Manu Anna Thomas
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Manu Anna Thomas.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
Anoop S. Mahajan; S. Fadnavis; Manu Anna Thomas; Luca Pozzoli; Smrati Gupta; S.-J. Royer; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Rafel Simó
One of the critical parameters in assessing the global impacts of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) on cloud properties and the radiation budget is the estimation of phytoplankton-induced ocean emissions, which are derived from prescribed, climatological surface seawater DMS concentrations. The most widely used global ocean DMS climatology was published 15 years ago and has recently been updated using a much larger database of observations. The updated climatology displays significant differences in terms of the global distribution and regional monthly averages of sea surface DMS. In this study, we use the ECHAM5-HAMMOZ aerosol-chemistry-climate general circulation model to quantify the influence of the updated DMS climatology in computed atmospheric properties, namely, the spatial and temporal distributions of atmospheric DMS concentration, sulfuric acid concentration, sulfate aerosols, number of activated aerosols, cloud droplet number concentration, and the aerosol radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere. Significant differences are observed for all the modeled variables. Comparison with observations of atmospheric DMS and total sulfate also shows that in places with large DMS emissions, the updated climatology shows a better match with the observations. This highlights the importance of using the updated climatology for projecting future impacts of oceanic DMS emissions, especially considering that the relative importance of the natural sulfur fluxes is likely to increase due to legislation to “clean up” anthropogenic emissions. The largest estimated differences are in the Southern Ocean, Indian Ocean, and parts of the Pacific Ocean, where the climatologies differ in seasonal concentrations over large geographical areas. The model results also indicate that the former DMS climatology underestimated the effect of DMS on the globally averaged annual aerosol radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere by about 20%.
Tellus B | 2013
Manu Anna Thomas; Abhay Devasthale; Michael Kahnert
One of the key knowledge gaps when estimating aerosol forcing and their role in air quality is our limited understanding of their vertical distribution. As an active lidar in space, the CALIOP-CALIPSO is helping to close this gap. The descending orbital track of CALIPSO follows elongated semi-major axis of Sweden, slicing its atmosphere every 2–3 d, thus providing a unique opportunity to characterise aerosols and their verticality in all seasons irrespective of solar conditions. This favourable orbital configuration of CALIPSO over Sweden is exploited in the present study. Using five years of night-time aerosol observations (2006–2011), we investigated the vertical distribution of aerosols. The role of temperature inversions and winds in governing this distribution is additionally investigated using collocated AIRS-Aqua and ERA-Interim Reanalysis data. It is found that the majority of aerosols (up to 70%) are located within 1 km above the surface in the lowermost troposphere, irrespective of the season. In summer, convection and stronger mixing lift aerosols to slightly higher levels, but their noticeable presence in the upper free troposphere is observed in the winter half of the year, when the boundary layer is decoupled due to strong temperature inversions separating local sources from the transport component. When southerly winds prevail, two or more aerosol layers are most frequent over southern Sweden and the polluted air masses have higher AOD values. The depolarisation ratio and integrated attenuated backscatter of these aerosol layers are also higher. About 30–50% of all aerosol layers are located below the level where temperature inversions peak. On the other hand, relatively cleaner conditions are observed when the winds have a northerly component.
Geoscientific Model Development | 2015
Virginie Marécal; V.-H. Peuch; Camilla Andersson; S. Andersson; J. Arteta; Matthias Beekmann; Anna Benedictow; Robert Bergström; Bertrand Bessagnet; A. Cansado; F. Cheroux; Augustin Colette; Adriana Coman; R. L. Curier; H. A. C. Denier van der Gon; A. Drouin; Hendrik Elbern; E. Emili; Richard J. Engelen; Henk Eskes; Gilles Foret; E. Friese; M. Gauss; C. Giannaros; Jonathan Guth; M. Joly; E. Jaumouille; B. Josse; N. Kadygrov; Johannes W. Kaiser
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
Abhay Devasthale; Manu Anna Thomas
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer | 2012
Michael Kahnert; Timo Nousiainen; Manu Anna Thomas; Jani Tyynelä
Geoscientific Model Development | 2014
Camilla Andersson; Robert Bergström; Cecilia Bennet; Lennart Robertson; Manu Anna Thomas; Hannele Korhonen; K. E. J. Lehtinen; H. Kokkola
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2012
Abhay Devasthale; Michael Tjernström; Mihaela Caian; Manu Anna Thomas; B. H. Kahn; Eric J. Fetzer
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
Manu Anna Thomas; Abhay Devasthale
Atmospheric Environment | 2012
Abhay Devasthale; Manu Anna Thomas
Geoscientific Model Development | 2015
Manu Anna Thomas; Michael Kahnert; Camilla Andersson; H. Kokkola; Ulf Hansson; Colin Jones; Joakim Langner; Abhay Devasthale