Marcel van den Brand

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving drug-eluting stents is increasingly used to treat complex coronary artery disease, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice historically. Our trial compared PCI and CABG for treating patients with previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (or both). METHODS We randomly assigned 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease to undergo CABG or PCI (in a 1:1 ratio). For all these patients, the local cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist determined that equivalent anatomical revascularization could be achieved with either treatment. A noninferiority comparison of the two groups was performed for the primary end point--a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (i.e., death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) during the 12-month period after randomization. Patients for whom only one of the two treatment options would be beneficial, because of anatomical features or clinical conditions, were entered into a parallel, nested CABG or PCI registry. RESULTS Most of the preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8%, vs. 12.4% for CABG; P=0.002), in large part because of an increased rate of repeat revascularization (13.5% vs. 5.9%, P<0.001); as a result, the criterion for noninferiority was not met. At 12 months, the rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar between the two groups; stroke was significantly more likely to occur with CABG (2.2%, vs. 0.6% with PCI; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS CABG remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, since the use of CABG, as compared with PCI, resulted in lower rates of the combined end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972.)

Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study

AIMS The SYNTAX score has been designed to better anticipate the risks of percutaneous or surgical revascularisation, taking into account the functional impact of the coronary circulation with all its anatomic components including the presence of bifurcations, total occlusions, thrombus, calcification, and small vessels. The purpose of this paper is to describe the baseline assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax randomised trial, the corelab reproducibility, the potential difference in score assessment between the investigator and the corelab, and to ascertain the impact on one-year outcome after either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with complex coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS To assess the reliability of Syntax scoring, 100 diagnostic angiograms from the Syntax trial were randomly selected and assessed independently by two observers. Intra-observer variability was assessed by analysing 91 sets of angiograms after an interval of at least eight weeks by one of the observers. Clinical outcomes in the randomised cohort of the Syntax trial up to one year are presented with stratification by tertile group of the SYNTAX score. The weighted kappa value for the inter-observer reproducibility on the global score was 0.45, while the intra-observer weighted kappa value was 0.59. The SYNTAX score as calculated by investigators consistently underscored the corelab score by 3.4 points. When the Syntax randomised cohort was stratified by tertiles of the SYNTAX score, there were similar or non-significantly different MACCE rates in those with low or intermediate scores; however in the top tertile the MACCE rate was greater in those receiving PCI compared to CABG. CONCLUSIONS The SYNTAX score is a visual coronary score with an acceptable corelab reproducibility that has an impact on the one-year outcome of those having PCI, whereas it has no effect on the one-year outcome following surgical revascularisation. The SYNTAX score tool is likely to be useful in a wide range of patients with complex coronary disease.

Persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: long-term (up to 2 years) clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up

Background—Early results of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation showed a nearly complete abolition of neointimal hyperplasia. The question remains, however, whether the early promising results will still be evident at long-term follow-up. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficiency of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for up to 2 years of follow-up. Methods and Results—Fifteen patients with de novo coronary artery disease were treated with 18-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx-Velocity stents (Cordis) loaded with 140 &mgr;g sirolimus/cm2 metal surface area in a slow release formulation. Quantitative angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed according to standard protocol. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was successful in all 15 patients. During the in-hospital course, 1 patient died of cerebral hemorrhage after periprocedural administration of abciximab, and 1 patient underwent repeat stenting after 2 hours because of edge dissection that led to acute occlusion. Through 6 months and up to 2 years of follow-up, no additional events occurred. QCA analysis revealed no significant change in stent minimal lumen diameter or percent diameter stenosis, and 3-dimensional IVUS showed no significant deterioration in lumen volume. In 2 patients, additional stenting was performed because of significant lesion progression remote from the sirolimus-eluting stent. Conclusion—Sirolimus-eluting stents showed persistent inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia for up to 2 years of follow-up.

The effect of completeness of revascularization on event-free survival at one year in the arts trial ☆

OBJECTIVES We sought to assess the relationship between completeness of revascularization and adverse events at one year in the ARTS (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study) trial. BACKGROUND There is uncertainty to what extent degree of completeness of revascularization, using up-to-date techniques, influences medium-term outcome. METHODS After consensus between surgeon and cardiologist regarding the potential for equivalence in the completeness of revascularization, 1,205 patients with multivessel disease were randomly assigned to either bypass surgery or stent implantation. All baseline and procedural angiograms and surgical case-record forms were centrally assessed for completeness of revascularization. RESULTS Of 1,205 patients randomized, 1,172 underwent the assigned treatment. Complete data for review were available in 1,143 patients (97.5%). Complete revascularization was achieved in 84.1% of the surgically treated patients and 70.5% of the angioplasty patients (p < 0.001). After one year, the stented angioplasty patients with incomplete revascularization showed a significantly lower event-free survival than stented patients with complete revascularization (i.e., freedom from death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and repeat revascularization) (69.4% vs. 76.6%; p < 0.05). This difference was due to a higher incidence of subsequent bypass procedures (10.0% vs. 2.0%; p < 0.05). Conversely, at one year, bypass surgery patients with incomplete revascularization showed only a marginally lower event-free survival rate than those with complete revascularization (87.8% vs. 89.9%). CONCLUSIONS Complete revascularization was more frequently accomplished by bypass surgery than by stent implantation. One year after bypass, there was no significant difference in event-free survival between surgically treated patients with complete revascularization and those with incomplete revascularization, but patients randomized to stenting with incomplete revascularization had a greater need for subsequent bypass surgery.

