–MAPK signaling. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1785–96. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract LB-327: Loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to the PI3Kα inhibitor BYL719 and provides evidence of convergent evolution under selective therapeutic pressure

Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA Activating mutations of PIK3CA, the gene encoding the p110α subunit of PI3K, are frequent in breast cancer and selective inhibitors of this enzyme have shown promising clinical activity in breast tumors harboring these mutations. We studied the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer harboring a PIK3CA mutation that was treated in a clinical trial with BYL719, a highly selective PI3Kα inhibitor. The treatment resulted in a robust partial response that lasted 7 months followed by rapid progression and death. A rapid autopsy was performed with collection of tissue samples from 16 different metastatic sites. We compared by whole genome and exome sequencing the original primary tumor, a rapidly progressing lung metastasis and a periaortic lesion that was still responding to BYL719 at time of death. Besides several common alterations, PTEN loss and a missense mutation were detected only in the lung metastasis. Using targeted exome sequencing we analyzed all the other available samples. Strikingly, we observed a consistent loss in PTEN (via different mechanisms such as deletion, splice site mutation and frameshift mutations) in all the lesions refractory to BYL719 but not in the responding ones. In every case, the loss of PTEN was also documented by lack of protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Finally, we were able to build a dendrogram showing the phylogenetic evolution of the lesions and the evolutionary convergence of the PTEN alterations. To validate PTEN loss as a possible mechanism of acquired resistance to selective PI3Kα inhibition, we generated doxycycline-inducible PTEN shRNA stable clones starting from three different BYL719-sensitive cell lines. In all the studied models, induction of PTEN shRNA resulted in resistance to BYL719. Since PTEN deficient genetic models have been shown to rely on the β subunit of the PI3K holoenzyme, we tested whether the concomitant inhibition of both p110α and p110β was sufficient to revert the resistant phenotype. BKM120 (a pan-PI3K inhibitor) or the addition of AZD6482 (p110β inhibitor) to BYL719 re-sensitized the cells to BYL719. To expand our findings in vivo, we generated a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model from a PTEN-null non-responding lesion (lung). Consistently, this PDX model was refractory to the antitumor activity of BYL719 but conserved sensitivity to BKM120 or the combination of AZD6482 and BYL719. In both cases, IHC analysis revealed a decrease in PI3K/AKT downstream effectors pPRAS40 (246) and pS6 (240/4) staining with BKM120 or AZD6482+BYL719, but not with BYL719 alone. Preliminary analyses of other samples collected from patients treated with BYL719 suggest that PTEN loss is a relatively frequent event upon therapy progression. Taken together, the different mechanisms that inactivate PTEN in the tumor treated with BYL719 can be explained by convergent phenotypic evolution in a heterogeneous tumor and highlight the importance of PTEN and PI3Kβ in acquired resistance to PI3Kα inhibitors. Citation Format: Pau Castel, Dejan Juric, Helen Won, Benjamin Ainscough, Haley Ellis, Saya Ebbesen, Malachi Griffith, Obi Griffith, Iyer Gopakumar, Dennis Sgroi, Steven Isakoff, Elaine Mardis, David Solit, Scott Lowe, Cornelia Quadt, Malte Peters, Michael Berger, Maurizio Scaltriti, Jose Baselga. Loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to the PI3Kα inhibitor BYL719 and provides evidence of convergent evolution under selective therapeutic pressure. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-327. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-327

Abstract A46: Inhibition of PIK3CA with BYL719 can overcome resistance to cetuximab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

