Manfred J. Schmitt
Saarland University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Manfred J. Schmitt.
Nature Reviews Microbiology | 2006
Manfred J. Schmitt; Frank Breinig
Since the discovery of toxin-secreting killer yeasts more than 40 years ago, research into this phenomenon has provided insights into eukaryotic cell biology and virus–host-cell interactions. This review focuses on the most recent advances in our understanding of the basic biology of virus-carrying killer yeasts, in particular the toxin-encoding killer viruses, and the intracellular processing, maturation and toxicity of the viral protein toxins. The strategy of using eukaryotic viral toxins to effectively penetrate and eventually kill a eukaryotic target cell will be discussed, and the cellular mechanisms of self-defence and protective immunity will also be addressed.
Journal of Cell Biology | 2005
Jochen Reiter; Eva Herker; Frank Madeo; Manfred J. Schmitt
In yeast, apoptotic cell death can be triggered by various factors such as H2O2, cell aging, or acetic acid. Yeast caspase (Yca1p) and cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) are key regulators of this process. Here, we show that moderate doses of three virally encoded killer toxins (K1, K28, and zygocin) induce an apoptotic yeast cell response, although all three toxins differ significantly in their primary killing mechanisms. In contrast, high toxin concentrations prevent the occurrence of an apoptotic cell response and rather cause necrotic, toxin-specific cell killing. Studies with Δyca1 and Δgsh1 deletion mutants indicate that ROS accumulation as well as the presence of yeast caspase 1 is needed for apoptosis in toxin-treated yeast cells. We conclude that in the natural environment of toxin-secreting killer yeasts, where toxin concentration is usually low, induction of apoptosis might play an important role in efficient toxin-mediated cell killing.
Biochemical Journal | 2004
Ventsislava Y. Petrova; Diane Drescher; Anna Kujumdzieva; Manfred J. Schmitt
Yeast catalase A (Cta1p) contains two peroxisomal targeting signals (SSNSKF) localized at its C-terminus and within the N-terminal third of the protein, which both can target foreign proteins to peroxisomes. In the present study we demonstrated that Cta1p can also enter mitochondria, although the enzyme lacks a classical mitochondrial import sequence. Cta1p co-targeting was studied in a catalase A null mutant after growth on different carbon sources, and expression of a Cta1p-GFP (green fluorescent protein)-fusion protein or a Cta1p derivative containing either a c-Myc epitope (Cta1p(myc)) or a SKF-extended tag (Cta1p(myc-SKF)). Peroxisomal and mitochondrial co-import of catalase A were tested qualitatively by fluorescence microscopy and functional complementation of a Delta cta1 null mutation, and quantitatively by subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot analysis and enzyme activity assays. Efficient Cta1p import into peroxisomes was observed when cells were cultivated under peroxisome-inducing conditions (i.e. growth on oleate), whereas significant co-import of Cta1p-GFP into mitochondria occurred when cells were grown under respiratory conditions that favour oxygen stress and ROS (reactive oxygen species) accumulation within this organelle. In particular, when cells were grown on the non-fermentable carbon source raffinose, respiration is maximally enhanced, and catalase A was efficiently targeted to the mitochondrial matrix where it presumably functions as scavenger of H2O2 and mitochondrial-derived ROS.
Cell | 2002
Frank Breinig; Donald J. Tipper; Manfred J. Schmitt
Saccharomyces cerevisiae K1 killer strains are infected by the M1 double-stranded RNA virus encoding a secreted protein toxin that kills sensitive cells by disrupting cytoplasmic membrane function. Toxin binding to spheroplasts is mediated by Kre1p, a cell wall protein initially attached to the plasma membrane by its C-terminal GPI anchor. Kre1p binds toxin directly. Both cells and spheroplasts of Deltakre1 mutants are completely toxin resistant; binding to cell walls and spheroplasts is reduced to 10% and < 0.5%, respectively. Expression of K28-Kre1p, an inactive C-terminal fragment of Kre1p retaining its toxin affinity and membrane anchor, fully restored toxin binding and sensitivity to spheroplasts, while intact cells remained resistant. Kre1p is apparently the toxin membrane receptor required for subsequent lethal ion channel formation.
