Manav Sohal

A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study

AIMS Alternative forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including biventricular endocardial (BV-Endo) and multisite epicardial pacing (MSP), have been developed to improve response. It is unclear which form of stimulation is optimal. We aimed to compare the acute haemodynamic response (AHR) and electrophysiological effects of BV-Endo with MSP via two separate coronary sinus (CS) leads or a single-quadripolar CS lead. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifteen patients with a previously implanted CRT system received a second temporary CS lead and left ventricular (LV) endocardial catheter. A pressure wire and non-contact mapping array were placed into the LV cavity to measure LVdP/dtmax and perform electroanatomical mapping. Conventional CRT, BV-Endo, and MSP were then performed (MSP-1 via two epicardial leads and MSP-2 via a single-quadripolar lead). The best overall AHR was found using BV-Endo pacing with a 19.6 ± 13.6% increase in AHR at the optimal endocardial site over baseline (P < 0.001). There was an increase in LVdP/dtmax with MSP-1 and MSP-2 compared with conventional CRT, but this was not statistically significant. Biventricular endocardial pacing from the optimal site was significantly superior to conventional CRT (P = 0.039). The AHR achieved when BV-Endo pacing was highly site specific. Within individuals, the best pacing modality varied and was affected by the underlying substrate. Left ventricular activation times did not predict the optimal haemodynamic configuration. CONCLUSION Biventricular endocardial pacing and not MSP was superior to conventional CRT, but was highly site specific. Within individuals, however, different methods of stimulation are optimal and may need to be tailored to the underlying substrate.

Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling

AIMS Left ventricular (LV) lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is largely empirical and operator-dependent. Our aim was to determine whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-guided CRT may improve the acute and the chronic response. METHODS AND RESULTS CMR-derived anatomical models and dyssynchrony maps were created for 20 patients. The CMR targets (three latest activated segments with <50% scar) were overlaid on to live fluoroscopy. Acute haemodynamic response (AHR) to LV pacing was assessed using an intra-ventricular pressure wire. Chronic CRT response (end-systolic volume reduction ≥15%) was assessed 6 months post-implantation. All patients underwent successful CMR-guided LV lead placement. A CMR target segment was paced in 75% of patients. The mean change in LVdP/dtmax for the CMR target was +14.2 ± 12.5 vs. +18.7 ± 11.9% for the best AHR in any segment and +12.0 ± 13.8% for the segment based on coronary sinus (CS) venography. Using CMR guidance, the acute responder rate was 60 vs. 50% on the basis of venography. At 6 months 60% of patients were echocardiographic responders. Of the echocardiographic responders, 92% were successfully paced in a CMR target segment compared with only 50% of non-responders (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION CMR guidance compared well when validated against the AHR. Lead placement was possible in the CMR target region in most patients with an AHR comparable with the best achieved in any CS branch. The chronic response was significantly better in patients paced in a CMR target segment. These results suggest that CMR guidance may represent a clinically useful tool for CRT.

Myocardial tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using T1 mapping predicts ventricular arrhythmia in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may provide a substrate for the initiation and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmia. T1 mapping overcomes the limitations of the conventional delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CE-CMR) imaging technique by allowing quantification of diffuse fibrosis. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess whether myocardial tissue characterization using T1 mapping would predict ventricular arrhythmia in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. METHODS This was a prospective longitudinal study of consecutive patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in a tertiary cardiac center. Participants underwent CMR myocardial tissue characterization using T1 mapping and conventional CE-CMR scar assessment before device implantation. The primary end point was an appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy or documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients (71 ischemic and 59 non-ischemic) were included with a mean follow-up period of 430 ± 185 days (median 425 days; interquartile range 293 days). At follow-up, 23 patients (18%) experienced the primary end point. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the following factors showed a significant association with the primary end point: secondary prevention (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.91), noncontrast T1(_native) for every 10-ms increment in value (HR 1.10; CI 1.04-1.16; 90-ms difference between the end point-positive and end point-negative groups), and Grayzone(_2sd-3sd) for every 1% left ventricular increment in value (HR 1.36; CI 1.15-1.61; 4% difference between the end point-positive and end point-negative groups). Other CE-CMR indices including Scar(_2sd), Scar(_FWHM), and Grayzone(_2sd-FWHM) were also significantly, even though less strongly, associated with the primary end point as compared with Grayzone(_2sd-3sd). CONCLUSION Quantitative myocardial tissue assessment using T1 mapping is an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmia in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.

