Julian Bostock

Invasive Acute Hemodynamic Response to Guide Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Predicts Chronic Remodeling in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the relationship between acute hemodynamic response (AHR) and reverse remodeling (RR) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND CRT reduces mortality and morbidity in heart failure patients; however, up to 30% of patients do not derive symptomatic benefit. Higher proportions do not remodel. Multicenter trials have shown echocardiographic techniques are poor at improving response rates. We hypothesized the degree of AHR at implant can predict which patients remodel. METHODS Thirty-three patients undergoing CRT (21 dilated and 12 ischemic cardiomyopathy) were studied. Left ventricular (LV) volumes were assessed before and after CRT. The AHR (maximum rate of left ventricular pressure [LV-dP/dt(max)]) was assessed at implant with a pressure wire in the LV cavity. Largest percentage rise in LV-dP/dt(max) from baseline (atrial antibradycardia pacing or right ventricular pacing with atrial fibrillation) to dual-chamber pacing (DDD)-LV was used to determine optimal coronary sinus LV lead position. Reverse remodeling was defined as reduction in LV end systolic volume ≥15% at 6 months. RESULTS The LV-dP/dt(max) increased significantly from baseline (801 ± 194 mm Hg/s to 924 ± 203 mm Hg/s, p < 0.001) with DDD-LV pacing for the optimal LV lead position. The LV end systolic volume decreased from 186 ± 68 ml to 157 ± 68 ml (p < 0.001). Eighteen (56%) patients exhibited RR. There was a significant relationship between percentage rise in LV-dP/dt(max) and RR for DDD-LV pacing (p < 0.001). A similar relationship for AHR and RR in dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006) was seen. CONCLUSIONS Acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing is useful for predicting which patients are likely to remodel in response to CRT both for dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Using AHR has the potential to guide LV lead positioning and improve response rates.

3-D Visualization of Acute RF Ablation Lesions Using MRI for the Simultaneous Determination of the Patterns of Necrosis and Edema

Catheter ablation using RF energy is a common treatment for atrial arrhythmias. Although this treatment provides a potential cure, currently, there remains a high proportion of patients returning for repeat ablations. Electrophysiologists have little information to verify that a lesion has been created in the myocardium. Temporary electrical block can be created from edema, which will subside. MRI can visualize acute and chronic ablation lesions using delayed-enhancement techniques. However, the ablation patterns cannot be determined from 2-D images alone. Using the combination of T2-weighted and delayed-enhancement MRI, ablation lesions can be characterized in terms of necrosis and edema. A novel 3-D visualization technique is presented that projects the image intensity due the lesions onto a 3-D cardiac surface, allowing the complete, simultaneous visualization of the delayed-enhancement and T2 -weighted ablation patterns. Results show successful visualization of ablation patterns in 18 patients, and an application of this technique is presented in which electroanatomical mapping systems can be validated by overlaying the acquired ablation points onto the cardiac surfaces and assessing the correlation with the lesion maps.

A Simultaneous X-Ray/MRI and Noncontact Mapping Study of the Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Left Ventricular Endocardial and Epicardial Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Humans

Background—Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing may be superior to conventional CRT. We studied the acute hemodynamic response to conventional CRT and LV pacing from different endocardial sites using a combined cardiac MRI and LV noncontact mapping (NCM) protocol to gain insights into the underlying mechanisms. Methods and Results—Fifteen patients (age, 63±10 years; 12 men) awaiting CRT were studied in a combined x-ray and MRI laboratory. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance was performed to define areas of myocardial fibrosis. Patients underwent an electrophysiological study incorporating endocardial and epicardial LV pacing. Acute hemodynamic response was measured using a pressure wire within the LV cavity to derive LV dP/dt max. NCM was used to define areas of slow conduction. There was a significant improvement in all LV pacing modes versus baseline (P<0.001). LV endocardial CRT from the best endocardial site was superior to conventional CRT, with a 79.8±49.0% versus 59.6±49.5% increase in LV dP/dt max of from baseline (P<0.05). The hemodynamic benefits of pacing were greater when LV stimulation was performed outside of areas of slow conduction defined by NCM (P<0.001). Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance was able to delineate zones of slow conduction seen with NCM in ischemic patients but was unreliable in nonischemic patients. Conclusions—Endocardial LV pacing appears superior to conventional CRT, although the optimal site varies between subjects and is influenced by pacing within areas of slow conduction. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance was a poor predictor of zones of slow conduction in nonischemic patients.

