Marc Barthold

Large-Scale Isolation of Human Hepatocytes for Therapeutic Application:

During the last decade, hepatocyte transplantation has been suggested as a safe and potentially effective clinical option for the treatment of acute or decompensating chronic liver failure as well as for hereditary liver disease. Currently, one of the major limiting factors for clinical application is the insufficient access to suitable liver cell preparations. In cooperation with the German and Catalane organ procurement organizations, a routine procedure for the isolation of hepatocytes from donor organs rejected for transplantation (n = 117) has been established. The process is performed according to the current EC Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) and all corresponding national laws and regulations concerning donor organ and tissue procurement. In about 50% of the cases (n = 58) the three-step perfusion procedure has been completed with an average total cell yield of 5.9 × 109 cells per organ, the cell preparations displaying a mean viability of 64%. The mean specific yield was 3.6 × 106 total and 2.6 × 106 viable cells per gram liver tissue, respectively. Specific cell yields from three infantile donor livers were considerably higher. No correlation between isolation efficiency and cold ischemia time or donor age was found within the adult organ donors. In contrast, organs with a severe steatosis generally did not result in successful cell isolation. Results of sterility and endotoxin determination are also presented. In summary, a standardized and cGMP conform method of hepatocyte isolation from nontransplantable liver organs was established, which reproducibly yields large amounts of hepatocytes suitable for therapeutic application.

Liver Cell Transplantation: Basic Investigations for Safe Application in Infants and Small Children

Liver cell transplantation (LCT) is a very promising method for the use in pediatric patients. It is significantly less invasive than whole organ transplantation, but has the potential to cure or at least to substantially improve severe disorders like inborn errors of metabolism or acute liver failure. Prior to a widespread use of the technique in children, some important issues regarding safety and efficacy must be addressed. We developed a mathematical model to estimate total hepatocyte counts in relation to bodyweight to make possible more appropriate dose calculations. Different liver cell suspensions were studied at different flow rates and different catheter sizes to determine mechanical damage of cells by shear forces. At moderate flow rates, no significant loss of viability was observed even at a catheter diameter of 4.2F. Addition of heparin to the cell suspension is favored, which is in contrast to previous animal experiments. Mitochondrial function of the hepatocytes was determined with the WST-1 assay and was not substantially altered by cryopreservation. We conclude that especially with the use of small catheters, human LCT should be safe and efficient even in small infants and neonates.

Risk Factors for Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Liver Transplant Recipients with MELD Score ≥30

BACKGROUND After introduction of MELD-based allocation in Germany, decreased waiting list mortality and increased mortality after transplantation have been reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study compares relevant outcome parameters in patients with high MELD ≥30 versus lower MELD scores in a retrospective analysis including 454 consecutively performed liver transplantations in adults (age >16 years) at Hannover Medical School between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2012 and a follow-up until 31/12/2013. Multivariable risk-adjusted models were applied to identify independent risk factors for 90-day and long-term mortality. RESULTS MELD score ≥30 (n=117; 26.1%) was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality (p=0.004, odds ratio: 3.045, 95% CI 1.439-6.498) and long-term mortality (p=0.016, hazard ratio: 1.620, 95% CI 1.095-2.396) and was associated with significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit stays (p<0.001), and death occurred in more cases earlier after transplantation (90-day mortality 21.6% vs. 13.0%; p=0.029). Portal vein thrombosis at transplantation was significantly associated with 90-day mortality after transplantation in patients with MELD scores ≥30 (p=0.041), but this was not the case for patients with MELD scores <30, although portal vein thrombosis was equally frequent in individuals of both groups (3.0% vs. 3.4%, p=0.824). CONCLUSIONS Results of this study suggest that liver transplant recipients with portal vein thrombosis at transplantation should be transplanted before reaching a MELD score ≥30.

Independent Pre-Transplant Recipient Cancer Risk Factors after Kidney Transplantation and the Utility of G-Chart Analysis for Clinical Process Control.

Background The aim of this study is to identify independent pre-transplant cancer risk factors after kidney transplantation and to assess the utility of G-chart analysis for clinical process control. This may contribute to the improvement of cancer surveillance processes in individual transplant centers. Patients and Methods 1655 patients after kidney transplantation at our institution with a total of 9,425 person-years of follow-up were compared retrospectively to the general German population using site-specific standardized-incidence-ratios (SIRs) of observed malignancies. Risk-adjusted multivariable Cox regression was used to identify independent pre-transplant cancer risk factors. G-chart analysis was applied to determine relevant differences in the frequency of cancer occurrences. Results Cancer incidence rates were almost three times higher as compared to the matched general population (SIR = 2.75; 95%-CI: 2.33–3.21). Significantly increased SIRs were observed for renal cell carcinoma (SIR = 22.46), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (SIR = 8.36), prostate cancer (SIR = 2.22), bladder cancer (SIR = 3.24), thyroid cancer (SIR = 10.13) and melanoma (SIR = 3.08). Independent pre-transplant risk factors for cancer-free survival were age <52.3 years (p = 0.007, Hazard ratio (HR): 0.82), age >62.6 years (p = 0.001, HR: 1.29), polycystic kidney disease other than autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) (p = 0.001, HR: 0.68), high body mass index in kg/m2 (p<0.001, HR: 1.04), ADPKD (p = 0.008, HR: 1.26) and diabetic nephropathy (p = 0.004, HR = 1.51). G-chart analysis identified relevant changes in the detection rates of cancer during aftercare with no significant relation to identified risk factors for cancer-free survival (p<0.05). Conclusions Risk-adapted cancer surveillance combined with prospective G-chart analysis likely improves cancer surveillance schemes by adapting processes to identified risk factors and by using G-chart alarm signals to trigger Kaizen events and audits for root-cause analysis of relevant detection rate changes. Further, comparative G-chart analysis would enable benchmarking of cancer surveillance processes between centers.

Prognostic Abilities and Quality Assessment of Models for the Prediction of 90-Day Mortality in Liver Transplant Waiting List Patients

Background Model of end-stage liver disease (MELD)-score and diverse variants are widely used for prognosis on liver transplant waiting-lists. Methods 818 consecutive patients on the liver transplant waiting-list included to calculate the MELD, MESO Index, MELD-Na, UKELD, iMELD, refitMELD, refitMELD-Na, upMELD and PELD-scores. Prognostic abilities for 90-day mortality were investigated applying Receiver-operating-characteristic-curve analysis. Independent risk factors for 90-day mortality were identified with multivariable binary logistic regression modelling. Methodological quality of the underlying development studies was assessed with a systematic assessment tool. Results 74 patients (9%) died on the liver transplant waiting list within 90 days after listing. All but one scores, refitMELD-Na, had acceptable prognostic performance with areas under the ROC-curves (AUROCs)>0.700. The iMELD performed best (AUROC = 0.798). In pediatric cases, the PELD-score just failed to reach the acceptable threshold with an AUROC = 0.699. All scores reached a mean quality score of 72.3%. Highest quality scores could be achieved by the UKELD and PELD-scores. Studies specifically lack statistical validity and model evaluation. Conclusions Inferior quality assessment of prognostic models does not necessarily imply inferior prognostic abilities. The iMELD might be a more reliable tool representing urgency of transplantation than the MELD-score. PELD-score is assumedly not accurate enough to allow graft allocation decision in pediatric liver transplantation.