Noninvasive Assessment of LV Contraction Patterns Using CMR to Identify Responders to CRT

OBJECTIVES Type II activation describes the U-shaped electrical activation of the left ventricle (LV) with a line of block in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We sought to determine if a corresponding pattern of contraction could be identified using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine imaging and whether this predicted response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND U-shaped LV electrical activation in LBBB has been shown to predict favorable response to CRT. It is not known if the degree of electromechanical coupling is such that the same is true for LV contraction patterns. METHODS A total of 52 patients (48% ischemic) scheduled for CRT implantation prospectively underwent pre-implantation CMR cine analysis using endocardial contour tracking software to generate time-volume curves and contraction propagation maps. These were analyzed to assess the contraction sequence of the LV. The effect of contraction pattern on CRT response in terms of reverse remodeling (RR) and clinical parameters (New York Heart Association functional class, 6-min walk distance and Heart Failure Questionnaire score) was assessed at 6 months. RESULTS Two types of contraction pattern were identified; homogenous spread from septum to lateral wall (type I, n = 27) and presence of block with a subsequent U-shaped contraction pattern (type II, n = 25). Rates of RR in those with a type 2 pattern were significantly greater at 6 months (80% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) as was mean increase in 6-min walk distance (126 ± 106 m vs. 55 ± 60 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Cine CMR can identify a U-shaped pattern of contraction which predicts increased echocardiographic and clinical response rates to CRT in patients with LBBB.

Multicentre evaluation of non-invasive biatrial mapping for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: The AFACART study

Aims Non-invasive electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping allows the activation of the entire atrial epicardium to be recorded simultaneously, potentially identifying mechanisms critical for atrial fibrillation (AF) persistence. We sought to evaluate the utility of ECG mapping as a practical tool prior to ablation of persistent AF (PsAF) in centres with no practical experience of the system. Methods and results A total of 118 patients with continuous AF duration <1 year were prospectively studied at 8 European centres. Patients were on a median of 1 antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) that had failed to restore sinus rhythm. Electrocardiogram mapping (ECVUE™, CardioInsight, USA) was performed prior to ablation to map AF drivers (local re-entrant circuits or focal breakthroughs). Ablation targeted drivers depicted by the system, followed by pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, and finally left atrial linear ablation if AF persisted. The primary endpoint was AF termination. Totally, 4.9 ± 1.0 driver sites were mapped per patient with a cumulative mapping time of 16 ± 2 s. Of these, 53% of drivers were located in the left atrium, 27% in the right atrium, and 20% in the anterior interatrial groove. Driver-only ablation resulted in AF termination in 75 of the 118 patients (64%) with a mean radiofrequency (RF) duration of 46 ± 28 min. Acute termination rates were not significantly different amongst all 8 centres (P = 0.672). Ten additional patients terminated with PV isolation and lines resulting in a total AF termination rate of 72%. Total RF duration was 75 ± 27 min. At 1-year follow-up, 78% of the patients were off AADs and 77% of the patients were free from AF recurrence. Of the patients with no AF recurrence, 49% experienced at least one episode of atrial tachycardia (AT) which required either continued AAD therapy, cardioversion, or repeat ablation. Conclusion Non-invasive mapping identifies biatrial drivers that are critical in PsAF. This is validated by successful AF termination in the majority of patients treated in centres with no experience of the system. Ablation targeting these drivers results in favourable AF-free survival at 1 year, albeit with a significant rate of AT recurrence requiring further management.

Mechanistic insights into the benefits of multisite pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The importance of electrical substrate and rate of left ventricular activation.