Biophysical Modeling to Simulate the Response to Multisite Left Ventricular Stimulation Using a Quadripolar Pacing Lead

Background:  Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reduced in patients with posterolateral scar. Multipolar pacing leads offer the ability to select desirable pacing sites and/or stimulate from multiple pacing sites concurrently using a single lead position. Despite this potential, the clinical evaluation and identification of metrics for optimization of multisite CRT (MCRT) has not been performed.

Endocardial Pacemaker Implantation in Infants Weighing ≤ 10 Kilograms

Epicardial pacemaker implantation is the most common approach for small children requiring pacemaker implantation, though it is not free from complications. This article reviews the experience with endocardial pacemaker implantation, as an alternative approach, in children ≤10 kg at two centers. Thirty‐nine children, median age 3.8 months (2 days–35 months), weight 4.6 kg (2.3–10 kg) underwent endocardial permanent pacing (VVI/R in 38, DDDR in 1). Indications for pacing were complete heart block (CHB) in 34 (congenital in 21, postsurgical in 12, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries 1), long QT syndrome in 3, and sinus bradycardia in 2 children. Two children with postsurgical CHB died 7 days and 3 weeks after implantation, respectively, due to heart failure and septicemia, despite appropriate pacemaker therapy. Over a median follow‐up of 4.3 years (9 months–15.3 years), 12 patients underwent 18 generator replacements. Five patients were upgraded to physiological pacing. Ten patients underwent 12 ventricular lead advancements. Ventricular lead extraction was attempted 11 times in nine patients and succeeded 10 times. Two patients were converted to epicardial dual chamber systems. Two prepectorally placed generators required resiting due to threatened skin necrosis. Infective endocarditis on the lead, 9 months postimplant required removal of the system in one patient. The subclavian vein was found to be asymptomatically thrombosed in four patients. Endocardial permanent pacing is feasible and effective in children ≤ 10 kg and an acceptable alternative to epicardial pacing.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered via a multipolar left ventricular lead is associated with reduced mortality and elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation: Long-term follow-up from a multicenter registry

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provides more pacing vectors compared to bipolar leads. This may avoid phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) and allow optimal lead placement to maximize biventricular pacing. However, a long‐term improvement in patient outcome has yet to be demonstrated.

A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study

AIMS Alternative forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including biventricular endocardial (BV-Endo) and multisite epicardial pacing (MSP), have been developed to improve response. It is unclear which form of stimulation is optimal. We aimed to compare the acute haemodynamic response (AHR) and electrophysiological effects of BV-Endo with MSP via two separate coronary sinus (CS) leads or a single-quadripolar CS lead. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifteen patients with a previously implanted CRT system received a second temporary CS lead and left ventricular (LV) endocardial catheter. A pressure wire and non-contact mapping array were placed into the LV cavity to measure LVdP/dtmax and perform electroanatomical mapping. Conventional CRT, BV-Endo, and MSP were then performed (MSP-1 via two epicardial leads and MSP-2 via a single-quadripolar lead). The best overall AHR was found using BV-Endo pacing with a 19.6 ± 13.6% increase in AHR at the optimal endocardial site over baseline (P < 0.001). There was an increase in LVdP/dtmax with MSP-1 and MSP-2 compared with conventional CRT, but this was not statistically significant. Biventricular endocardial pacing from the optimal site was significantly superior to conventional CRT (P = 0.039). The AHR achieved when BV-Endo pacing was highly site specific. Within individuals, the best pacing modality varied and was affected by the underlying substrate. Left ventricular activation times did not predict the optimal haemodynamic configuration. CONCLUSION Biventricular endocardial pacing and not MSP was superior to conventional CRT, but was highly site specific. Within individuals, however, different methods of stimulation are optimal and may need to be tailored to the underlying substrate.