Microbiology | 1996
Manfred J. Schmitt; Petra Klavehn; Jing Wang; Inge Schönig; Donald J. Tipper
The virally encoded K28 killer toxin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kills sensitive cells by a receptor-mediated process. DNA synthesis is rapidly inhibited, cell viability is lost more slowly and cells eventually arrest, apparently in the S phase of the cell cycle with a medium-sized bud, a single nucleus in the mother cell and a pre-replicated (1n) DNA content. Cytoplasmic microtubules appear normal, and no spindle is detectable. Arrest of a sensitive haploid yeast strain by alpha-factor at START gave complete protection for at least 4 h against a toxin concentration that killed non-arrested cells at the rate of one log each 2.5 h. Cells released from alpha-factor arrest were killed by toxin at a similar rate; arrest occurred with medium-sized buds within the same cell cycle. Cells arrested by hydroxyurea, with unreplicated DNA, or by the spindle poison methylbenzimidazol-2yl-carbamate, with unseparated chromosomes, both arrest at the checkpoint at the G2/M boundary; these arrested cells were not protected against toxin, losing about one log of viability every 4 h. Following release from the cell cycle block, a majority of these toxin-exposed cells progressed through the cell cycle and arrested in the following S-phase, again with medium-sized buds. Killing by K28 toxin apparently requires entry into the nuclear division and bud cycles, but can result from inhibition of either early or late events in these cycles. Morphogenesis in moribund cells is uniformly blocked in early S-phase with an immature bud. Toxin action causes either independent blockage of both DNA synthesis and the budding cycle, or inhibits some unknown step required for both events.
EMBO Reports | 2010
Tatsuo Kanno; Etienne Bucher; Lucia Daxinger; Bruno Huettel; David P. Kreil; Frank Breinig; Marc Lind; Manfred J. Schmitt; Stacey A. Simon; Sai Guna Ranjan Gurazada; Blake C. Meyers; Zdravko J. Lorković; Antonius J. M. Matzke; Marjori Matzke
RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM) in plants requires two RNA polymerase (Pol) II‐related RNA polymerases, namely Pol IV and Pol V. A genetic screen designed to reveal factors that are important for RdDM in a developmental context in Arabidopsis identified DEFECTIVE IN MERISTEM SILENCING 4 (DMS4). Unlike other mutants defective in RdDM, dms4 mutants have a pleiotropic developmental phenotype. The DMS4 protein is similar to yeast IWR1 (interacts with RNA polymerase II), a conserved putative transcription factor that interacts with Pol II subunits. The DMS4 complementary DNA partly complements the K1 killer toxin hypersensitivity of a yeast iwr1 mutant, suggesting some functional conservation. In the transgenic system studied, mutations in DMS4 directly or indirectly affect Pol IV‐dependent secondary short interfering RNAs, Pol V‐mediated RdDM, Pol V‐dependent synthesis of intergenic non‐coding RNA and expression of many Pol II‐driven genes. These data suggest that DMS4 might be a regulatory factor for several RNA polymerases, thus explaining its diverse roles in the plant.