BACKGROUND Multisite pacing (MSP) of the left ventricle is proposed as an alternative to conventional single-site LV pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Reports on the benefits of MSP have been conflicting. A paradigm whereby not all patients derive benefit from MSP is emerging. OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the hemodynamic and electrical effects of MSP with the aim of identifying a subgroup of patients more likely to derive benefit from MSP. METHODS Sixteen patients with implanted CRT systems incorporating a quadripolar LV pacing lead were studied. Invasive hemodynamic and electroanatomic assessment was performed during the following rhythms: baseline (non-CRT); biventricular (BIV) pacing delivered via the implanted CRT system (BIV(implanted)); BIV pacing delivered via an alternative temporary LV lead (BIV(alternative)); dual-vein MSP delivered via 2 LV leads; MultiPoint Pacing delivered via 2 vectors of the quadripolar LV lead. RESULTS Seven patients had an acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of <10% over baseline rhythm with BIV(implanted) and were deemed nonresponders. AHR in responders vs nonresponders was 21.4% ± 10.4% vs 2.0% ± 5.2% (P < .001). In responders, neither form of MSP provided incremental hemodynamic benefit over BIV(implanted). Dual-vein MSP (8.8% ± 5.7%; P = .036 vs BIV(implanted)) and MultiPoint Pacing (10.0% ± 12.2%; P = .064 vs BIV(implanted)) both improved AHR in nonresponders. Seven of 9 responders to BIV(implanted) had LV endocardial activation characterized by a functional line of block during intrinsic rhythm that was abolished with BIV pacing. All these patients met strict criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB). No nonresponders exhibited this line of block or met strict criteria for LBBB. CONCLUSION Patients not meeting strict criteria for LBBB appear most likely to derive benefit from MSP.

Beneficial Effect on Cardiac Resynchronization From Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing Is Mediated by Early Access to High Conduction Velocity Tissue: Electrophysiological Simulation Study

Background—Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered via left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is associated with improved acute hemodynamic response compared with LV epicardial pacing (EPI-CRT). The role of cardiac anatomy and physiology in this improved response remains controversial. We used computational electrophysiological models to quantify the role of cardiac geometry, tissue anisotropy, and the presence of fast endocardial conduction on myocardial activation during ENDO-CRT and EPI-CRT. Methods and Results—Cardiac activation was simulated using the monodomain tissue excitation model in 2-dimensional (2D) canine and human and 3D canine biventricular models. The latest activation times (LATs) for LV endocardial and biventricular epicardial tissue were calculated (LVLAT and TLAT), as well the percentage decrease in LATs for endocardial (en) versus epicardial (ep) LV pacing (defined as %dLV=100×(LVLATep−LVLATen)/LVLATep and %dT=100×(TLATep−TLATen)/TLATep, respectively). Normal canine cardiac anatomy is responsible for %dLV and %dT values of 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Concentric and eccentric remodeled anatomies resulted in %dT values of 15.6% and 1.3%, respectively. The 3D biventricular-paced canine model resulted in %dLV and %dT values of −7.1% and 1.5%, in contrast to the experimental observations of 16% and 11%, respectively. Adding fast endocardial conduction to this model altered %dLV and %dT to 13.1% and 10.1%, respectively. Conclusions—Our results provide a physiological explanation for improved response to ENDO-CRT. We predict that patients with viable fast-conducting endocardial tissue or distal Purkinje network or both, as well as concentric remodeling, are more likely to benefit from reduced ATs and increased synchrony arising from endocardial pacing.

Laser lead extraction to facilitate cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade and revision in the presence of central venous obstruction

Aims The number of procedures involving upgrade or revision of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing and the risks of adding additional leads are significant. Central venous occlusion in patients with pre-existing devices is often asymptomatic and optimal management of such patients in need of device revision/upgrade is not clear. We sought to assess our use of laser lead extraction in overcoming venous obstruction. Methods and results Patients in need of device upgrade/revision underwent pre-procedure venography to assess venous patency. In patients with venous occlusion or stenosis severe enough to preclude passage of a hydrophilic guide wire, laser lead extraction with retention of the outer sheath in the vasculature was performed with the aim of maintaining a patent channel through which new leads could be implanted. Data were recorded on a dedicated database and patient outcomes were assessed. Between July 2004 and April 2012, laser lead extractions were performed in 71 patients scheduled for device upgrade/revision who had occluded or functionally obstructed venous anatomy. New leads were successfully implanted across the obstruction in 67 (94%) cases. There were two major complications (infection) and four minor complications with no peri-procedural mortality. Device follow-up was satisfactory in 65 (92%) cases with mean follow-up up to 26 ± 19 months. Conclusion Laser lead extraction is a safe and effective option when managing patients with central venous obstruction in need of CIED revision or upgrade.