Relationship between endocardial activation sequences defined by high-density mapping to early septal contraction (septal flash) in patients with left bundle branch block undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS Early inward motion and thickening/thinning of the ventricular septum associated with left bundle branch block is known as the septal flash (SF). Correction of SF corresponds to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that SF was associated with a specific left ventricular (LV) activation pattern predicting a favourable response to CRT. We sought to characterize the spatio-temporal relationship between electrical and mechanical events by directly comparing non-contact mapping (NCM), acute haemodynamics, and echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirteen patients (63 ± 10 years, 10 men) with severe heart failure (ejection fraction 22.8 ± 5.8%) awaiting CRT underwent echocardiography and NCM pre-implant. Presence and extent of SF defined visually and with M-mode was fused with NCM bulls eye plots of endocardial activation patterns. LV-dP/dt(max) was measured during different pacing modes. Five patients had a large SF, four small SF, and four no SF. Large SF patients had areas of conduction block in non-infarcted regions, whereas those with small or no SF did not. Patients with large SF had greater acute response to LV and biventricular (BIV) pacing vs. those with small/no SF (% increase dP/dt 28 ± 14 vs. 11 ± 19% for LV pacing and 42 ± 28 vs. 22 ± 21% for BIV pacing) (P < 0.05). This translated into a more favourable chronic response to CRT. The lines of conduction block disappeared with LV/BIV pacing while remaining with right ventricle pacing. CONCLUSION A strong association exists between electrical activation and mechanical deformation of the septum. Correction of both mechanical synchrony and the functional conduction block by CRT may explain the favourable response in patients with SF.

Benefits of endocardial and multisite pacing are dependent on the type of left ventricular electric activation pattern and presence of ischemic heart disease: insights from electroanatomic mapping.

Background—There is considerable heterogeneity in the myocardial substrate of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in particular in the etiology of heart failure and in the location of conduction block within the heart. This may account for variability in response to CRT. New approaches, including endocardial and multisite left ventricular (LV) stimulation, may improve CRT response. We sought to evaluate these approaches using noncontact mapping to understand the underlying mechanisms. Methods and Results—Ten patients (8 men and 2 women; mean [SD] age 63 [12] years; LV ejection fraction 246%; QRS duration 161 [24] ms) fulfilling conventional CRT criteria underwent an electrophysiological study, with assessment of acute hemodynamic response to conventional CRT as well as LV endocardial and multisite pacing. LV activation pattern was assessed using noncontact mapping. LV endocardial pacing gave a superior acute hemodynamic response compared with conventional CRT (26% versus 37% increase in LV dP/dtmax, respectively; P<0.0005). There was a trend toward further incremental benefit from multisite LV stimulation, although this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.08). The majority (71%) of patients with nonischemic heart failure etiology or functional block responded to conventional CRT, whereas those with myocardial scar or absence of functional block often required endocardial or multisite pacing to achieve CRT response. Conclusions—Endocardial or multisite pacing may be required in certain subsets of patients undergoing CRT. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and those with narrower QRS, in particular, may stand to benefit.

Multi-site left ventricular pacing as a potential treatment for patients with postero-lateral scar: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive haemodynamic assessment.

AIMS Multi-site left ventricular (LV) pacing may be superior to single-site stimulation in correcting dyssynchrony and avoiding areas of myocardial scar. We sought to characterize myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We aimed to quantify the acute haemodynamic response to single-site and multi-site LV stimulation and to relate this to the position of the LV leads in relation to myocardial scar. METHODS Twenty patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy had implantation of two LV leads. One lead (LV1) was positioned in a postero-lateral vein, the second (LV2) in a separate coronary vein. LV dP/dtmax was recorded using a pressure wire during stimulation at LV1, LV2, and both sites simultaneously (LV1 + 2). Patients were deemed acute responders if ΔLV dP/dtmax was ≥ 10%. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess dyssynchrony as well as location and burden of scar. Scar anatomy was registered with fluoroscopy to assess LV lead position in relation to scar. RESULTS LV dP/dtmax increased from 726 ± 161 mmHg/s in intrinsic rhythm to 912 ± 234 mmHg/s with LV1, 837 ± 188 mmHg/s with LV2, and 932 ± 201 mmHg/s with LV1 and LV2. Nine of 19 (47%) were acute responders with LV1 vs. 6/19 (32%) with LV2. Twelve of 19 (63%) were acute responders with simultaneous LV1 + 2. Two of three patients benefitting with multi-site pacing had the LV1 lead positioned in postero-lateral scar. CONCLUSION Multi-site LV pacing increased acute response by 16% vs. single-site pacing. This was particularly beneficial in patients with postero-lateral scar identified on CMR.