Molecular Microbiology | 2000
Katrin Eisfeld; Frank Riffer; Johannes Mentges; Manfred J. Schmitt
We demonstrate that a virally encoded yeast ‘killer’ toxin is entering its eukaryotic target cell by endocytosis, subsequently travelling the yeast secretory pathway in reverse to exhibit its lethal effect. The K28 killer toxin is a secreted α/β heterodimer that kills sensitive yeasts in a receptor‐mediated fashion by blocking DNA synthesis in the nucleus. In vivo processing of the toxin precursor results in a protein whose β‐C‐terminus carries the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal HDEL, which, as we show here, is essential for retrograde toxin transport. Yeast end3/4 mutants as well as cells lacking the HDEL receptor (Δerd2) or mutants defective in Golgi‐to‐ER protein recycling (erd1) are toxin resistant because the toxin can no longer enter and/or retrograde pass the cell. Site‐directed mutagenesis further indicated that the toxins β‐HDEL motif ensures retrograde transport, although in a toxin‐secreting yeast the β‐C‐terminus is initially masked by an R residue (β‐HDELR) until Kex1p cleavage uncovers the toxins targeting signal in a late Golgi compartment. Prevention of Kex1p processing results in high‐level secretion of a biologically inactive protein incapable of re‐entering the secretory pathway. Finally, we present evidence that ER‐to‐cytosol toxin export is mediated by the Sec61p translocon and requires functional copies of the lumenal ER chaperones Kar2p and Cne1p.
Developmental Cell | 2009
Susheela Y. Carroll; Peter C. Stirling; Helen E. M. Stimpson; Esther Gießelmann; Manfred J. Schmitt; David G. Drubin
Like Ricin, Shiga, and Cholera toxins, yeast K28 is an A/B toxin that depends on endocytosis and retrograde trafficking for toxicity. Knowledge of the specific proteins, lipids, and mechanisms required for trafficking and killing by these toxins remains incomplete. Since K28 is a model for clinically relevant toxins, we screened over 5000 yeast mutants, identifying 365 that affect K28 sensitivity. Hypersensitive mutants revealed cytoprotective pathways, including stress-activated signaling and protein degradation. Resistant mutants clustered to endocytic, lipid organization, and cell wall biogenesis pathways. Furthermore, GPI anchors and transcriptional regulation are important for K28-cell binding. Strikingly, the AP2 complex, which in metazoans links endocytic cargo to the clathrin coat, but had no assigned function in yeast, was critical for K28 toxicity. Yeast AP2 localizes to endocytic sites and has a cargo-specific function in K28 uptake. This comprehensive genetic analysis identified conserved processes important for A/B toxin trafficking and killing.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2004
Antje Eiden-Plach; Tatjana Zagorc; Tanja Heintel; Yvonne Carius; Frank Breinig; Manfred J. Schmitt
ABSTRACT Besides its importance as model organism in eukaryotic cell biology, yeast species have also developed into an attractive host for the expression, processing, and secretion of recombinant proteins. Here we investigated foreign protein secretion in four distantly related yeasts (Candida glabrata, Pichia pastoris, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe) by using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter and a viral secretion signal sequence derived from the K28 preprotoxin (pptox), the precursor of the yeast K28 virus toxin. In vivo expression of GFP fused to the N-terminal pptox leader sequence and/or expression of the entire pptox gene was driven either from constitutive (PGK1 and TPI1) or from inducible and/or repressible (GAL1, AOX1, and NMT1) yeast promoters. In each case, GFP entered the secretory pathway of the corresponding host cell; confocal fluorescence microscopy as well as sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western analysis of cell-free culture supernatants confirmed that GFP was efficiently secreted into the culture medium. In addition to the results seen with GFP, the full-length viral pptox was correctly processed in all four yeast genera, leading to the secretion of a biologically active virus toxin. Taken together, our data indicate that the viral K28 pptox signal sequence has the potential for being used as a unique tool in recombinant protein production to ensure efficient protein secretion in yeast.
Molecular Biology of the Cell | 2010
Shuyu Li; Robert A. Spooner; Stuart C. H. Allen; Christopher P. Guise; Graham Ladds; Tina Schnöder; Manfred J. Schmitt; J. Michael Lord; Lynne M. Roberts
This study reveals that components of the yeast ERAD-L pathway can discriminate between two subtly different forms of the same toxin substrate. Although precytosolic requirements are similar for both toxin structures, there is a divergence in fate on the cytosolic face of the ER membrane.