Optimized Left Ventricular Endocardial Stimulation Is Superior to Optimized Epicardial Stimulation in Ischemic Patients With Poor Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electroanatomic Contact Mapping, and Hemodynamic Study to Target Endocardial Lead Placement

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal pacing site for the left ventricular (LV) lead in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Background LV endocardial pacing may offer benefit over conventional CRT in ischemic patients. Methods We performed cardiac magnetic resonance, invasive electroanatomic mapping (EAM), and measured the acute hemodynamic response (AHR) in patients with existing CRT systems. Results In all, 135 epicardial and endocardial pacing sites were tested in 8 patients. Endocardial pacing was superior to epicardial pacing with respect to mean AHR (% change in dP/dtmax vs. baseline) (11.81 [-7.2 to 44.6] vs. 6.55 [-11.0 to 19.7]; p = 0.025). This was associated with a similar first ventricular depolarization (Q-LV) (75 ms [13 to 161 ms] vs. 75 ms [25 to 129 ms]; p = 0.354), shorter stimulation–QRS duration (15 ms [7 to 43 ms] vs. 19 ms [5 to 66 ms]; p = 0.010) and shorter paced QRS duration (149 ms [95 to 218 ms] vs. 171 ms [120 to 235 ms]; p < 0.001). The mean best achievable AHR was higher with endocardial pacing (25.64 ± 14.74% vs. 12.64 ± 6.76%; p = 0.044). Furthermore, AHR was significantly greater pacing the same site endocardially versus epicardially (15.2 ± 10.7% vs. 7.6 ± 6.3%; p = 0.014) with a shorter paced QRS duration (137 ± 22 ms vs. 166 ± 30 ms; p < 0.001) despite a similar Q-LV (70 ± 38 ms vs. 79 ± 34 ms; p = 0.512). Lack of capture due to areas of scar (corroborated by EAM and cardiac magnetic resonance) was associated with a poor AHR. Conclusions In ischemic patients with poor CRT response, biventricular endocardial pacing is superior to epicardial pacing. This may reflect accessibility to sites that cannot be reached via coronary sinus anatomy and/or by access to more rapidly conducting tissue. Furthermore, guidance to the optimal LV pacing site may be aided by modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance to target delayed activating sites while avoiding scar.

A U-shaped type II contraction pattern in patients with strict left bundle branch block predicts super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND New criteria to define strict left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the basis of pathophysiological principles predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Heterogeneous activation and contraction patterns have been identified in patients with classical LBBB. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has demonstrated that a U-shaped (type II) contraction predicts reverse remodeling post-CRT. A homogeneous spread of (type I) contraction is less predictive. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate contraction patterns among patients with strict LBBB and to test whether a type II contraction pattern better predicts CRT response and super-response. METHODS Thirty-seven patients with strict LBBB (QRS duration ≥140 ms for men and ≥130 ms for women with mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 contiguous leads) underwent cine CMR imaging pre-CRT with an analysis of their contraction patterns by using endocardial contour tracking software. Patients were evaluated for reverse remodeling 6 months postimplantation. RESULTS Nineteen patients (51%) had a type II contraction pattern. A total of 25 patients (68%) of the cohort reverse remodeled. In the type II contraction group, all 19 patients (100%) reverse remodeled as compared with 6 patients (33%) in the type I contraction group (P < .01). Super-response was achieved in 21 patients (57%) of the total cohort: 5 patients with a type I contraction pattern (28%) and 16 patients with a type II contraction pattern (84%) (P < .01). CONCLUSION Patients with strict LBBB who are guideline indicated for CRT have heterogeneous contraction patterns derived from cine CMR. A type II contraction pattern is strongly predictive for reverse remodeling and super-response. This questions whether strict LBBB criteria alone are sufficient to reliably predict a positive response to CRT.