Angiographic Findings in Patients With Refractory Unstable Angina According to Troponin T Status

BACKGROUND The CAPTURE (C7E3 fab AntiPlatelet Therapy in Unstable REfactory angina) trial enrolled patients with refractory unstable angina and documented a therapeutic benefit for abciximab, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, that was particularly evident in patients with elevated troponin T (TnT) levels. In the current study, we related the angiographic data to the TnT status of the CAPTURE patients. METHODS AND RESULTS In 853 patients, angiographic data at baseline and 18 to 24 hours after treatment were available and assessed by an Angiographic Committee with respect to TIMI flow, lesion severity, and visibility of thrombus. TnT levels >0.1 microg/L were found in 30.9% of the patients. Before randomization, thrombus was visible in 14.6% of TnT-positive patients (TnT levels >0.1 microg/L) and 4.2% of TnT-negative patients (P=0.004). Complex lesion characteristics B2+/C (72.0% versus 53.9%; P<0.001) and TIMI flow <2 (15.6% versus 5. 1%; P<0.001) were more frequent in TnT-positive patients. Abciximab was effective with respect to reduction of visible thrombus, increase of TIMI flow, and reduction of cardiac events in TnT-positive patients only. Multivariate analysis identified TnT status, but not angiographic findings, as an independent predictor for both outcome and efficacy of treatment with abciximab. CONCLUSIONS Complex lesion characteristics and visible thrombus formation at baseline were significantly linked to TnT elevation. However, TnT status was a more powerful predictor of increased cardiac risk and efficacy of treatment with abciximab than either. Relative to the angiogram, TnT can thus be considered a more sensitive marker for the underlying pathology, identifying patients with unstable angina who will particularly benefit from antiplatelet treatment.

Emergency coronary angioplasty in refractory unstable angina

We performed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as an emergency procedure in 60 patients with unstable angina pectoris that was refractory to treatment with maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and intravenous nitroglycerin. The initial success rate for angioplasty was 93 per cent (56 patients). There were no deaths related to the procedure, although total occlusion occurred in four patients. Despite emergency bypass grafting, all four sustained a myocardial infarction. All the patients were followed for at least six months. Late cardiac death occurred in one patient, whereas eight had recurrent angina pectoris. There was no progression to myocardial infarction. The restenosis rate was 28 per cent (13 of 46) in the patients with initially successful coronary angioplasty who had repeat angiography. Improved cardiac functional status after sustained successful coronary angioplasty was demonstrated by an almost normal capacity on bicycle exercise testing and the absence of ischemia during thallium isotope studies in 80 per cent. We conclude that emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty may be useful for the treatment of selected patients with unstable angina pectoris who are unresponsive to intensive pharmacologic treatment.

Abciximab in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Results of the glycoprotein receptor antagonist patency evaluation (GRAPE) pilot study

OBJECTIVES We sought to study the effect of early infusion of abciximab on coronary patency before primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists have proved to be effective in reducing ischemic events associated with coronary angioplasty. The present study explores whether abciximab alone, without administration of thrombolytic therapy, may induce reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS In the Glycoprotein Receptor Antagonist Patency Evaluation pilot study 60 patients with less than 6 h signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary angioplasty received in the emergency room a bolus of abciximab 250 microg/kg followed by a 12-h infusion of 10 microg/min. All patients were also treated with an oral dose of 160 mg aspirin and 5,000 IU of heparin intravenously. As soon as possible a diagnostic angiography was performed to evaluate the patency of the infarct-related artery. RESULTS The median time between onset of symptoms and the administration of the abciximab bolus was 150 min (range 45 to 345), and the median time between abciximab bolus and first contrast injection in the infarct-related artery was 45 min (range 10 to 150). In 24 patients (40%, 95% confidence interval 28% to 52%) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 was observed at a median time of 45 min (range 10 to 150) after abciximab bolus; TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 11 patients (18%, 95% confidence interval 9% to 28%). There was no difference in percentage of TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 between patients who received abciximab within 2.5 h after onset of symptoms or thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Abciximab therapy given in the emergency room in patients awaiting primary angioplasty is associated with full reperfusion (TIMI flow grade 3) in about 20% and with TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 in about 40% of the patients at a median time of 45 min. These figures are higher than those in primary angioplasty trials without such pretreatment. Randomized controlled trials of very early infusion of abciximab, either prehospital or in-hospital, in patients eligible for angioplasty are warranted.

