Marcel J. Sankeralli

Postreceptoral chromatic detection mechanisms revealed by noise masking in three-dimensional cone contrast space

We used a noise masking technique to test the hypothesis that detection is subserved by only two chromatic postreceptoral mechanisms (red-green and blue-yellow) and one achromatic (luminance) mechanism. The task was to detect a 1-c/deg Gaussian enveloped grating presented in a mask of static, spatially low-passed binary or Gaussian distributed noise. In the main experiment, the direction of the test stimulus (termed the signal) was constant in cone contrast space, and the direction of the noise was sampled in equally spaced directions within a plane (the noise plane) in the space. The signal was chosen to coincide with one of the three cardinal directions of three postulated mechanisms. The noise plane was selected to span two of the cardinal directions, including that chosen as the signal direction. As the noise direction was sampled around the noise plane, the signal detection threshold was found to vary in accordance with a linear cosine model, which predicted noise directions yielding maximum and minimum masking of the signal. In the direction of minimum masking (termed a null direction), the noise was found to have no masking effect on the signal. Moreover, the null was not orthogonal to the signal direction but lay instead in one of the cardinal directions. Our findings suggest that detection is mediated by only three mechanisms. In a further experiment we found little or no cross masking between each pair of cardinal directions up to the limit of our noise mask contrasts. This further supports the presence of no more than three independent postreceptoral mechanisms.

Estimation of the L-, M-, and S-cone weights of the postreceptoral detection mechanisms

We have obtained two- and three-dimensional detection threshold contours in cone contrast space for sinusoidal gratings for three subjects at three spatiotemporal conditions (1 cycle/degree (c/deg), 0 Hz; 0.125 c/deg, 0 Hz; 1 c/deg, 24 Hz). These conditions were chosen to favor the response of each of the three postreceptoral mechanisms in turn. Contours were obtained from measurements in as many as 60 axes in (L, M, S) cone contrast space and were fitted by superellipses. Our technique permitted us to improve on earlier estimates of the cone weightings to the mechanisms. We found that the red–green mechanism has an input cone weighting of L−M with a 2% S-cone input; the luminance mechanism has a weighting of kL + M, where k varies between 3 and 5 at the high-temporal condition, with a 5% S-cone input in opposition to L- and M-cones; and the blue–yellow mechanism consists of S inputs in closely balanced opposition to L and M inputs. These cone weights were found to be consistent among our three subjects.

Evidence for the stochastic independence of the blue-yellow, red-green and luminance detection mechanisms revealed by subthreshold summation

We investigated the manner in which the outputs of the three postreceptoral mechanisms (red-green, blue-yellow and luminance) combine to determine contrast threshold. We used a subthreshold summation paradigm to test whether the combination of the postreceptoral mechanism outputs could be described by a probability summation model which assumes stochastic independence of the mechanisms, and determined the best fitting summation exponent. Stimuli were Gaussian enveloped 1 c/d sinusoidal gratings represented in a 3D cardinal space transformed from cone contrast axes, and normalized to detection threshold. The use of this space avoids the presence of elongated threshold contours, allowing a reliable model fit to include the less sensitive blue-yellow and luminance mechanisms. Our results were well fitted by the probability summation model and hence support the underlying stochastic independence of the three postreceptoral mechanisms.

Color and luminance vision in human amblyopia: Shifts in isoluminance, contrast sensitivity losses, and positional deficits

The deficits for contrast detection and positional accuracy were compared for chromatic and luminance mechanisms within a group of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. We found that the isoluminant point was shifted towards red in the amblyopic compared to the fellow normal eye. This was not accounted for by eccentric fixation by the amblyopic eye. Contrast sensitivity deficits were similar for luminance and color stimuli in normal and amblyopic visual systems. In the majority of our amblyopic subjects, however, the deficits in positional acuity were greater for the chromatic than the luminance stimuli.

Ratio model serves suprathreshold color–luminance discrimination

We extended earlier results [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2625 (1999)] to examine how the responses of the three postreceptoral mechanisms are combined to subserve discrimination of suprathreshold stimuli. Test thresholds were obtained in the presence of suprathreshold pedestals selected in different quadrants of the red-green/luminance and blue-yellow/luminance planes of cardinal color space. We showed that (1) test threshold was directly proportional to pedestal contrast for pedestal contrasts exceeding five times pedestal contrast threshold, and (2) there were exceptions to this proportionality, notably when the test and pedestal directions were fixed in the cardinal directions. Results support a ratio model of suprathreshold color-luminance discrimination, in which discrimination depends on a ratio of outputs of the postreceptoral mechanisms. We also observed that when test threshold was measured as a function of test color-space direction, masking by the achromatic component of the pedestal was less than that by the chromatic component. In addition, masking by a dark (negative luminance component) pedestal was lower than masking by a light (positive luminance) pedestal of a similar contrast. Our results demonstrated that (1) there is no fundamental difference between discrimination in the isoluminant and in the two chromoluminant cardinal planes, (2) there exists the possibility that discrimination in cardinal directions differs from that in noncardinal (intermediate) directions, and (3) suprathreshold discrimination of luminance differences may be more sensitive than that of chromatic differences for a given suprathreshold pedestal.

Ratio model for suprathreshold hue-increment detection

We use psychophysical techniques to investigate the neural mechanisms subserving suprathreshold chromatic discrimination in human vision. We address two questions: (1) How are the postreceptoral detection mechanism responses combined to form suprathreshold chromatic discriminators? and (2) How do these discriminators contribute to color perception? We use a pedestal paradigm in which the subject is required to distinguish between a pedestal stimulus and the same pedestal added to a chromatic increment (the test). Our stimuli are represented in a cardinal space, in which the axes express the responses of the three postreceptoral detection mechanisms normalized relative to their respective detection thresholds. In the main experiment the test (a hue increment) was fixed in the direction orthogonal to the pedestal in our cardinal space. We found that, for high pedestal contrasts, the test threshold varied proportionally with the pedestal contrast. This result suggests the presence of a hue-increment detector dependent on the ratio of the outputs from the red-green and blue-yellow postreceptoral detection mechanisms. The exception to this was for pedestals and tests fixed along the cardinal axes. In that case detection was enhanced by direct input from the postreceptoral mechanism capable of detecting the test in isolation. Our results also indicate that discrimination in the red-green/luminance and blue-yellow/luminance planes exhibits a behavior similar to discrimination within the isoluminant plane. In the final experiment we observed that thresholds for hue-increment identification (e.g., selecting the bluer of two stimuli) are also governed by a ratio relationship. This finding suggests that our ratio-based mechanisms play an important role in color-difference perception.

Evidence for mild blue-yellow colour vision deficits immediately following fluorescein angiography.

Aims: We have investigated the short term effects of fluorescein angiography on the blue–yellow, red–green, and luminance contrast senstivity of patients with early age‐related macular degeneration (ARMD).