Mangu Hanumantha Rao
Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mangu Hanumantha Rao.
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia | 2012
Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; Abha Chandra
Background: Treatment of acute post-thoracotomy pain is particularly important not only to keep the patient comfortable but also to minimize pulmonary complications. Aim: This study was designed to test the effect of pre-induction administration of clonidine, given as a single intravenous dose, on post-operative pain scores and fentanyl consumption in patients after thoracic surgery. Setting and Design: Tertiary referral centre. Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive clonidine (3 mcg/kg) or saline pre-operatively before induction of anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was pain on coughing (visual analogue scale (VAS) 0–100 mm) 120 min after surgery, time to first analgesic injection in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 24-h fentanyl consumption. Statistical Analysis: For between-group comparisons, t-test and U-test were used as appropriate after checking normality of distribution. The incidence of complications between the groups was compared by Fishers exact test. Results: The post-operative VAS for the first 120 min and the fentanyl consumption at 24 h was significantly greater in the placebo group compared with the clonidine group (P<0.05). The sedation score was increased in the clonidine group during study drug infusion, but did not differ significantly on admission to the PACU. Conclusions: A single intravenous dose of clonidine (3 mcg/kg) given before induction of anaesthesia significantly reduced the post-operative VAS score in the initial period and fentanyl consumption during 24 h after thoracic surgery.
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine | 2014
Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao
Context: Central venous catheter (CVC) insertion induces pain and discomfort to a conscious patient despite application of a local anesthetic (LA) field block and this pain can be greatly lessened by using additional analgesics. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of fentanyl along with LA field infiltration in controlling pain and discomfort associated with CVC insertion. Settings and Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients scheduled for planned CVC were randomly assigned to receive either fentanyl (2 μg/kg) or 0.9% normal saline. Pain and discomfort using a verbal numeric rating pain scale at 5 times points during CVC insertion were assessed and analyzed. Results: The median interquartile range pain score is worst for placebo group after LAI (5 [3-6]) and in the immediate postprocedure period (5 [4-5]) which was significantly attenuated by addition of fentanyl (3.5 [2-5] and 3 [2-4]) (P = 0.009 and 0.001 respectively). Overall, fentanyl and placebo group were not statistically different with median discomfort score except at T10 (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Preprocedural bolus fentanyl infusion provides adequate analgesia and can be safely used for alleviating pain during CVC insertion in conscious patients.
Critical Care Research and Practice | 2016
Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; Chitta Ranjan Sahu
We aimed to show that a single preprocedural dose of either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl reduces procedural pain and discomfort and provides clinically acceptable sedation. In this prospective, double-blind study, sixty patients scheduled for elective surgery and requiring planned central venous catheter insertion were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), or 0.9% normal saline intravenously over ten minutes followed by local anesthetic field infiltration before attempting central venous catheterization. The primary outcome measures are assessment and analysis of pain, discomfort, and sedation level before, during, and after the central venous catheter insertion at five time points. The median (IQR) pain score is worst for normal saline group at local anaesthetic injection [6 (4–6.7)] which was significantly attenuated by addition of fentanyl [3 (2–4)] and dexmedetomidine [4 (3–5)] in the immediate postprocedural period (P = 0.001). However, the procedure related discomfort was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group compared to fentanyl group in the first 10 min of procedure after local anaesthetic Injection (P = 0.001). Fentanyl is more analgesically efficient for central venous catheter insertion along with local anaesthetic injection. However, dexmedetomidine has the potential to be superior to fentanyl and placebo in terms of providing comfort to the patients during the procedure.
Pain Physician | 2015
Aloka Samantaray; Natham Hemanth; Karunakar Gunnampati; Hemalatha Pasupuleti; Madhusudan Mukkara; Mangu Hanumantha Rao
The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research | 2013
N. Hemanth; S. Geetha; Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; M Madhusudan
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2018
Goduguchintha Dharaniprasad; Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; Abha Chandra; Potukuchi Venkata Gurunadha Krishna Sarma
The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research | 2016
M Madhusudan; Lavakumar A; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; Aloka Samantaray; Charupalli K
The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research | 2013
M Madhusudan; J. Chaitanya; K. Vinay; N. Hemanth; Pasupuleti Hemalatha; B. Vinod; Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao
Archive | 2013
M Madhusudan; J. Chaitanya; K. Vinay; N. Hemanth; Pasupuleti Hemalatha; B. Vinod; Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | 2009
Aloka Samantaray; C. Sunil Kumar; Mangu Hanumantha Rao
Collaboration
Dive into the Mangu Hanumantha Rao's collaboration.
Potukuchi Venkata Gurunadha Krishna Sarma
Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences
View shared research outputs