Background: Preclinical data suggest squamous cell tumors, such as SCCHN, are driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression. However, many patients are refractory to anti-EGFR treatment due to intrinsic and acquired resistance. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation is a potential mechanism of resistance to EGFR-directed therapy. BYL719, a selective α-isoform PI3K inhibitor, enhances cetuximab (EGFR inhibitor) activity in SCCHN cell lines. A Phase Ib/II study combining BYL719 with cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN is testing this hypothesis (Razak et al, ASCO 2014, abst 6044; NCT01602315). Here, we outline the preclinical rationale for combining BYL719 with cetuximab in the setting of cetuximab-resistant squamous cell carcinoma, highlight Phase Ib safety and efficacy data in patients with SCCHN who have received prior cetuximab, and describe the design of the Phase II portion of the study, which is assessing both cetuximab-naive and -pretreated patients. Methods: The combination of BYL719 and cetuximab was tested in vivo in two xenograft models of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: KYSE180 (cetuximab-sensitive model) and KYSE180_CR (cetuximab-resistant, induced by long-term in vivo treatment). In the Phase Ib study, BYL719 was administered once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles with standard weekly (QW) cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on Cycle 1 Day 1; 250 mg/m2 QW thereafter) to adults with histologically/cytologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic SCCHN resistant/intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy (prior cetuximab therapy was allowed). Results: In the KYSE180 model, the addition of BYL719 to cetuximab demonstrated an additive effect leading to tumor regression; furthermore, in the KYSE180_CR model, adding BYL719 to cetuximab completely restored sensitivity and led to similar activity as seen in the cetuximab-sensitive model, suggesting that inhibiting PIK3CA signaling may overcome resistance to cetuximab. In the Phase Ib study, as of March 10, 2014, 37 patients were treated with BYL719 300 mg QD (n=32) or 400 mg QD (n=5) and cetuximab. Frequent adverse events (>30%; all-grade/Grade 3/4) were hyperglycemia (54/24), stomatitis (38/5), and dermatitis acneiform (35/3). Best overall response (BOR) per RECIST v1.1 in the full population (n=37) was 4 partial responses (PRs), 16 stable disease (SD; of which 5 were unconfirmed PRs), 10 unknown (UNK) responses, and 1 non-complete response/non-progressive disease (PD) at 300 mg or 400 mg. Six patients had PD as BOR. The overall response rate (ORR) in the full population was 4/37 (11%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 20/37 (54%). Within this population, 7 patients had received prior cetuximab therapy (6 in the metastatic/recurrent setting and 1 curative; BOR: 4 SD, 1 PR, 1 PD, and 1 UNK). Of these 7 patients, 1 had a confirmed PR, 2 had unconfirmed PRs, 2 had SD, and 1 had PD with BYL719 and cetuximab. One patient with prior cetuximab therapy had an UNK response due to death from tumor lysis syndrome after 1 week in the study. The ORR among patients with prior cetuximab was 1/7 (14%) and DCR was 5/7 (71%). Phase II tests the combination of BYL719 at the recommended Phase II dose of 300 mg QD in two second-line SCCHN patient populations. Patients who are cetuximab-naive are randomized to cetuximab alone or to BYL719 in combination with cetuximab, while patients who have received cetuximab and platinum therapy in the first-line setting are enrolled in a single arm to receive BYL719 with cetuximab. Conclusion: Combined inhibition of PI3Kα and EGFR by BYL719 and cetuximab, respectively, overcame cetuximab resistance in the preclinical setting, was well tolerated, and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in both cetuximab-naive and -pretreated patients with SCCHN. The Phase II part of the study in both patient populations is ongoing. Citation Format: Pamela Munster, Moshe Elkabets, Jill Gilbert, Albiruni R Abdul Razak, Myung-Ju Ahn, Chia-Jui Yen, Se-Hoon Lee, Hung-Ming Wang, Carla van Herpen, Wan-Teck Lim, David Demanse, Rupam Ranjan Pal, Alan Huang, Qing Sheng, Chiara Lambertini, Malte Peters, Christina Coughlin, Maurizio Scaltriti, Jose Baselga, George Blumenschein. Inhibition of PIK3CA with BYL719 can overcome resistance to cetuximab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Targeting the PI3K-mTOR Network in Cancer; Sep 14-17, 2014; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A46.