Local intracoronary administration of antisense oligonucleotide against c-myc for the prevention of in-stent restenosis: Results of the randomized investigation by the thoraxcenter of antisense dna using local delivery and ivus after coronary stenting (ITALICS) trial☆

OBJECTIVE This study was designed to determine whether antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) directed against the nuclear proto-oncogene c-myc could inhibit restenosis when given by local delivery immediately after coronary stent implantation. BACKGROUND Failure of conventional pharmacologic therapies to reduce the incidence of coronary restenosis after percutaneous revascularization techniques has prompted interest in the use of agents that target intracellular central regulatory mechanisms. METHODS Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified 15-mer antisense ODN or saline vehicle by intracoronary local delivery after coronary stent implantation. The primary end point was percent neointimal volume obstruction measured by computerized analysis of electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at six-month follow-up. Secondary end points included clinical outcome and quantitative coronary angiography analysis. RESULTS Analysis of follow-up IVUS data was performed on 77 patients. In-stent volume obstruction was similar between groups (44 +/- 16% and 46 +/- 14%, placebo vs. ODN; p = 0.57; 95% confidence interval: -1.13 to 0.85). Minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.84 +/- 0.36 and 0.90 +/- 0.45 (p = 0.55) to 2.70 +/- 0.37 and 2.80 +/- 0.37 (p = 0.28) after stent implantation, which decreased to 1.50 +/- 0.61 and 1.50 +/- 0.53 (p = 0.98) by six months, yielding similar loss indexes (placebo vs. ODN, respectively). There were no differences in angiographic restenosis rates (38.5 and 34.2%; p = 0.81; placebo vs. ODN) or clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with 10 mg of phosphorothioate-modified ODN directed against c-myc does not reduce neointimal volume obstruction or the angiographic restenosis rate in this patient population.

Long-term clinical outcome after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the role of stent implantation in vein grafts by evaluating the long-term clinical outcome and estimated event-free survival at 5 years in 62 patients and by comparing our data with those of other treatment modalities previously reported. BACKGROUND Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty. METHODS Patients undergoing stenting of a vein graft were entered into a dedicated data base. They were screened for death, infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty. Procedure-related events were included in the follow-up analysis. Survival and event-free survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS A total of 93 stents (84 Wallstent and 9 Palmaz-Shatz) were implanted in 62 patients. During the in-hospital period seven patients (11%) sustained a major cardiac event: two deaths (3%), two myocardial infarctions (3%) and three urgent bypass surgeries (5%). The clinical success rate, therefore, was 89%. During the follow-up period (median 2.5 years, range 0 to 5.9), another five patients (8%) died, 14 (23%) sustained a myocardial infarction, 12 (20%) underwent bypass surgery, and 14 (23%) underwent angioplasty. The estimated 5-year survival and event-free survival rates (free from infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) were (mean +/- SD) 83 +/- 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73% to 93%) and 30 +/- 7% (95% CI 16% to 44%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The in-hospital outcome of patients who underwent stent implantation in a vein graft is acceptable, but the long-term clinical outcome is poor. It is unlikely that mechanical intervention alone will provide a satisfactory or definite answer for the patient with graft sclerosis over the long term.

Emergency stenting for refractory acute coronary artery occlusion during coronary angioplasty

Abstract Acute coronary artery occlusion occurs in 2 to 11% of the patients who undergo coronary angioplasty and is the major cause of in-hospital mortality and morbidity associated with coronary angioplasty. 1–4 This procedural complication is usually caused by an occlusive dissection in association with thrombosis, spasm and elastic recoil. If immediate redilatation is unsuccessful, emergency surgery is traditionally recommended, but because of the clinical instability of these ischemic patients, acute surgery is associated with high perioperative mortality and morbidity, and despite emergent revascularization, development of myocardial infarction cannot be prevented in a substantial number of patients. 5 New methods that can restore anterograde flow and effectively stabilize the clinical condition after refractory acute occlusion are highly desirable. They may serve as a safe bridge until subsequent surgery or may even serve as an alternative to surgery. Emergency stent implantation in the dissected segment has been shown to restore anterograde flow. 6,7 However, because the first generation of stents had a high tendency to acute thrombotic occlusion, it was decided that emergency stent implantation should be followed by “semi-elective” surgery. This study reports the acute results of the management of acute coronary artery occlusion refractory to redilation with emergency stent implantation followed by “semi-elective” bypass surgery in most of these patients.