Manar Khashram

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Influencing Survival Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND Predicting long-term survival following repair is essential to clinical decision making when offering abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment. A systematic review and a meta-analysis of pre-operative non-modifiable prognostic risk factors influencing patient survival following elective open AAA repair (OAR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles reporting risk factors influencing long-term survival (≥1 year) following OAR and EVAR, published up to April 2015. Studies with <100 patients and those involving primarily ruptured AAA, complex repairs (supra celiac/renal clamp), and high risk patients were excluded. Primary risk factors were increasing age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score, and comorbidities such as ischaemic heart disease (IHD), cardiac failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), renal impairment, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and diabetes. Estimated risks were expressed as hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS A total of 5,749 study titles/abstracts were retrieved and 304 studies were thought to be relevant. The systematic review included 51 articles and the meta-analysis 45. End stage renal disease and COPD requiring supplementary oxygen had the worst long-term survival, HR 3.15 (95% CI 2.45-4.04) and HR 3.05 (95% CI 1.93-4.80) respectively. An increase in age was associated with HR of 1.05 (95% CI 1.04-1.06) for every one year increase and females had a worse survival than men HR 1.15 (95% CI 1.07-1.27). An increase in ASA score and the presence of IHD, cardiac failure, hypertension, COPD, renal impairment, cerebrovascular disease, PVD, and diabetes were also factors associated with poor long-term survival. CONCLUSION The result of this meta-analysis summarises and quantifies unmodifiable risk factors that influence late survival following AAA repair from the best available published evidence. The presence of these factors might assist in clinical decision making during discussion with patients regarding repair.

Patient flow to carotid endarterectomy: hastening the patient journey

Background:  Early carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after stroke or transient ischaemic attack is the proposed standard of care to prevent recurrent ischaemic events in selected patients. The aim of this study was to investigate if this standard is achieved in a tertiary vascular unit.

Does the diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm influence late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Studies reporting the influence of preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have not been consistent. Aim: To report the influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on overall long-term survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods Embase, Medline and the Cochrane electronic databases were searched to identify articles reporting the influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter on late survival following open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair published up to April 2015. Data were extracted from multivariate analysis; estimated risks were expressed as hazard ratio. Results A total of 2167 titles/abstracts were retrieved, of which 76 studies were fully assessed; 19 studies reporting on 22,104 patients were included. Preoperative larger abdominal aortic aneurysm size was associated with a worse survival compared to smaller aneurysms with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09–1.18), per 1 cm increase in abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter. Subgroup analysis of the different types of repair was performed and the hazard ratio (95% CI), for open aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair were 1.08 (1.03–1.12) and 1.20 (1.15–1.25), respectively, per 1 cm increase. There was a significant difference between the groups p < 0.02. Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that preoperative large abdominal aortic aneurysm independently influences overall late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and this association was greater in abdominal aortic aneurysm repaired with endovascular aneurysm repair.

Survival Disparity Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Highlights Inequality in Ethnic and Socio-economic Status

OBJECTIVES Socio-economic status (SES) and ethnicity have been reported as markers influencing the likelihood of increased mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate how SES and ethnicity impacted patient survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing open and endovascular AAA repair during a 14.5 year period were identified. Ethnicity was defined as recorded on health records and SES (a score of 10, where 1 is least deprived and 10 being most deprived) and was linked to census data. Operative outcomes were reported at 30 days and a medium-term survival analysis used the Cox model to report adjusted hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS A total of 6239 patients with a median age of 75 years and 78.7% males were included. The majority (5,654) were identified as New Zealand (NZ) Europeans, with 421 identified as NZ Maori, 97 identified as belonging to a Pacific ethnic group, and 67 identified as an Asian ethnic group. The median survival follow-up period was 5 years and after adjusting for confounders, those who identified as NZ Maori had the lowest survival compared with all other ethnic groups with a HR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.23-1.72). Living in areas of high social deprivation ≥ 7 was an independent predictor of short and medium-term overall mortality when compared with living in deprivation deciles 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS Low SES was identified as a marker of risk for all ethnic groups in relation to both reduced short and medium-term survival. However, regardless of SES, NZ Maori had worse overall medium-term survival following AAA repair than the other ethnic groups. Therefore it appears that both SES and being Maori were markers of increased exposure to risk that negatively impact upon survival after AAA repair. There is a need to ensure systemic processes support initiatives that reduce this inequality.

Use of the Off-the-Shelf t-Branch Device to Treat an Acute Type Ia Endoleak in a Symptomatic Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Purpose: To report the use of the off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Graft for the treatment of a symptomatic acute type Ia endoleak subsequent to previous infrarenal bifurcated endovascular aneurysm repair. Case Report: A 72-year-old man presented 4 years after implantation of an Anaconda stent-graft with sac expansion and type II endoleak, which was treated over the next 18 months with repeated coil and glue embolization of the leak and sac. Six months after the last attempt, imaging disclosed a new type Ia endoleak. Sac enlargement became symptomatic, and emergent treatment was performed using the off-the-shelf Zenith b-Branch device. The 4 visceral arteries were bridged with Fluency stent-grafts. The Anaconda stent-graft precluded the use of a standard Zenith universal distal body bifurcated device below the t-Branch graft, so a reversed tapered 16×20×82-mm iliac limb was placed to bridge the t-Branch to the larger Anaconda limb; the smaller 12-mm contralateral Anaconda limb was occluded. The procedure was concluded with a femorofemoral bypass. At 10 months after the procedure, the patient is well; the sac diameter has decreased, and there is no endoleak on imaging. Conclusion: The multibranched Zenith t-branch device may be useful in treating proximal endoleaks in bifurcated stent-grafts.

The impact of CT colonography on abdominal aortic aneurysm referrals in a tertiary hospital.

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) for the detection of colorectal disease is gaining popularity as an alternative to colonoscopy. This has been associated with an increase in incidental extra‐colonic findings such as abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, due to the patient selection process of obtaining a CTC, it was hypothesised that this patient cohort might represent a high‐risk group. The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact that CTC had on small aneurysm referrals. Owing to the potential selection bias, the secondary aim was to compare baseline characteristics referred by CTC to the cohort referred by other radiological modalities.