Marcel-Louis Viallard
Paris Descartes University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marcel-Louis Viallard.
Annals of Intensive Care | 2013
Olivier Lesieur; Marie-France Mamzer; Maxime Leloup; Frédéric Gonzalez; Alexandre Herbland; Brigitte Hamon; Marcel-Louis Viallard; Christian Hervé
BackgroundTransplantation brings sustainably improved quality of life to patients with end-stage organ failure. Persisting shortfall in available organs prompted French authorities and practitioners to focus on organ retrieval in patients withdrawn from life-sustaining treatment and awaiting cardiac arrest (Maastricht classification category III). The purpose of this study was to assess the theoretical eligibility of non-heart-beating donors dying in the intensive care unit (ICU) after a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (WoWt).MethodsWe collected the clinical and biological characteristics of all consecutive patients admitted to our ICU and qualified for a WoWt procedure under the terms of the French Leonetti law governing end-of-life care during a 12-month period. The theoretical organ donor eligibility (for kidney, liver, or lung retrieval) of deceased patients was determined a posteriori 1) according to routine medical criteria for graft selection and 2) according to the WoWt measures implemented and their impact on organ viability.ResultsA total of 596 patients (mean age: 67 ± 16 yr; gender ratio M/F: 1.6; mean SAPS (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) II: 54 ± 24) was admitted to the ICU, of which 84 patients (mean age: 71 ± 14 yr, 14% of admissions, gender ratio M/F: 3.2) underwent WoWt measures. Eight patients left the unit alive. Forty-four patients presented a contraindication ruling out organ retrieval either preexisting admission (n = 20) or emerged during hospitalization (n = 24). Thirty-two patients would have been eligible as kidney (n = 23), liver (n = 22), or lung donors (n = 2). Cardiopulmonary support was withdrawn in only five of these patients, and three died within 120 minutes after withdrawal (the maximum delay compatible with organ viability for donor grafts).ConclusionsIn this pilot study, a significant number of patients deceased under WoWt conditions theoretically would have been eligible for organ retrieval. However, the WoWt measures implemented in our unit seems incompatible with donor organ viability. A French multicenter survey of end-of-life practices in ICU may help to identify potential appropriate organ donors and to interpret nation-specific considerations of the related professional, legal, and ethical frameworks.
Archives De Pediatrie | 2017
Marcel-Louis Viallard; Guy Moriette
The choice of palliative care can be made today in the perinatal period, as it can be made in children and adults. Palliative care, rather than curative treatment, may be considered in three clinical situations: babies born at the limits of viability, withholding/withdrawing treatments in the NICU, and babies with severe malformations of genetic abnormalities identified during pregnancy. Only the last situation is addressed hereafter. In newborn infants as in older patients, palliative care aims at taking care of the baby and at providing comfort and well-being. The presence of human beings by the newborn infant, most importantly the parents and family, is of utmost importance. The available time should not be used only for care and medical treatments. Sufficient time should be kept for the parents to interact with the baby and for human presence and warmth. The best interests of the newborn infant are the main element for guiding appropriate care. Before birth, the choice of palliative care for newborn infants requires successive steps: (1) establishing a diagnosis of malformation(s) or genetic abnormalities; (2) making a prognosis and ruling out intensive treatments at birth and thereafter; (3) giving the parents appropriate information; (4) assisting the pregnant woman in deciding to continue pregnancy while excluding intensive treatment of the newborn baby; (5) dialoguing with parents about the expected duration of the babys life and the related uncertainty; (6) planning of palliative care to be implemented at birth; (7) preparing a plan with the parents for discharging the infant from the hospital and for taking care of him over a long time, when it is deemed possible that the baby may live for more than a few days.
Médecine Palliative | 2010
Véronique Blanchet; Marcel-Louis Viallard; Régis Aubry
Médecine Palliative | 2010
Régis Aubry; Véronique Blanchet; Marcel-Louis Viallard
Médecine Palliative | 2010
Marcel-Louis Viallard; Agnès Suc; Alain De Broca; Pierre Bétrémieux; Philippe Hubert; Sophie Parat; Jean-Louis Chabernaud; Pierre Canouï; Nicole Porée; Chantal Wood; Wahiba Mazouz; Véronique Blanchet; Régis Aubry
Médecine Palliative | 2010
Marcel-Louis Viallard; Agnès Suc; Alain De Broca; Pierre Bétrémieux; Philippe Hubert; Sophie Parat; Jean-Louis Chabernaud; Pierre Canouï; Nicole Porée; Chantal Wood; Wahiba Mazouz; Véronique Blanchet; Régis Aubry
Médecine Palliative | 2009
Marcel-Louis Viallard
Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique | 2010
Marcel-Louis Viallard; Aude Le Divenah
Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique | 2012
Véronique Blanchet; Marcel-Louis Viallard
Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique | 2010
Marcel-Louis Viallard; Véronique Blanchet; Régis Aubry